


<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Star Trek Producers Join Picket Lines</title>
	<atom:link href="http://trekmovie.com/2007/11/06/star-trek-producers-join-picket-lines/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://trekmovie.com/2007/11/06/star-trek-producers-join-picket-lines/</link>
	<description>the source for Star Trek news and information</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 10:40:13 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2007/11/06/star-trek-producers-join-picket-lines/comment-page-2/#comment-283318</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Nov 2007 08:55:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2007/11/06/star-trek-producers-join-picket-lines/#comment-283318</guid>
		<description>#60 - Steven correctly answered your question &quot;no&quot; in #63. 

#61 - &quot;There’s nothing nearly so unexamined or reflective of “groupthink” among the members of the various guilds in Hollywood (or most unions) as there is in the proclamations of objectivists and the even less-thoughtful folks who just parrot cast-off bits of their fictive “philosophy.”&quot;

If you are referring to me, I am neither. Sorry to disappoint. Also see my following comment.

#65 - The Constitution does not give us the the right of assembly - or any other right. As the Declaration of Independence states, our rights come from God. The only legitimate function of government is to protect our right to life, liberty and property - rights that existed prior to government. Anything beyond that is immoral and illegitimate.

If you are going to concede that our rights from government, then you have to allow the corollary that government can take them away. This why the Founding Fathers gave us a republic instead of a democracy - they knew that all too often it is a common tendency for people, when they can, to live and prosper at the expense of others. This is often done through the ballot box. They don&#039;t realize that in the end they will vote themselves into slavery - and we are not too far from that now.

As regards unions, you might spend some time here: http://www.mises.org/ Do a search on union or unions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#60 &#8211; Steven correctly answered your question &#8220;no&#8221; in #63. </p>
<p>#61 &#8211; &#8220;There’s nothing nearly so unexamined or reflective of “groupthink” among the members of the various guilds in Hollywood (or most unions) as there is in the proclamations of objectivists and the even less-thoughtful folks who just parrot cast-off bits of their fictive “philosophy.”&#8221;</p>
<p>If you are referring to me, I am neither. Sorry to disappoint. Also see my following comment.</p>
<p>#65 &#8211; The Constitution does not give us the the right of assembly &#8211; or any other right. As the Declaration of Independence states, our rights come from God. The only legitimate function of government is to protect our right to life, liberty and property &#8211; rights that existed prior to government. Anything beyond that is immoral and illegitimate.</p>
<p>If you are going to concede that our rights from government, then you have to allow the corollary that government can take them away. This why the Founding Fathers gave us a republic instead of a democracy &#8211; they knew that all too often it is a common tendency for people, when they can, to live and prosper at the expense of others. This is often done through the ballot box. They don&#8217;t realize that in the end they will vote themselves into slavery &#8211; and we are not too far from that now.</p>
<p>As regards unions, you might spend some time here: <a href="http://www.mises.org/" rel="nofollow">http://www.mises.org/</a> Do a search on union or unions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Redshirt</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2007/11/06/star-trek-producers-join-picket-lines/comment-page-2/#comment-278946</link>
		<dc:creator>Redshirt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2007 23:56:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2007/11/06/star-trek-producers-join-picket-lines/#comment-278946</guid>
		<description>The constitution gives us the right of assembly and that in turn allows for UNIONS. 
Unions are NOT evil and if you know your history, they are the reason the American worker has such a high standard of living. In the 19th century, workers were exploited in ways that would shock most people today. The American labor movement has been a boon to our economy and our status as the world&#039;s super power. 
That said, the Unions have caused problems with non-union people often denied employment in &quot;union shops&quot;, public safety threatened by police, transportation, and garbage strikes, and by violence over strike breakers just wanting to feed their family&#039;s. 

The issue of this strike is one of compensation for work provided in a changing electronic media. Hopefully it will not be like the baseball strike, where many a fan walked away and took years to return.

