Comments on: Kurtzman Sees Parallels Between New ‘Star Trek’ and Wrath of Khan

By: Jeri Thormina

Jeri Thormina — Thu, 21 Apr 2011 13:42:40 +0000

I know this if off topic but I’m looking into starting my own weblog and was wondering what all is required to get setup? I’m assuming having a blog like yours would cost a pretty penny? I’m not very internet savvy so I’m not 100% certain. Any tips or advice would be greatly appreciated. Cheers

By: Vejur

Vejur — Tue, 03 Jul 2007 18:03:12 +0000

ohh nooo not again wannabe bad guy Kahn movie

By: THEETrekMaster

THEETrekMaster — Mon, 02 Jul 2007 04:12:03 +0000

#97 Fuhgetaboutiiit…I think some wires got crossed and I misread some things and just reacted…so, please…find it in your heart to forgive me…

Xai…you too? :-)

TTM

By: Stanky (The Anti-Fake Kirk) McFibberich

Stanky (The Anti-Fake Kirk) McFibberich — Sun, 01 Jul 2007 22:45:30 +0000

# 100

!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ;)

By: Stanky (The Anti-Fake Kirk) McFibberich

Stanky (The Anti-Fake Kirk) McFibberich — Sun, 01 Jul 2007 22:44:41 +0000

re: 98. Xailaphone

Thanks for clearing that up. But we can still hope for Ceti eels and the fake Kirk burping David and Spock instructing a young Saavik how to make plomeek soup without the Romulan spices.
What a great idea making this movie a prequel to Space Seed and Wrath of khan!!

By: Xai

Xai — Sun, 01 Jul 2007 21:44:24 +0000

#95 Stanky,

After all that bs from above….I hate to quash anyone’s hopes, but…..

I spoke to Ricardo this morning, both of us sipping iced coffee on a rich Corinthian leather couch on his veranda.

He’s far to busy promoting the reamastered Fantasy Island DVD coming out and the Taco Bell voice-overs and can not commit to the project.

That kills THAT rumor… dam.

By: Anthony Pascale

Anthony Pascale — Sun, 01 Jul 2007 21:20:42 +0000

I am sorry if anyone took what I said personally. I dont post my opinions much but do feel I have a right as much as anybody. People can talk about what they want…but sometimes I feel the need to vent. If I was targeting anyone it was the post by John CT…someone who has never posted before and ‘dive bombs’ his ‘one word Nemesis’ as if that proves that ST08=suck.

I just find that ignorant…I am sorry, especially if you actually listen to what Kurtzman said and undestand the context. He is talking about replicating the experience for the viewers…not replicating the movie (as the tried in Nem). These people are not stupid….they have their own idea I and it not going to involve a genetic superman. They know Nemesis was bad.

But the idea of reinvigorating the franchise like STII did is exactly what this franchise needs. That film reaffirmed my love of Trek and I would love to see kids come and see it and fall in love with it and create a whole new generation of Trekkies.

Does this mean I think all trek is good? no…of course not…in fact i would call less than half of Trek really good. But I still contend that Paramount and the new team are doing and saying all the right things and have a track record to back it up. You can assume the worst if you like, I will assume for now that they are on the right track

By: Harry Ballz

Harry Ballz — Sun, 01 Jul 2007 20:45:29 +0000

Okay, group hug…EVERYBODY!!!

By: Stanky (The Anti-Fake Kirk) McFibberich

Stanky (The Anti-Fake Kirk) McFibberich — Sun, 01 Jul 2007 20:11:35 +0000

re: 94 X-Meister

So I should NOT assume that Montalban will appear as Khan in the movie?

By: Xai

Xai — Sun, 01 Jul 2007 19:36:30 +0000

Thetrekmaster, I made a comment to the room and you answered me by name, thus the response.
I don’t have ill will toward anyone here as long as there’s none toward me. I have a wait and see attitude toward all of this. Conjecture is fun, but ALL of us, have to keep in mind to not read too much into what’s said or reported yet. It seems too easy for some to assume bad things about this film, even before it’s filmed.