


<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8216;Star Trek&#8217; Scouting Iceland For Location Shooting</title>
	<atom:link href="http://trekmovie.com/2007/06/26/star-trek-scouting-iceland-for-location-shooting/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://trekmovie.com/2007/06/26/star-trek-scouting-iceland-for-location-shooting/</link>
	<description>the source for Star Trek news and information</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 12:30:13 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: THEETrekMaster</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2007/06/26/star-trek-scouting-iceland-for-location-shooting/comment-page-1/#comment-139892</link>
		<dc:creator>THEETrekMaster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2007 18:59:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2007/06/26/star-trek-scouting-iceland-for-location-shooting/#comment-139892</guid>
		<description>#49 LMAO!!! Too funny...LOL</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#49 LMAO!!! Too funny&#8230;LOL</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harry Ballz</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2007/06/26/star-trek-scouting-iceland-for-location-shooting/comment-page-1/#comment-139359</link>
		<dc:creator>Harry Ballz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2007 04:52:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2007/06/26/star-trek-scouting-iceland-for-location-shooting/#comment-139359</guid>
		<description>It would take too long to explain why it would be a pain to watch a sequel to Spock&#039;s Brain. That&#039;s my disdainful refrain!! Ouch!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It would take too long to explain why it would be a pain to watch a sequel to Spock&#8217;s Brain. That&#8217;s my disdainful refrain!! Ouch!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: THEETrekMaster</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2007/06/26/star-trek-scouting-iceland-for-location-shooting/comment-page-1/#comment-139354</link>
		<dc:creator>THEETrekMaster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2007 04:47:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2007/06/26/star-trek-scouting-iceland-for-location-shooting/#comment-139354</guid>
		<description>All I know is, I want my Spock&#039;s Brain sequel...lol</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All I know is, I want my Spock&#8217;s Brain sequel&#8230;lol</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harry Ballz</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2007/06/26/star-trek-scouting-iceland-for-location-shooting/comment-page-1/#comment-139343</link>
		<dc:creator>Harry Ballz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2007 04:32:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2007/06/26/star-trek-scouting-iceland-for-location-shooting/#comment-139343</guid>
		<description>When I said EXACTLY, what I meant was the flavour and tone of TOS. The best example to compare it to would be like listening to The Beatles in mono on vinyl records during the 1960&#039;s, and then being able to hear the &quot;same&quot; music now in stereo on a CD; the same in essence, only infinitely better for the enjoyment. More fleshed out and defined, making  the creation &quot;richer&quot; for it. Does that clarify my position?
p.s. thank you Stanky for the compliment and coming to my defense!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When I said EXACTLY, what I meant was the flavour and tone of TOS. The best example to compare it to would be like listening to The Beatles in mono on vinyl records during the 1960&#8217;s, and then being able to hear the &#8220;same&#8221; music now in stereo on a CD; the same in essence, only infinitely better for the enjoyment. More fleshed out and defined, making  the creation &#8220;richer&#8221; for it. Does that clarify my position?<br />
p.s. thank you Stanky for the compliment and coming to my defense!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2007/06/26/star-trek-scouting-iceland-for-location-shooting/comment-page-1/#comment-139328</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2007 04:04:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2007/06/26/star-trek-scouting-iceland-for-location-shooting/#comment-139328</guid>
		<description>To recreate exactly does mean identical does it not? 

Exactly-
1. in an exact manner; precisely; accurately.  
2. in every respect 

Exact- 
1. strictly accurate or correct: an exact likeness; an exact description.  
2. precise, as opposed to approximate: the exact sum; the exact date.  
3. admitting of no deviation, as laws or discipline; strict or rigorous.  

Or was it meant to mean a minor face lift w/o too much artistic license would be okay? 

If that&#039;s the case then I&#039;d be on board for that. Similar to what was done w/ the Borg in First Contact. A slight face lift, but they still looked like Borg. 

Obviously, don&#039;t take my literal meaning to mean that I want the Enterprise to look like the Borg.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To recreate exactly does mean identical does it not? </p>
<p>Exactly-<br />
1. in an exact manner; precisely; accurately.<br />
2. in every respect </p>
<p>Exact-<br />
1. strictly accurate or correct: an exact likeness; an exact description.<br />
2. precise, as opposed to approximate: the exact sum; the exact date.<br />
3. admitting of no deviation, as laws or discipline; strict or rigorous.  </p>
<p>Or was it meant to mean a minor face lift w/o too much artistic license would be okay? </p>
<p>If that&#8217;s the case then I&#8217;d be on board for that. Similar to what was done w/ the Borg in First Contact. A slight face lift, but they still looked like Borg. </p>
<p>Obviously, don&#8217;t take my literal meaning to mean that I want the Enterprise to look like the Borg.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stanky McFibberich</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2007/06/26/star-trek-scouting-iceland-for-location-shooting/comment-page-1/#comment-139302</link>
		<dc:creator>Stanky McFibberich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2007 03:21:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2007/06/26/star-trek-scouting-iceland-for-location-shooting/#comment-139302</guid>
		<description>re:42. Kevin
&quot;…Maybe I don’t follow.&quot;

No, I don&#039;t think you do.  I think you may be taking the word &#039;exactly&#039; too literally for the intent of the message...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>re:42. Kevin<br />
&#8220;…Maybe I don’t follow.&#8221;</p>
<p>No, I don&#8217;t think you do.  I think you may be taking the word &#8216;exactly&#8217; too literally for the intent of the message&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ted</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2007/06/26/star-trek-scouting-iceland-for-location-shooting/comment-page-1/#comment-139233</link>
		<dc:creator>Ted</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2007 01:47:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2007/06/26/star-trek-scouting-iceland-for-location-shooting/#comment-139233</guid>
		<description>No...please no andorians.

