


<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Daren Dochterman Talks &#8216;ST:TMP Directors Edition&#8217; And His &#8216;Trek Remastered&#8217; Pitch</title>
	<atom:link href="http://trekmovie.com/2006/09/13/daren-dochterman-talks-trek-enhanced/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://trekmovie.com/2006/09/13/daren-dochterman-talks-trek-enhanced/</link>
	<description>the source for Star Trek news and information</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 14:32:36 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Qwertyuiop</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2006/09/13/daren-dochterman-talks-trek-enhanced/comment-page-1/#comment-522496</link>
		<dc:creator>Qwertyuiop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 10:02:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2006/09/13/daren-dochterman-talks-trek-enhanced/#comment-522496</guid>
		<description>Initially it seemed impressive, but now I have seen the official trailer of vignettes of the new SFX on the official website I am left a bit dissappointed.

These are not state-of-the-art effects: they are computer game effects.  The lighting and surface detail are very low resolution, but most of all everything, especially the Enterprise and shuttles, move unnaturally, as if they have no mass at all.  And the lighting scales it to the appearance of a small model, not a ship the good part of 1000 feet long.  Admittedly, the remastered Star Wars had the same problem: the Falcon has no mass when landing on Bespin either.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Initially it seemed impressive, but now I have seen the official trailer of vignettes of the new SFX on the official website I am left a bit dissappointed.</p>
<p>These are not state-of-the-art effects: they are computer game effects.  The lighting and surface detail are very low resolution, but most of all everything, especially the Enterprise and shuttles, move unnaturally, as if they have no mass at all.  And the lighting scales it to the appearance of a small model, not a ship the good part of 1000 feet long.  Admittedly, the remastered Star Wars had the same problem: the Falcon has no mass when landing on Bespin either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Gorham</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2006/09/13/daren-dochterman-talks-trek-enhanced/comment-page-1/#comment-22177</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Gorham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jan 2007 22:49:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2006/09/13/daren-dochterman-talks-trek-enhanced/#comment-22177</guid>
		<description>That DigitalStream pitch is just nasty compaired to Dochterman&#039;s. Some interesting framing of shots but the models suck. Dochterman&#039;s version is sooooo SUPERIOR on every count.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That DigitalStream pitch is just nasty compaired to Dochterman&#8217;s. Some interesting framing of shots but the models suck. Dochterman&#8217;s version is sooooo SUPERIOR on every count.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chris</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2006/09/13/daren-dochterman-talks-trek-enhanced/comment-page-1/#comment-18658</link>
		<dc:creator>chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jan 2007 09:04:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2006/09/13/daren-dochterman-talks-trek-enhanced/#comment-18658</guid>
		<description>now that these films were announced tonite for possible HDdvd release, will they re render the new FX at HD res. or just upconvert them?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>now that these films were announced tonite for possible HDdvd release, will they re render the new FX at HD res. or just upconvert them?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marcelo Carvalho</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2006/09/13/daren-dochterman-talks-trek-enhanced/comment-page-1/#comment-683</link>
		<dc:creator>Marcelo Carvalho</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Sep 2006 22:34:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2006/09/13/daren-dochterman-talks-trek-enhanced/#comment-683</guid>
		<description>Sorry....! 

I made a HUGE mistake myself calling Daren of  &quot;David&quot;... !

What a shame...! 

I apologize....!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry&#8230;.! </p>
<p>I made a HUGE mistake myself calling Daren of  &#8220;David&#8221;&#8230; !</p>
<p>What a shame&#8230;! </p>
<p>I apologize&#8230;.!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marcelo Carvalho</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2006/09/13/daren-dochterman-talks-trek-enhanced/comment-page-1/#comment-682</link>
		<dc:creator>Marcelo Carvalho</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Sep 2006 22:31:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2006/09/13/daren-dochterman-talks-trek-enhanced/#comment-682</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve seen (and I have) the ST:TMP-DE DVD. The whole results are superb, of course. ..

