More Yelchin: On Spocks, Move To May, Accent and More February 21, 2008
by Anthony Pascale , Filed under: ST09 Cast , trackback
In a new video interview with MTV, Anton Yelchin talks at length about Star Trek. The new Chekov talks about aliens, a ‘gracious’ meeting with Walter Koenig on the set, a photo shoot, working with two Spocks, the move to May and more. Check out the video plus a new excerpt from his Star Trek Magazine interview below.
MTV VIDEO INTERVIEW [MINOR SPOILERS]
more on the interview at MTV.
YELCHIN DOES HIS HOMEWORK
Anton Yelchin admits that he didn’t know anything about Star Trek before he got cast. But in a new in depth interview with the official Star Trek Magazine, the actor shows how he has really studied the character.
Yelchin on Chekov’s accent
I know the Russian accent so well because I have so many family members and family friends who speak with one, but there are also certain things that Walter Koenig does specifically, like his version of it, that I have been picking up and studying to incorporate, because I think they’re really important. It really is Chekov. It’s not just some Russian guy. It’s Chekov. Specifically the word “very.” He always says “wery.” It’s a big emphasis on using a W instead of a V. And the way he says “keptin” … All these things, I think, are important to take note of and to use.
on what interests him about Chekov
My personal opinion of Chekov in the original series is he’s just a really funny little guy, and that’s what we’re going to do. I watched my favorite Star Trek episode yesterday, “The Apple.” The whole episode, everyone is doing something that is relevant to their mission, and he’s just over there with his girlfriend. He’s supposed to be this brilliant navigator and it’s in combination with this wonderful sense of humor and weirdness. In “The Apple” he starts talking about the Garden of Eden being outside of Moscow. Great little things like that I really like about him.
The latest issue of Star Trek Magazine has much more from Yelchin as well as other good articles on the film, and much more. Pick it on newsstands now.
Loading ...
Comments»
I like this kid.
No… must resist…
But I have to say in this image I buy him a little better in the role.
no comments yet – I shall be the first!
I think he will be great in this role. The little nuances of the accent plus his take on it
apparently not…..not too optimisitc rite now with actor news, i’ve kinda fallen out of the trek movie mood, may get back into it later this year, probably around the 1 year to go countdown (hmm de ja vu saying that)…anyway i’m happy for yelchin
I finally realized that TOS stands for “The Old Show”, instead of “The Original Series.” I think this kid is gonna be a good Chekov.
Uniforms sort of confirmed?
I’m going to echo #1 and say “I like this kid”
He seems to ‘get’ it.
im impressed that this guy is taking the time to watch some original series episodes. i think its essential. well done mate.
looking forward to your take on chekov
greg
uk
Good interview. I like this kid too. And two Spocks are indeed better than one!
It’s high time we heard from Chris Pine, though.
Peace. Live long and prosper
The Vulcanista }:-|
I think he’s got a good sense of humor and a good approach to this project.
His favorite episode is “The Apple”? Why not “Way to Eden”? OK, to each his own. I guess Apple is one of the few Chekov featured eps where Chekov isn’t made to scream out in agony. (Wonder if JJ’s mention ear-wigs to Yelchin yet?)
Velcome aboard, Anton. You’re wery velcome on this wessel.
Oh god, are we going to have to go through an actor’s strike now?
1. Jorg Sacul – February 21, 2008
I like this kid.
I do too.
In The Apple, Chekov was just hangin’ with the girl. In Way to Eden he was nearly compromised by the girl. Good character integrity choice, Anton!
Somebody has to ask the important question! WILL he be wearing a “Beatle” wig?? lol!
Somebody give this guy a feckin’ hug. He’s so bleedin’ nice.
Have to say that some of the remarks from the cast members have been very good. They seem to all think of the movie as some kind of Camp Star Trek, where they get to go play as Kirk an Co.
His new movie looks very good, I might just check it out.
Anthony, thanks for that MTV interview!
We really get a lot of good info and a great sense of how excited the cast is about what they’re a part of. That interview more than any others I read recently gave me chills of excitement. Anthony, you da man!!!
This young man will do a good job as our favorite navigator .
Nuclear Wessles!!!
Glad he doesn’t look like the pipsqueak kid I took him for in the first pictures I saw of him.
