


<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: TNG to get the G4 2.0 Treatment</title>
	<atom:link href="http://trekmovie.com/2006/12/04/tng-to-get-the-g4-20-treatment/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://trekmovie.com/2006/12/04/tng-to-get-the-g4-20-treatment/</link>
	<description>the source for Star Trek news and information</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 16:44:45 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Orbitalic</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2006/12/04/tng-to-get-the-g4-20-treatment/comment-page-1/#comment-8770</link>
		<dc:creator>Orbitalic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Dec 2006 22:29:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2006/12/04/tng-to-get-the-g4-20-treatment/#comment-8770</guid>
		<description>;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>;-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Orbitalic</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2006/12/04/tng-to-get-the-g4-20-treatment/comment-page-1/#comment-8769</link>
		<dc:creator>Orbitalic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Dec 2006 22:27:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2006/12/04/tng-to-get-the-g4-20-treatment/#comment-8769</guid>
		<description>#27 ...and yours for the things said in #16? C&#039;mon Josh, quit playing.

MichaelT&#039;s done posting as of today according to another thread. 

 But I agree with him totally.

O</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#27 &#8230;and yours for the things said in #16? C&#8217;mon Josh, quit playing.</p>
<p>MichaelT&#8217;s done posting as of today according to another thread. </p>
<p> But I agree with him totally.</p>
<p>O</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: E. Adam Thomas</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2006/12/04/tng-to-get-the-g4-20-treatment/comment-page-1/#comment-8758</link>
		<dc:creator>E. Adam Thomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Dec 2006 20:53:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2006/12/04/tng-to-get-the-g4-20-treatment/#comment-8758</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t mind the 2.0 treatment all that much, but I also agree that oversaturation of TNG is getting ridiculous. Up until this past couple of months, Spike and G4 have been broadcasting a combined 5 TNG episodes per day. Spike was running an additional 2 episodes of DS9. Only local stations seem to be running Voyager, and in Phoenix, that station, a low-powered UHF station out of Prescott, only runs it when they can&#039;t sell an hour of Paid programming, so about once every 2 - 3 weeks.

What they need to do is sell the whole kit-and-kaboodle to one network (where they&#039;ll be no tribble atall... sorry, couldn&#039;t resist), and that network needs to run all 5 shows in chronological order (of release, not star-date), so that it will take about 2 to 3 years to exhaust the run, and folks will be clamoring for stuff they haven&#039;t seen in a while. Either that, or designat each series to a certain night of the week (TOS on Monday, TNG on Tuesday, etc.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t mind the 2.0 treatment all that much, but I also agree that oversaturation of TNG is getting ridiculous. Up until this past couple of months, Spike and G4 have been broadcasting a combined 5 TNG episodes per day. Spike was running an additional 2 episodes of DS9. Only local stations seem to be running Voyager, and in Phoenix, that station, a low-powered UHF station out of Prescott, only runs it when they can&#8217;t sell an hour of Paid programming, so about once every 2 &#8211; 3 weeks.</p>
<p>What they need to do is sell the whole kit-and-kaboodle to one network (where they&#8217;ll be no tribble atall&#8230; sorry, couldn&#8217;t resist), and that network needs to run all 5 shows in chronological order (of release, not star-date), so that it will take about 2 to 3 years to exhaust the run, and folks will be clamoring for stuff they haven&#8217;t seen in a while. Either that, or designat each series to a certain night of the week (TOS on Monday, TNG on Tuesday, etc.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2006/12/04/tng-to-get-the-g4-20-treatment/comment-page-1/#comment-8749</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Dec 2006 19:35:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2006/12/04/tng-to-get-the-g4-20-treatment/#comment-8749</guid>
		<description>Where is the retributory post singling out MichaelT for this above post Anthony?

You see, that is my point.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Where is the retributory post singling out MichaelT for this above post Anthony?</p>
<p>You see, that is my point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MichaelT</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2006/12/04/tng-to-get-the-g4-20-treatment/comment-page-1/#comment-8718</link>
		<dc:creator>MichaelT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Dec 2006 17:37:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2006/12/04/tng-to-get-the-g4-20-treatment/#comment-8718</guid>
		<description>as I suspected... an attention whore.






23cs#-</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>as I suspected&#8230; an attention whore.</p>
<p>23cs#-</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2006/12/04/tng-to-get-the-g4-20-treatment/comment-page-1/#comment-8644</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Dec 2006 07:38:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2006/12/04/tng-to-get-the-g4-20-treatment/#comment-8644</guid>
		<description>You guys do far more for me than I could ever HOPE to. 

Talk about bonafied cheerleaders ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You guys do far more for me than I could ever HOPE to. </p>
<p>Talk about bonafied cheerleaders ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MichaelT</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2006/12/04/tng-to-get-the-g4-20-treatment/comment-page-1/#comment-8572</link>
		<dc:creator>MichaelT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Dec 2006 02:32:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2006/12/04/tng-to-get-the-g4-20-treatment/#comment-8572</guid>
		<description>Josh, 
I am still waiting...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Josh,<br />
I am still waiting&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Orbitalic</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2006/12/04/tng-to-get-the-g4-20-treatment/comment-page-1/#comment-8523</link>
		<dc:creator>Orbitalic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Dec 2006 20:04:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2006/12/04/tng-to-get-the-g4-20-treatment/#comment-8523</guid>
		<description>MichaelT,

You expecting an apology from Josh? I think you deserve one.

It&#039;ll come... and I have some swamp land you might be interested in.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MichaelT,</p>
<p>You expecting an apology from Josh? I think you deserve one.</p>
<p>It&#8217;ll come&#8230; and I have some swamp land you might be interested in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Herbert Eyes Wide Open</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2006/12/04/tng-to-get-the-g4-20-treatment/comment-page-1/#comment-8521</link>
		<dc:creator>Herbert Eyes Wide Open</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Dec 2006 19:53:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2006/12/04/tng-to-get-the-g4-20-treatment/#comment-8521</guid>
		<description>#21. Matt Wright

Thanks, Matt.  Sorry, even though I try to read all the threads i must have missed it.

Again, thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#21. Matt Wright</p>
<p>Thanks, Matt.  Sorry, even though I try to read all the threads i must have missed it.</p>
<p>Again, thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Wright</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2006/12/04/tng-to-get-the-g4-20-treatment/comment-page-1/#comment-8500</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Wright</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Dec 2006 17:32:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2006/12/04/tng-to-get-the-g4-20-treatment/#comment-8500</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;#8 Your question has been asked and answered before about the AR of the material.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;TOS was shot on 35mm film which has an AR of 1:37:1 so they are working from that. They are making the new CG effects 16:9 to be ready for any future project CBS might want with TOS remastered. &lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#8 Your question has been asked and answered before about the AR of the material.</p>
<p>TOS was shot on 35mm film which has an AR of 1:37:1 so they are working from that. They are making the new CG effects 16:9 to be ready for any future project CBS might want with TOS remastered. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
