


<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Star Trek XI Has Been Greenlit</title>
	<atom:link href="http://trekmovie.com/2007/02/26/star-trek-xi-has-been-greenlit/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://trekmovie.com/2007/02/26/star-trek-xi-has-been-greenlit/</link>
	<description>the source for Star Trek news and information</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 09:20:30 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Laurence Dunn</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2007/02/26/star-trek-xi-has-been-greenlit/comment-page-1/#comment-3424422</link>
		<dc:creator>Laurence Dunn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 May 2011 16:55:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2007/02/26/star-trek-xi-has-been-greenlit/#comment-3424422</guid>
		<description>That looks great but i&#039;m still not so certain that I like it. Regardless will look a lot more into it and choose for myself! :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That looks great but i&#8217;m still not so certain that I like it. Regardless will look a lot more into it and choose for myself! :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave A.</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2007/02/26/star-trek-xi-has-been-greenlit/comment-page-1/#comment-223715</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave A.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2007 07:44:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2007/02/26/star-trek-xi-has-been-greenlit/#comment-223715</guid>
		<description>Someone said &quot;star groans&quot;, and another begged for a new concept.  Here is my concept ...

There should be a new movie called &quot;Star Groins&quot;.  It should be shot exclusively between the knees and the waist, never seeing the characters&#039; faces.  And the actors should all be either super-fit or super-obese, but nothing in between.  So Kirk could weigh 160 and Spock 560.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Someone said &#8220;star groans&#8221;, and another begged for a new concept.  Here is my concept &#8230;</p>
<p>There should be a new movie called &#8220;Star Groins&#8221;.  It should be shot exclusively between the knees and the waist, never seeing the characters&#8217; faces.  And the actors should all be either super-fit or super-obese, but nothing in between.  So Kirk could weigh 160 and Spock 560.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BillyBoy</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2007/02/26/star-trek-xi-has-been-greenlit/comment-page-1/#comment-40446</link>
		<dc:creator>BillyBoy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2007 00:37:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2007/02/26/star-trek-xi-has-been-greenlit/#comment-40446</guid>
		<description>Star Trek: The Wrath of McCoy</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Star Trek: The Wrath of McCoy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2007/02/26/star-trek-xi-has-been-greenlit/comment-page-1/#comment-39548</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2007 14:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2007/02/26/star-trek-xi-has-been-greenlit/#comment-39548</guid>
		<description>I think &quot;Star Trek&quot; works.People will know well enough it&#039;s a new movie.Um ,but what will they call the sequel?Oh no.Star Trek 2?Oh well ,I guess they&#039;ll cross that bridge when they come to it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think &#8220;Star Trek&#8221; works.People will know well enough it&#8217;s a new movie.Um ,but what will they call the sequel?Oh no.Star Trek 2?Oh well ,I guess they&#8217;ll cross that bridge when they come to it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cervantes</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2007/02/26/star-trek-xi-has-been-greenlit/comment-page-1/#comment-39484</link>
		<dc:creator>Cervantes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2007 11:03:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2007/02/26/star-trek-xi-has-been-greenlit/#comment-39484</guid>
		<description>#34 curmudgeo

Star Groans indeed...  You do realise this is a Star Trek site, featuring news about a Star Trek Movie?