I think he’s got authentic Russian edge, a certain cool impatience. In the 60s, we needed to laugh at Russians, but anybody who lives with Russians [like we do in LA] knows that they are psychologically tough people.
Hope they don’t use him for comic relief.
well, he just confirmed some costume colors…gold, red and blue…
“Obviously there’s special perks if you’ve been a ‘Star Trek’ fan for forty years…”
There certainly are – the discounted “Early Bird Special” down at Denny’s is one of my favorites. :lol:
MTV guy: “obviously the kids watching MTV have been fans of yours…”
Did I miss something- is this guy really popular with the yungins? I’ve never heard of this kid before.
#20- Dennis , you so crazy! LOL!
NOT CANON!!!!!!!!
His eyes are .002 microns too far apart to accurately represent Chekov as Gene envisioned. Boycott…
Not canon????
It IS NOW!!!
Dennis: Do you have to carry all your DVDs and ships/action figures/autographs down to Denny’s to get the discount?
#23: “NOT CANON!!!!!!!! His eyes are .002 microns too far apart to accurately represent Chekov as Gene envisioned. Boycott…”
I’m more concerned about how Chekov fits into a Pike era story, that would make Pavel about 5 years old.
What I want to know is who’s playing Rand? My vote is for Tracey Gold.
Aw, c’mon……what’s next? Interviewing the catering truck guy? Why are we hearing nothing from Chris Pine? He’s playing the Kirkmeister for cryin’ out loud!!!
Can somebody link a transcript of some sort. MTV hates Canadian viewers like me. :(
#26 The current theory is that there will be several different eras depicted in the movie. From what Yelchin said it would seem the end of the movie is very likly to see a Kirk as Captain era as one of them.
er…nm…found the interview /blush
Ah, “The Apple”… the episode with the space hippies!
Also the episode that my “handle” is taken from ;-)
LL&P
The Apple has Vol, the papier mache rhino with an attitude and a red shirt body count of staggering proportions.
Way to Eden is the hippies.
#26—Why would he be involved in a Pike-era story? That is a small part of the story. The story also depicts Kirk’s academy days, Kirk’s days of commanding the Enterprise, Spock’s childhood, etc. I’m not sure where you get that Checkov would have anything to do with Pike. I’m beginning to think you just make negative comments about the film without any regard for accuracy whatsoever. You have been on his site long enough not to have missed that element in Anthony’s many spoiler articles. Do you even read them?
Oh Sh*t! You’re right! D’oh!!!
Hmmmm….it sounds like we only see the crew in regulation uniforms (from TOS) at the very end of the movie. Everything else in the film probably layers the story with how this iconic crew came to be together. If the last scene of the movie is them on the bridge of the Enterprise in the uniform “look” we know and love, what a great way to usher in the much anticipated sequel………….HOO HA!!
…cornfused Apple & Eden…
Both have hot chicks in silly situations. IMHO.
CmdrR: Heh! Too true!
Hmm. I can dig ‘epic’, but describing it as an action movie over and over again isn’t sitting too well with me. Not that there’s anything wrong with action, but that’s really not how I’d expect a Star Trek movie to be described as. Guess I’ll just have to wait and see what happens
But anyway, he’s pretty cute. Kinda reminds me of Michael J. Fox in a way. Can’t wait to see him (and everyone else) in their uniforms!
But will he get to do a Chekov scream? AAIAIAIIIEEEEEEEE
Young Chekov has to be a fun character for an actor to get into. Let’s suppose the final part of the film is set during Kirk’s command of the Enterprise. Chekov probably gets no formal introduction, just has a few lines here and there where he can be recognized: “Romulan wessels decloaking keptin!” Any actor worth his salt would make the most of it, I think we can count on Yelchin.
#14
Camp Star Trek … wouldn’t *that* be a trip and a half!
It sounds like everyone is having a lot of fun making this movie. The fact that Yeltsin is really into the Chekhov character is very encouraging. And interesting that Yeltsin also mentioned publicity photos. Hopefully, TPTB will fork some over soon!
We still need to hear from the Cap’n Pine himself, though.
Peace. Live long and prosper.
The Vulcanista }:-|
I just think it’s great that MTV is taking enough of an interest to talk to Anton about the new movie.
Here’s hoping it catches on. The franchise needs to bring in fresh some fresh fans as well as ideas.
