


<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Stewart: My Time On Star Trek Is Over</title>
	<atom:link href="http://trekmovie.com/2007/12/25/stewart-my-time-on-star-trek-is-over/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://trekmovie.com/2007/12/25/stewart-my-time-on-star-trek-is-over/</link>
	<description>the source for Star Trek news and information</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 23:43:21 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Blaise</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2007/12/25/stewart-my-time-on-star-trek-is-over/comment-page-3/#comment-373987</link>
		<dc:creator>Blaise</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 07:51:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2007/12/25/stewart-my-time-on-star-trek-is-over/#comment-373987</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t understand why so many of you who call your selfs star trek fans have the nerve to rag on Patrick Stewart. I thought he was great in the roll of Picard, he was the perfect Xaiver and one of the best Shakesperian actors of all times. He is a ACTOR for cying out loud, if he&#039;s dispationate about a roll he&#039;s played in the past its because of the fact is a actor. A true actor cares not about the roll but about the challenge. To play some one who is different from ones true self is a mark of a actor who seaks to challenge them self. 

The guy knew nothing of star trek when he started out he even said so many times early on. And now that his time in trek is at a close why can&#039;t he distance him self from the roll. He&#039;s off doing other things, and btw he isn&#039;t getting parts like X-men cause of star trek its because he is a good actor. Trek didn&#039;t make Stewarts carrier, his acting did. 

So why on earth should he be all excited about a project he had nothing to do with? Just cause he was in star trek does that mean he has to love the show like all of you? No, it was a job nothing more nothing less. He may have enjoy the challeng and change from theater and the people he worked with but it doesn&#039;t mean that he has to opseseted with Trek like some of you. Face facts he&#039;s moved on, now you should.

I loved TNG when it was on and I went to see all the the movies with the exception of the last one. And the only reason for that is my first son had just been born and other than going to work I didn&#039;t want to be away from him. But I bought the movie and I enjoyed it just like the rest. The only reasons why TNG didn&#039;t work well in theaters is cause of poor writing and no connection between them and Picard and Data where the only ones show cased. As where in TOS there were many connections and tie ins not only to the series but to each other. As well as excelnt writing and all the main characters had defining moments. 

So stop bashing the man for just doing his job, that is unless you&#039;d like some one you don&#039;t know coming to your work and doing the same to you. As for the comments he made I saw no bitterness, nor sour grapes and not getting to be Picard again. While I love Trek I hope the movie flops and trek is off the air for another 20 years cause for some reason you fans have gotten spoiled and think the show should cater to your whims. 

As for the Bryan Singer to direct a TNG film that would be cool. Just so long as its not...MICHAEL BAY! He&#039;d destroy Star Trek, just like he did Transformers and Pearl Habor. 

I&#039;ve said my peace you may now flame me.

