


<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Interview With Nicholas Meyer</title>
	<atom:link href="http://trekmovie.com/2007/07/14/interview-with-nicholas-meyer/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://trekmovie.com/2007/07/14/interview-with-nicholas-meyer/</link>
	<description>the source for Star Trek news and information</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 11:06:09 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: joncrvl tydoimp</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2007/07/14/interview-with-nicholas-meyer/comment-page-2/#comment-870797</link>
		<dc:creator>joncrvl tydoimp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 00:37:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2007/07/14/interview-with-nicholas-meyer/#comment-870797</guid>
		<description>rlximhzjt inlbdkt rhae zmxnlaqs soavp rbuhnvc maoj</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>rlximhzjt inlbdkt rhae zmxnlaqs soavp rbuhnvc maoj</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tiberius</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2007/07/14/interview-with-nicholas-meyer/comment-page-2/#comment-191833</link>
		<dc:creator>tiberius</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Aug 2007 12:25:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2007/07/14/interview-with-nicholas-meyer/#comment-191833</guid>
		<description>Nick Meyer is the most intelligent filmmaker to listen to, after perhaps Terry Gilliam. But both men are a testament to how even the best ideas sometimes get lost on screen. TWOK was perfect - not just great Trek, but a great motion picture on any level. If Nick had ONLY done that film, we would have been blathering on about how cheated we were that he didn&#039;t helm the whole thing from then on. But the fact of the matter is that he wrote 80% of the Voyage Home and directed the Undiscovered Country. And I like both of those movies, but they were not the perfect gems that Kahn was, were they? 

The Voyage Home had too many big laffs for many tastes. And STVI had some wonderful moments and was a fitting send-off. But there were some gaffes that make me cringe: the fight with the two Kirks, Spock yelling &quot;arrest yourself!&quot; at the end. Egad, those moments are like bad TOS. 

Personally, I would have brought Nick Meyer in to do the new film, and let him loose. But, as it is, I&#039;d be interested in hearing him speak more about the other films, which weren&#039;t as perfect as Khan.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nick Meyer is the most intelligent filmmaker to listen to, after perhaps Terry Gilliam. But both men are a testament to how even the best ideas sometimes get lost on screen. TWOK was perfect &#8211; not just great Trek, but a great motion picture on any level. If Nick had ONLY done that film, we would have been blathering on about how cheated we were that he didn&#8217;t helm the whole thing from then on. But the fact of the matter is that he wrote 80% of the Voyage Home and directed the Undiscovered Country. And I like both of those movies, but they were not the perfect gems that Kahn was, were they? </p>
<p>The Voyage Home had too many big laffs for many tastes. And STVI had some wonderful moments and was a fitting send-off. But there were some gaffes that make me cringe: the fight with the two Kirks, Spock yelling &#8220;arrest yourself!&#8221; at the end. Egad, those moments are like bad TOS. </p>
<p>Personally, I would have brought Nick Meyer in to do the new film, and let him loose. But, as it is, I&#8217;d be interested in hearing him speak more about the other films, which weren&#8217;t as perfect as Khan.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cygnus-X1</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2007/07/14/interview-with-nicholas-meyer/comment-page-2/#comment-161477</link>
		<dc:creator>Cygnus-X1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2007 06:11:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2007/07/14/interview-with-nicholas-meyer/#comment-161477</guid>
		<description>Well, for whatever reason, by computer finally played the interview clips.

It was nice to hear Meyer echo an idea that I&#039;ve been blowing hard about repeatedly, that story is the most important ingredient of a movie.

As Meyer said, if the story is good, nothing else matters, other than the picture being in focus. And, it doesn&#039;t take an economist to figure out that the $ millions spent on CGI would make a better film if they were spent on a good story and good writers.

Imagine that - making the story, once again, the priority of a story-telling endeavor.

