


<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: More Rumored &#8216;Star Trek&#8217; Plot Details [UPDATED: TOS Writer Reacts]</title>
	<atom:link href="http://trekmovie.com/2007/11/12/more-rumored-star-trek-plot-details/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://trekmovie.com/2007/11/12/more-rumored-star-trek-plot-details/</link>
	<description>the source for Star Trek news and information</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 13:50:49 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2007/11/12/more-rumored-star-trek-plot-details/comment-page-9/#comment-416194</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2008 17:36:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2007/11/12/more-rumored-star-trek-plot-details/#comment-416194</guid>
		<description>I wonder if the &quot;STARGATE&quot; is an illegitimate child of the Guardian of Forever... ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder if the &#8220;STARGATE&#8221; is an illegitimate child of the Guardian of Forever&#8230; ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tibs</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2007/11/12/more-rumored-star-trek-plot-details/comment-page-9/#comment-330674</link>
		<dc:creator>Tibs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2007 07:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2007/11/12/more-rumored-star-trek-plot-details/#comment-330674</guid>
		<description>Harlan Ellison is such a #@##@ primadonna!  The man whines much better than he writes.  Justman made his script workable and all he has done in the meantime is bitch and complain about how Star Trek made him marketable.  His ego is astonishing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Harlan Ellison is such a #@##@ primadonna!  The man whines much better than he writes.  Justman made his script workable and all he has done in the meantime is bitch and complain about how Star Trek made him marketable.  His ego is astonishing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PatrickG</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2007/11/12/more-rumored-star-trek-plot-details/comment-page-9/#comment-304150</link>
		<dc:creator>PatrickG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2007 10:44:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2007/11/12/more-rumored-star-trek-plot-details/#comment-304150</guid>
		<description>Shatner learned about &quot;Trials and Tribble-ations&quot; from TV Guide, if memory serves. He was never consulted and when he complained, he was quietly given increased royalties on merchandise as a non-settlement settlement.

Studios don&#039;t inform someone they think might sue them, I suspect. They consult with their OWN lawyers and if they decide they have a case, they move forward WITHOUT consulting someone who MIGHT have grounds to sue them.

I seem to recall Peter David using the Guardian of Forever in Imzadi. I wonder if he or other Star Trek novelists (including Shatner and his team) had permission. Or if the animated series had permission to use the GoF. Or the video games.

It seems to me that the studio may well have thought that if Ellison was going to contest use of the Guardian of Forever, he would have done it one of the last ten or twenty times it was used without his permission.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shatner learned about &#8220;Trials and Tribble-ations&#8221; from TV Guide, if memory serves. He was never consulted and when he complained, he was quietly given increased royalties on merchandise as a non-settlement settlement.</p>
<p>Studios don&#8217;t inform someone they think might sue them, I suspect. They consult with their OWN lawyers and if they decide they have a case, they move forward WITHOUT consulting someone who MIGHT have grounds to sue them.</p>
<p>I seem to recall Peter David using the Guardian of Forever in Imzadi. I wonder if he or other Star Trek novelists (including Shatner and his team) had permission. Or if the animated series had permission to use the GoF. Or the video games.</p>
<p>It seems to me that the studio may well have thought that if Ellison was going to contest use of the Guardian of Forever, he would have done it one of the last ten or twenty times it was used without his permission.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Closet Trekker</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2007/11/12/more-rumored-star-trek-plot-details/comment-page-9/#comment-297258</link>
		<dc:creator>Closet Trekker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Nov 2007 21:38:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2007/11/12/more-rumored-star-trek-plot-details/#comment-297258</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t mind the time travel angle, if it is done correctly. Maybe&quot;the Guardian&quot; angle, though, is just rumor. It is hard to imagine that Abrams would be this far into the project and not have obtained permission to use it. And thank God that this is &quot;Shatless&quot;! I do not need another Lazarus-like ressurection, and Star Fleet does not need officers built like Santa Clauss! Let the young Kirk fornicate and fist fight his way across the cosmos. It has been along time since we&#039;ve seen the Shat really bring it. Uh, 1982? (&quot;Khaaaaaaaaaan!&quot;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t mind the time travel angle, if it is done correctly. Maybe&#8221;the Guardian&#8221; angle, though, is just rumor. It is hard to imagine that Abrams would be this far into the project and not have obtained permission to use it. And thank God that this is &#8220;Shatless&#8221;! I do not need another Lazarus-like ressurection, and Star Fleet does not need officers built like Santa Clauss! Let the young Kirk fornicate and fist fight his way across the cosmos. It has been along time since we&#8217;ve seen the Shat really bring it. Uh, 1982? (&#8221;Khaaaaaaaaaan!&#8221;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DrTaylor</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2007/11/12/more-rumored-star-trek-plot-details/comment-page-9/#comment-297107</link>
		<dc:creator>DrTaylor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Nov 2007 19:35:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2007/11/12/more-rumored-star-trek-plot-details/#comment-297107</guid>
		<description>Personally, I&#039;m all for the time-travel concept. Or at least willing to watch it. And I&#039;ll even give a reason.

