


<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Trek Actors Confirmed</title>
	<atom:link href="http://trekmovie.com/2008/02/09/new-trek-actors-confirmed/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://trekmovie.com/2008/02/09/new-trek-actors-confirmed/</link>
	<description>the source for Star Trek news and information</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 11:06:09 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mais dois nomes anunciados para o elenco do filme &#171; Startrekbr&#8217;s Weblog</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2008/02/09/new-trek-actors-confirmed/comment-page-1/#comment-450841</link>
		<dc:creator>Mais dois nomes anunciados para o elenco do filme &#171; Startrekbr&#8217;s Weblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 11:19:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2008/02/09/new-trek-actors-confirmed/#comment-450841</guid>
		<description>[...] site The Trek Movie confirmou mais dois atores desconhecidos a integrarem o elenco de Jornada nas Estrelas. Trata-se da [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] site The Trek Movie confirmou mais dois atores desconhecidos a integrarem o elenco de Jornada nas Estrelas. Trata-se da [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Hall</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2008/02/09/new-trek-actors-confirmed/comment-page-1/#comment-450121</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Hall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 02:14:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2008/02/09/new-trek-actors-confirmed/#comment-450121</guid>
		<description>Doug,

In &quot;Balance of Terror,&quot; Kirk and crew are most definitely amazed at the ability of the warbird to vanish at will, though Spock noted that invisibility was &quot;theoretically possible&quot;--which would be a pretty bizzarre observation if the Federation had already encountered it 100 years before.  

Despite some disappointments I&#039;d held out hope for &quot;Enterprise,&quot; and even had enjoyed a fair amount of what I&#039;d seen up till that time.  But with &quot;Minefield,&quot; I knew the jig was up, and that the show would never be the true prequel to TOS that it should have been (instead, it was merely a prequel to TNG and its offspring), because the producers obviously didn&#039;t wish to go to the effort  to make it one.  And what angered me about the whole thing was that it was so &lt;i&gt;unnecessary&lt;/i&gt;, since a stealthed ship would have worked just as well for the plot of &quot;Minefield&quot; as an invisible one.  B &amp; B were just too lazy--and too disdainful of TOS--to care one way or the other.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Doug,</p>
<p>In &#8220;Balance of Terror,&#8221; Kirk and crew are most definitely amazed at the ability of the warbird to vanish at will, though Spock noted that invisibility was &#8220;theoretically possible&#8221;&#8211;which would be a pretty bizzarre observation if the Federation had already encountered it 100 years before.  </p>
<p>Despite some disappointments I&#8217;d held out hope for &#8220;Enterprise,&#8221; and even had enjoyed a fair amount of what I&#8217;d seen up till that time.  But with &#8220;Minefield,&#8221; I knew the jig was up, and that the show would never be the true prequel to TOS that it should have been (instead, it was merely a prequel to TNG and its offspring), because the producers obviously didn&#8217;t wish to go to the effort  to make it one.  And what angered me about the whole thing was that it was so <i>unnecessary</i>, since a stealthed ship would have worked just as well for the plot of &#8220;Minefield&#8221; as an invisible one.  B &amp; B were just too lazy&#8211;and too disdainful of TOS&#8211;to care one way or the other.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2008/02/09/new-trek-actors-confirmed/comment-page-1/#comment-449569</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2008 21:20:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2008/02/09/new-trek-actors-confirmed/#comment-449569</guid>
		<description>Like many fans, the Romulans were also my favorite of &quot;Star Trek&#039;s&quot;  alien races. In my opinion, we never saw enough of them in any of the series. I was fascinated with the dichotomy between the Romulans and Vulcans, and often wondered about the divergent path the two races traversed... and what lead to their split.

I never understood (or liked) why the subsequent TREKs gave the Romulans those odd protuberances on their foreheads... I guess the make-up budget had too much money to play with.

VOY did a couple of respectable episodes that involve the Romulans, as did DS9. I was very happy that ENT preserved canon by not ever permitting Archer and crew to (knowingly) meet the Romulans face-to-face, although I would have been curious to see how ENT would get around this since one of the season four arcs alluded to a conspiracy between a faction of the Romulans and Vulcan&#039;s leader V&#039;Las. 

Note: Someone in one of the threads said Berman destroyed canon in &quot;ST: Enterprise.&quot; probably referring to the episode The Minefield,&quot; by showing a warbird decloaking/ cloaking. Why this breaks canon is beyond me as it was introduced in TOS&#039;s episode &quot;Balance of Terror.&quot; and if I recall correctly, there was no indication in that episode that cloaking technology was new to the Romulans--just the plasma weapon.