Have a nice day</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t understand why so many of you who call your selfs star trek fans have the nerve to rag on Patrick Stewart. I thought he was great in the roll of Picard, he was the perfect Xaiver and one of the best Shakesperian actors of all times. He is a ACTOR for cying out loud, if he&#8217;s dispationate about a roll he&#8217;s played in the past its because of the fact is a actor. A true actor cares not about the roll but about the challenge. To play some one who is different from ones true self is a mark of a actor who seaks to challenge them self. </p>
<p>The guy knew nothing of star trek when he started out he even said so many times early on. And now that his time in trek is at a close why can&#8217;t he distance him self from the roll. He&#8217;s off doing other things, and btw he isn&#8217;t getting parts like X-men cause of star trek its because he is a good actor. Trek didn&#8217;t make Stewarts carrier, his acting did. </p>
<p>So why on earth should he be all excited about a project he had nothing to do with? Just cause he was in star trek does that mean he has to love the show like all of you? No, it was a job nothing more nothing less. He may have enjoy the challeng and change from theater and the people he worked with but it doesn&#8217;t mean that he has to opseseted with Trek like some of you. Face facts he&#8217;s moved on, now you should.</p>
<p>I loved TNG when it was on and I went to see all the the movies with the exception of the last one. And the only reason for that is my first son had just been born and other than going to work I didn&#8217;t want to be away from him. But I bought the movie and I enjoyed it just like the rest. The only reasons why TNG didn&#8217;t work well in theaters is cause of poor writing and no connection between them and Picard and Data where the only ones show cased. As where in TOS there were many connections and tie ins not only to the series but to each other. As well as excelnt writing and all the main characters had defining moments. </p>
<p>So stop bashing the man for just doing his job, that is unless you&#8217;d like some one you don&#8217;t know coming to your work and doing the same to you. As for the comments he made I saw no bitterness, nor sour grapes and not getting to be Picard again. While I love Trek I hope the movie flops and trek is off the air for another 20 years cause for some reason you fans have gotten spoiled and think the show should cater to your whims. </p>
<p>As for the Bryan Singer to direct a TNG film that would be cool. Just so long as its not&#8230;MICHAEL BAY! He&#8217;d destroy Star Trek, just like he did Transformers and Pearl Habor. </p>
<p>I&#8217;ve said my peace you may now flame me.</p>
<p>Have a nice day</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: steve adams</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2007/12/25/stewart-my-time-on-star-trek-is-over/comment-page-3/#comment-367509</link>
		<dc:creator>steve adams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2007 05:19:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2007/12/25/stewart-my-time-on-star-trek-is-over/#comment-367509</guid>
		<description>Totally agree DEMODE!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Totally agree DEMODE!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DEMODE</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2007/12/25/stewart-my-time-on-star-trek-is-over/comment-page-3/#comment-367152</link>
		<dc:creator>DEMODE</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2007 01:21:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2007/12/25/stewart-my-time-on-star-trek-is-over/#comment-367152</guid>
		<description>I would love to see Bryan Singer direct a TNG film.  If it were to be the last one, he would be the man to do it.  Helps that he is a friend of Patrick Stewart.  I don&#039;t think Patrick would say no to him.  In fact, I doubt he would say no to any chance of giving Picard a good send-off.  No actor wants to see a character they played end on a low note.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would love to see Bryan Singer direct a TNG film.  If it were to be the last one, he would be the man to do it.  Helps that he is a friend of Patrick Stewart.  I don&#8217;t think Patrick would say no to him.  In fact, I doubt he would say no to any chance of giving Picard a good send-off.  No actor wants to see a character they played end on a low note.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: steve adams</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2007/12/25/stewart-my-time-on-star-trek-is-over/comment-page-3/#comment-364262</link>
		<dc:creator>steve adams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Dec 2007 06:33:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2007/12/25/stewart-my-time-on-star-trek-is-over/#comment-364262</guid>
		<description>Thanks for that correction               
Shat_Fan_2000!
^
It truly sucks that we won&#039;t see that vison or maybe if JJ can&#039;t pull it off they&#039;ll bounce Star Trek around to different Directors?
I remember someone on this site mentioned how cool it would be to see Speilburg direct a Trek...
^
Let&#039;s hope for a good new year everyone !  :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for that correction<br />
Shat_Fan_2000!<br />
^<br />
It truly sucks that we won&#8217;t see that vison or maybe if JJ can&#8217;t pull it off they&#8217;ll bounce Star Trek around to different Directors?<br />
I remember someone on this site mentioned how cool it would be to see Speilburg direct a Trek&#8230;<br />
^<br />
Let&#8217;s hope for a good new year everyone !  :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shatner_Fan_2000</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2007/12/25/stewart-my-time-on-star-trek-is-over/comment-page-3/#comment-363413</link>
		<dc:creator>Shatner_Fan_2000</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Dec 2007 18:29:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2007/12/25/stewart-my-time-on-star-trek-is-over/#comment-363413</guid>
		<description>#100 &quot;It would have been a fresh direction
for a TNG film timeline if Bryan Singer was incharge instead of Abhrams.
He was a fan of TNG timeline..and also had a brief Cameo in “Nemesis”.
Only because he loved that crew.&quot;

He had the cameo because it was the Trek film they were making at the time, and he was friends with Stewart. Singer has stated in almost every interview he&#039;s ever given that TWOK is his favorite Trek movie, and that Spock is his favorite character. Still, I agree that Singer could&#039;ve made a better TNG movie than anyone else managed to. Pity he didn&#039;t get the chance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#100 &#8220;It would have been a fresh direction<br />
for a TNG film timeline if Bryan Singer was incharge instead of Abhrams.<br />
He was a fan of TNG timeline..and also had a brief Cameo in “Nemesis”.<br />
Only because he loved that crew.&#8221;</p>
<p>He had the cameo because it was the Trek film they were making at the time, and he was friends with Stewart. Singer has stated in almost every interview he&#8217;s ever given that TWOK is his favorite Trek movie, and that Spock is his favorite character. Still, I agree that Singer could&#8217;ve made a better TNG movie than anyone else managed to. Pity he didn&#8217;t get the chance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: COMPASSIONATE GOD</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2007/12/25/stewart-my-time-on-star-trek-is-over/comment-page-3/#comment-363071</link>
		<dc:creator>COMPASSIONATE GOD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Dec 2007 12:56:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2007/12/25/stewart-my-time-on-star-trek-is-over/#comment-363071</guid>
		<description>Re: 17. Kirk&#039;s Girdle - December 25, 2007 
&quot;Actor-dick syndrome. 

