Nichols Is An Orion + Morrison Is Kirk’s Mom

All the big casting news for the new Star Trek film is behind us, but there are still a few loose ends to tie up. Two of those loose ends are related to who two of the women in the cast are playing, which has been the subject of much speculation. Firstly TrekMovie.com can now confirm that Jennifer Morrison (House) is playing (a pregnant) Winona Kirk, the mother of James T. Kirk. Apparently, like Chris Hemsworth who is playing her husband George Kirk, Morrison is finished with her work on the project. The new Star Trek will be the first appearances for both of Kirk’s parents outside the non-canon Trek novels.

A few weeks ago Rachel Nichols of Alias fame stated “there’s a good chance you’ll see my shining face in the new Star Trek.” Yes you will indeed see her shining face, but it will be of a different hue than you are used to. TrekMovie.com has learned that Nichols will be playing be playing an Orion (but it hasn’t been confirmed if she is of the ‘slave girl’ variety). The name of her character is not known, but it is a new character. It does not appear that Nichols is the Orion girl spotted in the spy pics from last week, but a source told TrekMovie.com that the girl in the pic was likely a stand-in.


Will Rachel Nichols as an Orion turn young Jim Kirk’s head?
(NOTE: Photo is not official, just some quickie Photoshopping)

The first appearance of a green-skinned Orion was in the unaired Original Series pilot “The Cage.” The two part episode “The Menagerie” reused the footage and established that ‘no man can resist’ an Orion Slave girl. Orions showed up in a handful of episodes from The Original Series, The Animated Series as well as Enterprise. The appearance in the Star Trek movie will be the first for a Star Trek feature film. More on Orions at Memory Alpha.


Captain Pike meets the first Star Trek Orion in TOS “The Cage”

What about Marcus?
There has been a lot of speculation related to both Nichols and Morrison (and Keri Russell who will not be in the film) that one of these ladies would be playing Carol Marcus, the mother of James T. Kirk’s son David (played by Bibi Besch in Star Trek II). Back in June co-writer Alex Kurtzman was cagey on whether or not Marcus was in the movie or not, but would not categorically deny. TrekMovie.com has learned that there may have been good reason for this. Apparently Marcus was in an earlier draft of the script, but TrekMovie.com has confirmed she does not appear in the shooting script currently in production. In his interview with TrekMovie.com in October, co-writer Roberto Orci noted that many known Trek characters worked their way in and out of various drafts, but in the end would only include characters if they “could do them justice.” In October Orci also noted that characters that didn’t make the cut for the 2008 movie are “at the top of the list” for the sequel (assuming there is one). So maybe Marcus will show up next time.

More casting
We are almost done with the casting news for big and medium sized roles for the new Star Trek film, but there are still a few loose ends. TrekMovie.com has been told that the roles of the ‘Federation Captain’ (a new role) and another henchmen for Eric Bana’s Nero have been cast. We do not yet have the names, but apparently they are both relatively unknown actors. It is also yet to be confirmed if J.J. Abrams best friend (and Quinto’s Heroes co-star) Greg Grunberg will continue his tradition of cameos in Abrams projects. Hopefully there will be another update in the upcoming weeks, until then check out the TrekMovie.com Star Trek 2008 Cast Page for the latest info on the cast.

Who is the best new Trek Girl?
The James Bond films are famous for their ‘Bond Girls,’ but the new Star Trek movie has lined up quite the bevy of beauties. Which is your favorite? Vote in the latest poll (right sidebar)

Sort by:   newest | oldest
Harry Ballz
December 17, 2007 2:52 pm

Grrrrrr……………Hulk like green women!!!! :)

Paul
December 17, 2007 2:57 pm

Unghhhh!!!! Hulk want miniskirt….

SirMartman
December 17, 2007 2:58 pm

And I hear in Star Trek 12,,, they are going back to when James T Kirk was just sperm in his fathers testicles !!!

joey joe joe
December 17, 2007 2:59 pm

Green = Good…

sirh
December 17, 2007 3:03 pm

She makes green look easy!

December 17, 2007 3:10 pm

No SirMartman, Stanley Kubrick is dead, he will not be directing this movie! :)

Personally, I would have rather seen Jennifer Morrison in a larger role, instead of the younger Sulu, Uhura, etc.

Pragmaticus
December 17, 2007 3:19 pm

This is simply fantastic news!

VulcanBabe
December 17, 2007 3:22 pm

She doesn’t quite have the slave girl sexy look…maybe a deeper green…hmm…
And exactly how are they going to work Orion slave girls into the plotline?
But if they can…damn, I’m all for it! Go green girls! ;P

Cygnus-X1
December 17, 2007 3:24 pm

le gulp.

Noleuser
December 17, 2007 3:26 pm

I am very curious how the story jumps from point A to point B to point Z. How are the parents of Kirk and Spock before they’re born relevant?? I am very curious about the story.

Irishtrekkie
December 17, 2007 3:31 pm

lol right i dont think there are any more parts to cast ? what robert april ? the ghost of christmas past ? , i mean how many people can they fit into one movie , but yea honestly , sounds good to me, and orions are cool , it was nice to see them again in enterprise (one of the few things that show done right ) .

table10
December 17, 2007 3:38 pm

WOW

Word that comes to mind at the constant breaking news first reported here by Anthony.

