


<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Comic Con: Video of JJ Abrams Star Trek Panel</title>
	<atom:link href="http://trekmovie.com/2007/07/26/comic-con-video-of-jj-abrams-star-trek-panel/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://trekmovie.com/2007/07/26/comic-con-video-of-jj-abrams-star-trek-panel/</link>
	<description>the source for Star Trek news and information</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 12:30:13 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Kaye Irene</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2007/07/26/comic-con-video-of-jj-abrams-star-trek-panel/comment-page-3/#comment-191446</link>
		<dc:creator>Kaye Irene</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Aug 2007 01:29:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2007/07/26/comic-con-video-of-jj-abrams-star-trek-panel/#comment-191446</guid>
		<description>Vulcans live more than 150 years so only Nimoy &quot;Spock&quot; will be available in present stardate. i hope we can see the Romulan-Federation Peace Treaty after Nemesis which Spock is greatly involved because he is staying at Romulus in present stardate. I think the movie is more on like this and then Spock will tell a story and then flashback early missions with Kirk and the TOS Crew. It&#039;s more like what&#039;s happening to Spock after 90 years then currently living in Romulus and then remembering his untold memorable days with the TOS crew. As JJ said we should respect the continuity and canon of Star Trek so i think it will be hard for Shat to appear in this movie. We all love Shat but we should respect the storyline because i love all Star Trek Series TOS, TNG, DS9, VOY and little ENT. The continuity is the only thing that hooked me in watching Star Trek because it makes the storyline rich and expandable. After this movie they should consider creating new Star Trek at present star date after TNG/VOY era with new capt, new ship, new crew and new gadgets to continue the story.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Vulcans live more than 150 years so only Nimoy &#8220;Spock&#8221; will be available in present stardate. i hope we can see the Romulan-Federation Peace Treaty after Nemesis which Spock is greatly involved because he is staying at Romulus in present stardate. I think the movie is more on like this and then Spock will tell a story and then flashback early missions with Kirk and the TOS Crew. It&#8217;s more like what&#8217;s happening to Spock after 90 years then currently living in Romulus and then remembering his untold memorable days with the TOS crew. As JJ said we should respect the continuity and canon of Star Trek so i think it will be hard for Shat to appear in this movie. We all love Shat but we should respect the storyline because i love all Star Trek Series TOS, TNG, DS9, VOY and little ENT. The continuity is the only thing that hooked me in watching Star Trek because it makes the storyline rich and expandable. After this movie they should consider creating new Star Trek at present star date after TNG/VOY era with new capt, new ship, new crew and new gadgets to continue the story.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RaGhul</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2007/07/26/comic-con-video-of-jj-abrams-star-trek-panel/comment-page-3/#comment-172252</link>
		<dc:creator>RaGhul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jul 2007 04:23:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2007/07/26/comic-con-video-of-jj-abrams-star-trek-panel/#comment-172252</guid>
		<description>#144
#147

I echo that. It&#039;s nice when we can keep things civil. But alot of times, these threads turn into a written version of a &quot;Jerry Springer&quot; episode.

Then again... Springer can be VERY entertaining. :P</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#144<br />
#147</p>
<p>I echo that. It&#8217;s nice when we can keep things civil. But alot of times, these threads turn into a written version of a &#8220;Jerry Springer&#8221; episode.</p>
<p>Then again&#8230; Springer can be VERY entertaining. :P</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RaGhul</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2007/07/26/comic-con-video-of-jj-abrams-star-trek-panel/comment-page-3/#comment-172249</link>
		<dc:creator>RaGhul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jul 2007 04:22:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2007/07/26/comic-con-video-of-jj-abrams-star-trek-panel/#comment-172249</guid>
		<description>#144
#147

I echo that. It&#039;s nice when we can keep things civil. But alot of times, these threads turn into a written &quot;Jerry Springer&quot; episode.

Then again... Springer can be VERY entertaining. :P</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#144<br />
#147</p>
<p>I echo that. It&#8217;s nice when we can keep things civil. But alot of times, these threads turn into a written &#8220;Jerry Springer&#8221; episode.</p>
<p>Then again&#8230; Springer can be VERY entertaining. :P</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Xai</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2007/07/26/comic-con-video-of-jj-abrams-star-trek-panel/comment-page-3/#comment-171980</link>
		<dc:creator>Xai</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jul 2007 21:48:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2007/07/26/comic-con-video-of-jj-abrams-star-trek-panel/#comment-171980</guid>
		<description>First they gotta sign him and I don&#039;t think it&#039;s for lack of trying. But we&#039;ll see....