Just a thought, perhaps the Romulan / Federation War was was the result of the subterfuge that we saw in ENT&#039;s season four.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Like many fans, the Romulans were also my favorite of &#8220;Star Trek&#8217;s&#8221;  alien races. In my opinion, we never saw enough of them in any of the series. I was fascinated with the dichotomy between the Romulans and Vulcans, and often wondered about the divergent path the two races traversed&#8230; and what lead to their split.</p>
<p>I never understood (or liked) why the subsequent TREKs gave the Romulans those odd protuberances on their foreheads&#8230; I guess the make-up budget had too much money to play with.</p>
<p>VOY did a couple of respectable episodes that involve the Romulans, as did DS9. I was very happy that ENT preserved canon by not ever permitting Archer and crew to (knowingly) meet the Romulans face-to-face, although I would have been curious to see how ENT would get around this since one of the season four arcs alluded to a conspiracy between a faction of the Romulans and Vulcan&#8217;s leader V&#8217;Las. </p>
<p>Note: Someone in one of the threads said Berman destroyed canon in &#8220;ST: Enterprise.&#8221; probably referring to the episode The Minefield,&#8221; by showing a warbird decloaking/ cloaking. Why this breaks canon is beyond me as it was introduced in TOS&#8217;s episode &#8220;Balance of Terror.&#8221; and if I recall correctly, there was no indication in that episode that cloaking technology was new to the Romulans&#8211;just the plasma weapon.</p>
<p>Just a thought, perhaps the Romulan / Federation War was was the result of the subterfuge that we saw in ENT&#8217;s season four.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2008/02/09/new-trek-actors-confirmed/comment-page-1/#comment-448652</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2008 11:54:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2008/02/09/new-trek-actors-confirmed/#comment-448652</guid>
		<description>There were some pretty cool Romulan episodes on DS9 in fact they were key to the story arc for a while with Sisko trying to find a way to bring them into the war.

They had a key episode revolve around a Romulan senator who Sisko brought to the station under stealth to present &quot;evidence&quot; of a dominion attack on Romulas in an attempt to gain the Romulans entry into the war.

Romulan Warbirds also featured heavily in the larger engagements shown in DS9 and they were mentioned to have liberated several Federation systems from Dominion control.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There were some pretty cool Romulan episodes on DS9 in fact they were key to the story arc for a while with Sisko trying to find a way to bring them into the war.</p>
<p>They had a key episode revolve around a Romulan senator who Sisko brought to the station under stealth to present &#8220;evidence&#8221; of a dominion attack on Romulas in an attempt to gain the Romulans entry into the war.</p>
<p>Romulan Warbirds also featured heavily in the larger engagements shown in DS9 and they were mentioned to have liberated several Federation systems from Dominion control.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Finnegan</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2008/02/09/new-trek-actors-confirmed/comment-page-1/#comment-448091</link>
		<dc:creator>Finnegan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2008 05:15:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2008/02/09/new-trek-actors-confirmed/#comment-448091</guid>
		<description>36 Thanks Anthony for taking time to answer my question! I really love your site and the effort you and your team expend on it.

&quot;I am 100 % confident that every single one reported has a role... When I say &#039;confirmed&#039; that is not a rumour&quot; - That&#039;s why I asked you  :-)  You are THE source. I just wondered what you think about these rumours.

I absolutely understand this. There are far too many people in this movie to do an article on every single one. But I&#039;m just so curious about this movie: every little article brings a thrill to me :-)

But I think I can be patient - or try to be :-)  
And don&#039;t worry, I will &quot;stay tuned&quot;!

Thank you very much.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>36 Thanks Anthony for taking time to answer my question! I really love your site and the effort you and your team expend on it.</p>
<p>&#8220;I am 100 % confident that every single one reported has a role&#8230; When I say &#8216;confirmed&#8217; that is not a rumour&#8221; &#8211; That&#8217;s why I asked you  :-)  You are THE source. I just wondered what you think about these rumours.</p>
<p>I absolutely understand this. There are far too many people in this movie to do an article on every single one. But I&#8217;m just so curious about this movie: every little article brings a thrill to me :-)</p>
<p>But I think I can be patient &#8211; or try to be :-)<br />
And don&#8217;t worry, I will &#8220;stay tuned&#8221;!</p>
<p>Thank you very much.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anthony Pascale</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2008/02/09/new-trek-actors-confirmed/comment-page-1/#comment-447917</link>
		<dc:creator>Anthony Pascale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2008 03:17:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2008/02/09/new-trek-actors-confirmed/#comment-447917</guid>
		<description>32...and others...

We run a story every time we confirm an actor with a speaking role (or a famous person with a background role). There are dozens of extras out there that we will not do articles on, but I may add them to the cast list at some point...but really there are far too many. 

As for more speaking roles...This site reports those we have confirmed through sources. We also report what other trusted sites report, but do not report stuff off any site that allows user generated content. 

