


<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Shatner Discusses Latest Rumors [UPDATED - More Video From Shatner]</title>
	<atom:link href="http://trekmovie.com/2007/10/18/shatner-discusses-latest-rumors/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://trekmovie.com/2007/10/18/shatner-discusses-latest-rumors/</link>
	<description>the source for Star Trek news and information</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 15:29:02 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: SeataPref</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2007/10/18/shatner-discusses-latest-rumors/comment-page-13/#comment-401277</link>
		<dc:creator>SeataPref</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 19:47:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2007/10/18/shatner-discusses-latest-rumors/#comment-401277</guid>
		<description>http://www.google.com 
http://www.yahoo.com 
http://www.msn.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.google.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.google.com</a><br />
<a href="http://www.yahoo.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.yahoo.com</a><br />
<a href="http://www.msn.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.msn.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cervantes</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2007/10/18/shatner-discusses-latest-rumors/comment-page-13/#comment-261242</link>
		<dc:creator>Cervantes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Oct 2007 12:02:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2007/10/18/shatner-discusses-latest-rumors/#comment-261242</guid>
		<description>The answer to that is...quite probably, by the way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The answer to that is&#8230;quite probably, by the way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cervantes</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2007/10/18/shatner-discusses-latest-rumors/comment-page-13/#comment-261239</link>
		<dc:creator>Cervantes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Oct 2007 12:00:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2007/10/18/shatner-discusses-latest-rumors/#comment-261239</guid>
		<description>#645

Couldn&#039;t they have just originally come up with a good story that included an appearance of an &#039;older&#039; Kirk, and much-alive William Shatner, seeing as they were including Leonard Nimoy in this reboot project?...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#645</p>
<p>Couldn&#8217;t they have just originally come up with a good story that included an appearance of an &#8216;older&#8217; Kirk, and much-alive William Shatner, seeing as they were including Leonard Nimoy in this reboot project?&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GaryS</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2007/10/18/shatner-discusses-latest-rumors/comment-page-13/#comment-259505</link>
		<dc:creator>GaryS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 14:22:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2007/10/18/shatner-discusses-latest-rumors/#comment-259505</guid>
		<description>#646 nah this thread still has some lfe in it</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#646 nah this thread still has some lfe in it</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 4 8 15 16 23 42</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2007/10/18/shatner-discusses-latest-rumors/comment-page-13/#comment-259473</link>
		<dc:creator>4 8 15 16 23 42</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 13:47:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2007/10/18/shatner-discusses-latest-rumors/#comment-259473</guid>
		<description>#645 -- Bump.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#645 &#8212; Bump.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GaryS</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2007/10/18/shatner-discusses-latest-rumors/comment-page-13/#comment-258897</link>
		<dc:creator>GaryS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 02:02:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2007/10/18/shatner-discusses-latest-rumors/#comment-258897</guid>
		<description>i hope Mr.  Shatner is in the film.  but the purpose  of the film should be to tell a good story .PERIOD! its not about righting the wrongs of Generations or any other Trek film.
plese tell a good story  first mr. Orci.
Its OK to Include  Mr.Shatner , but only if it serves the story.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i hope Mr.  Shatner is in the film.  but the purpose  of the film should be to tell a good story .PERIOD! its not about righting the wrongs of Generations or any other Trek film.<br />
plese tell a good story  first mr. Orci.<br />
Its OK to Include  Mr.Shatner , but only if it serves the story.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ivory</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2007/10/18/shatner-discusses-latest-rumors/comment-page-13/#comment-258245</link>
		<dc:creator>Ivory</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 15:55:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2007/10/18/shatner-discusses-latest-rumors/#comment-258245</guid>
		<description>Please bring Shatner back as Kirk.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please bring Shatner back as Kirk.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: StillKirok</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2007/10/18/shatner-discusses-latest-rumors/comment-page-13/#comment-258211</link>
		<dc:creator>StillKirok</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 15:33:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2007/10/18/shatner-discusses-latest-rumors/#comment-258211</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m in that camp too.  I just want the character alive and well, with a happy ending, riding off into the sunset, post-Generations.  It&#039;s all I&#039;ve ever wanted.  In fact, had Star Trek 6 been the last appearance of Shatner, I doubt there would be anything close to the demand or the uproar.