PLEASE...BOTH SIDES... SETTLE THIS DAMN THING FAST SO EVERYONE CAN GET BACK TO WORK !!!!!
[AND SO LETTERMAN AND CONAN STOP SHOWING RERUNS!]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The constitution gives us the right of assembly and that in turn allows for UNIONS.<br />
Unions are NOT evil and if you know your history, they are the reason the American worker has such a high standard of living. In the 19th century, workers were exploited in ways that would shock most people today. The American labor movement has been a boon to our economy and our status as the world&#8217;s super power.<br />
That said, the Unions have caused problems with non-union people often denied employment in &#8220;union shops&#8221;, public safety threatened by police, transportation, and garbage strikes, and by violence over strike breakers just wanting to feed their family&#8217;s. </p>
<p>The issue of this strike is one of compensation for work provided in a changing electronic media. Hopefully it will not be like the baseball strike, where many a fan walked away and took years to return.</p>
<p>PLEASE&#8230;BOTH SIDES&#8230; SETTLE THIS DAMN THING FAST SO EVERYONE CAN GET BACK TO WORK !!!!!<br />
[AND SO LETTERMAN AND CONAN STOP SHOWING RERUNS!]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steven Choate</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2007/11/06/star-trek-producers-join-picket-lines/comment-page-2/#comment-278920</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven Choate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2007 23:40:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2007/11/06/star-trek-producers-join-picket-lines/#comment-278920</guid>
		<description>#47: &quot;Shawn Ryan - producer of “The Shield” - has written so eloquently today...&quot;  &amp; &quot;That’s the crux of the matter - that phrase “these are all acts that are about the writing of the show or protecting the writing of the show.”&quot;


     It may be eloquently written, and passionately felt, but it&#039;s a bit lacking in intellectual thought.   There&#039;s NO question that TV and movie production are collaborate efforts that all help to make the whole of the show; but each thing (writing, directing, editing, location shooting, etc) are all just subsets of that whole and in fact are NOT the same thing.
     As a member of the writers guild Mr. Ryan is morally obligated to follow his union and not do any writing for his show.  BUT, if any of his salary is derived from editing, director prep, etc then he has an obligation to continue with those parts of his job.
     The WRITERS are on strike, not anyone else.  Writing is NOT editing, directing, etc.   IF they were then there would not be different unions, each with their own contracts.  The fact that there are different unions disproves Mr Ryan&#039;s point.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#47: &#8220;Shawn Ryan &#8211; producer of “The Shield” &#8211; has written so eloquently today&#8230;&#8221;  &amp; &#8220;That’s the crux of the matter &#8211; that phrase “these are all acts that are about the writing of the show or protecting the writing of the show.”&#8221;</p>
<p>     It may be eloquently written, and passionately felt, but it&#8217;s a bit lacking in intellectual thought.   There&#8217;s NO question that TV and movie production are collaborate efforts that all help to make the whole of the show; but each thing (writing, directing, editing, location shooting, etc) are all just subsets of that whole and in fact are NOT the same thing.<br />
     As a member of the writers guild Mr. Ryan is morally obligated to follow his union and not do any writing for his show.  BUT, if any of his salary is derived from editing, director prep, etc then he has an obligation to continue with those parts of his job.<br />
     The WRITERS are on strike, not anyone else.  Writing is NOT editing, directing, etc.   IF they were then there would not be different unions, each with their own contracts.  The fact that there are different unions disproves Mr Ryan&#8217;s point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steven Choate</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2007/11/06/star-trek-producers-join-picket-lines/comment-page-2/#comment-278908</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven Choate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2007 23:29:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2007/11/06/star-trek-producers-join-picket-lines/#comment-278908</guid>
		<description>#60:  &quot;“Rights belong to individuals, not groups”
    What about The Bill of Rights? Doesn’t that belong to a group of 300 million people?&quot;