Honestly, I am really impressed with this sites arsenal of spies connected to this production. Rumors debunked, and loose ends confirmed.

Kudos

J C
December 17, 2007 3:39 pm

Maybe they’re filming a whole bunch of minor Trek characters with the intension to use just a few due to the writers strike.that way they have the film in the can and they can add to or delete a particular minor character’s part post writer’s strike.

Viking
December 17, 2007 3:40 pm

“……so the plot may jump from Z to B to A to L then back to Z then over the N? ”

Oh, man, now I need a drink………and an Advil.

Noleuser
December 17, 2007 3:40 pm

I am a BIG fan of all their work on these shows, so you’re right it could be flashbacks. It’s all very curious.

cw
December 17, 2007 3:44 pm

Gosh, do I ever LOVE hot green chicks! WOW!!!

Harry Ballz
December 17, 2007 3:47 pm

Ooh, to have an Orion slave girl
My gawd, it makes the mind whirl
Her greenish hue
I’d (insert your own line here)
You bet I’d make her toes curl!

p.s. I had to censor my fourth line otherwise I’d be banned for a month! :)

Danya Romulus
December 17, 2007 4:00 pm

Regarding the possible sequels if “Star Trek” is successful:

I hope the sequels don’t continue having names like “Star Trek: [Something],” I think that construction has gotten very stale. I think it would be great if they gave them titles without the words “Star Trek” but still instantly recognizable as a Trek reference; I’m thinking something like

“Where No Man Has Gone Before” or
“A Star to Steer Her By” or even something like
“NCC-1701”

Agree/Disagree?

James Jamziz
December 17, 2007 4:09 pm

I understand what you’re saying Danya and I agree with you. You can see this trend being followed with the newest Batman movies, first beginning with “Batman Begin” then moving onto the new “The Dark Knight”.

The titles you suggested were a little lengthy and not that eye grabbing (sorry haha) but I’m sure in the future they’ll come up with names that will do the franchise justice.

DavidJ
December 17, 2007 4:17 pm

The more I think about it, the more I wish Abrams and these other guys were creating a new Trek SERIES instead of just a movie. I’m sure they’ll do good work on the movie, but TV is where they REALLY shine and do their best stuff.

I think it would be cool as hell to see a Trek series with their style of storytelling every week.

TheGreatBird
December 17, 2007 4:20 pm

This movie is sounding tackier/cheesier with each bit of news that comes out.

CaptainRickover
December 17, 2007 4:24 pm

# 20 “but I’m sure in the future they’ll come up with names that will do the franchise justice. ”

Yes, that will be “Star Trek”. Nothing wrong with that.

Noleuser
December 17, 2007 4:29 pm

Who knows DavidJ, maybe with Lost ending in a year or two, they could develop a trek series as their next project.

SPB
December 17, 2007 4:36 pm

Oooooh, baby. Yes, please.

JGG1701
December 17, 2007 4:39 pm

22. TheGreatBird – December 17, 2007
This movie is sounding tackier/cheesier with each bit of news that comes out.
Sounds just the old TOS to me, with a few eps. exceptions of course. :-)

Roddenberry was a peacenik
December 17, 2007 4:46 pm

As cynical as I am, every time I look at a new press release, I look for reasons to doubt this movie. I mean, if something seems too good to be true it is. So far the only thing that came close was the idea of the Enterprise having a ‘gritty metal skin’, and the fact that the ‘good guy goes back in time to fight the bad guy intent on changing history’ plot-by-numbers has been done to death. We had it in Terminator, we had it in both First Contact and we had it Star Trek: Enterprise. It’s lazy storytelling. But oh well. That’s a minor complaint. In the end, I find myself shocked that things are sounding so right with this movie. Sounds like fans are finally getting the movie we deserve, after years of taking it up the aft-port.

DavidJ
December 17, 2007 5:00 pm

27

If nothing else, at least they’re using an entirely different team this time around.

Even if the plot ends up feeling way too familiar, you can be sure this Star Trek movie will at least LOOK and MOVE in an entirely different way.

Prologic9
December 17, 2007 5:02 pm

Just because it’s been done before does not make it “lazy storytelling”. Everything’s been done before.

I suspect the movie will technically be linear from the chracters POV, and that they’ll be leaping to pre- kirk birth , pre-kirk command, etc. .

RTC
December 17, 2007 5:06 pm

After seeing that photo, five words leap to my middle-aged mind:

It sucks to be old.

Stanky McFibberich
December 17, 2007 5:08 pm

re: 27 Rod peacenik
“I find myself shocked that things are sounding so right with this movie.”

I find myself shocked that some people think that things sound right. The only things I’ve seen so far that looks right is the font on the poster.

Plum
December 17, 2007 5:14 pm

“Funny how they are on this planet, actually like being taken advantage of.” – mysterious star fleet guy at the party.