And bring it on, in all it&#039;s hopefully new, spangly, bright, shiny TOS era clothing say I!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#34 curmudgeo</p>
<p>Star Groans indeed&#8230;  You do realise this is a Star Trek site, featuring news about a Star Trek Movie?</p>
<p>And bring it on, in all it&#8217;s hopefully new, spangly, bright, shiny TOS era clothing say I!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: yo</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2007/02/26/star-trek-xi-has-been-greenlit/comment-page-1/#comment-39413</link>
		<dc:creator>yo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2007 08:04:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2007/02/26/star-trek-xi-has-been-greenlit/#comment-39413</guid>
		<description>Star Warp</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Star Warp</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Craig</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2007/02/26/star-trek-xi-has-been-greenlit/comment-page-1/#comment-39409</link>
		<dc:creator>Craig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2007 07:58:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2007/02/26/star-trek-xi-has-been-greenlit/#comment-39409</guid>
		<description>Star Trek Redux</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Star Trek Redux</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: curmudgeo</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2007/02/26/star-trek-xi-has-been-greenlit/comment-page-1/#comment-39281</link>
		<dc:creator>curmudgeo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Feb 2007 23:52:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2007/02/26/star-trek-xi-has-been-greenlit/#comment-39281</guid>
		<description>&gt; &quot;... regrettable decision to go backwards down a well-worn path
&gt; instead of looking forward and giving us a new cast, crew, and ship
&gt; in a post-NextGen universe.&quot;

It&#039;s regrettable that anybody is still doing Star Trek at all,
what we need is a completely new concept, something
completely different.

Remember when &quot;Star Wars&quot; burst upon the scene?
It was a revelation.  Of course, SW is like ST now, old and tired.

Bah!  Down with the old.
We need something new.  New new new new new!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt; &#8220;&#8230; regrettable decision to go backwards down a well-worn path<br />
&gt; instead of looking forward and giving us a new cast, crew, and ship<br />
&gt; in a post-NextGen universe.&#8221;</p>
<p>It&#8217;s regrettable that anybody is still doing Star Trek at all,<br />
what we need is a completely new concept, something<br />
completely different.</p>
<p>Remember when &#8220;Star Wars&#8221; burst upon the scene?<br />
It was a revelation.  Of course, SW is like ST now, old and tired.</p>
<p>Bah!  Down with the old.<br />
We need something new.  New new new new new!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dr. Image</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2007/02/26/star-trek-xi-has-been-greenlit/comment-page-1/#comment-39173</link>
		<dc:creator>Dr. Image</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Feb 2007 18:35:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2007/02/26/star-trek-xi-has-been-greenlit/#comment-39173</guid>
		<description>&#039;Star Trek: Revenge of the Wagon Train to the Stars.&quot;
&quot;Star-Trek&quot;
&quot;Star Trek: Millenium Edition.&quot; (Naa... doomed to crash.)
&quot;The Star Trek.&quot;
&quot;A Star Trek.&quot;
&quot;Star Trek: Breaking Training.&quot;
&quot;StartreK ST-1&quot;
...ahhh...fk. it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8216;Star Trek: Revenge of the Wagon Train to the Stars.&#8221;<br />
&#8220;Star-Trek&#8221;<br />
&#8220;Star Trek: Millenium Edition.&#8221; (Naa&#8230; doomed to crash.)<br />
&#8220;The Star Trek.&#8221;<br />
&#8220;A Star Trek.&#8221;<br />
&#8220;Star Trek: Breaking Training.&#8221;<br />
&#8220;StartreK ST-1&#8243;<br />
&#8230;ahhh&#8230;fk. it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: big E</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2007/02/26/star-trek-xi-has-been-greenlit/comment-page-1/#comment-39170</link>
		<dc:creator>big E</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Feb 2007 18:18:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2007/02/26/star-trek-xi-has-been-greenlit/#comment-39170</guid>
		<description>While calling it just &quot;Star Trek&quot; would be cool, it might be pushing it a bit too far, especially if it&#039;s not a full blown reboot.

If I where in charge, I&#039;d give the movie a sub-title (Star Trek: it&#039;s actually good this time!), but use a much larger font for &quot;Star Trek&quot;. Sort of holding the stick at both ends.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While calling it just &#8220;Star Trek&#8221; would be cool, it might be pushing it a bit too far, especially if it&#8217;s not a full blown reboot.</p>
<p>If I where in charge, I&#8217;d give the movie a sub-title (Star Trek: it&#8217;s actually good this time!), but use a much larger font for &#8220;Star Trek&#8221;. Sort of holding the stick at both ends.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