I wonder how many Hollywood producers are crazy enough to actually try it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, for whatever reason, by computer finally played the interview clips.</p>
<p>It was nice to hear Meyer echo an idea that I&#8217;ve been blowing hard about repeatedly, that story is the most important ingredient of a movie.</p>
<p>As Meyer said, if the story is good, nothing else matters, other than the picture being in focus. And, it doesn&#8217;t take an economist to figure out that the $ millions spent on CGI would make a better film if they were spent on a good story and good writers.</p>
<p>Imagine that &#8211; making the story, once again, the priority of a story-telling endeavor.</p>
<p>I wonder how many Hollywood producers are crazy enough to actually try it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JodarTrekFan</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2007/07/14/interview-with-nicholas-meyer/comment-page-2/#comment-161228</link>
		<dc:creator>JodarTrekFan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2007 00:26:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2007/07/14/interview-with-nicholas-meyer/#comment-161228</guid>
		<description>All right let&#039;s set some things straight.  The reason why Paramount is revisiting the series and movies for HD is because, technically, the medium is that much more detailed than anything we&#039;ve seen before.  That being the case, things like matte lines, grain, color degradation can be fixed so that when we see the films/tv series again, those artifacts won&#039;t be that obvious.

The TMP Director&#039;s Edition is wonderful, but if you look at the quality of the presentation, itself, it sucks!  The opening shot of the Klingon ships shows much grain, matte lines, faded color and is a prime example as to why that film and the rest need major clean up before they ever get to HD-DVD.  

TWOK is no exception.  Even during its theatrical run, there were obvious technical issues.  One being the reused shot of the Enterprise, after the first shot post warp.  They need to redo that sound effect as it doesn&#039;t have the right whoooosh.  Secondly, the sound effect of the &#039;dropped bolt&#039; in the Genesis cave needs to be restored to be &#039;heard&#039; in the right rear channel ALONE, as it was in the 70mm 6-track mag prints.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All right let&#8217;s set some things straight.  The reason why Paramount is revisiting the series and movies for HD is because, technically, the medium is that much more detailed than anything we&#8217;ve seen before.  That being the case, things like matte lines, grain, color degradation can be fixed so that when we see the films/tv series again, those artifacts won&#8217;t be that obvious.</p>
<p>The TMP Director&#8217;s Edition is wonderful, but if you look at the quality of the presentation, itself, it sucks!  The opening shot of the Klingon ships shows much grain, matte lines, faded color and is a prime example as to why that film and the rest need major clean up before they ever get to HD-DVD.  </p>
<p>TWOK is no exception.  Even during its theatrical run, there were obvious technical issues.  One being the reused shot of the Enterprise, after the first shot post warp.  They need to redo that sound effect as it doesn&#8217;t have the right whoooosh.  Secondly, the sound effect of the &#8216;dropped bolt&#8217; in the Genesis cave needs to be restored to be &#8216;heard&#8217; in the right rear channel ALONE, as it was in the 70mm 6-track mag prints.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Major Joe Ely Carrales, CAP</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2007/07/14/interview-with-nicholas-meyer/comment-page-2/#comment-159446</link>
		<dc:creator>Major Joe Ely Carrales, CAP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 07:36:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2007/07/14/interview-with-nicholas-meyer/#comment-159446</guid>
		<description>Many of the TMP uniforms did appear in TWOK...as &quot;enlisted&quot; crewman uniform.  They were dyed red and added to, but they were there.

ST Uniforms, by the Major...

1) TWOK- It lis elaborate enough to look like an &quot;organizational&quot; uniform. Had believeability and showed a presence.
2) TOS- can&#039;t bash the KIRK/SPOCK.McCoy hay days.  Not as &quot;pajama&quot; as everyone says (unless you wear boots to bed).
3) TNG-Later Seasons, they finally got something that was not a &quot;pajama&quot;
4) TOS-Cage/WNMGB- Needed work...looked like it was off the rack from JC Penny&#039;s
5) TMP- It&#039;s the 70s so we can only assume they intened to show rank based on the size one&#039;s genitals appeared.  The Rad-suit was a cool design.  The &quot;leasure/casual&quot; stype shirt that Kirk wears with the sort of open colar is something that should have survived.

The others are in there.  The Star Trek:Insurrection uniforms were sort of like a crosee between DS9 uniforms and TWOK.  The Full dress uniform also was improved from what was seen in TNG.  TNG was supposed to probabny harken back to the Red Movie Era uniform...but its length looked ridiculous...like a dress.  They should have kept the Movie Unifroms as Mess Dess in TNG...it is fitting with custom to base such uniforms on past designs.