This dude sure is spilling the beans. J.J. better tell him to be wery, wery wuiet!.
Nice
9. The Vulcanista – February 21, 2008
“It’s high time we heard from Chris Pine, though.”
Sensors indicate that Mr. Pine is a most smokin’-hot humanoid, Captain.
Do sensors indicate that Mr. Pine has hazel eyes and a hairless chest, Mr. Spock?
Yes, Captain, as well as the ability to chew the scenery upon demand.
#43
agreed. they sem to hava a lot of problems in that area. and now the film is pushed back to May? god help them.
and that mention of a photo shoot? when can we get those pics?
#5
sorry but its always been ‘the original series’ to me and most people ive talked too. only rarely every few years does someone pop up and say they thought it was ‘the old show’
Anton Yelchin seems like a nice enough kid, but honestly…. LOSE Koenig’s crappy, pseudo-Russian accent! I have had some Russian friends and NONE of them ever sounded like Walter Koenig. I love the idea that Abrams and company are saluting classic Trek, but you don’t have to salute the things that DON’T work! That phony-baloney accent of Koenig’s was not “stylized;” it was BAD acting! Don’t salute it; do it better! Make it your own, kid! Never liked Walter Koenig’s characterization and I never will. Russians CAN make the “V” sound! This is not 1967. They should not be characterized as cliche, Cold-War stereotypes! Too bad they feel the pressure to hang on to stuff that didn’t work before.
Aww…Koenig’s crappy, pseudo-Russian accent was part of the fun and charm of the character! I’m kind of glad they’re going to keep some aspects of it. After all, how do we know for certain what humans from Russian are going to sound like in the 23rd Century? TNG did give us a French captain that sounded exactly like he was from Britain. ;)
Of course, I would have been happy with a legitimate Russian accent too. I don’t envy the job the actors and producers of this film have at all. There is SUCH a wide array of what different fans want and don’t want. No matter what they choose there’s going to be some outcry from some fans.
I look forward to seeing him in the in the role of chekov
Just listening to his regular voice, he sounds like Chekov indeed. Throw in the Russian Accent, it may be dead on!
I’m fifty FIRST!!
Maybe he’s been sent to spill some plot beans for the fans who are clamoring so loudly. Maybe.
dang.
One thing’s for certain. He still won’t have a brother, Piotr!
Groovy kid. As usual, everything I see about the cast makes me smile. I am at the point now where I strongly suspect that even if I choose to see the film and end up disliking it, I’ll still enjoy the cast and appreciate their take on the characters.
Yep, he gave it away that they will be in Gold Blue and Red Uniforms at the end.
He’s awesome. I think he’ll be a great Chekov. I keep thinking of him as a kid though, and it’s weird to think Chekov will be several years younger than I am! TOS was way before my time, so that just doesn’t seem right. :lol: But with every cast interview, I’m more confident in the movie and their casting choices.
funny, I’m more confident in their casting and movie choices!
Chekov’s bizarre “Russian” accent (wessels etc.) might be how some Russians speak in the 23rd century, for whatever reason. We have plenty of time between now and then for accents to evolve. Same goes for quick thinking Scotsmen.
It’s part of the character. Let Chekov be Chekov.
He is CUTE
since the only reason to bring Chekov onboard was to attract the “monkeys” fans, this coul work as well
# 28
http://www.mtv.com/movies/news/articles/1582058/20080221/story.jhtml
this is the link to the full story. I can’t see the video but he has some pretty interesting things to say in the text…”and you see everyone in the gold, and the blue, and the red” for instance
Aahh, it’s Yelchin time again. And although this interview was somewhat better than the previous one, for me personally, it’s getting really amusing to see the kids scraping through – as good as a play. IMO, their general sweet ignorance is one indicator as to the direction the film is heading for.
you’ve got to love Anton. He understands his part and the way in wich it IS important (not judging by the size of the role) perfectly. I think now that new Russian is developing a new confidence in itself and will be a valuable partner for this word (already is in fact), a new Russian spirtit on the Enterprise in the form of this lovely kid would be great to watch. Now Abrams is really Trekking the right way.
More please!
I like him. He seems cool, like he’d do really well with the role. But, and don’t get me wrong he seems very nice and chill, but he’s a pothead. Something about this prospect makes me giggle…
Just so we’re clear, watch the way he looks around, and the way his eyes droop. They’re also a bit glassey, and listen to the way he talks. I thought it was funny, it doesn’t bother me.
