


<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Review: &#8220;Tomorrow Is Yesterday&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://trekmovie.com/2007/05/09/review-tomorrow-is-yesterday/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://trekmovie.com/2007/05/09/review-tomorrow-is-yesterday/</link>
	<description>the source for Star Trek news and information</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 07:39:38 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: ian</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2007/05/09/review-tomorrow-is-yesterday/comment-page-2/#comment-2277017</link>
		<dc:creator>ian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 01:21:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2007/05/09/review-tomorrow-is-yesterday/#comment-2277017</guid>
		<description>the creators of this show (or anyone who&#039;s ever read vonnegut or thought about time travel) should have known that future events are constant and cannot be altered upon going back in time, so sending the captain back immediately would necessarily not have any effect on the future, as future events are constant and unalterable. the episode should have been over in 5 minutes and spock&#039;s &quot;logic&quot; is absolutely wrong... i just couldn&#039;t get over it so i&#039;m not a huge fan of the episode.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the creators of this show (or anyone who&#8217;s ever read vonnegut or thought about time travel) should have known that future events are constant and cannot be altered upon going back in time, so sending the captain back immediately would necessarily not have any effect on the future, as future events are constant and unalterable. the episode should have been over in 5 minutes and spock&#8217;s &#8220;logic&#8221; is absolutely wrong&#8230; i just couldn&#8217;t get over it so i&#8217;m not a huge fan of the episode.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jfrancis</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2007/05/09/review-tomorrow-is-yesterday/comment-page-2/#comment-100757</link>
		<dc:creator>jfrancis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2007 22:56:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2007/05/09/review-tomorrow-is-yesterday/#comment-100757</guid>
		<description>I cannot believe that no one else has spotted the most glaring error of the entire episode: the Earth is spinning backwards!

If the sun rises in the east and sets in the west, then the rotation of the planet should be COUNTER-CLOCKWISE (when looked at from the &quot;north&quot; pole, or top). Nope, the CBS/P &quot;remaster-ers&quot; gave Earth a clockwise spin, which means the sun now rises in the west and sets in the east. Think about it.

For shame, CBS. For shame.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I cannot believe that no one else has spotted the most glaring error of the entire episode: the Earth is spinning backwards!</p>
<p>If the sun rises in the east and sets in the west, then the rotation of the planet should be COUNTER-CLOCKWISE (when looked at from the &#8220;north&#8221; pole, or top). Nope, the CBS/P &#8220;remaster-ers&#8221; gave Earth a clockwise spin, which means the sun now rises in the west and sets in the east. Think about it.</p>
<p>For shame, CBS. For shame.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Willis</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2007/05/09/review-tomorrow-is-yesterday/comment-page-2/#comment-100494</link>
		<dc:creator>John Willis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2007 16:15:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2007/05/09/review-tomorrow-is-yesterday/#comment-100494</guid>
		<description>Sorry,

Had to put my two cents in here.

Beaming yourself into yourself, in this situation is rather brilliant.

You gotta remember when this show was made, a mere 60 or so years after people woke up to the idea that Time was relative and Dimension an illusion. It all depends on your perspective.

Which is exactly what the beaming was all about, and that long discussion prior to the event.

In fact Captain Christopher did not beam &quot;into himself&quot; and he &quot;did not forget&quot;, he simply lived out his life in a world in which what he recalled never happened. As did the rest of the Enterprise crew.

This is a short post, so I won&#039;t get out the slide rule, but look at the those old diagrams that were popular in say 1972, and again in 1984 . The ones where velocity and time are at right angles and the speed of light cuts across them diagonally. Gosh it seems so freakin obvious, I feel embarrassed mentioning it.

I just don&#039;t get it though, its been 40 years and I &quot;got it &quot;the very first time. 
So you gotta be kidding me right?

This was a brilliant way to step around &quot;all&quot; of the paradoxes.

The answer was as it always was, it was true, it all happened, but everyone was insulated from each others timeline simply by their perspective.

To the Enterprise crew they simply &quot;stepped across a room&quot; not across time, the fact that time was a factor was simply an inconvenience.

To them to be sure, the world from which they came still existed, it always existed how could it not? 

But if they weren&#039;t very careful, it could become lost to them and they might never see home again. that was the crux of the dilema.

It seemed to funny, all these years to watch my friends get personally involved and wrapped up in &quot;how could they mess with my world, my time line.. they&#039;re going to destroy the entire universe...&quot; wow, what an ego.. the Enterprise crew had a personal axe to grind with that guy.