Trek made him famous; made his baldness “sexy” (as he stated in an interview once). Very few of us would remember his three lines in “Excalibur”, his five lines in the Tobe Hooper crapfest “Life Force”, or his ten lines as Gurney Halleck in “Dune” if TNG hadn’t come along. It made him a viable actor for American films and television. 

Now he’s going the Alexander Dane route and saying “I’ve had a long career in film and theataah, so I have no feelings and shant comment on such silliness.”

A job is a job; he does not owe the rest of his life to TNG. Some former Trek actors feel close to/blessed by the role and the doors participation opened, while others do not, but it is his right to say exactly everything seen in the post.

Additionally, with this year being the 20th anniversary of TNG, but next to no fanfare/news coverage about the alleged milestone (just the opposite in the case of TOS when it reached 20) , its not like TNG is SO alive and well to the fanbase or general public (which--if it were the case, may make some actors feel close to a past production), so for Stewart to divorce himself from TNG is not a big deal at all. After all, the public certainly beat him to it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re: 17. Kirk&#8217;s Girdle &#8211; December 25, 2007<br />
&#8220;Actor-dick syndrome. </p>
<p>Trek made him famous; made his baldness “sexy” (as he stated in an interview once). Very few of us would remember his three lines in “Excalibur”, his five lines in the Tobe Hooper crapfest “Life Force”, or his ten lines as Gurney Halleck in “Dune” if TNG hadn’t come along. It made him a viable actor for American films and television. </p>
<p>Now he’s going the Alexander Dane route and saying “I’ve had a long career in film and theataah, so I have no feelings and shant comment on such silliness.”</p>
<p>A job is a job; he does not owe the rest of his life to TNG. Some former Trek actors feel close to/blessed by the role and the doors participation opened, while others do not, but it is his right to say exactly everything seen in the post.</p>
<p>Additionally, with this year being the 20th anniversary of TNG, but next to no fanfare/news coverage about the alleged milestone (just the opposite in the case of TOS when it reached 20) , its not like TNG is SO alive and well to the fanbase or general public (which&#8211;if it were the case, may make some actors feel close to a past production), so for Stewart to divorce himself from TNG is not a big deal at all. After all, the public certainly beat him to it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: steve adams</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2007/12/25/stewart-my-time-on-star-trek-is-over/comment-page-3/#comment-362768</link>
		<dc:creator>steve adams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Dec 2007 07:56:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2007/12/25/stewart-my-time-on-star-trek-is-over/#comment-362768</guid>
		<description>Ds9 was good! I own the entire series on dvd and I love it!
^
Ira if your out there &quot;without a show, 4400&quot; please write a sequel to Deep Space Nine.
A Sisko returns kind of thing. ?!?!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ds9 was good! I own the entire series on dvd and I love it!<br />
^<br />
Ira if your out there &#8220;without a show, 4400&#8243; please write a sequel to Deep Space Nine.<br />
A Sisko returns kind of thing. ?!?!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: steve adams</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2007/12/25/stewart-my-time-on-star-trek-is-over/comment-page-3/#comment-362679</link>
		<dc:creator>steve adams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Dec 2007 06:30:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2007/12/25/stewart-my-time-on-star-trek-is-over/#comment-362679</guid>
		<description>KG, I read that Patrick Stewart took Nemesis&#039;s downfall pretty hard...  
I have also heard that he had alot of input on his lines and direction in the film. 
^
I&#039;m sure he&#039;s upset with the prospect of not being involved in the eminant future of Trek. 
^
Also
I thought Nemesis had some great space warfare shots. I especally like the scene where the Enterprise was knocked out of warp by the Semittar. 
:) ok I&#039;m slipping into a geek rant. Gotta go</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>KG, I read that Patrick Stewart took Nemesis&#8217;s downfall pretty hard&#8230;<br />
I have also heard that he had alot of input on his lines and direction in the film.<br />
^<br />
I&#8217;m sure he&#8217;s upset with the prospect of not being involved in the eminant future of Trek.<br />
^<br />
Also<br />
I thought Nemesis had some great space warfare shots. I especally like the scene where the Enterprise was knocked out of warp by the Semittar.<br />
:) ok I&#8217;m slipping into a geek rant. Gotta go</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MiamiTrek</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2007/12/25/stewart-my-time-on-star-trek-is-over/comment-page-3/#comment-362665</link>
		<dc:creator>MiamiTrek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Dec 2007 06:19:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2007/12/25/stewart-my-time-on-star-trek-is-over/#comment-362665</guid>
		<description>I watch Trek on Spike too, but it doesn&#039;t change the fact that when you think Star Trek, you think Kirk, Spock and McCoy. They existed for over two decades before the Trek resurgence of the 80&#039;s and have been part of the pop-culture conciousness much longer than subsequent shows and crews.