Blue guys with insect antennae do not make for a very sophisticated-looking alien.  If the &quot;new group of Trek fans&quot; that Abrams is courting get one look at Andorians, they&#039;ll just walk away from the movie laughing.  That will only reinforce the myth that Star Trek is for geeks only.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No&#8230;please no andorians.</p>
<p>Blue guys with insect antennae do not make for a very sophisticated-looking alien.  If the &#8220;new group of Trek fans&#8221; that Abrams is courting get one look at Andorians, they&#8217;ll just walk away from the movie laughing.  That will only reinforce the myth that Star Trek is for geeks only.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ted</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2007/06/26/star-trek-scouting-iceland-for-location-shooting/comment-page-1/#comment-139229</link>
		<dc:creator>Ted</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2007 01:39:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2007/06/26/star-trek-scouting-iceland-for-location-shooting/#comment-139229</guid>
		<description>My wife and I visited Iceland for a vacation once.  It&#039;s definitely not all ice -- it&#039;s known as &quot;the land of fire and ice&quot;.  We visited vast lava fields, beautiful huge waterfalls dropingoing into vast grassy plains, geysers as good as old faithful, and of course we had a picnic lunch on a glacier.  It was a spectacular place with far less snow than I expected.  The Southwest part of the island is surprisingly mild, due to the fact that the gulfstream runs right into it (we were there during mid-October and we enjoyed 7 days of 40 degrees F and higher).  The interior, though, is very cold and mostly uninhabited.

The lava field we visited could definitey be a stand-in for an alien planet -- lava rock (such as pumice and basalt) as far as the eye can see in all directions.   The part of the country that had the geysers also looked Alien, with warm pools of higly mineralized water that almost glowed with different colors.  One thing though...there weren&#039;t any trees.  Our guide told us that almost all of the tress were cut down by the vikings and later settlers for firewood and building materials.  I remember I left a $50 donation to help re-forestation projects.

Iceland has some of the most beautiful landscapes I&#039;ve ever seen...It&#039;s a lot more than just glaciers (although the glaciers are beautiful, too).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My wife and I visited Iceland for a vacation once.  It&#8217;s definitely not all ice &#8212; it&#8217;s known as &#8220;the land of fire and ice&#8221;.  We visited vast lava fields, beautiful huge waterfalls dropingoing into vast grassy plains, geysers as good as old faithful, and of course we had a picnic lunch on a glacier.  It was a spectacular place with far less snow than I expected.  The Southwest part of the island is surprisingly mild, due to the fact that the gulfstream runs right into it (we were there during mid-October and we enjoyed 7 days of 40 degrees F and higher).  The interior, though, is very cold and mostly uninhabited.</p>
<p>The lava field we visited could definitey be a stand-in for an alien planet &#8212; lava rock (such as pumice and basalt) as far as the eye can see in all directions.   The part of the country that had the geysers also looked Alien, with warm pools of higly mineralized water that almost glowed with different colors.  One thing though&#8230;there weren&#8217;t any trees.  Our guide told us that almost all of the tress were cut down by the vikings and later settlers for firewood and building materials.  I remember I left a $50 donation to help re-forestation projects.</p>
<p>Iceland has some of the most beautiful landscapes I&#8217;ve ever seen&#8230;It&#8217;s a lot more than just glaciers (although the glaciers are beautiful, too).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2007/06/26/star-trek-scouting-iceland-for-location-shooting/comment-page-1/#comment-139223</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2007 01:31:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2007/06/26/star-trek-scouting-iceland-for-location-shooting/#comment-139223</guid>
		<description>uuummm... so you mean using CGI to make phasers look like painted on lines? Expensive sets made to look like a cardboard? Flat monitors in the bridge showing static, not so technical looking pictures (they actually did that on Enterprise)? Have the Enterprise very flat w/o the surface detailing it had on the hull in the movies (which gave the ship scale and more depth)? Using black bars on the sides of the movie screen so the movie remains in 4:3 aspect ratio?

...Maybe I don&#039;t follow.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>uuummm&#8230; so you mean using CGI to make phasers look like painted on lines? Expensive sets made to look like a cardboard? Flat monitors in the bridge showing static, not so technical looking pictures (they actually did that on Enterprise)? Have the Enterprise very flat w/o the surface detailing it had on the hull in the movies (which gave the ship scale and more depth)? Using black bars on the sides of the movie screen so the movie remains in 4:3 aspect ratio?</p>
<p>&#8230;Maybe I don&#8217;t follow.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stanky McFibberich</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2007/06/26/star-trek-scouting-iceland-for-location-shooting/comment-page-1/#comment-139147</link>
		<dc:creator>Stanky McFibberich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2007 23:30:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2007/06/26/star-trek-scouting-iceland-for-location-shooting/#comment-139147</guid>
		<description>re:39. Harry

I like that idea.  It would not solve ALL the problems, but I like the idea.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>re:39. Harry</p>
<p>I like that idea.  It would not solve ALL the problems, but I like the idea.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
