Comments on: Shatner Wonders Why He Is Not In ‘Star Trek’ – Abrams Explains Why

By: FUk me

FUk me — Sun, 20 Apr 2008 01:35:52 +0000

y so sad
‘
not many ppl talking aye well good luk every1 go on http://www.runescape.com and get addicted lik me!!!

By: FUk me

FUk me — Sun, 20 Apr 2008 01:34:26 +0000

d bom just go home u homo homo hompnomh homo homo homomomomomommomomomomomomomomomommomomomomomomomomomo

By: Perfectsdr

Perfectsdr — Mon, 04 Feb 2008 16:12:12 +0000

JJ Abrams is rumored to be a genius perfectionist and needs things done to his liking; Shatner is a force of nature and has his own ideas as to how Kirk could be featured. However it is more likely Shatner would prefer a complete revival of his character rather than a cameo performance in line with the story. JJ’s comments about the difficulty of including Kirk because of his on screen death is completely false – because if anyone knows JJ’s work, reviving dead characters has dominated his recent shows; Alias, Lost – even Dominic Monaghan got to make an appearance is the new season despite having an onscreen death. If anything the type of creative writing his team frequently delivers should the extenuating reason why Shatner could be featured. After all the creator of the new Battlestar Ronald D. Moore wrote the Kirk death scene in ‘Generations’ – he’s a genius but let’s face it – it was a clumsy bit of writing and the fact that Captain Kirk died in the time travelling nexus, the audience – I was one at the time – thought that Kirk would be brought back but was disappointed when it dawned that this was the passing of the torch of the star trek ‘generations’.
JJ should surprise all of us who can already guess that this new film will feature s story narrative structure akin to Lost, after all Mi:3 was a rip off of many Alias episodes, not to mention Michael Vartan’s character of Alias was revived for fans, despite being pummeled with bullets. So really it should be plausible to include Shatner unless JJ is not being truthful about his fan boy status of the original series. Live Long & Prosper….

By: Pearl

Pearl — Mon, 28 Jan 2008 15:03:57 +0000

Kirk is dead; William Shatner should NOT be on any more Star Trek movies – in real life he’s been acting like an arrogant jerk, and THAT should not be allowed on Star Trek; especially after the filth he plays on Boston Legal

By: Jack

Jack — Mon, 28 Jan 2008 05:58:54 +0000

Why am I reading all this?

By: Outer Kirkdom

Outer Kirkdom — Mon, 28 Jan 2008 05:10:32 +0000

If Kirk were resurrected, would he be thin?

By: Catman

Catman — Sun, 27 Jan 2008 05:06:04 +0000

Captain “Kirk” can BLOW ME!

By: Catman

Catman — Sun, 27 Jan 2008 05:05:17 +0000

I’ll be happy when William Shatner is DEAD and can quit bitching and writing those god-awful books.

By: Ben

Ben — Sun, 27 Jan 2008 01:31:06 +0000

There is a very simple way to put Kirk in the film – Set it between the dates of Star Trek 6 & The enterprise B Christening Ceremony in Star Trek Generation. Sure Kirk is Older, but there could be reference to the coming ceremony and, especially, why Spock wont be able to attend.

It ties in perfectly!

By: Mike Thompson (uk)

Mike Thompson (uk) — Sat, 26 Jan 2008 18:42:59 +0000

Whill, Look forward to you making 76 when you will more than likely to be old fat and bald………… oh that’s if you make it.

Just watch Star Trek II again and tell me Shatner is no good.

By the way it’s Nimoy and I think its wonderful that he is in this movie!

606 thanks for the feed back.