#144 Billhardin22
Thanks, for echoing the opinion and a good mention in another or your posts. 
LLAP</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First they gotta sign him and I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s for lack of trying. But we&#8217;ll see&#8230;.</p>
<p>#144 Billhardin22<br />
Thanks, for echoing the opinion and a good mention in another or your posts.<br />
LLAP</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shatner_Fan_2000</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2007/07/26/comic-con-video-of-jj-abrams-star-trek-panel/comment-page-3/#comment-171954</link>
		<dc:creator>Shatner_Fan_2000</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jul 2007 21:17:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2007/07/26/comic-con-video-of-jj-abrams-star-trek-panel/#comment-171954</guid>
		<description>#145: &quot;WHY? Hey, Shatner’s a great actor, no doubt. But it’s kinda like Ford stepping in Indy’s shoes again for one last ride. Does he really need to milk the cow for one more paycheck?&quot;

YES. In both cases. Indiana Jones returning is a GREAT idea, since that character was always very vulnerable and human, and was shown in the tv series to have adventures spanning many decades. Come next spring, Spielberg, Lucas and Ford are gonna show all the heartless wanna-be action franchises how it&#039;s done!

As for Shatner as Kirk, Nimoy is back as Spock, so why the hell not? Shatner looks great for his age and is still a great performer, arguably better than he&#039;s ever been. And if you don&#039;t like the Nexus (and I don&#039;t blame you for that), how about a little device known as The Guardian of Forever? Or simply some powerful new alien technology? The writers should be able to come up with SOMETHING.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#145: &#8220;WHY? Hey, Shatner’s a great actor, no doubt. But it’s kinda like Ford stepping in Indy’s shoes again for one last ride. Does he really need to milk the cow for one more paycheck?&#8221;</p>
<p>YES. In both cases. Indiana Jones returning is a GREAT idea, since that character was always very vulnerable and human, and was shown in the tv series to have adventures spanning many decades. Come next spring, Spielberg, Lucas and Ford are gonna show all the heartless wanna-be action franchises how it&#8217;s done!</p>
<p>As for Shatner as Kirk, Nimoy is back as Spock, so why the hell not? Shatner looks great for his age and is still a great performer, arguably better than he&#8217;s ever been. And if you don&#8217;t like the Nexus (and I don&#8217;t blame you for that), how about a little device known as The Guardian of Forever? Or simply some powerful new alien technology? The writers should be able to come up with SOMETHING.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RaGhul</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2007/07/26/comic-con-video-of-jj-abrams-star-trek-panel/comment-page-3/#comment-171476</link>
		<dc:creator>RaGhul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jul 2007 04:56:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2007/07/26/comic-con-video-of-jj-abrams-star-trek-panel/#comment-171476</guid>
		<description>Okay.... first of all:

WHY DO WE NEED TO RESURRECT CAPPY KIRK?
Alot of the thread&#039;s discussion has turned to &quot;How can Kirk be included in the next film?&quot;

I know most of you are jumping on this because of a very brief comment by Abrams, but don&#039;t let your anticipation get the better of you. None of us REALLY knows what they&#039;re up to. Truth is, I doubt THEY (the producers, writers, etc.) know either. It&#039;s common knowledge that scripts get edited right up to filming, and sometimes scripts are even re-written in the middle of the shoot!

My comments are what I&#039;d LIKE to see, not what I EXPECT to see. If you want to speculate, feel free. But make an effort to go outside every now and then and get some fresh air. Don&#039;t lock yourself up in a closet pondering Star Trek XI for the next year and a half.

But... back to Kirk.
WHY? Hey, Shatner&#039;s a great actor, no doubt. But it&#039;s kinda like Ford stepping in Indy&#039;s shoes again for one last ride. Does he really need to milk the cow for one more paycheck? It reminds me of that skit from &quot;In Living Color&quot; where the crew of the Enterprise are all on the bridge in wheelchairs and canes! C&#039;mon, people...

And most of the ideas for bringing him back involve the NEXUS. Are you shitting me? The NEXUS?? It was a sad plot device in Generations. Do we really want THAT?

