


<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New &#8216;Star Trek&#8217; Gets Big Coverage</title>
	<atom:link href="http://trekmovie.com/2007/07/30/new-star-trek-gets-big-coverage/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://trekmovie.com/2007/07/30/new-star-trek-gets-big-coverage/</link>
	<description>the source for Star Trek news and information</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 14:52:31 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Harry Ballz</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2007/07/30/new-star-trek-gets-big-coverage/comment-page-3/#comment-174672</link>
		<dc:creator>Harry Ballz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2007 18:45:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2007/07/30/new-star-trek-gets-big-coverage/#comment-174672</guid>
		<description>Fat and skinny look like drek,
and thus they must be in to Trek!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fat and skinny look like drek,<br />
and thus they must be in to Trek!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: snake</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2007/07/30/new-star-trek-gets-big-coverage/comment-page-2/#comment-174410</link>
		<dc:creator>snake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2007 11:43:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2007/07/30/new-star-trek-gets-big-coverage/#comment-174410</guid>
		<description>on a side note - just WTF is it with Trekkies or fans of Sci fi in general - seem to always look like those two? I mean WHY do they look the way they do? either real skinny and pale OR all greasy and fat?

i mean do they have no self respect? Dont they think &#039;oh man i must hit the gym/lose weight etc&#039; 

Why is it this way?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>on a side note &#8211; just WTF is it with Trekkies or fans of Sci fi in general &#8211; seem to always look like those two? I mean WHY do they look the way they do? either real skinny and pale OR all greasy and fat?</p>
<p>i mean do they have no self respect? Dont they think &#8216;oh man i must hit the gym/lose weight etc&#8217; </p>
<p>Why is it this way?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: snake</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2007/07/30/new-star-trek-gets-big-coverage/comment-page-2/#comment-174406</link>
		<dc:creator>snake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2007 11:38:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2007/07/30/new-star-trek-gets-big-coverage/#comment-174406</guid>
		<description>hey fatty - fook off...U know NOTHING

My winer has more sense than you!

Jesus how many pies did that guy have to eat to get all fat like that? bet he smells too - of that horrdid beef and onion smell..You just KNOW dont you.

Bet hes NEVER been laid too - I mean even a 10 dollar hooker would turn her nose up at that.

Also he&#039;s really stupid as well cause his opinions are just SHITE. with no basis in fact. 

so in summing up i think fatty should go fook off and do what he does best - eat some more pies

I thank you</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hey fatty &#8211; fook off&#8230;U know NOTHING</p>
<p>My winer has more sense than you!</p>
<p>Jesus how many pies did that guy have to eat to get all fat like that? bet he smells too &#8211; of that horrdid beef and onion smell..You just KNOW dont you.</p>
<p>Bet hes NEVER been laid too &#8211; I mean even a 10 dollar hooker would turn her nose up at that.</p>
<p>Also he&#8217;s really stupid as well cause his opinions are just SHITE. with no basis in fact. </p>
<p>so in summing up i think fatty should go fook off and do what he does best &#8211; eat some more pies</p>
<p>I thank you</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Londo</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2007/07/30/new-star-trek-gets-big-coverage/comment-page-2/#comment-174298</link>
		<dc:creator>Londo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2007 08:42:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2007/07/30/new-star-trek-gets-big-coverage/#comment-174298</guid>
		<description>The big fat guy in that video is such a wanker.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The big fat guy in that video is such a wanker.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: trektacular</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2007/07/30/new-star-trek-gets-big-coverage/comment-page-2/#comment-173835</link>
		<dc:creator>trektacular</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2007 23:36:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2007/07/30/new-star-trek-gets-big-coverage/#comment-173835</guid>
		<description>I totally agree with trekkie33, they need to get the sci fi back into Star Trek and most importantly explore strange new worlds.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I totally agree with trekkie33, they need to get the sci fi back into Star Trek and most importantly explore strange new worlds.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: THX-1138</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2007/07/30/new-star-trek-gets-big-coverage/comment-page-2/#comment-173748</link>
		<dc:creator>THX-1138</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2007 22:27:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2007/07/30/new-star-trek-gets-big-coverage/#comment-173748</guid>
		<description>#95

I&#039;ve said that before on another thread.  Couldn&#039;t agree more.

IMO I would prefer Arex.  M&#039;Ress reminded me of the fightin&#039; cat on ST V.
(If I&#039;m remembering my cartoon character, obscure one-off characters correctly.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#95</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve said that before on another thread.  Couldn&#8217;t agree more.</p>
<p>IMO I would prefer Arex.  M&#8217;Ress reminded me of the fightin&#8217; cat on ST V.<br />
(If I&#8217;m remembering my cartoon character, obscure one-off characters correctly.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeyl</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2007/07/30/new-star-trek-gets-big-coverage/comment-page-2/#comment-173579</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeyl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2007 19:09:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2007/07/30/new-star-trek-gets-big-coverage/#comment-173579</guid>
		<description>77. Harry Kim:
With the original series it felt like that was the FIRST Enterprise to have really made a name for itself with Kirk in command and that it was the 1st STARSHIP Enterprise - NCC 1701 - and all that followed were NCC 1701 A, B, C, D etc..(u can see all the previous Enterprises prior to the original in TNGs conference room and in The Motion Picture rec room)

That&#039;s what my problem was with the series Enterprise the moment the title falshed on the screen. The very first ship ever is called Enterprise. I did not and I still look at that as my primary reason for not getting into the series. This was as you said one of Rick&#039;s attempt to do a &quot;Sandwhich&quot; on the Star Trek franchise. Rick has been a big part of Star Trek after TOS, and now he wants to say &quot;This is how everything happens&quot; so that when people look at Star Trek, they&#039;re going to see it as a big Rick thing more than a Gene thing. Just look at what Rick did:

A. He gave &quot;Space, the final frontier&quot; an origin.
B. He alienated fans with his depiction of the Vulcans being more paranoid than logical.
C. He tried to give the enterprise ship a uniqne touch that was just dumb. It&#039;s &quot;THE Enterprise&quot;, not &quot;Enterprise&quot;.
D. He didn&#039;t include &quot;Star Trek&quot; in the title for the first couple of seasons.
E. He showed us the Romulans and cloaked Romulan ships 100 years before we even knew they looked like.
F. Did I mention the Borg and the Ferengi?