Kids of course will identify with the different crews, and I happen to be a huge fan of DS9 myself, and nothing would make me happier than to see them on the movie screen. But I also know that DS9 will never make it on screen because the majority of people, as in general audience, not Trek fans, will have no idea who those people are and what it is they would be going into. 

That&#039;s just my personal opinion. The box office numbers for Nemesis pretty much sealed TNG&#039;s fate considering it was the lowest grossing Trek movie ever. Which personally, is very disappointing to me. 

Back to DS9 though, I have always had this fantasy that 10 or 15 years after the show went off the air, that there would be this rediscovery of the show that would lead into movies or tele-films, very much with what happened with Original Trek. 

Come to think of it, maybe letting TNG disappear for 5 years before jumping into the movies might have helped. 

ok...I&#039;ve rambled, someone stun me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I watch Trek on Spike too, but it doesn&#8217;t change the fact that when you think Star Trek, you think Kirk, Spock and McCoy. They existed for over two decades before the Trek resurgence of the 80&#8217;s and have been part of the pop-culture conciousness much longer than subsequent shows and crews.</p>
<p>Kids of course will identify with the different crews, and I happen to be a huge fan of DS9 myself, and nothing would make me happier than to see them on the movie screen. But I also know that DS9 will never make it on screen because the majority of people, as in general audience, not Trek fans, will have no idea who those people are and what it is they would be going into. </p>
<p>That&#8217;s just my personal opinion. The box office numbers for Nemesis pretty much sealed TNG&#8217;s fate considering it was the lowest grossing Trek movie ever. Which personally, is very disappointing to me. </p>
<p>Back to DS9 though, I have always had this fantasy that 10 or 15 years after the show went off the air, that there would be this rediscovery of the show that would lead into movies or tele-films, very much with what happened with Original Trek. </p>
<p>Come to think of it, maybe letting TNG disappear for 5 years before jumping into the movies might have helped. </p>
<p>ok&#8230;I&#8217;ve rambled, someone stun me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MiamiTrek</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2007/12/25/stewart-my-time-on-star-trek-is-over/comment-page-3/#comment-362653</link>
		<dc:creator>MiamiTrek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Dec 2007 06:09:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2007/12/25/stewart-my-time-on-star-trek-is-over/#comment-362653</guid>
		<description>#101

I wish I could expound on why I dislike Nemesis so much, but to put it simply, it was not an original or enjoyable movie to watch. 

I loved the Next Gen crew and what I saw was a shadow of the crew I had come to know in 7 seven seasons on television. The story was not compelling to me and honestly another android?! 

I own every Trek movie except for Nemesis. At one point, my partner and I decided perhaps it was just a bad movie going experience and we rented it On Demand. I clicked it off after 45 minutes. 

I can only speak for my own personal opinion. I thought the movie was boring, a sentiment I have never felt for any Trek movie, ever.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#101</p>
<p>I wish I could expound on why I dislike Nemesis so much, but to put it simply, it was not an original or enjoyable movie to watch. </p>
<p>I loved the Next Gen crew and what I saw was a shadow of the crew I had come to know in 7 seven seasons on television. The story was not compelling to me and honestly another android?! </p>
<p>I own every Trek movie except for Nemesis. At one point, my partner and I decided perhaps it was just a bad movie going experience and we rented it On Demand. I clicked it off after 45 minutes. </p>
<p>I can only speak for my own personal opinion. I thought the movie was boring, a sentiment I have never felt for any Trek movie, ever.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