Oh, and as for the &quot;Spock is reflecting on his life&quot; bit:
That may very well be their plans for Nimoy. And if so, it&#039;s quite sad. For it&#039;s a worn-out idea that&#039;s been recycled more than McDonald&#039;s hamburger meat. But more importantly, with Nimoy looking back on the past, that makes for a future that&#039;s set in stone. In other words, what would change? What are we looking forward to here?

Let&#039;s do a TRUE reboot, that doesn&#039;t totally blasphemy Star Trek, but at least puts a twist on it. I love the amazing job the cast and crew of Smallville have done. For me, it&#039;s the best treatment of Superman thus far.

Otherwise...  &quot;Spock remembering the past...&quot; will be like the Star Wars prequels. &quot;Oh, is that Anakin guy gonna turn into Darth Vader?&quot; &quot;Oooh, who&#039;s this Darth Sidious? Is he that Emperor guy from the first trilogy?&quot;

We already knew, so we didn&#039;t care.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay&#8230;. first of all:</p>
<p>WHY DO WE NEED TO RESURRECT CAPPY KIRK?<br />
Alot of the thread&#8217;s discussion has turned to &#8220;How can Kirk be included in the next film?&#8221;</p>
<p>I know most of you are jumping on this because of a very brief comment by Abrams, but don&#8217;t let your anticipation get the better of you. None of us REALLY knows what they&#8217;re up to. Truth is, I doubt THEY (the producers, writers, etc.) know either. It&#8217;s common knowledge that scripts get edited right up to filming, and sometimes scripts are even re-written in the middle of the shoot!</p>
<p>My comments are what I&#8217;d LIKE to see, not what I EXPECT to see. If you want to speculate, feel free. But make an effort to go outside every now and then and get some fresh air. Don&#8217;t lock yourself up in a closet pondering Star Trek XI for the next year and a half.</p>
<p>But&#8230; back to Kirk.<br />
WHY? Hey, Shatner&#8217;s a great actor, no doubt. But it&#8217;s kinda like Ford stepping in Indy&#8217;s shoes again for one last ride. Does he really need to milk the cow for one more paycheck? It reminds me of that skit from &#8220;In Living Color&#8221; where the crew of the Enterprise are all on the bridge in wheelchairs and canes! C&#8217;mon, people&#8230;</p>
<p>And most of the ideas for bringing him back involve the NEXUS. Are you shitting me? The NEXUS?? It was a sad plot device in Generations. Do we really want THAT?</p>
<p>Oh, and as for the &#8220;Spock is reflecting on his life&#8221; bit:<br />
That may very well be their plans for Nimoy. And if so, it&#8217;s quite sad. For it&#8217;s a worn-out idea that&#8217;s been recycled more than McDonald&#8217;s hamburger meat. But more importantly, with Nimoy looking back on the past, that makes for a future that&#8217;s set in stone. In other words, what would change? What are we looking forward to here?</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s do a TRUE reboot, that doesn&#8217;t totally blasphemy Star Trek, but at least puts a twist on it. I love the amazing job the cast and crew of Smallville have done. For me, it&#8217;s the best treatment of Superman thus far.</p>
<p>Otherwise&#8230;  &#8220;Spock remembering the past&#8230;&#8221; will be like the Star Wars prequels. &#8220;Oh, is that Anakin guy gonna turn into Darth Vader?&#8221; &#8220;Oooh, who&#8217;s this Darth Sidious? Is he that Emperor guy from the first trilogy?&#8221;</p>
<p>We already knew, so we didn&#8217;t care.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: billhardin22</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2007/07/26/comic-con-video-of-jj-abrams-star-trek-panel/comment-page-3/#comment-171381</link>
		<dc:creator>billhardin22</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jul 2007 02:37:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2007/07/26/comic-con-video-of-jj-abrams-star-trek-panel/#comment-171381</guid>
		<description>#138 Shadow 6283

You know, I&#039;ve been Trekking for 40 years myself.  You are one of the posters who needs to be less critical and more accepting of  the opinions of others.

You may disagree, but rudeness is really not becoming.

As Xai suggests, the condescension is really wearing thin.

Try adopting the style of Flying Tigress. I can handle differing opinions.

