


<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8220;The Corbomite Maneuver&#8221; Screenshots and Video</title>
	<atom:link href="http://trekmovie.com/2006/12/09/the-corbomite-maneuver-screenshots/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://trekmovie.com/2006/12/09/the-corbomite-maneuver-screenshots/</link>
	<description>the source for Star Trek news and information</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 12:41:19 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Cheap Dunhill Red Ks Filter online</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2006/12/09/the-corbomite-maneuver-screenshots/comment-page-2/#comment-3749793</link>
		<dc:creator>Cheap Dunhill Red Ks Filter online</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Aug 2011 21:57:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2006/12/09/the-corbomite-maneuver-screenshots/#comment-3749793</guid>
		<description>Okay, it really is a nice beginning however i&#039;ll have to explore that a touch more. Will let you know exactly what else there really is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay, it really is a nice beginning however i&#8217;ll have to explore that a touch more. Will let you know exactly what else there really is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bill</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2006/12/09/the-corbomite-maneuver-screenshots/comment-page-2/#comment-1827363</link>
		<dc:creator>bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 18:36:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2006/12/09/the-corbomite-maneuver-screenshots/#comment-1827363</guid>
		<description>I agree with B.K.!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with B.K.!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Happy New Year: I hope you relish it as much as I &#124; Bad Astronomy &#124; Discover Magazine</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2006/12/09/the-corbomite-maneuver-screenshots/comment-page-2/#comment-1385923</link>
		<dc:creator>Happy New Year: I hope you relish it as much as I &#124; Bad Astronomy &#124; Discover Magazine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2009 17:11:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2006/12/09/the-corbomite-maneuver-screenshots/#comment-1385923</guid>
		<description>[...] shot from TrekMovie.com, and the ball from [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] shot from TrekMovie.com, and the ball from [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: B.K.</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2006/12/09/the-corbomite-maneuver-screenshots/comment-page-2/#comment-818114</link>
		<dc:creator>B.K.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 19:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2006/12/09/the-corbomite-maneuver-screenshots/#comment-818114</guid>
		<description>This is a disgrace.  They&#039;ve ruined part of the charm of the original series with this &quot;upgrading&quot; of effects.  Some of us like the fact that there are rolling numbers on Sulu&#039;s chronometer and the rocks are styrofoam.  

It&#039;s like trying to &quot;upgrade&quot; &quot;Stairway to Heaven&quot;.  

&quot;Well, Page&#039;s guitars just aren&#039;t good enough here.  Let&#039;s get Steve Vai to come in and play them all over.&quot;  

GEEZ!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a disgrace.  They&#8217;ve ruined part of the charm of the original series with this &#8220;upgrading&#8221; of effects.  Some of us like the fact that there are rolling numbers on Sulu&#8217;s chronometer and the rocks are styrofoam.  </p>
<p>It&#8217;s like trying to &#8220;upgrade&#8221; &#8220;Stairway to Heaven&#8221;.  </p>
<p>&#8220;Well, Page&#8217;s guitars just aren&#8217;t good enough here.  Let&#8217;s get Steve Vai to come in and play them all over.&#8221;  </p>
<p>GEEZ!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2006/12/09/the-corbomite-maneuver-screenshots/comment-page-2/#comment-11112</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Dec 2006 02:39:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2006/12/09/the-corbomite-maneuver-screenshots/#comment-11112</guid>
		<description>#69 the torpedoes are in fact objects. Hence the word &quot;torpedo&quot; and not ray or bolt. They do use matter and antimatter which are stored seperately in the torpedo and then combined and detonated. They glow (and always have from TOS through VOY) b/c of the propulsion used by the torpedoes.

