Comments on: Review: Wolf In the Fold Remastered

By: eenicker

eenicker — Tue, 24 Apr 2012 10:06:59 +0000

By: Dyson Sphere

Dyson Sphere — Fri, 16 Mar 2007 09:51:58 +0000

In 13 years on early we went from poodle skirts to mini skirts – anything is possible.

By: DEMODE

DEMODE — Fri, 16 Mar 2007 09:39:47 +0000

Mmmmm….

Star Trek: The Motion Picture (circa 2271-2272, two-and-a-half years after the end of the series)

Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan (circa 2285)

You know, if the powers that be wanted too (I doubt they would, but hey… I can dream) they could set these new films after the events of TMP. Between TMP and WOK is a 13 year gap. Quite a large space to fill. If they wanted to have costumes similar to the red movie costumes, but done in the TOS colours, that would be a logical way of doing it, as it would be a clear evolution in style.

Also, as much as I love the TOS Enterprise, I do feel the movie version of 1701 would look better on screen.

By: Dr. Image

Dr. Image — Thu, 15 Mar 2007 20:15:33 +0000

I, for one, liked the Pike-era production design. All steel greys and serious business. Probably why I liked the TMP bridge as well, and especially the way it looked at the end of IV- white, silver, with blue and green readouts. Too bad they tore it apart to make the TNG battle bridge.

Given the time frame, I expect more of a Pike-era feel, and hopefully not the alt-Trek universe style of Enterprise.

By: Jeffrey S. Nelson

Jeffrey S. Nelson — Thu, 15 Mar 2007 09:43:17 +0000

Stanky McFibberich is wise. The Stank-Man has climbed the steps of Mt. Selaya.
His are high worship words. Much like “eeb-pleb-neesta.”
Please don’t give us a fake Kirk, i.e., Matt Damon. I’d rather see the adventures of Captain Tracy and his phaser pack.

By: David

David — Thu, 15 Mar 2007 09:01:27 +0000

I think this is the best opportunity to see the original series on the big screen. This may be the best chance we get to see something similar to the color and design.

You have to have full color, look how bad Superman Returns was because the didn’t use a full color pallette and RED.

Don’t give us muted use the three primary colors at least, if the poster is anything to go by hopefully the GOLD and BLUE and maybe RED will be there.

By: omf

omf — Thu, 15 Mar 2007 05:37:27 +0000

Has anyone brought up the inconsistency in the look of different scenes in these new CBSD airings? Some scenes look just beautiful – obviously remastered. Other scenes look muddled and muted, as if they didn’t have time to work on those. This is all within the same episode! Any guesses as to why this would be the case? Hopefully the eventual DVD/HD re-releases don’t have this problem.

By: Michael Appleton

Michael Appleton — Thu, 15 Mar 2007 05:07:45 +0000

#43 I like your message, but if you keep it up, Stanky need a spanky! Or, put another way, McFibberich can be such a….no, I won’t go there!

By: Stanky McFibberich

Stanky McFibberich — Wed, 14 Mar 2007 23:30:20 +0000

Star Trek IS about the look of the series. Kirk looks like William Shatner in a goldish shirt or greenish tunic. Spock looks like Leonard Nimoy in a blue shirt. The Enterprise looks like the TV series Enterprise. Fake Star Trek looks fake.

SMF

PS-Gooseneck viewers look like viewers on goosenecks. ;)

By: FlyingTigress

FlyingTigress — Wed, 14 Mar 2007 22:48:21 +0000

#41

That would have involved them running down to sickbay — and was cut out during the writing of the script. Too many pages.

(remembering Animal House…funny, funny movie — particularly if you were in college at the time, and had friends who reminded you of those characters!)