If you are my age, you should be able to as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#138 Shadow 6283</p>
<p>You know, I&#8217;ve been Trekking for 40 years myself.  You are one of the posters who needs to be less critical and more accepting of  the opinions of others.</p>
<p>You may disagree, but rudeness is really not becoming.</p>
<p>As Xai suggests, the condescension is really wearing thin.</p>
<p>Try adopting the style of Flying Tigress. I can handle differing opinions.</p>
<p>If you are my age, you should be able to as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Xai</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2007/07/26/comic-con-video-of-jj-abrams-star-trek-panel/comment-page-3/#comment-171086</link>
		<dc:creator>Xai</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jul 2007 20:32:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2007/07/26/comic-con-video-of-jj-abrams-star-trek-panel/#comment-171086</guid>
		<description>#127 Shadow6283

I am sure you are the hit of your neighborhood with your &quot;40 years of Trekking&quot; and the condescending attitude.... but it&#039;s now a yawner. Try respecting others opinions and comments without the stomp and heel-grind. Even you may surprised what you may learn.

VOODOO...
  Hey, thanks for the compliments. You and I have differing opinions of some things Trek, but not all. I was pleased and surprised by your kind comments. Thanks again.
LLAP.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#127 Shadow6283</p>
<p>I am sure you are the hit of your neighborhood with your &#8220;40 years of Trekking&#8221; and the condescending attitude&#8230;. but it&#8217;s now a yawner. Try respecting others opinions and comments without the stomp and heel-grind. Even you may surprised what you may learn.</p>
<p>VOODOO&#8230;<br />
  Hey, thanks for the compliments. You and I have differing opinions of some things Trek, but not all. I was pleased and surprised by your kind comments. Thanks again.<br />
LLAP.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg2600</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2007/07/26/comic-con-video-of-jj-abrams-star-trek-panel/comment-page-3/#comment-170979</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg2600</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jul 2007 18:05:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2007/07/26/comic-con-video-of-jj-abrams-star-trek-panel/#comment-170979</guid>
		<description>I really do feel like getting Nimoy and Shatner, and only having them do a flashback, would be a bummer for me.  But if they were to do that, they should at least place it after Generations (Enterprise-B), having a scroll on the bottom saying &quot;300 years in the future&quot; (aka 2308).  And not use CGI on them,  or very little.  That way, you bring back Kirk and Spock for the fans, give the dignity to the actors by not CGI&#039;ing them.  If they choose to set the flashback moment before Generations, with CGI, it&#039;s going to look like Riker and Troi in Enterprise finale (ridiculous).  If you set it after Generations 2371 where Spock is mourning the death of Kirk, what does that give?  A lot of angry BBKers and Berman bashers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really do feel like getting Nimoy and Shatner, and only having them do a flashback, would be a bummer for me.  But if they were to do that, they should at least place it after Generations (Enterprise-B), having a scroll on the bottom saying &#8220;300 years in the future&#8221; (aka 2308).  And not use CGI on them,  or very little.  That way, you bring back Kirk and Spock for the fans, give the dignity to the actors by not CGI&#8217;ing them.  If they choose to set the flashback moment before Generations, with CGI, it&#8217;s going to look like Riker and Troi in Enterprise finale (ridiculous).  If you set it after Generations 2371 where Spock is mourning the death of Kirk, what does that give?  A lot of angry BBKers and Berman bashers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nostromo</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2007/07/26/comic-con-video-of-jj-abrams-star-trek-panel/comment-page-3/#comment-170773</link>
		<dc:creator>Nostromo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jul 2007 14:01:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2007/07/26/comic-con-video-of-jj-abrams-star-trek-panel/#comment-170773</guid>
		<description>My gut feeling about this is that the &#039;Nimoy as Spock&#039; cameo will be a brief, framing appearance not a fully fledged storyline in its own right; and that the difficulty in introducing Kirk, therefore, is having to explain how he came to be alive: it introduces a requirement for awkward exposition into a sequence that is primarily intended to be short and nostalgic.

Obviously we won&#039;t know anything for sure until much further down the road.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My gut feeling about this is that the &#8216;Nimoy as Spock&#8217; cameo will be a brief, framing appearance not a fully fledged storyline in its own right; and that the difficulty in introducing Kirk, therefore, is having to explain how he came to be alive: it introduces a requirement for awkward exposition into a sequence that is primarily intended to be short and nostalgic.</p>
<p>Obviously we won&#8217;t know anything for sure until much further down the road.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