The TOS Full dress uniform was pretty good, however, it was never seen again.  

Star Fleet awards were seen worn in TOS and and ST:VI TUC (worn by the admirals likely to evoke Col Oliver North and the various Pentagon/Nato Generals that made lots of appearances during the cold war.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Many of the TMP uniforms did appear in TWOK&#8230;as &#8220;enlisted&#8221; crewman uniform.  They were dyed red and added to, but they were there.</p>
<p>ST Uniforms, by the Major&#8230;</p>
<p>1) TWOK- It lis elaborate enough to look like an &#8220;organizational&#8221; uniform. Had believeability and showed a presence.<br />
2) TOS- can&#8217;t bash the KIRK/SPOCK.McCoy hay days.  Not as &#8220;pajama&#8221; as everyone says (unless you wear boots to bed).<br />
3) TNG-Later Seasons, they finally got something that was not a &#8220;pajama&#8221;<br />
4) TOS-Cage/WNMGB- Needed work&#8230;looked like it was off the rack from JC Penny&#8217;s<br />
5) TMP- It&#8217;s the 70s so we can only assume they intened to show rank based on the size one&#8217;s genitals appeared.  The Rad-suit was a cool design.  The &#8220;leasure/casual&#8221; stype shirt that Kirk wears with the sort of open colar is something that should have survived.</p>
<p>The others are in there.  The Star Trek:Insurrection uniforms were sort of like a crosee between DS9 uniforms and TWOK.  The Full dress uniform also was improved from what was seen in TNG.  TNG was supposed to probabny harken back to the Red Movie Era uniform&#8230;but its length looked ridiculous&#8230;like a dress.  They should have kept the Movie Unifroms as Mess Dess in TNG&#8230;it is fitting with custom to base such uniforms on past designs.</p>
<p>The TOS Full dress uniform was pretty good, however, it was never seen again.  </p>
<p>Star Fleet awards were seen worn in TOS and and ST:VI TUC (worn by the admirals likely to evoke Col Oliver North and the various Pentagon/Nato Generals that made lots of appearances during the cold war.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jay-ceperley</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2007/07/14/interview-with-nicholas-meyer/comment-page-2/#comment-159395</link>
		<dc:creator>jay-ceperley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 06:32:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2007/07/14/interview-with-nicholas-meyer/#comment-159395</guid>
		<description>I think that without Mr. Meyer&#039;s genius, there would be no Trek today. The franchaise would have died out in the early 80&#039;s, right after TMP. And it&#039;s great to see someone who contributed so much, to speak with such enthusiastically about it. And I must say that he&#039;s way too right on a lot of what he was saying, especially when the question of updating his movies with CGI or whatever (I&#039;ve never understood why some directors feel they have to take new technology and cover up old films, although I do prefer the director&#039;s edition of TMP over the original, but that&#039;s because all the new stuff was planned and would have been done if they had delayed it&#039;s release). 

Also, I didn&#039;t know that he was friends with Mr. Abrams (or at least his dad). I would love it if Mr. Abrams brought Mr. Meyer in to help out on the new, even as a consultant or another executive producer. I&#039;m pretty certain that if he didn&#039;t decide to direct, than Mr. Meyer would have been the top choice to helm the film.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that without Mr. Meyer&#8217;s genius, there would be no Trek today. The franchaise would have died out in the early 80&#8217;s, right after TMP. And it&#8217;s great to see someone who contributed so much, to speak with such enthusiastically about it. And I must say that he&#8217;s way too right on a lot of what he was saying, especially when the question of updating his movies with CGI or whatever (I&#8217;ve never understood why some directors feel they have to take new technology and cover up old films, although I do prefer the director&#8217;s edition of TMP over the original, but that&#8217;s because all the new stuff was planned and would have been done if they had delayed it&#8217;s release). </p>
<p>Also, I didn&#8217;t know that he was friends with Mr. Abrams (or at least his dad). I would love it if Mr. Abrams brought Mr. Meyer in to help out on the new, even as a consultant or another executive producer. I&#8217;m pretty certain that if he didn&#8217;t decide to direct, than Mr. Meyer would have been the top choice to helm the film.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mctrekkie</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2007/07/14/interview-with-nicholas-meyer/comment-page-2/#comment-159062</link>
		<dc:creator>mctrekkie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2007 23:34:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2007/07/14/interview-with-nicholas-meyer/#comment-159062</guid>
		<description>Hitch 1969- Funny

I have not heard that phrase since my ole &#039;grandpappie used to say &quot;Fattie -boom-a-laddie&quot; and he was right off the boat from Ireland.