We have reported first on more trek cast members than any other site. I am 100% confident that every single one reported has a role (at least before the editor gets her hands on the movie). When I say &#039;confirmed&#039; that is not a rumor...that from my point of view is a fact.  This site will report plot points that I consider still &#039;rumor&#039; but not cast

patience is a virtue and stay tuned.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>32&#8230;and others&#8230;</p>
<p>We run a story every time we confirm an actor with a speaking role (or a famous person with a background role). There are dozens of extras out there that we will not do articles on, but I may add them to the cast list at some point&#8230;but really there are far too many. </p>
<p>As for more speaking roles&#8230;This site reports those we have confirmed through sources. We also report what other trusted sites report, but do not report stuff off any site that allows user generated content. </p>
<p>We have reported first on more trek cast members than any other site. I am 100% confident that every single one reported has a role (at least before the editor gets her hands on the movie). When I say &#8216;confirmed&#8217; that is not a rumor&#8230;that from my point of view is a fact.  This site will report plot points that I consider still &#8216;rumor&#8217; but not cast</p>
<p>patience is a virtue and stay tuned.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Vulcanista</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2008/02/09/new-trek-actors-confirmed/comment-page-1/#comment-447789</link>
		<dc:creator>The Vulcanista</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2008 02:06:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2008/02/09/new-trek-actors-confirmed/#comment-447789</guid>
		<description>#31

I didn&#039;t see &quot;Nemesis&quot; until after the first LOTR flick came out.  My first thought was:  &quot;Where are the Romulans?&quot;  

My second thought was, &quot;Why are there orcs in a Star Trek movie?&quot;

Then I flipped the channel.

Peace. Live long and prosper.
The Vulcanista }:-&#124;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#31</p>
<p>I didn&#8217;t see &#8220;Nemesis&#8221; until after the first LOTR flick came out.  My first thought was:  &#8220;Where are the Romulans?&#8221;  </p>
<p>My second thought was, &#8220;Why are there orcs in a Star Trek movie?&#8221;</p>
<p>Then I flipped the channel.</p>
<p>Peace. Live long and prosper.<br />
The Vulcanista }:-|</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2008/02/09/new-trek-actors-confirmed/comment-page-1/#comment-447407</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Feb 2008 22:50:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2008/02/09/new-trek-actors-confirmed/#comment-447407</guid>
		<description>Since cast members&#039; ages are being tossed around... let&#039;s see...

William Shatner and Leonard Nimoy are both 76 (Shatner is three or four days older than Nimoy--both will be 77 next month)
Grace Lee Whitney is 78
Majel Barrett is 76 later this month
Nichelle Nichols is 75
Walter Koenig is 71
George Takei is 70
Bruce Hyde is 66

--- and those who&#039;ve gone on to the stars...

Jimmy Doohan was 85
DeForest Kelley was 79
Gene Roddenberry was 70
Mark Lenard was 72
Jane Wyatt was 96</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since cast members&#8217; ages are being tossed around&#8230; let&#8217;s see&#8230;</p>
<p>William Shatner and Leonard Nimoy are both 76 (Shatner is three or four days older than Nimoy&#8211;both will be 77 next month)<br />
Grace Lee Whitney is 78<br />
Majel Barrett is 76 later this month<br />
Nichelle Nichols is 75<br />
Walter Koenig is 71<br />
George Takei is 70<br />
Bruce Hyde is 66</p>
<p>&#8212; and those who&#8217;ve gone on to the stars&#8230;</p>
<p>Jimmy Doohan was 85<br />
DeForest Kelley was 79<br />
Gene Roddenberry was 70<br />
Mark Lenard was 72<br />
Jane Wyatt was 96</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Killamarsh - Baz</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2008/02/09/new-trek-actors-confirmed/comment-page-1/#comment-447353</link>
		<dc:creator>Killamarsh - Baz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Feb 2008 22:20:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2008/02/09/new-trek-actors-confirmed/#comment-447353</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been re-looking at the JFX Online &quot;On Set: I’m An Extra Jim, Not A Cult Member!&quot; pics from ages ago and the man on the image (oso_0055.jpg) looks remarkably like this new guy Kelvin Yu. Could the white costume he&#039;s wearing be that of a Starfleet Medical technician? What does everybody else think?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been re-looking at the JFX Online &#8220;On Set: I’m An Extra Jim, Not A Cult Member!&#8221; pics from ages ago and the man on the image (oso_0055.jpg) looks remarkably like this new guy Kelvin Yu. Could the white costume he&#8217;s wearing be that of a Starfleet Medical technician? What does everybody else think?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Finnegan</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2008/02/09/new-trek-actors-confirmed/comment-page-1/#comment-447318</link>
		<dc:creator>Finnegan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Feb 2008 22:05:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2008/02/09/new-trek-actors-confirmed/#comment-447318</guid>
		<description>@ 28: Good Question! 

Anthony, can you confirm the following rumors?

- Faran Tahir as ?
- David Narloch as Starfleet Cadet
- Greg Ellis as Enterprise&#039; Chief-Engineer Olsen
- Wednesday Mourning as an extra</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ 28: Good Question! </p>
<p>Anthony, can you confirm the following rumors?</p>
<p>- Faran Tahir as ?<br />
- David Narloch as Starfleet Cadet<br />
- Greg Ellis as Enterprise&#8217; Chief-Engineer Olsen<br />
- Wednesday Mourning as an extra</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
