


<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Abrams &amp; Trek XI Update</title>
	<atom:link href="http://trekmovie.com/2007/02/09/abrams-trek-xi-update/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://trekmovie.com/2007/02/09/abrams-trek-xi-update/</link>
	<description>the source for Star Trek news and information</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 02:02:04 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Trevok</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2007/02/09/abrams-trek-xi-update/comment-page-1/#comment-30311</link>
		<dc:creator>Trevok</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2007 21:31:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2007/02/09/abrams-trek-xi-update/#comment-30311</guid>
		<description>The reason people didn&#039;t go to the last few films was because they were bad movies. Movies only make real money if people see them more than once, something most people didn&#039;t do with the last few Trek films. As for people not liking the idea of a prequel I&#039;m not so convinced it will matter if the film is good, also just because a few fans complain about the idea on the net doesn&#039;t mean the silent majority won&#039;t love the idea.
LLAP</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The reason people didn&#8217;t go to the last few films was because they were bad movies. Movies only make real money if people see them more than once, something most people didn&#8217;t do with the last few Trek films. As for people not liking the idea of a prequel I&#8217;m not so convinced it will matter if the film is good, also just because a few fans complain about the idea on the net doesn&#8217;t mean the silent majority won&#8217;t love the idea.<br />
LLAP</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Prophecy</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2007/02/09/abrams-trek-xi-update/comment-page-1/#comment-30267</link>
		<dc:creator>Prophecy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2007 19:43:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2007/02/09/abrams-trek-xi-update/#comment-30267</guid>
		<description>This prequel idea is hated by sooo many fans that we just aren&#039;t going to show up.  And trek has such a nerd stigma attached that very few main stream fans will take the chance of being seen in the theatres.

Bringing back Kirk/Spock is fanboy fiction at its worst.  JJ is going to ruin trek, then fluff it off and make Lost or MI4.

Move over 150 kilotonne nuclear warhead cause there&#039;s a new bomb in town.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This prequel idea is hated by sooo many fans that we just aren&#8217;t going to show up.  And trek has such a nerd stigma attached that very few main stream fans will take the chance of being seen in the theatres.</p>
<p>Bringing back Kirk/Spock is fanboy fiction at its worst.  JJ is going to ruin trek, then fluff it off and make Lost or MI4.</p>
<p>Move over 150 kilotonne nuclear warhead cause there&#8217;s a new bomb in town.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ERIK J KELLY</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2007/02/09/abrams-trek-xi-update/comment-page-1/#comment-29546</link>
		<dc:creator>ERIK J KELLY</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Feb 2007 15:56:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2007/02/09/abrams-trek-xi-update/#comment-29546</guid>
		<description>people, has it even been confirmed by paramount that this film is going to be a TOS movie, i know the rumor mill has been running wild with it, but i have yet to hear solid confirmation of this.  If this is the case, i will be somewhat dissapointed because StarTrek has always been about moving forward not backward.  To me how can you just abandon all of the material that was made about the 24th century; 21 seasons of TV, and 4 feature films.  Now granted in no way am i defending berman and braga during the last few years of their run, they definately got sloppy and burned out, howeverthey did give us great stoytelling basically throughout the 90s.  I think everyone will agree with me that Enterprise was the attempt to go back and do the prequel and quite simply it didnt work, nobody cared, and the cast was to one dimensional.  To summarize, I believe the future of this franchise should be exactly that; THE FUTURE  first stay off of television at least for a while so the market doesnt get saturated.  scond give us a movie post nemesis or farther in the future</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>people, has it even been confirmed by paramount that this film is going to be a TOS movie, i know the rumor mill has been running wild with it, but i have yet to hear solid confirmation of this.  If this is the case, i will be somewhat dissapointed because StarTrek has always been about moving forward not backward.  To me how can you just abandon all of the material that was made about the 24th century; 21 seasons of TV, and 4 feature films.  Now granted in no way am i defending berman and braga during the last few years of their run, they definately got sloppy and burned out, howeverthey did give us great stoytelling basically throughout the 90s.  I think everyone will agree with me that Enterprise was the attempt to go back and do the prequel and quite simply it didnt work, nobody cared, and the cast was to one dimensional.  To summarize, I believe the future of this franchise should be exactly that; THE FUTURE  first stay off of television at least for a while so the market doesnt get saturated.  scond give us a movie post nemesis or farther in the future</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trevok</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2007/02/09/abrams-trek-xi-update/comment-page-1/#comment-29062</link>
		<dc:creator>Trevok</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Feb 2007 21:04:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2007/02/09/abrams-trek-xi-update/#comment-29062</guid>
		<description>Heres an idea have everyone that makes comments on this site direct one day of the film each. Your sure to end up with a brilliant film. LOL.
LLAP</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Heres an idea have everyone that makes comments on this site direct one day of the film each. Your sure to end up with a brilliant film. LOL.<br />
LLAP</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sybok</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2007/02/09/abrams-trek-xi-update/comment-page-1/#comment-28991</link>
		<dc:creator>Sybok</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Feb 2007 18:05:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2007/02/09/abrams-trek-xi-update/#comment-28991</guid>
		<description>If I were &quot;producing&quot; this film, I would consider using Shatner as narrator (think Shawshank Redemption), and make sure the screenplay was literate, in other words, have Shatner reminisce with Spock (Nimoy) about, perhaps, their first meeting.