Some time ago, I saw David&#039;s ST:Enhanced project version on YouTube... I found it spetacular...! This personal work-of-art was ALL I, for one, always thought it could be done to the old Classic Series to really &quot;enhance&quot; it... I was so delighted that I even got in touch with David to congratulate him.

Now, CBS/Paramount come with this ST:Remastered... I thought &quot;Oh, my God! David got it...!!&quot; but I finally found that David&#039;s proposal had nothing to do with the studio intentions...

I have to say that what I saw of the new remastered Trek was good, was fine, was ok... but I saw only what is in the internet, with &quot;web quality&quot;, as ti say...

Here in Brazil HDTV is still in project to be implemented so I guess we have a long way here to the day we would e really able to wach this new version of Trek...

But, for what I saw of the remastered Trek, I must say that I&#039;d much better prefer the &quot;ST:Enhanced&quot; version of David&#039;s...! As I read commented here, the CBS internal-team CGI effects seem to lack &quot;reality&quot; - if one can say that...! The images are a blast, nice, perfect... but - just from what I saw - they seem to lack &quot;soul&quot;...!! There&#039;s no &quot;life&quot; in there, it seems...!!

It&#039;s a pity... It will be a success, of course (the preview videos an teasers are the best!), but the final result will be a step or three behind it could be (if it seemed more like Trek:Enhanced)...! 

This is my opinion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve seen (and I have) the ST:TMP-DE DVD. The whole results are superb, of course. ..</p>
<p>Some time ago, I saw David&#8217;s ST:Enhanced project version on YouTube&#8230; I found it spetacular&#8230;! This personal work-of-art was ALL I, for one, always thought it could be done to the old Classic Series to really &#8220;enhance&#8221; it&#8230; I was so delighted that I even got in touch with David to congratulate him.</p>
<p>Now, CBS/Paramount come with this ST:Remastered&#8230; I thought &#8220;Oh, my God! David got it&#8230;!!&#8221; but I finally found that David&#8217;s proposal had nothing to do with the studio intentions&#8230;</p>
<p>I have to say that what I saw of the new remastered Trek was good, was fine, was ok&#8230; but I saw only what is in the internet, with &#8220;web quality&#8221;, as ti say&#8230;</p>
<p>Here in Brazil HDTV is still in project to be implemented so I guess we have a long way here to the day we would e really able to wach this new version of Trek&#8230;</p>
<p>But, for what I saw of the remastered Trek, I must say that I&#8217;d much better prefer the &#8220;ST:Enhanced&#8221; version of David&#8217;s&#8230;! As I read commented here, the CBS internal-team CGI effects seem to lack &#8220;reality&#8221; &#8211; if one can say that&#8230;! The images are a blast, nice, perfect&#8230; but &#8211; just from what I saw &#8211; they seem to lack &#8220;soul&#8221;&#8230;!! There&#8217;s no &#8220;life&#8221; in there, it seems&#8230;!!</p>
<p>It&#8217;s a pity&#8230; It will be a success, of course (the preview videos an teasers are the best!), but the final result will be a step or three behind it could be (if it seemed more like Trek:Enhanced)&#8230;! </p>
<p>This is my opinion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anthony Pascale</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2006/09/13/daren-dochterman-talks-trek-enhanced/comment-page-1/#comment-611</link>
		<dc:creator>Anthony Pascale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Sep 2006 16:43:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2006/09/13/daren-dochterman-talks-trek-enhanced/#comment-611</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;RE: is STTMP:DE HD or Rescreening Ready&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It appears that the answer to that is no. That is why I got when I contacted David Fein (producer on the DE). Apparently the team wanted to do the work but Paramount decided to focus on the immediate delivery for the DVD...here is an except from his message to me&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;I\&#039;m incredibly proud of the film\&#039;s edit and effects; our team did a remarkable job.  However, this job is not complete until we satisfy Bob\&#039;s wish and a film resolution master completed... a step closer would be HD....While I\&#039;ve insured that all of our production materials are available and ready for us to complete the Director\&#039;s Edition in film or hidef resolution, there is no approved master of the Director\&#039;s Edition for HD release.&quot;&lt;br /&gt;
- David Fein&lt;br /&gt;
Producer, ST: TMP: DE
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RE: is STTMP:DE HD or Rescreening Ready</p>
<p>It appears that the answer to that is no. That is why I got when I contacted David Fein (producer on the DE). Apparently the team wanted to do the work but Paramount decided to focus on the immediate delivery for the DVD&#8230;here is an except from his message to me</p>
<p> </p>
<p>&#8220;I\&#8217;m incredibly proud of the film\&#8217;s edit and effects; our team did a remarkable job.  However, this job is not complete until we satisfy Bob\&#8217;s wish and a film resolution master completed&#8230; a step closer would be HD&#8230;.While I\&#8217;ve insured that all of our production materials are available and ready for us to complete the Director\&#8217;s Edition in film or hidef resolution, there is no approved master of the Director\&#8217;s Edition for HD release.&#8221;<br />
- David Fein<br />
Producer, ST: TMP: DE</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2006/09/13/daren-dochterman-talks-trek-enhanced/comment-page-1/#comment-535</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Sep 2006 06:13:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2006/09/13/daren-dochterman-talks-trek-enhanced/#comment-535</guid>
		<description>I believe TMP may have been done at theatrical resolution, but Paramount did not want a theatrical release.

