Did they redo Gary Mitchell’s computer screen? The one where he’s reading a book at superspeed.

They redid the scanning screen in “Fridays’ Child”, so I figure they must do this one too. Mitchell’s original screen was so lame – just typewritten pages.

I mean, for us to to like something you absolutely hate while at the same time we also like something you love….bzzt..bzzt. ERROR ERROR Landrieu…help me…help me…ERRRROR….bzzzt…

If Mr. Abrams winds up making a fine vintage of TOS Star Trek after all, I expect many of you will be the ones that are disappointed. Many of you being the ones that constantly spit nothing but vitriol towards those of us that don’t hate TNG and would also just so happen to want a TOS era film to be something of an homage instead of a complete overwrite. That doesn’t mean bridge replicas or Shatner-clones…it does mean staying true to the spirit of Star Trek…the spirit that so many TNG fans appreciated also in TOS.

BTW…no problem here with the new TOS-R..most of it has been good. But I will say that its certainly strange that after 40 years, there’s apparently NOW some kind of damned rush that isn’t allowing enough time for quality control. Honestly, CBS corporate should put some of you on their Public Relations payroll….so you can get paid for making excuses…

It’s fine to critique while realizing that it is for conversation purposes. Please remember you have no say in how anything happens. (Don’t expect JJ to read your special post and call you for pointers.)

If you dislike something to the point (example: the movie) of not going…. don’t go. Neither Josh nor I or anyone else here will beg you to go, or give rides.

Not only is The U.S.S. Enterprise design they chose is truly ugly, but the energy barrier in the original was far better than the \’pink lady\’ clouds.

An aurora would have been far more effective, in my opinion. I cannot believe CBS Paramount, as a business, is less well served by mindless servility.

You can choose to buy the product, I may choose otherwise.

Has the Enterprise ever encountered a quantum singularity in any episodes?

I had a sharp pain in my left posterior cheek , I think an errant sub-atomic black hole passed through my ass and consumed several atoms before succumbing to Hawkings radiation, then again, it could have been attributed to reading some of the posts in this thread.

WHHHHHHHHAAAAAAAAAAA nacelle caps
WHHHHHHHHAAAAAAAAAAA phasers
WHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA soundstage planetary backgrounds
WHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA “Cotton candy” interstellar nebula effects
WHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA They arent making the film I want them to make

If I was Paramount, Dave Rossi, Micheal Okuda, or anyone involved in an official capacity with Star Trek, I would eternally TERMINATE anything pertaining to Star Trek. Permanently.

Some of you people don’t DESERVE Star Trek. Crying like spoiled toddlers isn’t being a fan and demonstrating love or not desiring mediocrity, it’s feigned ENTITLEMENT – and anyone not working for CBS/Paramount is NOT entitled to anything pertaining to Star Trek.
I don’t care how much money you have forked out over the years or how many episodes you can recite verbatim, or how many hours have been spent watching the programs, Star Trek is an intellectual property of CBS/Paramount and isn’t owned by collective fan commitee and doesn’t owe any allegiance to anyone save Paramount’s shareholders.

I didn’t cry incessantly for 15 years while suffering through Berman era Trek by visiting forums and posting venom disguised as constructive criticism, resulting in ruining the mood for everyone. No, I politely and quietly tuned out and didn’t expose myself to the filth.

Star Trek is entering a new phase. For those that can’t embrace or accept that reality and come along for the ride, bite the bullet and take it like a man and tune out.
Star Trek will NEVER be all things to all people and that’s as it should be, but don’t presume to delude yourself into thinking by constantly pointing out what is WRONG , or rather what is PERCIEVED to be wrong, that a service is being done in the name of “support.”

So you DO understand then that I am against the movie? I just want to be sure on that. For the record, yes, I AM against them making any movie with the roles recast, even if some of the original actors participate in some way. (Foot Stomp) And furthermore, I am against having a troll at the galaxy barrier. A gnome or perhaps a cigar chomping kangaroo, but no troll (Hissy Fit). Now I am going to take my ball and go home (Pout).