It grates the nerves when I hear barbed, dumb-ass questions along the lines of what that interviewer posed: (Paraphrasing) “Do you think people are going to get into this film even though it’s Star Trek?” ..Huh?? I don’t recall witnessing that sort of “prejudice” from the media over the latest, retroactive Star Wars films. Anyone else noticing this disparity? Trek fans always seem to be portrayed as questionable geeks while Star Wars fans are depicted as lovable and fun, even if they’re camping for weeks outside the wrong theater.
Impressive. the more I hear from the cast the more hopeful I am for this movie. They all seem vary enthusiastic. Its also nice to hear that Mr Keonig(THE Mr. Chekov) has gotten a chance to visit the set and see the big goings-on.
We still need to hear from Mr. Pegg. I can’t wait to hear more about his take on Scotty.
#65 – “Do you think people are going to get into this film even though it’s Star Trek?” ..Huh??”
In all fairness, that’s actually a rather legit question. Star Trek Fans do have a stereotype, and it seems the intent of the writers to break this stereotype and make this movie appeal to all, despite it having the name “Star Trek” attached to it.
He said “The Apple” is his favorite! Ha HA! The episode with a young David Soul. Chekhov definitely wanted to STUN that Lt. with his phaser?!! Not too mention in “Spectre of the Gun” He wanted to give Sylvia his 6 shooter and got BLASTED by Morgan Earp!! I thought that was classic!! All in all, he appears to be a nice kid..
I agree with previous quotes about What does Chekhov have to do with a Pike Era background?? It seems they are going to have to do a lot of convincing.
#61–Why would the “ignorance” of an actor who portrays a character, who has never been anything but minor, indicate to you a specific direction in which the film may be heading? That just seems like one of your predetermined negative conclusions about a film you have not yet seen.
I like this kid and the way he did his homework. I think he’s gonna be a whole lot of fun to watch. Now I want to echo other people’s concern here regarding the fact that Chris Pine has been conspicuously quite lately… What gives?
To The Vulcanista:
It’s “Yelchin”, sweetie, not “Yeltsin”. Relatively similar names but not exactly the same type of person… :-D
Boris Yeltsin was also a whole lot of fun to watch.
Ummm. Just watched it again, and he sorta says that JJ needed the time to tweak the film after the strike ended. Looping, etc.
Speculation, or did he contradict the Paramount statement?
#70
It’s the general ignorance of the actors, e. g. Quinto’s lack of interest in watching the episodes, Pine’s feebly insignificant interview, etc. that I consider indicators. There are other indicators like Abrams’ recent interviews which IMO are somewhat conflicting and not very confidence inspiring – I think he e. g. said something to the effect hat it would be silly to live in fear of fans of a television series, which might be true, but to me statements like this still have a negative connotation. But as I said, I tend to be rather amused than annoyed, because at present I cannot take those statements seriously – not enough background and awareness.
I’ve never been cagey about the fact that I’m not supportive of the film because I highly doubt that its direction will bode well for ST. And nothing I’ve heard so far could change my mind. But of course, I’m aware that – although based on actual information provided – this is my personal opinion and would have to be validated by the film itself, as much as your predetermined acceptance of the film won’t be validated before May 09.
# 69 – Who said Chekov would be part of the Pike era of the story?
# 72 – AJ
Good point! :-D
I feel like I am in the agony booth.
“Quinto’s lack of interest in watching the episodes,”
But Quinto has an advantage over everyone else.. Leonard Nimoy is on the set with him. If Quinto doesn’t blink like Nimoy, I’m sure Nimoy will make him aware ;)
#74–I would venture to say that unless you are going to cast Eddie Murphy as Captain Kirk, you won’t find all that many actors who have seen many Trek episodes and understand the depths of the characters they are portraying. In Pine’s defense, he has reached out to Shatner, as the other actors have reached out to their predecessors as well for any guidance they might have to offer. As for Quinto, he has Nimoy to guide him. Beyond that, it is the director’s responsibility to get the essence of the character out of the actor. JJ has told us here that the “Supreme Court” HAS done their homework with regards to watching the episodes. While JJ is not a Trekkie or a Trekker, he did like the original show and described seeing TWOK as one of his better movie-going experiences in his youth. The writers/ executive producers ARE Star Trek fans.
