


<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: James Cawley To Appear In New Star Trek Movie + Talks About Visit To Set</title>
	<atom:link href="http://trekmovie.com/2008/01/23/james-cawley-to-appear-in-new-star-trek-movie/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://trekmovie.com/2008/01/23/james-cawley-to-appear-in-new-star-trek-movie/</link>
	<description>the source for Star Trek news and information</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 02:58:53 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: JMK3421</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2008/01/23/james-cawley-to-appear-in-new-star-trek-movie/comment-page-9/#comment-1987801</link>
		<dc:creator>JMK3421</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2009 00:26:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2008/01/23/james-cawley-to-appear-in-new-star-trek-movie/#comment-1987801</guid>
		<description>#380
#411

Here is James telling everyone that he is &quot;Dear Friends with Leslie Hoffman.  Then she backs him up in her post.

Why then on Kitumba did he threaten us all if we even talk to her, we would be kicked off the set?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#380<br />
#411</p>
<p>Here is James telling everyone that he is &#8220;Dear Friends with Leslie Hoffman.  Then she backs him up in her post.</p>
<p>Why then on Kitumba did he threaten us all if we even talk to her, we would be kicked off the set?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tom</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2008/01/23/james-cawley-to-appear-in-new-star-trek-movie/comment-page-9/#comment-1826878</link>
		<dc:creator>tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 05:59:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2008/01/23/james-cawley-to-appear-in-new-star-trek-movie/#comment-1826878</guid>
		<description>where was he in the movie? I don&#039;t see it listed on imdb.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>where was he in the movie? I don&#8217;t see it listed on imdb.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Regina</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2008/01/23/james-cawley-to-appear-in-new-star-trek-movie/comment-page-9/#comment-1812183</link>
		<dc:creator>Regina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 03:21:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2008/01/23/james-cawley-to-appear-in-new-star-trek-movie/#comment-1812183</guid>
		<description>I just watched JJ Abrams star trek twice now, two days in a row.  I had no idea James cawley was in it!!!!  Where on earth was he?  Please point him out to me. don&#039;t tell me he was olsen, the one who crashed and burned in the suit flying through the atmosphere with sulu and kirk... was that him??  Lots of love to  you james, missing you and your elvis concerts too on the boat and at the park.  sincerely Regina your one double western ny fan  Ps  yeah, that new &quot;old&quot; enterprise bridge JJ abrams used really surprised me too!  But its nice.  gotta admit it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just watched JJ Abrams star trek twice now, two days in a row.  I had no idea James cawley was in it!!!!  Where on earth was he?  Please point him out to me. don&#8217;t tell me he was olsen, the one who crashed and burned in the suit flying through the atmosphere with sulu and kirk&#8230; was that him??  Lots of love to  you james, missing you and your elvis concerts too on the boat and at the park.  sincerely Regina your one double western ny fan  Ps  yeah, that new &#8220;old&#8221; enterprise bridge JJ abrams used really surprised me too!  But its nice.  gotta admit it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BishopAsh</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2008/01/23/james-cawley-to-appear-in-new-star-trek-movie/comment-page-9/#comment-1770484</link>
		<dc:creator>BishopAsh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 10:02:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2008/01/23/james-cawley-to-appear-in-new-star-trek-movie/#comment-1770484</guid>
		<description>Hey I don&#039;t know James Cawley in the slightest, but I gotta say, I am completelly jazzed FOR him.  I can mentally put myself in his shoes, and, damn, that&#039;s a great story!  This feature film didn&#039;t exist when James and friends started &quot;their trek&quot;, I would say, look where it got him, but the journey is the reward.  If I were in shape enough to throw on a red shirt, I&#039;d take some random styrofoam boulder to the cranium to be a part of Phase Two (sadly my waistline has &quot;Gone the way of Shatner&quot;, and I say that with love for the man, so nuts to you squawkers) but I&#039;ll be happy to sit back and enjoy Jim&#039;s efforts &quot;for the fans&quot;.

I also think it speaks volumes for who J.J. Abrams is, that he recognized James right off the bat...he&#039;s obviously been doing his homework, and that allays my fears a bit.  There are a lot of cameos in this film, (just look at IMDB) and who knows if Jim (I got tired of calling him James, so sue me) will be on screen for even two seconds, but even if it is, that&#039;s two more seconds than any of the rest of us out her in fan-land.