     The fact that 300 million people with rights can constitute a group of people with the same rights does NOT make their rights &#039;group&#039; rights.   The fact of the matter is, the Bill of Rights ARE and always have been INDIVIDUAL rights (and have always been held to be so by the courts).  I think you&#039;re confusing the general definition of a &#039;group&#039; with the constitutional definitions of groups vs individuals.
     The 2nd amendment is an easy example.  If the 2nd is an individual right then you as an individual have a right to own a gun not only as part of a group (military/militia) but also for the purposes of home self-defense, target shooting, hunting, etc.  IF the 2nd is a &#039;group&#039; right then you would only be allowed to own a gun as part of a group (the military/militia).  Your 1st amendment right to free speech works similarly: if it&#039;s an individual right then you can stand on the street corner and say anything you wish; if it&#039;s a group right then you would not be allowed to speak by yourself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#60:  &#8220;“Rights belong to individuals, not groups”<br />
    What about The Bill of Rights? Doesn’t that belong to a group of 300 million people?&#8221;</p>
<p>     The fact that 300 million people with rights can constitute a group of people with the same rights does NOT make their rights &#8216;group&#8217; rights.   The fact of the matter is, the Bill of Rights ARE and always have been INDIVIDUAL rights (and have always been held to be so by the courts).  I think you&#8217;re confusing the general definition of a &#8216;group&#8217; with the constitutional definitions of groups vs individuals.<br />
     The 2nd amendment is an easy example.  If the 2nd is an individual right then you as an individual have a right to own a gun not only as part of a group (military/militia) but also for the purposes of home self-defense, target shooting, hunting, etc.  IF the 2nd is a &#8216;group&#8217; right then you would only be allowed to own a gun as part of a group (the military/militia).  Your 1st amendment right to free speech works similarly: if it&#8217;s an individual right then you can stand on the street corner and say anything you wish; if it&#8217;s a group right then you would not be allowed to speak by yourself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Commodore Z</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2007/11/06/star-trek-producers-join-picket-lines/comment-page-2/#comment-278902</link>
		<dc:creator>Commodore Z</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2007 23:26:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2007/11/06/star-trek-producers-join-picket-lines/#comment-278902</guid>
		<description>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oJ55Ir2jCxk

We enjoy the writers&#039; work.  We need to support their efforts to be paid fairly.

Hey Anthony, maybe you could post that video on the front page?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oJ55Ir2jCxk" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oJ55Ir2jCxk</a></p>
<p>We enjoy the writers&#8217; work.  We need to support their efforts to be paid fairly.</p>
<p>Hey Anthony, maybe you could post that video on the front page?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dennis Bailey</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2007/11/06/star-trek-producers-join-picket-lines/comment-page-2/#comment-278248</link>
		<dc:creator>Dennis Bailey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2007 16:17:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2007/11/06/star-trek-producers-join-picket-lines/#comment-278248</guid>
		<description>#57:&quot;Rights belong to individuals, not groups. &quot;

Saying that doesn&#039;t make it so, and Rand failed to make the case.  There&#039;s nothing nearly so unexamined or reflective of &quot;groupthink&quot; among the members of the various guilds in Hollywood (or most unions) as there is in the proclamations of objectivists and the even less-thoughtful folks who just parrot cast-off bits of their fictive &quot;philosophy.&quot; :)

As far as problems for the movie...presumably there are no pickets at the location site.  If and when Abrams and other WGA members have to cross picket lines at the studio in order to work on the film it might cause some discomfort.