Anyhow, she was half- Romulon., and Saavik just probably ended up eating in the same place that Pardec does. she&#039;d be thin if she were like, T&#039;Savvick or something.

jack #71-

yeah I made the point in an earlier post that Meyter claimed how he&#039;d some in under such a small budget- but there were many rehashed effects. (space office suite becomes regula1 station, etc)

Everyone bashed TMP for being way over budget, but it had to CARRY ALL of the previous pre-productions- The prior  70&#039;s canceled movies (I think 2! AND the Phase II budget) so, really shame on  the suits at Paramount for being so disingenuous in the early 80&#039;s and making Meyer work with spit and bailing wire.. 

I&#039;m surprised they didn&#039;t just turn the Bug E upside down and call that the Reliant!

As an aside- I am fascinated by how many here appear to have read the TMP novel (and say so without shame!).

Oh, and the whole telling stories visually thing- 

Re Trek VI-
Dear Nick, we get it- the Enterprise is in a hurry. That&#039;s why it&#039;s shaking.
No need to but a big F&#039;ing red Sony 80&#039;s clock above the view screen. 

Directors.

Any excuse for a countdown, a useless large, slow vent fan, or a crane shot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hitch 1969- Funny</p>
<p>I have not heard that phrase since my ole &#8216;grandpappie used to say &#8220;Fattie -boom-a-laddie&#8221; and he was right off the boat from Ireland.</p>
<p>Anyhow, she was half- Romulon., and Saavik just probably ended up eating in the same place that Pardec does. she&#8217;d be thin if she were like, T&#8217;Savvick or something.</p>
<p>jack #71-</p>
<p>yeah I made the point in an earlier post that Meyter claimed how he&#8217;d some in under such a small budget- but there were many rehashed effects. (space office suite becomes regula1 station, etc)</p>
<p>Everyone bashed TMP for being way over budget, but it had to CARRY ALL of the previous pre-productions- The prior  70&#8217;s canceled movies (I think 2! AND the Phase II budget) so, really shame on  the suits at Paramount for being so disingenuous in the early 80&#8217;s and making Meyer work with spit and bailing wire.. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m surprised they didn&#8217;t just turn the Bug E upside down and call that the Reliant!</p>
<p>As an aside- I am fascinated by how many here appear to have read the TMP novel (and say so without shame!).</p>
<p>Oh, and the whole telling stories visually thing- </p>
<p>Re Trek VI-<br />
Dear Nick, we get it- the Enterprise is in a hurry. That&#8217;s why it&#8217;s shaking.<br />
No need to but a big F&#8217;ing red Sony 80&#8217;s clock above the view screen. </p>
<p>Directors.</p>
<p>Any excuse for a countdown, a useless large, slow vent fan, or a crane shot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack Plotner</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2007/07/14/interview-with-nicholas-meyer/comment-page-2/#comment-158946</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack Plotner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2007 21:09:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2007/07/14/interview-with-nicholas-meyer/#comment-158946</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t know if someone already mentioned it already, but I have always had a problem with the re-used special effects from STTMP being re-used as the space dock in TWOK. It has always put me out of the movie for a moment, because I know they are from the fist picture. The dialog clearly says space dock, but it is really a refitting station.
  I was hopping for the Meyers Directors Cut, like Mr.Wise&#039;s beatiful redo of film STTMP(though still to many cooks in the kitchen problems). Mr. Meyer would put in a nice CGI shot of the big E coming from the same space dock seen in Star Trek III and all the following film/TV series ect.. This is just a geeks dream of course. I believe Mr. Meyer did not have the budget to do those shots and re-used shots and un-used shots from the first film to come out within budget. So since this film gave Paramount a fatter golden egg to sponge off of, I think a small budget should be allowed for him to redo those shots with a good CBS-/Daren R. Dochterman team.
   This would also bolster sales of the up coming HD release as something to make fans like me want to buy it again. The rest of the movie is still perfect by the way, only those few shots really bugged me to no end for years. Please hear my cry or moan.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know if someone already mentioned it already, but I have always had a problem with the re-used special effects from STTMP being re-used as the space dock in TWOK. It has always put me out of the movie for a moment, because I know they are from the fist picture. The dialog clearly says space dock, but it is really a refitting station.<br />
  I was hopping for the Meyers Directors Cut, like Mr.Wise&#8217;s beatiful redo of film STTMP(though still to many cooks in the kitchen problems). Mr. Meyer would put in a nice CGI shot of the big E coming from the same space dock seen in Star Trek III and all the following film/TV series ect.. This is just a geeks dream of course. I believe Mr. Meyer did not have the budget to do those shots and re-used shots and un-used shots from the first film to come out within budget. So since this film gave Paramount a fatter golden egg to sponge off of, I think a small budget should be allowed for him to redo those shots with a good CBS-/Daren R. Dochterman team.<br />
   This would also bolster sales of the up coming HD release as something to make fans like me want to buy it again. The rest of the movie is still perfect by the way, only those few shots really bugged me to no end for years. Please hear my cry or moan.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hitch1969©</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2007/07/14/interview-with-nicholas-meyer/comment-page-2/#comment-158880</link>
		<dc:creator>hitch1969©</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2007 19:41:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2007/07/14/interview-with-nicholas-meyer/#comment-158880</guid>
		<description>Kirstey Alley was never as skinny again as she was in that movie. I think that this was about the time she got off the coke. 