I could be wrong though.

The thinking behind the Remastered version of the series is that the original effects footage would not hold up at all at HD resolution, while the set elements held up better, not having been through so many damaging photochemical composits to destroy the quality.

By redoing the effects, and younger audience can see it without the &#039;bad effects&#039; baggage.

I have the original series on DVD, and still hold this as the definitive item.

If they foul up Trek Remastered, it will matter little to me, since the originals are easily available.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe TMP may have been done at theatrical resolution, but Paramount did not want a theatrical release.</p>
<p>I could be wrong though.</p>
<p>The thinking behind the Remastered version of the series is that the original effects footage would not hold up at all at HD resolution, while the set elements held up better, not having been through so many damaging photochemical composits to destroy the quality.</p>
<p>By redoing the effects, and younger audience can see it without the &#8216;bad effects&#8217; baggage.</p>
<p>I have the original series on DVD, and still hold this as the definitive item.</p>
<p>If they foul up Trek Remastered, it will matter little to me, since the originals are easily available.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Giuseppe</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2006/09/13/daren-dochterman-talks-trek-enhanced/comment-page-1/#comment-466</link>
		<dc:creator>Giuseppe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Sep 2006 21:56:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2006/09/13/daren-dochterman-talks-trek-enhanced/#comment-466</guid>
		<description>What Dochterman proposed was a hell of a lot more interesting than what Trek Remastered will ultimately be. 
Of course this is just another opinion among the many others.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What Dochterman proposed was a hell of a lot more interesting than what Trek Remastered will ultimately be.<br />
Of course this is just another opinion among the many others.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: By-Tor</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2006/09/13/daren-dochterman-talks-trek-enhanced/comment-page-1/#comment-445</link>
		<dc:creator>By-Tor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Sep 2006 23:41:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2006/09/13/daren-dochterman-talks-trek-enhanced/#comment-445</guid>
		<description>Jon C: that&#039;s not a plot, that&#039;s a poem.  Which was the big problem with that movie.  It was a poem.  Very beautiful.  But no meat.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jon C: that&#8217;s not a plot, that&#8217;s a poem.  Which was the big problem with that movie.  It was a poem.  Very beautiful.  But no meat.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2006/09/13/daren-dochterman-talks-trek-enhanced/comment-page-1/#comment-444</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Sep 2006 23:12:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2006/09/13/daren-dochterman-talks-trek-enhanced/#comment-444</guid>
		<description>Seriously why waste money on fake looking CGI Voyager and DS9 and Enterprise looked shocking do it the old fashion way like on TNG pull the model out of satorage and set it up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seriously why waste money on fake looking CGI Voyager and DS9 and Enterprise looked shocking do it the old fashion way like on TNG pull the model out of satorage and set it up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