I could go on forever and I&#039;d love to, but I&#039;m off topic.

94.
I would LOVE to see M&#039;Ress too! Just not voiced by Majel Barrett (No offense ma&#039;am!)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>77. Harry Kim:<br />
With the original series it felt like that was the FIRST Enterprise to have really made a name for itself with Kirk in command and that it was the 1st STARSHIP Enterprise &#8211; NCC 1701 &#8211; and all that followed were NCC 1701 A, B, C, D etc..(u can see all the previous Enterprises prior to the original in TNGs conference room and in The Motion Picture rec room)</p>
<p>That&#8217;s what my problem was with the series Enterprise the moment the title falshed on the screen. The very first ship ever is called Enterprise. I did not and I still look at that as my primary reason for not getting into the series. This was as you said one of Rick&#8217;s attempt to do a &#8220;Sandwhich&#8221; on the Star Trek franchise. Rick has been a big part of Star Trek after TOS, and now he wants to say &#8220;This is how everything happens&#8221; so that when people look at Star Trek, they&#8217;re going to see it as a big Rick thing more than a Gene thing. Just look at what Rick did:</p>
<p>A. He gave &#8220;Space, the final frontier&#8221; an origin.<br />
B. He alienated fans with his depiction of the Vulcans being more paranoid than logical.<br />
C. He tried to give the enterprise ship a uniqne touch that was just dumb. It&#8217;s &#8220;THE Enterprise&#8221;, not &#8220;Enterprise&#8221;.<br />
D. He didn&#8217;t include &#8220;Star Trek&#8221; in the title for the first couple of seasons.<br />
E. He showed us the Romulans and cloaked Romulan ships 100 years before we even knew they looked like.<br />
F. Did I mention the Borg and the Ferengi?</p>
<p>I could go on forever and I&#8217;d love to, but I&#8217;m off topic.</p>
<p>94.<br />
I would LOVE to see M&#8217;Ress too! Just not voiced by Majel Barrett (No offense ma&#8217;am!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trekkie33years</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2007/07/30/new-star-trek-gets-big-coverage/comment-page-2/#comment-173511</link>
		<dc:creator>Trekkie33years</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2007 18:12:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2007/07/30/new-star-trek-gets-big-coverage/#comment-173511</guid>
		<description>With the advancements in CGI, I&#039;d love to see M&#039;Ress.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With the advancements in CGI, I&#8217;d love to see M&#8217;Ress.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shatner_Fan_2000</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2007/07/30/new-star-trek-gets-big-coverage/comment-page-2/#comment-173496</link>
		<dc:creator>Shatner_Fan_2000</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2007 17:42:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2007/07/30/new-star-trek-gets-big-coverage/#comment-173496</guid>
		<description>I agree that it would be nice to see underused TOS characters like Gary Mitchell, Carol Marcus, and especially Captain Chris Pike. Some of the family trees on the later Trek spinoffs got too crowded, but TOS was chock full o&#039; great characters who only appeared 1 time. FYI, Marcus was in an early draft of the TUC script. IIRC, Kirk was &quot;making love&quot; to her at the time he was reactivated by Starfleet! :) 

Pike is the character I&#039;d most want to see more of, though. Show us what a badass he had to have been to be in command of the Enterprise!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that it would be nice to see underused TOS characters like Gary Mitchell, Carol Marcus, and especially Captain Chris Pike. Some of the family trees on the later Trek spinoffs got too crowded, but TOS was chock full o&#8217; great characters who only appeared 1 time. FYI, Marcus was in an early draft of the TUC script. IIRC, Kirk was &#8220;making love&#8221; to her at the time he was reactivated by Starfleet! :) </p>
<p>Pike is the character I&#8217;d most want to see more of, though. Show us what a badass he had to have been to be in command of the Enterprise!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RaveOnEd</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2007/07/30/new-star-trek-gets-big-coverage/comment-page-2/#comment-173479</link>
		<dc:creator>RaveOnEd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2007 17:06:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2007/07/30/new-star-trek-gets-big-coverage/#comment-173479</guid>
		<description>I forget if it was a DC Comic, or one of the Pocket Books, where they made the connection of the &quot;little blonde lab technician&quot; that Mitchell aimed at Kirk with being Carol Marcus.

I just remember gasping at the connection, how it worked so well.

Time for that to be made into the movie canon.  Plus, it would tie the end up neatly for TWOK.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I forget if it was a DC Comic, or one of the Pocket Books, where they made the connection of the &#8220;little blonde lab technician&#8221; that Mitchell aimed at Kirk with being Carol Marcus.</p>
<p>I just remember gasping at the connection, how it worked so well.</p>
<p>Time for that to be made into the movie canon.  Plus, it would tie the end up neatly for TWOK.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