The Grandfather paradox.. that&#039;a funny one too.. sure you could kill your Grandfather.. but why? It wouldn&#039;t effect you other than killing a person that represents your Grandfather.. and emotional turmoil aside, he might not appreciate it. But these are merely forced ways of trying to think about the space, time, area we live in as an artificial continuous line of events.. sorry, it don&#039;t work that way. Thinking that way is as logical as following the train of thought of a car salesman.

I think it was an wide open mind, a gifted person who wrote the story in the area of time in which they lived.

- jtw</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry,</p>
<p>Had to put my two cents in here.</p>
<p>Beaming yourself into yourself, in this situation is rather brilliant.</p>
<p>You gotta remember when this show was made, a mere 60 or so years after people woke up to the idea that Time was relative and Dimension an illusion. It all depends on your perspective.</p>
<p>Which is exactly what the beaming was all about, and that long discussion prior to the event.</p>
<p>In fact Captain Christopher did not beam &#8220;into himself&#8221; and he &#8220;did not forget&#8221;, he simply lived out his life in a world in which what he recalled never happened. As did the rest of the Enterprise crew.</p>
<p>This is a short post, so I won&#8217;t get out the slide rule, but look at the those old diagrams that were popular in say 1972, and again in 1984 . The ones where velocity and time are at right angles and the speed of light cuts across them diagonally. Gosh it seems so freakin obvious, I feel embarrassed mentioning it.</p>
<p>I just don&#8217;t get it though, its been 40 years and I &#8220;got it &#8220;the very first time.<br />
So you gotta be kidding me right?</p>
<p>This was a brilliant way to step around &#8220;all&#8221; of the paradoxes.</p>
<p>The answer was as it always was, it was true, it all happened, but everyone was insulated from each others timeline simply by their perspective.</p>
<p>To the Enterprise crew they simply &#8220;stepped across a room&#8221; not across time, the fact that time was a factor was simply an inconvenience.</p>
<p>To them to be sure, the world from which they came still existed, it always existed how could it not? </p>
<p>But if they weren&#8217;t very careful, it could become lost to them and they might never see home again. that was the crux of the dilema.</p>
<p>It seemed to funny, all these years to watch my friends get personally involved and wrapped up in &#8220;how could they mess with my world, my time line.. they&#8217;re going to destroy the entire universe&#8230;&#8221; wow, what an ego.. the Enterprise crew had a personal axe to grind with that guy.</p>
<p>The Grandfather paradox.. that&#8217;a funny one too.. sure you could kill your Grandfather.. but why? It wouldn&#8217;t effect you other than killing a person that represents your Grandfather.. and emotional turmoil aside, he might not appreciate it. But these are merely forced ways of trying to think about the space, time, area we live in as an artificial continuous line of events.. sorry, it don&#8217;t work that way. Thinking that way is as logical as following the train of thought of a car salesman.</p>
<p>I think it was an wide open mind, a gifted person who wrote the story in the area of time in which they lived.</p>
<p>- jtw</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chuck_N</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2007/05/09/review-tomorrow-is-yesterday/comment-page-2/#comment-98720</link>
		<dc:creator>Chuck_N</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 May 2007 17:53:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2007/05/09/review-tomorrow-is-yesterday/#comment-98720</guid>
		<description>An earlier post commented on the fact that Capt Christopher beamed in standing up instead of the sitting position he had in his cockpit. Here&#039;s another oddity - he wasn&#039;t wearing his parachute! Boy, that transporter system is clever!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An earlier post commented on the fact that Capt Christopher beamed in standing up instead of the sitting position he had in his cockpit. Here&#8217;s another oddity &#8211; he wasn&#8217;t wearing his parachute! Boy, that transporter system is clever!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cervantes</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2007/05/09/review-tomorrow-is-yesterday/comment-page-2/#comment-98480</link>
		<dc:creator>Cervantes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 May 2007 11:17:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2007/05/09/review-tomorrow-is-yesterday/#comment-98480</guid>
		<description>Strong &quot;vibrations&quot; on &quot;E&quot;good.  Too much &quot;wobbles&quot; on &quot;E&quot; bad...and ridiculous!   The crew inside should shake, not be &quot;blended&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Strong &#8220;vibrations&#8221; on &#8220;E&#8221;good.  Too much &#8220;wobbles&#8221; on &#8220;E&#8221; bad&#8230;and ridiculous!   The crew inside should shake, not be &#8220;blended&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mrregular</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2007/05/09/review-tomorrow-is-yesterday/comment-page-2/#comment-98294</link>
