


<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Trouble Between JJ and Paramount Rumor Debunked [UPDATED]</title>
	<atom:link href="http://trekmovie.com/2007/02/01/rumor-trouble-between-jj-and-paramount-debunked/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://trekmovie.com/2007/02/01/rumor-trouble-between-jj-and-paramount-debunked/</link>
	<description>the source for Star Trek news and information</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 15:36:35 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Trevok</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2007/02/01/rumor-trouble-between-jj-and-paramount-debunked/comment-page-1/#comment-25787</link>
		<dc:creator>Trevok</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Feb 2007 20:43:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2007/02/01/rumor-trouble-between-jj-and-paramount/#comment-25787</guid>
		<description>Okay, JJ you&#039;ve had your fun spreading that rumor, time to get back to work getting the script written.
LLAP</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay, JJ you&#8217;ve had your fun spreading that rumor, time to get back to work getting the script written.<br />
LLAP</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Appleton</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2007/02/01/rumor-trouble-between-jj-and-paramount-debunked/comment-page-1/#comment-24866</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Appleton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Feb 2007 21:57:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2007/02/01/rumor-trouble-between-jj-and-paramount/#comment-24866</guid>
		<description>At first I believed the rumour because maybe Paramount was jittery about Abrams bonehead notion to have old Kirk meet young Kirk. Funny how even a brilliant film-maker like Abrams can have a brainfart once in a while. How are we supposed to suspend disbelief and bond with the new Kirk if the Shat (in his hammy fashion) is mugging for the camera in the very same scene? If anyone but Abrams had pitched this idea he would have been laughed out of the room! That premise is asking WAY too much of any audience, be they either fanatic or general audience. A GREAT script should take precedent over any notion of seeing Shatner one more time!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At first I believed the rumour because maybe Paramount was jittery about Abrams bonehead notion to have old Kirk meet young Kirk. Funny how even a brilliant film-maker like Abrams can have a brainfart once in a while. How are we supposed to suspend disbelief and bond with the new Kirk if the Shat (in his hammy fashion) is mugging for the camera in the very same scene? If anyone but Abrams had pitched this idea he would have been laughed out of the room! That premise is asking WAY too much of any audience, be they either fanatic or general audience. A GREAT script should take precedent over any notion of seeing Shatner one more time!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Picardsucks</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2007/02/01/rumor-trouble-between-jj-and-paramount-debunked/comment-page-1/#comment-24847</link>
		<dc:creator>Picardsucks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Feb 2007 21:43:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2007/02/01/rumor-trouble-between-jj-and-paramount/#comment-24847</guid>
		<description>For the love of humanity I&#039;m only 30 and believe I experienced a coronary when I read this yesterday. Paramount better not F us.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For the love of humanity I&#8217;m only 30 and believe I experienced a coronary when I read this yesterday. Paramount better not F us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SithMenace</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2007/02/01/rumor-trouble-between-jj-and-paramount-debunked/comment-page-1/#comment-24721</link>
		<dc:creator>SithMenace</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Feb 2007 16:13:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2007/02/01/rumor-trouble-between-jj-and-paramount/#comment-24721</guid>
		<description>I want Abrams&#039; Trek NOW.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I want Abrams&#8217; Trek NOW.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lukas</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2007/02/01/rumor-trouble-between-jj-and-paramount-debunked/comment-page-1/#comment-24669</link>
		<dc:creator>Lukas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Feb 2007 12:50:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2007/02/01/rumor-trouble-between-jj-and-paramount/#comment-24669</guid>
		<description>Funny how it&#039;s going to be 12 years between excellent Trek movies.......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Funny how it&#8217;s going to be 12 years between excellent Trek movies&#8230;&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Still Kirok</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2007/02/01/rumor-trouble-between-jj-and-paramount-debunked/comment-page-1/#comment-24546</link>
		<dc:creator>Still Kirok</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Feb 2007 04:26:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2007/02/01/rumor-trouble-between-jj-and-paramount/#comment-24546</guid>
		<description>Stranger things have happened.  The way Paramount has handled this franchise over the last decade plus has been so bad that the idea of a really good Trek movie is shocking.  That&#039;s why these news reports seem too good to be true.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stranger things have happened.  The way Paramount has handled this franchise over the last decade plus has been so bad that the idea of a really good Trek movie is shocking.  That&#8217;s why these news reports seem too good to be true.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam Cohen</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2007/02/01/rumor-trouble-between-jj-and-paramount-debunked/comment-page-1/#comment-24540</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam Cohen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Feb 2007 03:59:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2007/02/01/rumor-trouble-between-jj-and-paramount/#comment-24540</guid>
		<description>What&#039;s curious about the rumor is the timing, that&#039;s why people were apt to believe it.  But I&#039;m of the school of thought that until they start actually shooting the movie, I&#039;m not assuming anything whatsoever.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What&#8217;s curious about the rumor is the timing, that&#8217;s why people were apt to believe it.  But I&#8217;m of the school of thought that until they start actually shooting the movie, I&#8217;m not assuming anything whatsoever.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Smitty</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2007/02/01/rumor-trouble-between-jj-and-paramount-debunked/comment-page-1/#comment-24530</link>
		<dc:creator>Smitty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Feb 2007 03:03:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2007/02/01/rumor-trouble-between-jj-and-paramount/#comment-24530</guid>
		<description>Come on it&#039;s rumors posted on the internet, it must be true!!

Hahahahahahaha!

-cs™</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Come on it&#8217;s rumors posted on the internet, it must be true!!</p>
<p>Hahahahahahaha!</p>
<p>-cs™</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anthony Pascale</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2007/02/01/rumor-trouble-between-jj-and-paramount-debunked/comment-page-1/#comment-24523</link>
		<dc:creator>Anthony Pascale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Feb 2007 02:42:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2007/02/01/rumor-trouble-between-jj-and-paramount/#comment-24523</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;andoriano,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;to answer your question, when we first heard the rumor we looked into it and werent going to report it until confirmed. However once other sites reported the rumor it became news so we reported what we had learned. Lots of folks come to this site to see whats up and if there is a rumor out there we always look into it, just like when we debunked the Tom Cruise rumor. Plus the peopl close to the movie and Abrams wanted to be sure we (and other sites) got the truth out there to counter the false stories. If we reported nothing after the rumor comes out, some might believe the rumor&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt; &lt;br /&gt;
¿por qué usted no escribe en inglés?
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>andoriano,</p>
<p>to answer your question, when we first heard the rumor we looked into it and werent going to report it until confirmed. However once other sites reported the rumor it became news so we reported what we had learned. Lots of folks come to this site to see whats up and if there is a rumor out there we always look into it, just like when we debunked the Tom Cruise rumor. Plus the peopl close to the movie and Abrams wanted to be sure we (and other sites) got the truth out there to counter the false stories. If we reported nothing after the rumor comes out, some might believe the rumor</p>
<p> <br />
¿por qué usted no escribe en inglés?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2007/02/01/rumor-trouble-between-jj-and-paramount-debunked/comment-page-1/#comment-24520</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Feb 2007 02:23:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2007/02/01/rumor-trouble-between-jj-and-paramount/#comment-24520</guid>
		<description>Oh,What a relief (just a rumor).Now JJ can go forward with his big Star Trek musical</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh,What a relief (just a rumor).Now JJ can go forward with his big Star Trek musical</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