OTOH, it&#039;s been reported that the picketing is being set up at hours such that it doesn&#039;t interfere with Teamsters arriving for work, etc.  Perhaps the producers can arrive and leave at hours that don&#039;t require them to make the choice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#57:&#8221;Rights belong to individuals, not groups. &#8221;</p>
<p>Saying that doesn&#8217;t make it so, and Rand failed to make the case.  There&#8217;s nothing nearly so unexamined or reflective of &#8220;groupthink&#8221; among the members of the various guilds in Hollywood (or most unions) as there is in the proclamations of objectivists and the even less-thoughtful folks who just parrot cast-off bits of their fictive &#8220;philosophy.&#8221; :)</p>
<p>As far as problems for the movie&#8230;presumably there are no pickets at the location site.  If and when Abrams and other WGA members have to cross picket lines at the studio in order to work on the film it might cause some discomfort.</p>
<p>OTOH, it&#8217;s been reported that the picketing is being set up at hours such that it doesn&#8217;t interfere with Teamsters arriving for work, etc.  Perhaps the producers can arrive and leave at hours that don&#8217;t require them to make the choice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave O</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2007/11/06/star-trek-producers-join-picket-lines/comment-page-2/#comment-278205</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave O</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2007 15:41:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2007/11/06/star-trek-producers-join-picket-lines/#comment-278205</guid>
		<description>&quot;Rights belong to individuals, not groups&quot;

Mark, 

What about The Bill of Rights? Doesn&#039;t that belong to a group of 300 million people?

Just sayin.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Rights belong to individuals, not groups&#8221;</p>
<p>Mark, </p>
<p>What about The Bill of Rights? Doesn&#8217;t that belong to a group of 300 million people?</p>
<p>Just sayin.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Magic_Al</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2007/11/06/star-trek-producers-join-picket-lines/comment-page-2/#comment-278073</link>
		<dc:creator>Magic_Al</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2007 14:03:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2007/11/06/star-trek-producers-join-picket-lines/#comment-278073</guid>
		<description>#54. Hosts are, in fact, allowed to write for themselves during the strike, although they are not supposed to write a greater proportion of material than they normally do and most of the show must be ad-libbed. In 1988, after several weeks of reruns, Johnny Carson and David Letterman went back on the air without their writers and wrote abbreviated monologues and bits by themselves. Letterman&#039;s former executive producer Bob Morton was on NPR this morning reminiscing about it, and he pointed out that these comedy-variety talk shows have to balance showing solidarity with 13 or so writers while caring for over 100 other employees who don&#039;t make a lot of money and depend on the shows to support their families.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#54. Hosts are, in fact, allowed to write for themselves during the strike, although they are not supposed to write a greater proportion of material than they normally do and most of the show must be ad-libbed. In 1988, after several weeks of reruns, Johnny Carson and David Letterman went back on the air without their writers and wrote abbreviated monologues and bits by themselves. Letterman&#8217;s former executive producer Bob Morton was on NPR this morning reminiscing about it, and he pointed out that these comedy-variety talk shows have to balance showing solidarity with 13 or so writers while caring for over 100 other employees who don&#8217;t make a lot of money and depend on the shows to support their families.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oregon Trek Geek</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2007/11/06/star-trek-producers-join-picket-lines/comment-page-2/#comment-277705</link>
		<dc:creator>Oregon Trek Geek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2007 07:22:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2007/11/06/star-trek-producers-join-picket-lines/#comment-277705</guid>
		<description>#54 - I think I understand then. The hosts of the late night shows could certainly make it without the writers, but are prevented from doing so because of belonging to the same union?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#54 &#8211; I think I understand then. The hosts of the late night shows could certainly make it without the writers, but are prevented from doing so because of belonging to the same union?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2007/11/06/star-trek-producers-join-picket-lines/comment-page-2/#comment-277629</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2007 06:17:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2007/11/06/star-trek-producers-join-picket-lines/#comment-277629</guid>
		<description>Well, if the new movie is successful and leads to sequels, at least Abrams and the rest can draw on their experience as Borg (union members) for those sequels. The union mentality is garbage. Rights belong to individuals, not groups. The mob mentality of stopping someone from working that wishes to work (often through violence) is collectivism at its finest. What nonsense.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, if the new movie is successful and leads to sequels, at least Abrams and the rest can draw on their experience as Borg (union members) for those sequels. The union mentality is garbage. Rights belong to individuals, not groups. The mob mentality of stopping someone from working that wishes to work (often through violence) is collectivism at its finest. What nonsense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