		<dc:creator>mrregular</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 May 2007 04:51:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2007/05/09/review-tomorrow-is-yesterday/#comment-98294</guid>
		<description>Re: #60
Please forgive me while I cross over to the new Battlestar Galactica for an example how the cloud sequence COULD have been handled.
Galactica, in a surprise tactical move to get the surviving humans away from New Caprica,  jumps(FTL)into the atmosphere of the planet. There is a flash and then the ship is seen descending rapidly towards the surface. The exterior of the ship is smoking; aflame from this atmospheric descent.
Now that you get the idea..why couldn&#039;t our Big E be smoking hot and even aflame from the sudden descent into the Earth&#039;s atmosphere? It sure was during the remastered &quot;The Naked Time&quot; when the BIg E was just miles above PSI 2000. That would really add to the impact of the cloud scene above Omaha, Nebraska..a ship under great physical stress..a lot more realistic than that darn wobbling.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re: #60<br />
Please forgive me while I cross over to the new Battlestar Galactica for an example how the cloud sequence COULD have been handled.<br />
Galactica, in a surprise tactical move to get the surviving humans away from New Caprica,  jumps(FTL)into the atmosphere of the planet. There is a flash and then the ship is seen descending rapidly towards the surface. The exterior of the ship is smoking; aflame from this atmospheric descent.<br />
Now that you get the idea..why couldn&#8217;t our Big E be smoking hot and even aflame from the sudden descent into the Earth&#8217;s atmosphere? It sure was during the remastered &#8220;The Naked Time&#8221; when the BIg E was just miles above PSI 2000. That would really add to the impact of the cloud scene above Omaha, Nebraska..a ship under great physical stress..a lot more realistic than that darn wobbling.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack: The Kirk Bauer Of Space</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2007/05/09/review-tomorrow-is-yesterday/comment-page-2/#comment-98110</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack: The Kirk Bauer Of Space</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 May 2007 00:13:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2007/05/09/review-tomorrow-is-yesterday/#comment-98110</guid>
		<description>Also, I don&#039;t understand why the CBS digital people decided to put in the cheesy wobble when during the atmosphere shot. A really cool atmosphere shot comes to mind as I type this: during the time travel episode in Voyager (yes, Voyager) the atmosphere shot of the ship was really cool. Something along those lines would have been better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also, I don&#8217;t understand why the CBS digital people decided to put in the cheesy wobble when during the atmosphere shot. A really cool atmosphere shot comes to mind as I type this: during the time travel episode in Voyager (yes, Voyager) the atmosphere shot of the ship was really cool. Something along those lines would have been better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2007/05/09/review-tomorrow-is-yesterday/comment-page-2/#comment-97797</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2007 16:17:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2007/05/09/review-tomorrow-is-yesterday/#comment-97797</guid>
		<description>Good review.   One continuity omission and a missed opportuntiy was with Christoper&#039;s cockpit.
When looking out from his perspective you saw clouds.  When the camera pointed at him, the sky outside of the cockpit glass was blue with no clouds.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good review.   One continuity omission and a missed opportuntiy was with Christoper&#8217;s cockpit.<br />
When looking out from his perspective you saw clouds.  When the camera pointed at him, the sky outside of the cockpit glass was blue with no clouds.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug L.</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2007/05/09/review-tomorrow-is-yesterday/comment-page-2/#comment-97770</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug L.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2007 15:32:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2007/05/09/review-tomorrow-is-yesterday/#comment-97770</guid>
		<description>Well, I finally got to actually watch Tomorrow is Yesterday on DVR, and the only kind thing I can think of to say is....  low budget.

Doug L.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I finally got to actually watch Tomorrow is Yesterday on DVR, and the only kind thing I can think of to say is&#8230;.  low budget.</p>
<p>Doug L.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Appleton</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2007/05/09/review-tomorrow-is-yesterday/comment-page-2/#comment-97327</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Appleton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2007 01:46:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2007/05/09/review-tomorrow-is-yesterday/#comment-97327</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m beaming from your convoluted, but interesting, explanation!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m beaming from your convoluted, but interesting, explanation!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