Well shes been a phattybooom battie ever since. Ever seen a fat chick Vulcan? I think that the part might have become too good for her. 

And that&#039;s the message to all the little girls out there reading this - Stay on the coke. Rehab is for quitters. And plumpers are not sexy at all, let alone good hot Vulcan chicks. Binge and purge and stay on the coke, gals. I&#039;m going to respect you more that way.

best!!

=h=</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kirstey Alley was never as skinny again as she was in that movie. I think that this was about the time she got off the coke. </p>
<p>Well shes been a phattybooom battie ever since. Ever seen a fat chick Vulcan? I think that the part might have become too good for her. </p>
<p>And that&#8217;s the message to all the little girls out there reading this &#8211; Stay on the coke. Rehab is for quitters. And plumpers are not sexy at all, let alone good hot Vulcan chicks. Binge and purge and stay on the coke, gals. I&#8217;m going to respect you more that way.</p>
<p>best!!</p>
<p>=h=</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TomBot2007</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2007/07/14/interview-with-nicholas-meyer/comment-page-2/#comment-158843</link>
		<dc:creator>TomBot2007</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2007 18:59:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2007/07/14/interview-with-nicholas-meyer/#comment-158843</guid>
		<description>*yawn* Uniforms... uniforms.. if TWOK had been made with the TMP uniforms or some varient of, would it have made much difference, except budgetary? ;-) I also don&#039;t get the big hoopla about the kitchen on a starship... As for some of the corny stuff in TUC... a lot of it follows the &quot;show me don&#039;t tell me rule&quot; of cinema.  I&#039;ve also had the sneaky suspicion all these years that Ms. Alley felt she was too &quot;good&quot; for Star Trek and that TWOK was just a stepping stone to elsewhere. 
It will be interesting to see how JJ affects the Star Trek franchise... heh, heh.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>*yawn* Uniforms&#8230; uniforms.. if TWOK had been made with the TMP uniforms or some varient of, would it have made much difference, except budgetary? ;-) I also don&#8217;t get the big hoopla about the kitchen on a starship&#8230; As for some of the corny stuff in TUC&#8230; a lot of it follows the &#8220;show me don&#8217;t tell me rule&#8221; of cinema.  I&#8217;ve also had the sneaky suspicion all these years that Ms. Alley felt she was too &#8220;good&#8221; for Star Trek and that TWOK was just a stepping stone to elsewhere.<br />
It will be interesting to see how JJ affects the Star Trek franchise&#8230; heh, heh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