#79 I too wish they would do something with the bridge screens. Unfortunately it was not b/c of time or money. Okuda has said it&#039;s b/c they don&#039;t look right animated. It&#039;s too bad, b/c they were always meant to be animated. It was dropped after the first pilot b/c of the time and money involved paying people to operate the slide projectors from behind.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#69 the torpedoes are in fact objects. Hence the word &#8220;torpedo&#8221; and not ray or bolt. They do use matter and antimatter which are stored seperately in the torpedo and then combined and detonated. They glow (and always have from TOS through VOY) b/c of the propulsion used by the torpedoes.</p>
<p>#79 I too wish they would do something with the bridge screens. Unfortunately it was not b/c of time or money. Okuda has said it&#8217;s b/c they don&#8217;t look right animated. It&#8217;s too bad, b/c they were always meant to be animated. It was dropped after the first pilot b/c of the time and money involved paying people to operate the slide projectors from behind.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Wright</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2006/12/09/the-corbomite-maneuver-screenshots/comment-page-2/#comment-10711</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Wright</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Dec 2006 04:46:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2006/12/09/the-corbomite-maneuver-screenshots/#comment-10711</guid>
		<description>#89 - The show was really inconsistent as to just where phasers came from. This is one of the reasons why CBS Digital has standardized the shots. The now always will come from emitters just above the sensor dome. That dome is a for sensors and the ion pod (that last one is conjecture).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#89 &#8211; The show was really inconsistent as to just where phasers came from. This is one of the reasons why CBS Digital has standardized the shots. The now always will come from emitters just above the sensor dome. That dome is a for sensors and the ion pod (that last one is conjecture).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JON/ 4 technoGeeks only...</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2006/12/09/the-corbomite-maneuver-screenshots/comment-page-2/#comment-10194</link>
		<dc:creator>JON/ 4 technoGeeks only...</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Dec 2006 01:42:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2006/12/09/the-corbomite-maneuver-screenshots/#comment-10194</guid>
		<description>Here&#039;s a question for Trek techno geeks...Where are the phaser emitters on TOS enterprise?when I was a kid I thought they came out of the dome on the underside of the primary hull and could emit anywhere from outsidethe dome&#039;s surface .In this photo they look like they emit from the ring around the dome (theoretically so they can fire in just about any direction).then sometimes they re located halfway up the underside of the primary hull in  pairs facing forward ,starboard and port.(like in Wrath Khan).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s a question for Trek techno geeks&#8230;Where are the phaser emitters on TOS enterprise?when I was a kid I thought they came out of the dome on the underside of the primary hull and could emit anywhere from outsidethe dome&#8217;s surface .In this photo they look like they emit from the ring around the dome (theoretically so they can fire in just about any direction).then sometimes they re located halfway up the underside of the primary hull in  pairs facing forward ,starboard and port.(like in Wrath Khan).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Pemble</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2006/12/09/the-corbomite-maneuver-screenshots/comment-page-2/#comment-9693</link>
		<dc:creator>John Pemble</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2006 05:44:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2006/12/09/the-corbomite-maneuver-screenshots/#comment-9693</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not feeling this.  I love CG, but the way it&#039;s being used with TOS almost makes it looke like an animated series.  Sometimes, bad looking but gruzzy sci-fi shots from the 60&#039;s need to stay that way.  I wish I could see these episodes all cleaned up with small &quot;corrections&quot; in the visual effects.  I want to like this as a big fan of Trek, but the 2.0 is distracting and feels out of place when the visual effects come up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not feeling this.  I love CG, but the way it&#8217;s being used with TOS almost makes it looke like an animated series.  Sometimes, bad looking but gruzzy sci-fi shots from the 60&#8217;s need to stay that way.  I wish I could see these episodes all cleaned up with small &#8220;corrections&#8221; in the visual effects.  I want to like this as a big fan of Trek, but the 2.0 is distracting and feels out of place when the visual effects come up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SPOCKBOY</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2006/12/09/the-corbomite-maneuver-screenshots/comment-page-2/#comment-9572</link>
		<dc:creator>SPOCKBOY</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Dec 2006 07:12:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2006/12/09/the-corbomite-maneuver-screenshots/#comment-9572</guid>
		<description>OKAY NACELLES!  (oh no!)
I&#039;m going to finally settle the nacelle problem once and for all.
If you&#039;re listening CBS DIGITAL grab a cup of joe and lend an ear.
Are you ready?

THE-LIGHTS-ARE-FLASHING-TOO-FAST!

