Comments on: Kirk & Spock Storyline NOT Denied in New Star Trek Magazine http://trekmovie.com/2006/09/01/kirk-spock-storyline-not-denied-in-new-star-trek-magazine/ the source for Star Trek news and information Fri, 10 Feb 2012 12:30:29 -0800 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8 hourly 1 By: dzpen http://trekmovie.com/2006/09/01/kirk-spock-storyline-not-denied-in-new-star-trek-magazine/comment-page-1/#comment-229 dzpen Sun, 03 Sep 2006 13:05:15 +0000 http://trekmovie.com/2006/09/01/kirk-spock-storyline-not-denied-in-new-star-trek-magazine/#comment-229 It's about Kirk and Spock. I don't understand why everyone is in such a rush to debunk the rumors ... even Nimoy says he's been contacted about he and Shatner appearing in the movie. DUHHHHHH! Where's the controversy? It's so surprising that Berman (the destroyer) refused comment!!!! It’s about Kirk and Spock. I don’t understand why everyone is in such a rush to debunk the rumors … even Nimoy says he’s been contacted about he and Shatner appearing in the movie. DUHHHHHH! Where’s the controversy? It’s so surprising that Berman (the destroyer) refused comment!!!!

]]> By: Anthony Pascale http://trekmovie.com/2006/09/01/kirk-spock-storyline-not-denied-in-new-star-trek-magazine/comment-page-1/#comment-215 Anthony Pascale Sat, 02 Sep 2006 23:27:03 +0000 http://trekmovie.com/2006/09/01/kirk-spock-storyline-not-denied-in-new-star-trek-magazine/#comment-215 the point of this story was to make clear that the official magazine was not \'officially\' saying the Kirk/Spock recasting was denied. They are not and that is confirmed by the editor of the magazine. The part about BSG again is taken out of context, they were referring to an interview with Screenwriters Magazine where the Trek XI writers say they would stick with Trek history, it was not denying recasting, but a BSG style \'canon reboot\'. In fact the writers said that some characters from the past would be in the new film, which would require \'recasting\' and/or using the same actors it is the position of this site that the Kirk and Spock recasting is \'likely\' until Paramount or JJ Abrams confirm it or deny it officially. Again the point of this particular article was to make it clear that Star Trek Magazine were not \'officially denying\', and after talking to them it is quite unlikely they ever will. I have yet to speak to anyone in \'trekdom\' or Paramount or CBS who isnt working under the assumption it is a kirk and spock movie but you never know until they say it for sure. Any quotes of comments from Abrams, Paramount or other producers that you think I may have missed, please send them via the tip line onn the right thanks the point of this story was to make clear that the official magazine was not \’officially\’ saying the Kirk/Spock recasting was denied. They are not and that is confirmed by the editor of the magazine. The part about BSG again is taken out of context, they were referring to an interview with Screenwriters Magazine where the Trek XI writers say they would stick with Trek history, it was not denying recasting, but a BSG style \’canon reboot\’. In fact the writers said that some characters from the past would be in the new film, which would require \’recasting\’ and/or using the same actors

it is the position of this site that the Kirk and Spock recasting is \’likely\’ until Paramount or JJ Abrams confirm it or deny it officially. Again the point of this particular article was to make it clear that Star Trek Magazine were not \’officially denying\’, and after talking to them it is quite unlikely they ever will. I have yet to speak to anyone in \’trekdom\’ or Paramount or CBS who isnt working under the assumption it is a kirk and spock movie

but you never know until they say it for sure. Any quotes of comments from Abrams, Paramount or other producers that you think I may have missed, please send them via the tip line onn the right

thanks

]]> By: Daniel http://trekmovie.com/2006/09/01/kirk-spock-storyline-not-denied-in-new-star-trek-magazine/comment-page-1/#comment-214 Daniel Sat, 02 Sep 2006 23:13:19 +0000 http://trekmovie.com/2006/09/01/kirk-spock-storyline-not-denied-in-new-star-trek-magazine/#comment-214 I support the blog and the man behind it but soemtimes it feels like you are so convinced of the recast that you ignore stuff that contradicts it and believe questionable sources(I guy who obviously hated Star Trek). For example although the headline means nothing a quote in it does hint it may not be a recast. I don't have it on hand but here is a replication. We are not going to do a recast like BSG was a reboot. Its kind of vague buts it hints in the "no recast" direction. I have no idea what it will be and you don't so don't be too sure of the future. I support the blog and the man behind it but soemtimes it feels like you are so convinced of the recast that you ignore stuff that contradicts it and believe questionable sources(I guy who obviously hated Star Trek). For example although the headline means nothing a quote in it does hint it may not be a recast. I don’t have it on hand but here is a replication.
We are not going to do a recast like BSG was a reboot.
Its kind of vague buts it hints in the “no recast” direction.
I have no idea what it will be and you don’t so don’t be too sure of the future.

]]>