Generations created a mess that really needs to be cleaned up to finally restore the good will of the franchise.

This film should be about the originals passing the torch properly.  Generations failed miserably in that regard.  You don&#039;t pass the torch by killing the torch bearer.  Generations created nothing but anger on long time fans, and the demand for Kirk&#039;s return has been one of the few constants in Trek ever since.  Unfortunately, so has been Paramount ignoring that demand.  

Anything involving Kirk post-Generations has succeeded.  The Shatner books were among the best selling of all time.  No episode of Trek got a higher rating than Trials &amp; Tribbleations since it aired.  

People like happy endings.  

Put Shatner in this film, show him alive and close the movie with Nimoy and Shatner, and they wouldn&#039;t need either actor anymore.  The Pine/Quinto era can continue with great feelings all around.

Don&#039;t bring in Shatner, and you will continue to have a disappointed group of Trek fans who likely will not see the film and will continue the bad momentum that has plagued the franchise since it started to decline right after Generations.

It shouldn&#039;t be a tough decision.  Yet the producers, despite claiming to be &quot;trying to get him in the film,&quot; have yet to actually contact him with the script.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m in that camp too.  I just want the character alive and well, with a happy ending, riding off into the sunset, post-Generations.  It&#8217;s all I&#8217;ve ever wanted.  In fact, had Star Trek 6 been the last appearance of Shatner, I doubt there would be anything close to the demand or the uproar.</p>
<p>Generations created a mess that really needs to be cleaned up to finally restore the good will of the franchise.</p>
<p>This film should be about the originals passing the torch properly.  Generations failed miserably in that regard.  You don&#8217;t pass the torch by killing the torch bearer.  Generations created nothing but anger on long time fans, and the demand for Kirk&#8217;s return has been one of the few constants in Trek ever since.  Unfortunately, so has been Paramount ignoring that demand.  </p>
<p>Anything involving Kirk post-Generations has succeeded.  The Shatner books were among the best selling of all time.  No episode of Trek got a higher rating than Trials &amp; Tribbleations since it aired.  </p>
<p>People like happy endings.  </p>
<p>Put Shatner in this film, show him alive and close the movie with Nimoy and Shatner, and they wouldn&#8217;t need either actor anymore.  The Pine/Quinto era can continue with great feelings all around.</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t bring in Shatner, and you will continue to have a disappointed group of Trek fans who likely will not see the film and will continue the bad momentum that has plagued the franchise since it started to decline right after Generations.</p>
<p>It shouldn&#8217;t be a tough decision.  Yet the producers, despite claiming to be &#8220;trying to get him in the film,&#8221; have yet to actually contact him with the script.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Iowagirl</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2007/10/18/shatner-discusses-latest-rumors/comment-page-13/#comment-258190</link>
		<dc:creator>Iowagirl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 15:24:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2007/10/18/shatner-discusses-latest-rumors/#comment-258190</guid>
		<description>#640,641

Exactly what ShatnerFan said. This is our last request. No sweat afterwards - we&#039;ll have 40 years to re-watch and to re-consider. We&#039;ll be the lucky ones.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#640,641</p>
<p>Exactly what ShatnerFan said. This is our last request. No sweat afterwards &#8211; we&#8217;ll have 40 years to re-watch and to re-consider. We&#8217;ll be the lucky ones.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shatner_Fan_2000</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2007/10/18/shatner-discusses-latest-rumors/comment-page-13/#comment-258131</link>
		<dc:creator>Shatner_Fan_2000</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 14:28:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2007/10/18/shatner-discusses-latest-rumors/#comment-258131</guid>
		<description>#640 ... For me, yes. Of course I would prefer more than a brief cameo, but the bottom line is - I think myself and many others just want to walk out of the theater feeling better about the fate of our favorite character than we did after the depressing experience of seeing him die a lonely death in Generations.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#640 &#8230; For me, yes. Of course I would prefer more than a brief cameo, but the bottom line is &#8211; I think myself and many others just want to walk out of the theater feeling better about the fate of our favorite character than we did after the depressing experience of seeing him die a lonely death in Generations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