As for JJ’s conflicting statements to various media, I think the purpose of that has been made clear by Mr. Orci. It is their intention to approach interviews with mainstream media (aimed at attaining the interest of common moviegoers who have an inherently negative view of past Trek) very differently than interviews with fan-friendly media outlets such as this one. That is an logical strategy to use, considering the particular goal of getting non-traditional fans to see the film. With that said, it IS silly to live “in fear” of fans, however, I believe that remark was followed by a statement of confidence about their ability and intention to make a film that the traditional fans will enjoy as well.
“…this is my personal opinion and would have to be validated by the film itself, as much as your predetermined acceptance of the film won’t be validated before May 09.”
I understand the basis of your intended comparison, but I have not “accepted” the film yet. I just believe that it is unfair to pass judgement on the work of an artist until that work has been released to the World. I hope that when we both see the film, we will both have a positive feeling about it. However, I assure you that if it is not a good Trek movie—I will be the first to say so! Not every original Trek movie, IMO, has been a good one–and I am not shy about saying so when that is the case.
74 – You’re angry because Shatner is not in the movie. And, if there was a way to post your history on this site, it will bear out that you seemed positive about this movie until it looked more like Shatner’s presence would not be a part of the movie.
Then, you hide behind phony logic and ten-dollar words to make meaningless arguments about paraphrased quotes from people involved in the movie that were never said to begin with.
People like you are why Star Trek gets ridiculed by the general public.
79. Closettrekker – February 22, 2008
“I just believe that it is unfair to pass judgement on the work of an artist until that work has been released to the World
Glad you said this… it’s so tiresome to hear and read the negative stuff when there’s no true info yet.
Imagine what would have happened had this actor said “Engage!” or “make it so..”?
The whole bloomin’ internet-thing woulda exploded and Al Gore would have had to start from scratch.
#72–Not as fun as Kruschev (I bang my shoe on the table too sometimes!) or Gorbachev (does anyone remember “Not Necessarily The News”?).
#81–”The whole bloomin’ internet-thing woulda exploded and Al Gore would have had to start from scratch.”
Either that or none of it would matter, because “The Supernova is going to kill us all!”
#79
- Beyond that, it is the director’s responsibility to get the essence of the character out of the actor. -
This may be right, but mainly for a newly developed character. I still think that if you inherit the chance to portray characters with such a long and significant history you should attach careful consideration to their development through the years – IMO, this is only possible by making yourself familiar with the history, the lore, and their distinctive traits, together with the director, of course.
#80
I wonder why you’re so angry – must be because there are people who have views that differ from yours, who are able to express them, stick to them, and who are still able to enjoy ST and this site.
84 – Keep deflecting things said to you when you are disagreed with or found out for what your true motive is for the negativity towards the movie, and your credibility (what little there is) decreases.
Other folks here have views different than mine, but I can discuss things with them and even find common ground at times.
You, and a couple others, are the ones demonstrating the tactic of being angry towards those who see differently than you.
This from a universe where differences are appreciated and embraced. You should be ashamed of yourself for even thinking that you are a fan of it.
It is your negativity and the desire to not listen to those who have a difference of opinion that make this site less than enjoyable.
Go on, try and turn it back on me. I’ll wait.
#84–” …IMO, this is only possible by making yourself familiar with the history, the lore, and their distinctive traits, together with the director, of course.”
I think watching the episodes as reasearch is certainly one of many tools an actor might choose to use to accomplish the goal of bringing such an established character to life. On the other hand, you could make a case that ignoring the episodes and simply following the director’s vision of how the actor should pull off each individual scene might actually incur a better result. Different actors, different approaches.
As a longtime leader of men (whether in the military or in civilian business), I have found that people often achieve the best results by entirely different means of motivation and preparation, depending on the individual in question. Quinto, for instance, will not likely find a better method of research on the character of Spock than picking the brain of Leonard Nimoy.
And Pine may find that he is better off getting what he needs to know from the writers and the director for each particular scene. I, for one, do not want to see Chris Pine on screen simply doing an impression of a Shatner monologue. I want to see Pine portray Kirk as passionate when he needs to be, angry when he needs to be, disappointed, annoyed, and so on. Only the director can see the bigger picture. We often give the actor too much credit in thinking he actually understands the reasoning behind every scene while he is on set. The truth is, he is on set, off set, on set, and so on.
