Comments on: Sirtis Badmouths Trek XI, Abrams, Paramount and Enterprise http://trekmovie.com/2006/07/30/sirtis-badmouths-trek-xi-abrams-paramount-and-enterprise/ the source for Star Trek news and information Fri, 25 May 2012 10:48:41 -0700 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8 hourly 1 By: Charles H. Root, III http://trekmovie.com/2006/07/30/sirtis-badmouths-trek-xi-abrams-paramount-and-enterprise/comment-page-1/#comment-1540084 Charles H. Root, III Wed, 18 Feb 2009 15:46:58 +0000 http://trekmovie.com/2006/08/20/sirtis-badmouths-trek-xi-abrams-paramount-and-enterprise/#comment-1540084 I don't think we need to diagnose her mental status or perceived physical shortcomings in order to parse her comments. I've been critical of Paramount and Bad Robot and don't totally disagree with her that some of the powers that be don't "get" Trek or know what to do with it. We all know they've thrown their hands in the air and given Trek to JJ. Either it works or they wash their hands of it. Not exactly a long term plan. Putting Rod in charge, however... Not cool. Enterprise is canon and she should get over it. So are Voyager and DS9. I can look at any of the Trek series or films and see things that don't live up to expectations. But regardless of the kitsch and cheese factor present in all, Roddenberry's original underlying concept of hope, unity and a better future are still there. Just because the execution fails short doesn't diminish this message. I pray the message isn't lost in the new film in favor of mindless vacant action to hit short term 2009 Q3 business goals. I don’t think we need to diagnose her mental status or perceived physical shortcomings in order to parse her comments.

I’ve been critical of Paramount and Bad Robot and don’t totally disagree with her that some of the powers that be don’t “get” Trek or know what to do with it. We all know they’ve thrown their hands in the air and given Trek to JJ. Either it works or they wash their hands of it. Not exactly a long term plan.

Putting Rod in charge, however… Not cool.

Enterprise is canon and she should get over it. So are Voyager and DS9.

I can look at any of the Trek series or films and see things that don’t live up to expectations. But regardless of the kitsch and cheese factor present in all, Roddenberry’s original underlying concept of hope, unity and a better future are still there. Just because the execution fails short doesn’t diminish this message.

I pray the message isn’t lost in the new film in favor of mindless vacant action to hit short term 2009 Q3 business goals.

]]> By: Julian http://trekmovie.com/2006/07/30/sirtis-badmouths-trek-xi-abrams-paramount-and-enterprise/comment-page-1/#comment-248151 Julian Fri, 19 Oct 2007 02:40:18 +0000 http://trekmovie.com/2006/08/20/sirtis-badmouths-trek-xi-abrams-paramount-and-enterprise/#comment-248151 What I find very amusing about this is that ever since TNG premiered, Sirtis has come across as a snob, but what's worse, she thinks she is a beautiful goddess and wants us Trek fans to believe it. She has even stated in an old interview that when she was a child, she was called "The Ugly Duckling" and even showed photos of herself to her much surprised husband. But my question is, what's there to be surprised about? She's still "The Ugly Duckling" anyway. Have you ever seen her nose? My god, its absolutely horrid! It is so long that it will attract every bird to perch and shit on it. I'm glad Paramount is done with TNG crew, especially that terrible actress Sirtis. Good riddens bitch! What I find very amusing about this is that ever since TNG premiered, Sirtis has come across as a snob, but what’s worse, she thinks she is a beautiful goddess and wants us Trek fans to believe it. She has even stated in an old interview that when she was a child, she was called “The Ugly Duckling” and even showed photos of herself to her much surprised husband. But my question is, what’s there to be surprised about? She’s still “The Ugly Duckling” anyway. Have you ever seen her nose? My god, its absolutely horrid! It is so long that it will attract every bird to perch and shit on it. I’m glad Paramount is done with TNG crew, especially that terrible actress Sirtis. Good riddens bitch!

]]> By: omf http://trekmovie.com/2006/07/30/sirtis-badmouths-trek-xi-abrams-paramount-and-enterprise/comment-page-1/#comment-169675 omf Fri, 27 Jul 2007 14:55:27 +0000 http://trekmovie.com/2006/08/20/sirtis-badmouths-trek-xi-abrams-paramount-and-enterprise/#comment-169675 Guess who's not getting invited to the premiere! Smiley test: :) ;) :D Guess who’s not getting invited to the premiere!

Smiley test:
:) ;) :D

]]> By: Jane http://trekmovie.com/2006/07/30/sirtis-badmouths-trek-xi-abrams-paramount-and-enterprise/comment-page-1/#comment-49385 Jane Fri, 16 Mar 2007 01:51:54 +0000 http://trekmovie.com/2006/08/20/sirtis-badmouths-trek-xi-abrams-paramount-and-enterprise/#comment-49385 Coz she can't get any other work! Coz she can’t get any other work!

]]> By: Monotone http://trekmovie.com/2006/07/30/sirtis-badmouths-trek-xi-abrams-paramount-and-enterprise/comment-page-1/#comment-14528 Monotone Wed, 03 Jan 2007 11:43:09 +0000 http://trekmovie.com/2006/08/20/sirtis-badmouths-trek-xi-abrams-paramount-and-enterprise/#comment-14528 So if Enterprise is NOT Trek, why appear on it, wearing your Star Trek uniform? So if Enterprise is NOT Trek, why appear on it, wearing your Star Trek uniform?

]]> By: Julian http://trekmovie.com/2006/07/30/sirtis-badmouths-trek-xi-abrams-paramount-and-enterprise/comment-page-1/#comment-7378 Julian Wed, 29 Nov 2006 17:34:35 +0000 http://trekmovie.com/2006/08/20/sirtis-badmouths-trek-xi-abrams-paramount-and-enterprise/#comment-7378 Nuts, egotistical, and no talent! ;) Nuts, egotistical, and no talent! ;)

]]> By: PollyWollyDoodle http://trekmovie.com/2006/07/30/sirtis-badmouths-trek-xi-abrams-paramount-and-enterprise/comment-page-1/#comment-6919 PollyWollyDoodle Sun, 26 Nov 2006 17:40:13 +0000 http://trekmovie.com/2006/08/20/sirtis-badmouths-trek-xi-abrams-paramount-and-enterprise/#comment-6919 I am sensing that Sirtis is nuts. I am sensing that Sirtis is nuts.

]]>