I have NEVER heard this line in this one! I haven’t seen the remastered, restored, ‘The Menagerie’ or ‘The Cage’. Does this line appear in both?

And umm… the Menagerie got new CGI from CBS recently did it not? Let me know. I live on an island!!! Need input.

Dave Roberts
December 17, 2007 5:17 pm

Anthony,

Bigger photo, please………

Mary Jay
December 17, 2007 5:21 pm

Oh, a Orion girl now… :-P

Enjoy, guys! Personally, I will patiently wait for some Karl Urban pics :-D

Seriously, not ALL Star Trek fans are men, you know… some girls like SciFi, and Star Trek, too ;-)

December 17, 2007 5:28 pm

No CM in this flick? Maybe she is meant to only be in the second of each movie series after all.

Roddenberry was a peacenik
December 17, 2007 5:29 pm

28. Absolutely a good point.

29. I understand, and I don’t mean to judge too prematurely. And yes every story has been done before, but that doesn’t mean you keep doing the same one over and over and expecting a different result. That’s the textbook definition of insanity. But maybe I’m wrong, since we know so little about the plot-line, and what has been leaked may be from an earlier draft or maybe BS altogether. In any event, that’s a minor complaint compared to everything else that I’m liking so far.

31. Mostly I’m referring to what the creators said. Every time Orci and Kurtzman or Quint/Nimoy give an interview, from my perspective they seem to be saying all the right things. Most of all, they understand the spirit of Trek, what makes it special and how it’s about hope for a better tomorrow. I think, if nothing else, you don’t think that they at least ‘get’ what Trek is about at its core?

Cranston
December 17, 2007 5:34 pm

#11

“so the plot may jump from Z to B to A to L then back to Z then over the N?”

They had BETTER NOT skip over the N. The N is an integral part of Roddenberry’s original vision, philosophy, and outlook, and something that MUST be preserved in this film.

If they skip over the N, I (and every true Trek fan) will boycott this movie, and it will fail miserably at the box office.

(Now, the L I could probably do without.)

J C
December 17, 2007 5:34 pm

That scene reminded me of Jabba’s throneroom.Wonder if that crept into Lucas’ list of things to copy for his Star Wars films.

Jupiter1701
December 17, 2007 5:36 pm

Randon thoughts after reading just the headline:

1. OMG, Nichelle Nichols is playing an Orion slave girl?

2. If a Morrison is Kirk’s mom, and not a Kirk, then that means David Marcus’s dad was a bastard, too.

It was kind of a letdown to read the actual article, then. I guess imagination is more creative than reality.

R.C. Williams
December 17, 2007 5:41 pm

Since this obviously will take place (at least in part) in Kirk’s early academy days, I wonder if we’ll see FINNEGAN?

Regarding the slave girl: Rachel will be excellent. She’s very tall and has a models body, so she should make an excellent catch for a young Kirk.

I AM THX-1138
December 17, 2007 5:48 pm

Weird how a green woman can look so hot. Who knew.

cd
December 17, 2007 5:49 pm

No Carol Marcus: very disappointing.

CanuckLou
December 17, 2007 5:53 pm

With such a large cast many characters are going to have little more screen time than a cameo. Right now it seems like Quinto and Nimoy have the largest amount based on their work schedule.

December 17, 2007 6:03 pm

I don’t believe the time traveling Spock is the plotline.
^
Woundnt be surprised to have him as the narrator nothing more…
^
Stanky right on as usual…..

Paul McDowell
December 17, 2007 6:04 pm

“And yes every story has been done before, but that doesn’t mean you keep doing the same one over and over and expecting a different result. That’s the textbook definition of insanity,”

Time travel is is plot device…. not the plot itself. There are a million differernt stories that would be written around time travel. Can we can the negativity till the movie comes out please. Its spoiling my buzz.

Roddenberry was a peacenik
December 17, 2007 6:15 pm

45. I don’t believe I was being negative. If you’ll look at my post, if anything I’m glowingly positive for what we’ve learned so far about the film. I was expressing a tentative opinion based on a plot (device) that may or may not even be in the movie. Sorry to kill your buzz, but this isn’t an echo chamber, this is a comment section. And besides, discussions would be boring beyond belief if everyone just sat around gushing and agreeing with one another.

December 17, 2007 6:19 pm

(Correction)
I don’t believe the time traveling Spock is the plotline.
^
Woundnt be surprised to have him (Nimoy)as the narrator nothing more…
^

December 17, 2007 6:27 pm

Orion Slave Women!!!

See, that would have made Gene proud. Good move, Abrams.

Danya Romulus
December 17, 2007 6:28 pm

I really hope this doesn’t mean there won’t be Number One in the film. And I am still really hoping for Rand.

Dierna
December 17, 2007 6:33 pm

Isn’t it funny that James Kirk’s mom’s name is Winona and Spock’s mom is played by a Winona?…That was probably confusing on the set.

Abrahms “Ok Winona…”
Winona Ryder and Jennifer Morrison: “What?”
John Cho: “Oh my…”

34: I too am waiting for the Carl Urban pics. Meanwhile Im enjoying the Zach Quinto pics…*G*

wpDiscuz