First Contact.

Right. Does anyone else remember that First Contact was a time travel movie? Who didn&#039;t love First Contact? It had a great plot. And you know what made it great? The time travel was secondary. They were all about stopping the Borg, not anything else. (Funny historical sidebar - it&#039;s also the last time the Borg were actually still scary.)

So, while it&#039;s risky, I&#039;d just like to toss out that the time travel actually adds an element of hope that I was missing.

Also, I&#039;d like to react to the &quot;Spock&#039;s on the Guardian&#039;s planet doing scentific research&quot; theory. Have we gone stark raving mad? Where was Spock when we last saw him? Romulus. With who? The Romulans. In what capacity? Diplomat. He&#039;s not a science officer anymore, people.

So more likely, Spock will be walking down a street and he&#039;ll see a couple of guys talking. And his advanced Vulcan hearing (leaving out for the moment that Leonard Nimoy is actually wearing hearing aids now) will pick up &quot;that will be the end of Kirk!&quot; and some maniacal laughter. &quot;Huh,&quot; he&#039;ll think, &quot;that&#039;s weird.&quot;

But because he really loves Kirk (nature of that love to be debated at another time please) he&#039;ll follow them anyway, all the way to the Guardian. Presto.

Just my two cents.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Personally, I&#8217;m all for the time-travel concept. Or at least willing to watch it. And I&#8217;ll even give a reason.</p>
<p>First Contact.</p>
<p>Right. Does anyone else remember that First Contact was a time travel movie? Who didn&#8217;t love First Contact? It had a great plot. And you know what made it great? The time travel was secondary. They were all about stopping the Borg, not anything else. (Funny historical sidebar &#8211; it&#8217;s also the last time the Borg were actually still scary.)</p>
<p>So, while it&#8217;s risky, I&#8217;d just like to toss out that the time travel actually adds an element of hope that I was missing.</p>
<p>Also, I&#8217;d like to react to the &#8220;Spock&#8217;s on the Guardian&#8217;s planet doing scentific research&#8221; theory. Have we gone stark raving mad? Where was Spock when we last saw him? Romulus. With who? The Romulans. In what capacity? Diplomat. He&#8217;s not a science officer anymore, people.</p>
<p>So more likely, Spock will be walking down a street and he&#8217;ll see a couple of guys talking. And his advanced Vulcan hearing (leaving out for the moment that Leonard Nimoy is actually wearing hearing aids now) will pick up &#8220;that will be the end of Kirk!&#8221; and some maniacal laughter. &#8220;Huh,&#8221; he&#8217;ll think, &#8220;that&#8217;s weird.&#8221;</p>
<p>But because he really loves Kirk (nature of that love to be debated at another time please) he&#8217;ll follow them anyway, all the way to the Guardian. Presto.</p>
<p>Just my two cents.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Closet Trekker</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2007/11/12/more-rumored-star-trek-plot-details/comment-page-9/#comment-297096</link>
		<dc:creator>Closet Trekker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Nov 2007 19:25:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2007/11/12/more-rumored-star-trek-plot-details/#comment-297096</guid>
		<description>#424 How about Finney (&quot;Court Martial&quot;)?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#424 How about Finney (&#8221;Court Martial&#8221;)?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: will</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2007/11/12/more-rumored-star-trek-plot-details/comment-page-9/#comment-296135</link>
		<dc:creator>will</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Nov 2007 03:33:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2007/11/12/more-rumored-star-trek-plot-details/#comment-296135</guid>
		<description>does anyone know if Gary Mitchell will be in the plot</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>does anyone know if Gary Mitchell will be in the plot</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cap'n Calhoun</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2007/11/12/more-rumored-star-trek-plot-details/comment-page-9/#comment-294147</link>
		<dc:creator>Cap'n Calhoun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2007 02:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2007/11/12/more-rumored-star-trek-plot-details/#comment-294147</guid>
		<description>As far as the Department of Temporal Investigations (the &quot;time corps&quot; from &quot;Trials and Tribble-ations&quot;) are concerned, keep a few things in mind:

#1: They shouldn&#039;t have existed until at least 2366.  Enterprise aside, &quot;The Naked Now&quot; was when they discovered time travel was possible.

#2: They don&#039;t come until *after* a problem has already occurred to investigate it after the fact.  They wouldn&#039;t have appeared in any episode unless they specifically wanted to show them.