...just my two cents.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey I don&#8217;t know James Cawley in the slightest, but I gotta say, I am completelly jazzed FOR him.  I can mentally put myself in his shoes, and, damn, that&#8217;s a great story!  This feature film didn&#8217;t exist when James and friends started &#8220;their trek&#8221;, I would say, look where it got him, but the journey is the reward.  If I were in shape enough to throw on a red shirt, I&#8217;d take some random styrofoam boulder to the cranium to be a part of Phase Two (sadly my waistline has &#8220;Gone the way of Shatner&#8221;, and I say that with love for the man, so nuts to you squawkers) but I&#8217;ll be happy to sit back and enjoy Jim&#8217;s efforts &#8220;for the fans&#8221;.</p>
<p>I also think it speaks volumes for who J.J. Abrams is, that he recognized James right off the bat&#8230;he&#8217;s obviously been doing his homework, and that allays my fears a bit.  There are a lot of cameos in this film, (just look at IMDB) and who knows if Jim (I got tired of calling him James, so sue me) will be on screen for even two seconds, but even if it is, that&#8217;s two more seconds than any of the rest of us out her in fan-land.</p>
<p>&#8230;just my two cents.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Heidi Steinborn</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2008/01/23/james-cawley-to-appear-in-new-star-trek-movie/comment-page-9/#comment-1730038</link>
		<dc:creator>Heidi Steinborn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 17:40:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2008/01/23/james-cawley-to-appear-in-new-star-trek-movie/#comment-1730038</guid>
		<description>Way to go James &quot;Jimmy&quot; Cawley, Heidi here, you remember me! What a dream for you to meet him. See you soon. Star Trek fan all the way here!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Way to go James &#8220;Jimmy&#8221; Cawley, Heidi here, you remember me! What a dream for you to meet him. See you soon. Star Trek fan all the way here!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: scottishtreky</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2008/01/23/james-cawley-to-appear-in-new-star-trek-movie/comment-page-9/#comment-1438018</link>
		<dc:creator>scottishtreky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jan 2009 13:33:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2008/01/23/james-cawley-to-appear-in-new-star-trek-movie/#comment-1438018</guid>
		<description>once a STAR  TREK  fan     always  a  STAR TREK    fan thats what i say   !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>once a STAR  TREK  fan     always  a  STAR TREK    fan thats what i say   !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mad Yank</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2008/01/23/james-cawley-to-appear-in-new-star-trek-movie/comment-page-9/#comment-1399728</link>
		<dc:creator>Mad Yank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 13:48:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2008/01/23/james-cawley-to-appear-in-new-star-trek-movie/#comment-1399728</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s been disappointing, to say the least, that Paramount has so consistently ignored it&#039;s OWN &#039;canon&#039; of what the ST &quot;History&quot; is supposed to be. The Continuity department, both within the written end of things, wherever that resides (Simon &amp; Schuster/Pocket Books, Paramount, or whoever) and the TV and Film divisions at Paramount/Viacom/CBS, seem to ignore each other and their OWN manuals and Continuity Bibles! The back stories for each series have been totally blown away as the production history has progressed, until by the time Enterprise was in production, NOTHING was sacred in the search for bigger and better plotlines.
JJ Abrams and James Cawley seem to have one big thing in common; they will stick to the original history as far as possible, even at the expense of the later series.
Although, the second trailer for the film, with Kirk roaring up to the construction site on his motorcycle, has me wondering about one thing:
WHAT HAPPENED TO SAN FRANCISCO? NCC-1701 was fabricated in San Francisco Yards, then flown to orbit in sections for final assembly at the Fleet SF Yard facility in Geo-sync orbit over San Francisco; only the Warp nacelles were fueled in orbit with matter/antimatter.
JJ: You goofed!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s been disappointing, to say the least, that Paramount has so consistently ignored it&#8217;s OWN &#8216;canon&#8217; of what the ST &#8220;History&#8221; is supposed to be. The Continuity department, both within the written end of things, wherever that resides (Simon &amp; Schuster/Pocket Books, Paramount, or whoever) and the TV and Film divisions at Paramount/Viacom/CBS, seem to ignore each other and their OWN manuals and Continuity Bibles! The back stories for each series have been totally blown away as the production history has progressed, until by the time Enterprise was in production, NOTHING was sacred in the search for bigger and better plotlines.<br />
JJ Abrams and James Cawley seem to have one big thing in common; they will stick to the original history as far as possible, even at the expense of the later series.<br />
Although, the second trailer for the film, with Kirk roaring up to the construction site on his motorcycle, has me wondering about one thing:<br />
WHAT HAPPENED TO SAN FRANCISCO? NCC-1701 was fabricated in San Francisco Yards, then flown to orbit in sections for final assembly at the Fleet SF Yard facility in Geo-sync orbit over San Francisco; only the Warp nacelles were fueled in orbit with matter/antimatter.<br />
JJ: You goofed!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tirdsamwitch</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2008/01/23/james-cawley-to-appear-in-new-star-trek-movie/comment-page-9/#comment-804644</link>
		<dc:creator>tirdsamwitch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jun 2008 08:46:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2008/01/23/james-cawley-to-appear-in-new-star-trek-movie/#comment-804644</guid>
		<description>James Cawley AKA Elvis Kirk played an Extra the man can&#039;t act. Hes a wannabe</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>James Cawley AKA Elvis Kirk played an Extra the man can&#8217;t act. Hes a wannabe</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jerry</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2008/01/23/james-cawley-to-appear-in-new-star-trek-movie/comment-page-9/#comment-740967</link>
		<dc:creator>Jerry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jun 2008 09:39:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2008/01/23/james-cawley-to-appear-in-new-star-trek-movie/#comment-740967</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s just nice to see the studio cater to the fanbase again. We want Trek, not some half-baked derivative thereof. I think the lumps they got with Nemesis and Enterprise, and the surprising success of true to form fan productions like New Voyages and  Star Trek: Excelsior may have just woken them up to that fact.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s just nice to see the studio cater to the fanbase again. We want Trek, not some half-baked derivative thereof. I think the lumps they got with Nemesis and Enterprise, and the surprising success of true to form fan productions like New Voyages and  Star Trek: Excelsior may have just woken them up to that fact.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Barrett</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2008/01/23/james-cawley-to-appear-in-new-star-trek-movie/comment-page-9/#comment-539358</link>
		<dc:creator>James Barrett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2008 23:50:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2008/01/23/james-cawley-to-appear-in-new-star-trek-movie/#comment-539358</guid>
		<description>Great work James, and congratulations on your role on the new film!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great work James, and congratulations on your role on the new film!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