Shatner often did not understand the needs of the scenes he was shooting, and the “stronger” directors were able to extract his enormous potential by oftentimes reeling him in and “holding his leash” (at least if you believe his friend Leonard Nimoy and some of the others who worked with him on Trek). Coincidentally, Bill has to this day–never seen an episode of Star Trek! Granted, Gene and the show’s writers and directors were making it up as they went along, but Bill never once found it necessary to go back and look at the way his character faced this challenge or that challenge to determine how he should approach one in an upcoming episode, or a film for that matter (some of them were decades after his original work), even when he was, of all things, directing a Star Trek movie! Bill obviously worked better from scene to scene, and perhaps Chris does too.
As for Yelchin, does it really matter? As usual, Checkov’s role is an extremely minor one. It is extremely likely that he could simply take the director’s orders to the letter and be entirely successful in his limited scenes. However, it is of particular interest that JJ and Bob sent him home with a list of episodes to watch, and actually took the time to discuss the accent and who Checkov is to the franchise.
All: Star Trek also teaches us about diplomacy, and how to bring together factions who disagree so that they and those who have to live with them, can all benefit.
It is not pleasant to see people argue over 200 threads about landing parties and away teams, especially when the responses become insulting. It’s like Star Trek: Attack of the Tellarites.
This site brings so many different types together, and we love the show. The insulting exchanges just make it a bore to read. Call each other on the phone and spare us the agony. Your positions are not that far apart, and could be fleshed out in another forum. Or go onto “Chat” and hack each other to death.
I mean, on this thread, it’s almost impossible now to discuss Chekhov and Yelchin, who, BTW, is starring in a new film now.
Let’s talk about why he likes “The Apple” (girls) and why a Russian actor is being made to sound not-Russian as a homage to WK’s original character. And how about that guy from STNV? I thought his Chekhov was loads of fun.
Sorry, but as someone once said, “no blah blah blah!”
AJ- Attack of the Tellerites – LOL!
Re: #87. AJ
“Sorry, but as someone once said, “no blah blah blah!” ”
Totally agree. It is making it unpleasant to visit. Will have to try to skip over the negative posts and just read the good ones. And, no, my name is not Pollyanna. Life sucks enough as it is without having to deliberately subject yourself to angry, argumentative Tellarites — uh, people.
By the way, excellent line!!! Star Trek: Attack of the Tellarites. Hah! LOL
kg
#85, (86)
Over the last couple of months I’ve had a lot of interesting discussions with people with whose views I differ and whose views differ from mine, many of them e. g. with Closettrekker who is on a completely different page than I am with respect to the film. And as it seems to preoccupy you that much, yes, some of those discussions were about Shatner, as well. I’ve never hidden my feelings as to that issue and I’ve never denied that I see a basic problem in Shatner’s absence from the film, but my concerns and doubts regarding the film have been there from the beginning and would remain if Shatner was in the film. They’d be less demanding, but they’d still be there and I still would not offhandedly be embracing the film. This all is well-known. Even Roberto Orci knew that I’ve been concerned about the film from the very beginning.
I enjoy a healthy debate, and sometimes in the discussions I’ve mentioned we were able to reach partial agreement, and sometimes it wasn’t possible, but that’s fine with me as long as the debate is handled in a respectful manner. In Closettrekker’s and my recent discussion, for example, I think we cannot agree (at least not tonight), because we have different ideas as to how the actors should best prepare for their roles. But that’s alright – we both have expressed our views and I for one found some of Closettrekker’s arguments rather interesting and enjoyed reading them, and so I’ll give some thought to them. And maybe he’ll do the same with what I said. But this doesn’t mean that I have to change my mind or that I will adopt his view.
Varied opinions are important for this site, they are always important in life. If you, RaveOnEd, cannot deal with them, you should change your attitude instead of trying to attack other people for expressing their doubts. Not embracing something doesn’t mean being less credible. Not respecting other people’s concern and views on the other hand, does, and this is definitely something to be ashamed of.
