


<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CBS Testing Remastering TNG in HD</title>
	<atom:link href="http://trekmovie.com/2007/07/27/cbs-testing-remastering-tng/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://trekmovie.com/2007/07/27/cbs-testing-remastering-tng/</link>
	<description>the source for Star Trek news and information</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 07:18:37 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Larry Wilson</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2007/07/27/cbs-testing-remastering-tng/comment-page-3/#comment-2230175</link>
		<dc:creator>Larry Wilson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2009 17:06:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2007/07/27/cbs-testing-remastering-tng/#comment-2230175</guid>
		<description>Actually, James, only &quot;Enterprise&quot; won&#039;t need to be remastered. That will most likely be the next series to show up on Blu-Ray, since it&#039;s the one they can get out the door immediately. It was produced in an HD-ready format from the beginning.

However, though, I would rather they did release the other shows. I never liked &quot;Enterprise.&quot; It seemed to me that Paramount knew they had a turd on their hands, which was why they didn&#039;t put the &quot;Star Trek&quot; name on it, then when it was about to be axed, they did in the hopes that its being a &quot;Star Trek&quot; series would save it.

I hope that if CBS DIgital takes the TNG project on, they will do a better job with it than they did with TOS. As good as it was, there were certainly some missed opportunities. I certainly hoped that the ships would have had greater detail, like &quot;Aztec Panels.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, James, only &#8220;Enterprise&#8221; won&#8217;t need to be remastered. That will most likely be the next series to show up on Blu-Ray, since it&#8217;s the one they can get out the door immediately. It was produced in an HD-ready format from the beginning.</p>
<p>However, though, I would rather they did release the other shows. I never liked &#8220;Enterprise.&#8221; It seemed to me that Paramount knew they had a turd on their hands, which was why they didn&#8217;t put the &#8220;Star Trek&#8221; name on it, then when it was about to be axed, they did in the hopes that its being a &#8220;Star Trek&#8221; series would save it.</p>
<p>I hope that if CBS DIgital takes the TNG project on, they will do a better job with it than they did with TOS. As good as it was, there were certainly some missed opportunities. I certainly hoped that the ships would have had greater detail, like &#8220;Aztec Panels.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Borne</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2007/07/27/cbs-testing-remastering-tng/comment-page-3/#comment-1877977</link>
		<dc:creator>Borne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 14:42:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2007/07/27/cbs-testing-remastering-tng/#comment-1877977</guid>
		<description>definitely need some more variety in the vfx shots, i found the re-use of stock footage to be far too irritating. the added variety to TOS-R i beleive was one of its strongest points... TNG-R needs more ship classes, a few less excelsiors, a lot less mirandas, replace the oberths with other vessels, get some beauty shots whenever the main action takes place on another vessel such as the USS Hathaway... the constellation class was a great model but it wasn&#039;t shot very well. Show us the contemporary starships, such as the ambassador and the nebula classes... even a few new designs would be good. New designs for alien ships as opposed to constant reuse of that triangular one that turned up every other week with a different species on board. New matte paintings, new designs of spacedocks... stop reusing elements from the movies. nostalgia is fine, but to reuse those elements out of budgetary constraints makes the whole TNG era look run down as if there&#039;s been hardly any starships built in 70 years</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>definitely need some more variety in the vfx shots, i found the re-use of stock footage to be far too irritating. the added variety to TOS-R i beleive was one of its strongest points&#8230; TNG-R needs more ship classes, a few less excelsiors, a lot less mirandas, replace the oberths with other vessels, get some beauty shots whenever the main action takes place on another vessel such as the USS Hathaway&#8230; the constellation class was a great model but it wasn&#8217;t shot very well. Show us the contemporary starships, such as the ambassador and the nebula classes&#8230; even a few new designs would be good. New designs for alien ships as opposed to constant reuse of that triangular one that turned up every other week with a different species on board. New matte paintings, new designs of spacedocks&#8230; stop reusing elements from the movies. nostalgia is fine, but to reuse those elements out of budgetary constraints makes the whole TNG era look run down as if there&#8217;s been hardly any starships built in 70 years</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ethics</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2007/07/27/cbs-testing-remastering-tng/comment-page-3/#comment-1745787</link>
		<dc:creator>ethics</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 09:28:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2007/07/27/cbs-testing-remastering-tng/#comment-1745787</guid>
		<description>I would buy a HD TNG in a heartbeat.  Price means nothing</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would buy a HD TNG in a heartbeat.  Price means nothing</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Capt. of U.S.S. Hamburg</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2007/07/27/cbs-testing-remastering-tng/comment-page-3/#comment-1495571</link>
		<dc:creator>Capt. of U.S.S. Hamburg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 17:47:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2007/07/27/cbs-testing-remastering-tng/#comment-1495571</guid>
		<description>does anyone know which episode the test episode was?? I think maybe sometime it would come as a bonus on a enterprise blueray set... hopefully

