Comments on: Star Trek Movie ‘Mistakes’ Mash-Up

By: GeneralGrin

GeneralGrin — Sun, 28 Sep 2008 07:39:39 +0000

check out part 3 and 4

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=42Q-pFlzung

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gy_-TklmyYE

By: Gene Rodenberry's Ghost

Gene Rodenberry's Ghost — Sat, 09 Feb 2008 22:06:44 +0000

Gary Mitchell misremembered the middle name of his Captain.

End of Story.

No canon violation.

How many here know the middle names of their co-workers?

You’re welcome.

Gene’s Ghost

By: karanadon

karanadon — Sat, 03 Nov 2007 22:34:06 +0000

hang on…when was Bashir on TNG or Data on DS9? could anyone tell me please…I’d love to know…

By: GeneralGrin

GeneralGrin — Sat, 27 Oct 2007 06:44:41 +0000

Check out Part 2 of Star Trek Mistakes on Youtube

By: Michelle

Michelle — Tue, 23 Oct 2007 21:36:30 +0000

I like both of the videos Data+Lore=cool to the 9th degree!!!!

By: V1L3

V1L3 — Mon, 22 Oct 2007 09:46:03 +0000

“If they mess with the uniforms, the ships or the basic designs, I won’t watch it.”

“I also hate how friends of canon are ridiculed and labeled as nitpickers and killjoys.”

I can’t imagine where anyone would get THAT impression….

By: Michelle

Michelle — Sun, 21 Oct 2007 20:35:43 +0000

I disagree with the one mess up that showed Shelby and Riker talking about how ineffective their weapons were, but to the battle scene in First Contact where Federation ships including the Enterprise were making significant damage with their shots. It makes perfect sense to me that within the intervening years of BoBW and First Contact, that the Federation would invest in many resources to improve their weapons in anticipation of another Borg attack.

The rest I got a pretty good laugh about! I try not to let mistakes annoy me too much, and I’ll overlook most things if the story is a good one to tell. Thanks for putting together and sharing this video.

By: 4 8 15 16 23 42

4 8 15 16 23 42 — Sun, 21 Oct 2007 08:15:23 +0000

#104 — The Borg Queen was more of an avatar of the Borg than an actual leader… a sort of physical incarnation of a specific function, yes, but not with political power, like a leader. I grant you, it is still a veiled plot device, but perhaps not quite to the level of being a mistake or paradox.

By: Wilson

Wilson — Sat, 20 Oct 2007 21:16:29 +0000

That’s true, there are many planets in the Vulcan star system.

Also, a lot of those paradoxes can be explained pretty easily. Like Scotty “forgetting” that Captain Kirk was dead…..I mean, he was stuck in the Transporter for a long time….he could’ve had a mild case of Transporter Physcosis.

Some are kindof funny, but lets not forget that the people who created, wrote, directed, produced etc… Star Trek are human.

By: ramy

ramy — Sat, 20 Oct 2007 11:54:14 +0000

Maybe Vulcan itself IS a moon of a bigger planet. and the other moons we see are also moons of the bigger planet and not of Vulcan.
therefore Vulcan has no moons even though you see ‘moons’ in the sky