Personal attacks on fellow posters and accusations are no basis to start a discussion. And that’s why I’m not interested in discussing ST with you, RaveOnEd. I’m enjoying the discussions I’m having, and obviously my discussion partners are not fed up with me. So, I suggest you respect my different view or don’t bother me again.
One thing I have learned as a corporate manager in a high pressure situation is that when you are flamed by your boss, go ahead and flame him back, and before sending, put the mail in your Drafts folder. Then calm down, maybe (gasp!) talk with him, or wait until emotions have calmed, read it again and erase it.
E-mails and posts are particularly vitriolic because we get to mull on the content as we write, and steadily make it more damaging via re-writes before we push SEND.
Here all of us see what we write, including Bob Orci, James Cawley, Chris Doohan and other potential surprise visitors/lurkers. It’s a privilege to have these people talking to us. I’d rather they not get bored with the vitriol and decide to lurk less. Also, it’s a long wait until May 2009, so let’s be a bit closer to “Emily Post,” and maybe look at these talks more as negotiations rather than flame opportunities.
Just my 2 cents.
Well said AJ. There have been times I like to rant as well; however, keep it to a minimum folks, and name-calling, venom and Andorians-wielding-knives are not allowed here (so says Anthony, creator of the most beloved website).
Ah, Denise: Andorians with knives do not talk much. Shran was a chatterbox thanks to the wonderful Jeff Combs, but I prefer my Andorians quiet and deadly.
I actually worry that the delay of the film’s release may give us little to talk about unless Paramount keeps throwing out crumbs. I enjoy tangents where a story about Yelchin leads to a full-fledged discussion of Balance of Terror, its story, philosophy, and impact on the series and the new film.
But when it leads to insults and flames, it’s just a drag.
AJ- Come to think of it, the guy wielding the knife wasn’t even an Andorian – he was an Orien trying to pass. Man, now I’m starting to think about Babel and how long it’s been since I’ve watched it. Gotta go…
Denise:
But the Andorian ambassador was deliciously horrid, with a non-descript Eastern European accent. And that’s just the secondary story… Spock and his family!
Re-watch!
#93
- I enjoy tangents where a story about Yelchin leads to a full-fledged discussion of Balance of Terror, its story, philosophy, and impact on the series and the new film. -
Exactly. I would enjoy this, too, but this was being tried on the previous Yelchin thread (I for one expressed my interest in BOT and thought it might be crucial to the film) and was dropped due to the usual canon controversy. I think it’s too bad about those subjects that would really make an interesting thread, but can’t catch on.
#94
Yep, watch Babel again, it’s a wonderful ep! Cheers!
Iowagirl-
Thank you for clarifying your position. Sometimes, one can get caught up in an emotional state, and it becomes that one last straw that makes someone come off as being hotheaded and idiotic. In this case, me.
I love discussing ST with anyone. It was there for me in very difficult times in my life (with Kirk being a model for me to face some tough times).
I apologize, and I hope we can continue discussions here, and maybe off this site.
Ed
Ed, you ol’ honeydripper, you………..
RaveOnEd
I accept your apologize and I’m sure we’ll find a chance to continue discussions.
and your apology, as well…
Are you trying to apologize for your apology debacle a moment ago?
#101
Not sure what you’re trying to say – I just wanted to correct my post 99 where I used the verb instead of the noun by mistake.
I don’t see any debacle in apologizing nor in accepting an apology. On the contrary, I consider this a very mature behavior and I’m glad RaveOnEd and I could come to terms.
Ya see? An apology is the first step.
And now I have the Klingon “apology” scene from STV in my head, and it just won’t leave ;-)
I’ve always said, STV does have some great, memorable moments! ;-)
5:30am(EST) and the first thing I read when I click on is that STV had some great, memorable moments?! Iowagirl, I haven’t even had my Mountain Dew yet! Well, I must begrudgingly admit that “Captain, please, not in front of the Klingons” was a line I never saw coming! he..he..
Harry- Apologize for your apology debacle- good stuff… not your best, but good… it is 5:30am.
Denise, isn’t it great to be welcomed that way in the morning? ;-) But honestly, I think STV is much underrated and I’ve always liked the film, but of course to each their own..