live long and prosper
Lebe lang und in Frieden</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>does anyone know which episode the test episode was?? I think maybe sometime it would come as a bonus on a enterprise blueray set&#8230; hopefully</p>
<p>live long and prosper<br />
Lebe lang und in Frieden</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2007/07/27/cbs-testing-remastering-tng/comment-page-3/#comment-1489688</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 04:35:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2007/07/27/cbs-testing-remastering-tng/#comment-1489688</guid>
		<description>If they were to redo TNG, especially seasons 1 and 2, with new FX, especially the planets and a few other bits, that would make my year.  I&#039;d buy those seasons.  I&#039;m holding off on TNG for the HD Remastered versions.  DS9, VOY, and ENT don&#039;t really need the remastering process as much as TNG (early seasons) do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If they were to redo TNG, especially seasons 1 and 2, with new FX, especially the planets and a few other bits, that would make my year.  I&#8217;d buy those seasons.  I&#8217;m holding off on TNG for the HD Remastered versions.  DS9, VOY, and ENT don&#8217;t really need the remastering process as much as TNG (early seasons) do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fek'Leyr Targ</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2007/07/27/cbs-testing-remastering-tng/comment-page-3/#comment-991947</link>
		<dc:creator>Fek'Leyr Targ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 08:28:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2007/07/27/cbs-testing-remastering-tng/#comment-991947</guid>
		<description>Sounds cool.
But please don&#039;t alter the scenes like you did in TOS. Just bring TNG to HD.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sounds cool.<br />
But please don&#8217;t alter the scenes like you did in TOS. Just bring TNG to HD.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Me</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2007/07/27/cbs-testing-remastering-tng/comment-page-3/#comment-204503</link>
		<dc:creator>Me</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2007 10:41:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2007/07/27/cbs-testing-remastering-tng/#comment-204503</guid>
		<description>Is it the 1st of April already.

They ruined TOS, now they&#039;re going after TNG.  What next DS9, VOY &amp; ENT.  Just to fit in with current TV standards.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is it the 1st of April already.</p>
<p>They ruined TOS, now they&#8217;re going after TNG.  What next DS9, VOY &amp; ENT.  Just to fit in with current TV standards.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jamie</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2007/07/27/cbs-testing-remastering-tng/comment-page-3/#comment-197518</link>
		<dc:creator>Jamie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Aug 2007 17:57:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2007/07/27/cbs-testing-remastering-tng/#comment-197518</guid>
		<description>Someone asked if anyone had seen Trek DVDs on an HD screen. I&#039;ve had an HD screen for 3 years now, and have been watching everything on it, including digital broadcasts of TOS. Nothing looks bad on an HD screen, you just realise how much better everything could be.

But I have to say, good quality DVDs do look pretty good on an HD screen. They&#039;re not HD, but there is plenty of resolution. They look distinctly better than broadcast quality digital TV. I haven&#039;t seen HD on my own screen yet, but I&#039;ve seen it in the shops and it doesn&#039;t wow me THAT much. There isn&#039;t a massive difference at normal viewing distance, in my opinion. But that is just my opinion, most people who have subscribed to HD channels say it&#039;s loads better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Someone asked if anyone had seen Trek DVDs on an HD screen. I&#8217;ve had an HD screen for 3 years now, and have been watching everything on it, including digital broadcasts of TOS. Nothing looks bad on an HD screen, you just realise how much better everything could be.</p>
<p>But I have to say, good quality DVDs do look pretty good on an HD screen. They&#8217;re not HD, but there is plenty of resolution. They look distinctly better than broadcast quality digital TV. I haven&#8217;t seen HD on my own screen yet, but I&#8217;ve seen it in the shops and it doesn&#8217;t wow me THAT much. There isn&#8217;t a massive difference at normal viewing distance, in my opinion. But that is just my opinion, most people who have subscribed to HD channels say it&#8217;s loads better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jamie</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2007/07/27/cbs-testing-remastering-tng/comment-page-3/#comment-194427</link>
		<dc:creator>Jamie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2007 11:54:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2007/07/27/cbs-testing-remastering-tng/#comment-194427</guid>
		<description>Space stations visible around the earth?