And I&#039;d have Daren Doc involved with pre-production design, and have an Enterprise that looked like the Motion Picture version, except with those fantastic, and problematic, Nacelle Caps! ;)

Live long and prosper.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If I were &#8220;producing&#8221; this film, I would consider using Shatner as narrator (think Shawshank Redemption), and make sure the screenplay was literate, in other words, have Shatner reminisce with Spock (Nimoy) about, perhaps, their first meeting.</p>
<p>And I&#8217;d have Daren Doc involved with pre-production design, and have an Enterprise that looked like the Motion Picture version, except with those fantastic, and problematic, Nacelle Caps! ;)</p>
<p>Live long and prosper.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam Cohen</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2007/02/09/abrams-trek-xi-update/comment-page-1/#comment-28989</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam Cohen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Feb 2007 18:03:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2007/02/09/abrams-trek-xi-update/#comment-28989</guid>
		<description>My big bone to pick re: Abrams is this- he spreads himself too thin.  Anthony, I respectfully disagree that Abrams&#039; involvement in a project like Cloverfield does in fact interfere with Trek XI if those projects commence concurrently.  No, Abrams doesn&#039;t need to be Trek XI&#039;s director, but if this movie is going to be budgeted over $100 million like we all project, and if it is meant to revive the franchise, shouldn&#039;t that be Abrams&#039; main focus?  Orci and Kurtzman are following Abrams&#039; lead.  So will the director, if it&#039;s not going to be Abrams himself.  If he chooses to develop and direct another movie while Trek XI is in production/post-production, I will be really concerned.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My big bone to pick re: Abrams is this- he spreads himself too thin.  Anthony, I respectfully disagree that Abrams&#8217; involvement in a project like Cloverfield does in fact interfere with Trek XI if those projects commence concurrently.  No, Abrams doesn&#8217;t need to be Trek XI&#8217;s director, but if this movie is going to be budgeted over $100 million like we all project, and if it is meant to revive the franchise, shouldn&#8217;t that be Abrams&#8217; main focus?  Orci and Kurtzman are following Abrams&#8217; lead.  So will the director, if it&#8217;s not going to be Abrams himself.  If he chooses to develop and direct another movie while Trek XI is in production/post-production, I will be really concerned.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Admiraldeem</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2007/02/09/abrams-trek-xi-update/comment-page-1/#comment-28985</link>
		<dc:creator>Admiraldeem</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Feb 2007 17:53:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2007/02/09/abrams-trek-xi-update/#comment-28985</guid>
		<description># 12 Tim--how I wish.....I still mis De Kelly and Jimmy Doohan.  I guess that&#039;s what they got for putting on red shirts the days they died.

Wow.....too mean today.  Better go de-venomize.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p># 12 Tim&#8211;how I wish&#8230;..I still mis De Kelly and Jimmy Doohan.  I guess that&#8217;s what they got for putting on red shirts the days they died.</p>
<p>Wow&#8230;..too mean today.  Better go de-venomize.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jason</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2007/02/09/abrams-trek-xi-update/comment-page-1/#comment-28958</link>
		<dc:creator>jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Feb 2007 17:03:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2007/02/09/abrams-trek-xi-update/#comment-28958</guid>
		<description>sounds like trek xi is crumbling apart</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sounds like trek xi is crumbling apart</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CmdrR</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2007/02/09/abrams-trek-xi-update/comment-page-1/#comment-28949</link>
		<dc:creator>CmdrR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Feb 2007 16:49:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2007/02/09/abrams-trek-xi-update/#comment-28949</guid>
		<description>If Shatner&#039;s really the star, then they&#039;ve already made it. It was in the Simpsons. &quot;Star Trek XII: So Very Tired.&quot; Memorable quotes: &quot;Again with the Klingons!&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If Shatner&#8217;s really the star, then they&#8217;ve already made it. It was in the Simpsons. &#8220;Star Trek XII: So Very Tired.&#8221; Memorable quotes: &#8220;Again with the Klingons!&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Still Kirok</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2007/02/09/abrams-trek-xi-update/comment-page-1/#comment-28926</link>
		<dc:creator>Still Kirok</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Feb 2007 16:29:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2007/02/09/abrams-trek-xi-update/#comment-28926</guid>
		<description>Data couldn&#039;t be resurrected.  He never died because he was never alive.  Besides, he just downloaded himself into his &quot;brother&quot; and that&#039;s that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Data couldn&#8217;t be resurrected.  He never died because he was never alive.  Besides, he just downloaded himself into his &#8220;brother&#8221; and that&#8217;s that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