If you look at any films with Christmas lights from the 1960&#039;s. Those big ones flashed very slowly. Because they were BIG OL&#039; lights, when they turned off they wouldn&#039;t just shut off sharply, they would almost fade.
It is ironic because when Scott Gammans was first doing his thing long before CBS digital started, the ONE thing I critisized were his nacelle globes. My reasoning was that they were too much like the original &quot;Christmas lights&quot; which looked cheesy and dated, although extremely authentic. Scott stuck to his guns and when I saw CBS&#039;s first Enterprise I was appalled at how awful they looked. I thought &quot;surely an entire professional digital company can do better than some guy on his MAC/PC? 
I was wrong.  
The CBS nacelles HAVE improved immensely but I still think the flashing                                  is too quick.
HE&#039;s probably going to be pissed but I took a piece of video from his website and zoomed on the nacelle so you guys could see what I mean. I think he totally has timing of the flashing DEAD ON.
What do YOU guys think?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W3A1SaakCaA</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OKAY NACELLES!  (oh no!)<br />
I&#8217;m going to finally settle the nacelle problem once and for all.<br />
If you&#8217;re listening CBS DIGITAL grab a cup of joe and lend an ear.<br />
Are you ready?</p>
<p>THE-LIGHTS-ARE-FLASHING-TOO-FAST!</p>
<p>If you look at any films with Christmas lights from the 1960&#8217;s. Those big ones flashed very slowly. Because they were BIG OL&#8217; lights, when they turned off they wouldn&#8217;t just shut off sharply, they would almost fade.<br />
It is ironic because when Scott Gammans was first doing his thing long before CBS digital started, the ONE thing I critisized were his nacelle globes. My reasoning was that they were too much like the original &#8220;Christmas lights&#8221; which looked cheesy and dated, although extremely authentic. Scott stuck to his guns and when I saw CBS&#8217;s first Enterprise I was appalled at how awful they looked. I thought &#8220;surely an entire professional digital company can do better than some guy on his MAC/PC?<br />
I was wrong.<br />
The CBS nacelles HAVE improved immensely but I still think the flashing                                  is too quick.<br />
HE&#8217;s probably going to be pissed but I took a piece of video from his website and zoomed on the nacelle so you guys could see what I mean. I think he totally has timing of the flashing DEAD ON.<br />
What do YOU guys think?</p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W3A1SaakCaA" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W3A1SaakCaA</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Capt. James B. Quirk</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2006/12/09/the-corbomite-maneuver-screenshots/comment-page-2/#comment-9571</link>
		<dc:creator>Capt. James B. Quirk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Dec 2006 07:07:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2006/12/09/the-corbomite-maneuver-screenshots/#comment-9571</guid>
		<description>To quote myself from another thread.

&quot;I loved this episode and all of the new work that went into it. I&#039;m amazed by the fact that no matter what is done , someone will find something to complain about. Sheesh! 

I was one of the great unwashed, that had the audacity, years ago, to ask &quot;What if they redid the FX for TOS?&quot;

I for one am damned glad they did. Considering they have no budget, I think they&#039;ve done a stellar job and I for one, am glad to see the changes.

The new Fesarius didn&#039;t take anything away from the original and only added to the beauty of the ship and show.

I can&#039;t wait for more and will definately be in line for the new DVD sets. I&#039;m proud to be an &quot;old school&quot; TOS fan, but I&#039;m also proud to see the new effects.

I think they are magnificent. Watch your old DVD&#039;s and leave it alone. No one is bashing cannon. At least this isn&#039;t the travesty that was &quot;Enterprise&quot; wanna be Star Trek.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To quote myself from another thread.</p>
<p>&#8220;I loved this episode and all of the new work that went into it. I&#8217;m amazed by the fact that no matter what is done , someone will find something to complain about. Sheesh! </p>
<p>I was one of the great unwashed, that had the audacity, years ago, to ask &#8220;What if they redid the FX for TOS?&#8221;</p>
<p>I for one am damned glad they did. Considering they have no budget, I think they&#8217;ve done a stellar job and I for one, am glad to see the changes.</p>
<p>The new Fesarius didn&#8217;t take anything away from the original and only added to the beauty of the ship and show.</p>
<p>I can&#8217;t wait for more and will definately be in line for the new DVD sets. I&#8217;m proud to be an &#8220;old school&#8221; TOS fan, but I&#8217;m also proud to see the new effects.</p>
<p>I think they are magnificent. Watch your old DVD&#8217;s and leave it alone. No one is bashing cannon. At least this isn&#8217;t the travesty that was &#8220;Enterprise&#8221; wanna be Star Trek.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