&quot;Always when the Enterprise orbits Earth, we never see any spacedocks, orbital stations, drydocks, etc.&quot;

To be visible around the earth, a space station would have to be hundreds of miles long, at the very least. All the Trek space stations we&#039;ve seen are nowhere near that kind of size! They&#039;re about a mile, at most.

There could be thousands of &quot;DS9-size&quot; space stations orbiting the Earth, but the chance of them happening to be visible in any particular shot of Earth is practically zero. There&#039;s no way you&#039;d see them. The only reason you see the Enterprise when it&#039;s orbiting a planet is because the camera is looking in exactly the right place. If the camera moved a few hundred miles in any other direction, the Enterprise would just look like another star in space.

Think of it like this: if you stand in a big city, you can see all these huge buildings around you. Huge buildings the size of space stations. If you fly up over the city in a plane, those huge buildings start to get quite small. If you fly really high into space, those buildings will be no more than dots. And finally, if you fly 10,000 miles up so you can look at the Earth, there is absolutely no way you could see anything the size of a large building. You&#039;d be able to make out small countries, and that&#039;s it.

Or, imagine DS9 was sat on Earth and you were standing next to it. It would be huge. Then, imagine it flew up into the night sky. After a few hundred miles up, it would just be another dot among the stars. After 10,000 miles it would be utterly insignificant and possibly invisible.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Space stations visible around the earth?</p>
<p>&#8220;Always when the Enterprise orbits Earth, we never see any spacedocks, orbital stations, drydocks, etc.&#8221;</p>
<p>To be visible around the earth, a space station would have to be hundreds of miles long, at the very least. All the Trek space stations we&#8217;ve seen are nowhere near that kind of size! They&#8217;re about a mile, at most.</p>
<p>There could be thousands of &#8220;DS9-size&#8221; space stations orbiting the Earth, but the chance of them happening to be visible in any particular shot of Earth is practically zero. There&#8217;s no way you&#8217;d see them. The only reason you see the Enterprise when it&#8217;s orbiting a planet is because the camera is looking in exactly the right place. If the camera moved a few hundred miles in any other direction, the Enterprise would just look like another star in space.</p>
<p>Think of it like this: if you stand in a big city, you can see all these huge buildings around you. Huge buildings the size of space stations. If you fly up over the city in a plane, those huge buildings start to get quite small. If you fly really high into space, those buildings will be no more than dots. And finally, if you fly 10,000 miles up so you can look at the Earth, there is absolutely no way you could see anything the size of a large building. You&#8217;d be able to make out small countries, and that&#8217;s it.</p>
<p>Or, imagine DS9 was sat on Earth and you were standing next to it. It would be huge. Then, imagine it flew up into the night sky. After a few hundred miles up, it would just be another dot among the stars. After 10,000 miles it would be utterly insignificant and possibly invisible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The UK Shark</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2007/07/27/cbs-testing-remastering-tng/comment-page-3/#comment-193602</link>
		<dc:creator>The UK Shark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Aug 2007 16:44:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2007/07/27/cbs-testing-remastering-tng/#comment-193602</guid>
		<description>We in Europe would be glad to see a reconversion of TNG from film to high def, because you would not believe the rubbish NTSC to PAL conversion we had to put up with on this side of the pond. Even more hard to swallow, when you know they actually filmed it on celuloid in the fisrt place, and that the PAL terrortories are bigger than NTSC.
.
I would be happy for them just to remaster TNG from film, just so we
could then get a decent PAL version, as we got it from Kirk and company
30 years before...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We in Europe would be glad to see a reconversion of TNG from film to high def, because you would not believe the rubbish NTSC to PAL conversion we had to put up with on this side of the pond. Even more hard to swallow, when you know they actually filmed it on celuloid in the fisrt place, and that the PAL terrortories are bigger than NTSC.<br />
.<br />
I would be happy for them just to remaster TNG from film, just so we<br />
could then get a decent PAL version, as we got it from Kirk and company<br />
30 years before&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