OK, I take it then that Harry was sort of joking – sometimes it’s not easy to tell for a second-language speaker like me (that’s why things like mistaking verbs for nouns sometimes happen, too), but I’m learning something new every day; the advantages of being a part of this board;-)
#106–Considering English is a second language to you, you have an excellent grasp of it. I studied German for one year in school and Spanish for four years. I have a decent command of Spanish, but my knowledge of German is barely existent. Hint, though—Harry is always joking!
#107
Thanks for the compliment and for the hint. As regards Harry, I’m quite aware of his joking in general, but wasn’t sure in this case, and I didn’t want to have any misunderstanding regarding my post in question as this was an important issue for me. Glad, though, you told me;-)
Iowagirl +Denise
I sincerely apologize for any hurt feelings I may have caused. As others have pointed out I am usually joking with any of my posted comments. Once in a while I can be serious when the occasion calls for it.
I have great respect for anyone who has mastered more than one language…..I have enough trouble with just the one!
I can tell you straight out, Iowagirl and Denise, that I greatly enjoy any posts that either of you share with us. Your comments are always witty and insightful, a pleasure to read. Please let me know from now on if you have ANY concern regarding one of my posts and whether I am kidding around or not…………………..friends?
Yes, Harry, friends! No harm done, and I surely have no concern regarding your posts; as I said, I just wanted to make sure that there wasn’t any misunderstanding.
Thanks for clarifying and keep on joking! :-)
Harry- You will always be my friend, moi chere’. We’ve had some good times on these boards, especially when Vulcanista was involved. But then you guys always have more fun with two women at a time…he..he.. (Anthony is going to yell at me, I can just feel it…).
“guys always have more fun with two women at a time”
Denise………..I’m confident that you would be more than enough woman for ANY man and a second gal wouldn’t be necessary…………….but, I have to ask……the statement I just quoted above…….er….how do I put this…..is that the voice of experience talking?
(blush)
Harry- First of all, that is classified information and… you know the drill. Secondly, I do not believe that you ever blush under any circumstances whatsoever. N’est-ce pas? (Where’s Vucanista…)
I cannot believe I misspelled Vulcanista again.
#114–At least you didn’t spell it the OTHER way (although that was alot of fun)!!!!
Closet#115- You guys just loved Vulcanista and I being loaded on the green stuff… but it was fun (don’t tell Harry I said that…).
Too late!
Oh, and as to your suggestion that I never blush under any circumstance, completely untrue………I remember blushing once…..as I recall, it was October 1971………and her name was Helen!
Harry- Were you guys, by any chance, curled up together on her parents sofa watching ST when you decided to pull a Captain Kirk move on her and she pulled the Uhura-from-mirror-universe-slapping-Sulu move on you?
I’m amazed you guessed that! Yes, I whispered in her ear about checking out my “Captain’s log” and she slapped me into next week!
Harry- Groan…
And where is Vulcanista anyway? She is several hours late for her assigned duties…
Vulcanista must be having a siesta after that burrito she scarfed down!
I am a huge fan of ST-TOS. I don’t see how ancient die-hards like myself will be able to disassociate from the original crew and accept the new crew (yes, I qualify for the senior discount lol). I want to be able to do this. This interview helps. I had hopes for the new Spock until I saw a picture of him in full Spock make-up and uniform, but it was only a still. So this interview gives me hope. He mentioned in another interview that there are both Klingons and Romulans in this film. I hope at least they will look like they did in the original series and not with the forehead appliances in the rest of the ST spin-offs.
Liaaseil#123- I grok your love man, but tell me- where did you see this picture and what did he look like? The only paparrazi pic I’ve seen of Quinto in Vulcan garb had him outfitted as a young guy, probably academy age, and even with distorted imagery he looked great IMHO.
Do you think it might have been a photoshop pic you saw?
Okay — which thread is this again?
:-)
By the way, has Anthony disconnected the little pukey yellow happy face function? Wouldn’t doubt it. Something has changed…
kg
#125 “Okay — which thread is this again?”
It’s the Great Saturday Night Thread Derailment of the month? :-)
I think you have to have text in front of the pukey (LOL!) yellow happy face. We’ll see when this posts.
Peace. Live long and prosper.
The Vulcanista }:-|
Re: 126. Vulcanista
No, sorry, still no pukey face. I’m sure Anthony has disconnected the magic button that transformed the type. They did seem to be multiplying.
Anyway, I’m getting out of this train wreck. (Get it???)
Goodnight all.
kg