As far as the other &quot;time corps&quot; is concerned (I assume that #413 is referring to &quot;Future&#039;s End&quot;), they appeared when, as far as they were concerned, Voyager had *already* caused a major catastrophe in the 30th Century.  Hardly a minor mission.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As far as the Department of Temporal Investigations (the &#8220;time corps&#8221; from &#8220;Trials and Tribble-ations&#8221;) are concerned, keep a few things in mind:</p>
<p>#1: They shouldn&#8217;t have existed until at least 2366.  Enterprise aside, &#8220;The Naked Now&#8221; was when they discovered time travel was possible.</p>
<p>#2: They don&#8217;t come until *after* a problem has already occurred to investigate it after the fact.  They wouldn&#8217;t have appeared in any episode unless they specifically wanted to show them.</p>
<p>As far as the other &#8220;time corps&#8221; is concerned (I assume that #413 is referring to &#8220;Future&#8217;s End&#8221;), they appeared when, as far as they were concerned, Voyager had *already* caused a major catastrophe in the 30th Century.  Hardly a minor mission.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: crazybeach</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2007/11/12/more-rumored-star-trek-plot-details/comment-page-9/#comment-293457</link>
		<dc:creator>crazybeach</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2007 18:50:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2007/11/12/more-rumored-star-trek-plot-details/#comment-293457</guid>
		<description>For what it&#039;s worth, guys

I Googled Bart LaRue. he sadly passed away in 1990. 

If the GoF IS used, I have a suggestion for a voice. 
Did anyone see Heavy Metal (The cartoon)? The guys that did the opening VO (and several characters in the film as well) was named August Schellenberg. I think he would be a worthy replacement for Mr. LaRue to voice the Gaurdian. (Assuming HE&#039;s still kicking, that is! lol)

As to whomever said to just make it an Iconian Portal and not a GoF, think of it this way.  The iconian portals were portrayed as being primarily technological, i.e., as being built by someone&#039;s hand. The portals were also not portrayed as TIME TRAVEL devices, merely as an alternate means of Point-A-to-Point-B transportation. 
The GoF is ALIVE, as far as being a sentient, albeit immobile, being, if perhaps an artificial one...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For what it&#8217;s worth, guys</p>
<p>I Googled Bart LaRue. he sadly passed away in 1990. </p>
<p>If the GoF IS used, I have a suggestion for a voice.<br />
Did anyone see Heavy Metal (The cartoon)? The guys that did the opening VO (and several characters in the film as well) was named August Schellenberg. I think he would be a worthy replacement for Mr. LaRue to voice the Gaurdian. (Assuming HE&#8217;s still kicking, that is! lol)</p>
<p>As to whomever said to just make it an Iconian Portal and not a GoF, think of it this way.  The iconian portals were portrayed as being primarily technological, i.e., as being built by someone&#8217;s hand. The portals were also not portrayed as TIME TRAVEL devices, merely as an alternate means of Point-A-to-Point-B transportation.<br />
The GoF is ALIVE, as far as being a sentient, albeit immobile, being, if perhaps an artificial one&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Vulcanista</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2007/11/12/more-rumored-star-trek-plot-details/comment-page-9/#comment-292296</link>
		<dc:creator>The Vulcanista</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2007 04:35:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2007/11/12/more-rumored-star-trek-plot-details/#comment-292296</guid>
		<description>#419

&quot;Off camera, we don’t know what happened to Spock and the story itself, or events after the fact in ‘Yesteryear’. He could have been punished. His parents might have reported the incident to The Time Corps or a Vulcan equivalent. They would have sent officers, through time to correct what he did.&quot; 
_________________________
You bring up some very interesting points.

Logic would dictate that probably nothing happened to Spock.  The shuttle accident never happened after the timeline was repaired; therefore, the folks in the &quot;real&quot; timeline should have no memories of anything other than their pasts in the &quot;correct&quot; timeline.

That is what has always bugged me about &quot;CotEoF&quot; and that episode of Enterprise where they met their descendants, in which T&#039;Pol rightly pointed out,  &quot;Then why do we remember them?&quot;  Did the memories just fade over time?  

Time travel:  It&#039;s a conundrum, I tell you, a conundrum, and an especially tricky one at that!

And I&#039;m telling y&#039;all, there is WATER coming from the sky in ATL!!  Swear to Vulcan!!  WTF izzat? 

Peace.  Live long and prosper.
The Vulcanista }:-&#124;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#419</p>
<p>&#8220;Off camera, we don’t know what happened to Spock and the story itself, or events after the fact in ‘Yesteryear’. He could have been punished. His parents might have reported the incident to The Time Corps or a Vulcan equivalent. They would have sent officers, through time to correct what he did.&#8221;<br />
_________________________<br />
You bring up some very interesting points.</p>
<p>Logic would dictate that probably nothing happened to Spock.  The shuttle accident never happened after the timeline was repaired; therefore, the folks in the &#8220;real&#8221; timeline should have no memories of anything other than their pasts in the &#8220;correct&#8221; timeline.</p>
<p>That is what has always bugged me about &#8220;CotEoF&#8221; and that episode of Enterprise where they met their descendants, in which T&#8217;Pol rightly pointed out,  &#8220;Then why do we remember them?&#8221;  Did the memories just fade over time?  </p>
<p>Time travel:  It&#8217;s a conundrum, I tell you, a conundrum, and an especially tricky one at that!</p>
<p>And I&#8217;m telling y&#8217;all, there is WATER coming from the sky in ATL!!  Swear to Vulcan!!  WTF izzat? </p>
<p>Peace.  Live long and prosper.<br />
The Vulcanista }:-|</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
