


<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Roddenberry Considered TOS Prequel For TMP</title>
	<atom:link href="http://trekmovie.com/2008/02/27/roddenberry-considered-tos-prequel-for-tmp/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://trekmovie.com/2008/02/27/roddenberry-considered-tos-prequel-for-tmp/</link>
	<description>the source for Star Trek news and information</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 22:47:58 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Abandon Ship &#171; Weather Station 1</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2008/02/27/roddenberry-considered-tos-prequel-for-tmp/comment-page-5/#comment-1034182</link>
		<dc:creator>Abandon Ship &#171; Weather Station 1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 07:02:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2008/02/27/roddenberry-considered-tos-prequel-for-tmp/#comment-1034182</guid>
		<description>[...] Here&#8217;s a link to some more Trek history&#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Here&#8217;s a link to some more Trek history&#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EdDR</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2008/02/27/roddenberry-considered-tos-prequel-for-tmp/comment-page-5/#comment-923236</link>
		<dc:creator>EdDR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 22:07:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2008/02/27/roddenberry-considered-tos-prequel-for-tmp/#comment-923236</guid>
		<description>What ever happened to the concept illustrations Ralph McQuarrie did for Star Trek, the Motion Picture?  Aside from the Big E,  there was a painting of the E going into a Federation Space Station carved into an asteroid and another of the E going into battle with the Klingons</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What ever happened to the concept illustrations Ralph McQuarrie did for Star Trek, the Motion Picture?  Aside from the Big E,  there was a painting of the E going into a Federation Space Station carved into an asteroid and another of the E going into battle with the Klingons</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Liquid Ocelot</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2008/02/27/roddenberry-considered-tos-prequel-for-tmp/comment-page-5/#comment-797968</link>
		<dc:creator>Liquid Ocelot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 17:57:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2008/02/27/roddenberry-considered-tos-prequel-for-tmp/#comment-797968</guid>
		<description>I like how this article completely ignores the fact that Gene was considering these ideas for the second series Star Trek: Phase II which Paramount was going to use to start their fourth network. when that fell through of course, the pilot he&#039;d been working on was slowly turned into The Motion Picture.

Read Shatner&#039;s Movie Memories.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like how this article completely ignores the fact that Gene was considering these ideas for the second series Star Trek: Phase II which Paramount was going to use to start their fourth network. when that fell through of course, the pilot he&#8217;d been working on was slowly turned into The Motion Picture.</p>
<p>Read Shatner&#8217;s Movie Memories.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aliera</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2008/02/27/roddenberry-considered-tos-prequel-for-tmp/comment-page-5/#comment-611153</link>
		<dc:creator>Aliera</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Apr 2008 07:18:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2008/02/27/roddenberry-considered-tos-prequel-for-tmp/#comment-611153</guid>
		<description>No way in hell would Gene Roddenberry approve of this abomination of a movie. I&#039;m a hard-core trekkie and refuse to take part in this &#039;Going where we&#039;ve already been&#039; rewriting of Trek history. I&#039;ve read more and more hard-core trekkies are considering protesting the movie. This is going to an interesting development once the media picks up on it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No way in hell would Gene Roddenberry approve of this abomination of a movie. I&#8217;m a hard-core trekkie and refuse to take part in this &#8216;Going where we&#8217;ve already been&#8217; rewriting of Trek history. I&#8217;ve read more and more hard-core trekkies are considering protesting the movie. This is going to an interesting development once the media picks up on it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Garovorkin</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2008/02/27/roddenberry-considered-tos-prequel-for-tmp/comment-page-5/#comment-491251</link>
		<dc:creator>Garovorkin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 00:05:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2008/02/27/roddenberry-considered-tos-prequel-for-tmp/#comment-491251</guid>
		<description># correction typo I ment to say there were no battles between ships, exceept maybe the one sided affair between Vger and the KLingons, that epic 2 second battle.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p># correction typo I ment to say there were no battles between ships, exceept maybe the one sided affair between Vger and the KLingons, that epic 2 second battle.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Garovorkin</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2008/02/27/roddenberry-considered-tos-prequel-for-tmp/comment-page-5/#comment-491240</link>
		<dc:creator>Garovorkin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 00:00:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2008/02/27/roddenberry-considered-tos-prequel-for-tmp/#comment-491240</guid>
		<description>#237  Navigator Star trek the motion picture is the best looking of the Trek films even by todays standards the film still looks incredible, V&#039;ger scared the socks off of me, in fact Borg pale in comparison to V&#039;ger. It also was the first and only film to live up to the reach out and explore mysteries. concept which was an original principle to trek, there was battles between ships. In Robert Wise they had the right director, If you look at his Movie Hindenburg it  influenced some of the look of the movie , in terms of its grandeur. Unfortunatley the movie was too slow paced. The Story was not the best in terms of a trek film and years later even Leonard Nimoy conceded that they did not get the script that they wanted. It was decent film science fiction film all things considered.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#237  Navigator Star trek the motion picture is the best looking of the Trek films even by todays standards the film still looks incredible, V&#8217;ger scared the socks off of me, in fact Borg pale in comparison to V&#8217;ger. It also was the first and only film to live up to the reach out and explore mysteries. concept which was an original principle to trek, there was battles between ships. In Robert Wise they had the right director, If you look at his Movie Hindenburg it  influenced some of the look of the movie , in terms of its grandeur. Unfortunatley the movie was too slow paced. The Story was not the best in terms of a trek film and years later even Leonard Nimoy conceded that they did not get the script that they wanted. It was decent film science fiction film all things considered.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Navigator NCC 2120 USS Entente</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2008/02/27/roddenberry-considered-tos-prequel-for-tmp/comment-page-5/#comment-491214</link>
		<dc:creator>Navigator NCC 2120 USS Entente</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Mar 2008 23:45:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2008/02/27/roddenberry-considered-tos-prequel-for-tmp/#comment-491214</guid>
		<description>For all of you TWOK fans out there I found this link via google video search of William Shatner, Leonard Nimoy, Deforest Kelley, and Bibi Besch interviewed on the Merv Griffin Show circa 1982 promoting TWOK:

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=5159430639708927440&amp;q=%22%22Deforest+Kelley%22%22&amp;lr=lang_en&amp;total=122&amp;start=0&amp;num=10&amp;so=0&amp;type=search&amp;plindex=4


It appears to be in 4 parts.  The above link is Part 1.

For the record TMP is my favorite Star Trek film, I never cared for the sequels.  However, I am looking forward to seeing JJ Abrams&#039; Star Trek 11 film.


Enjoy,

Navigator NCC 2120 USS Entente
/\</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For all of you TWOK fans out there I found this link via google video search of William Shatner, Leonard Nimoy, Deforest Kelley, and Bibi Besch interviewed on the Merv Griffin Show circa 1982 promoting TWOK:</p>
<p><a href="http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=5159430639708927440&amp;q=%22%22Deforest+Kelley%22%22&amp;lr=lang_en&amp;total=122&amp;start=0&amp;num=10&amp;so=0&amp;type=search&amp;plindex=4" rel="nofollow">http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=5159430639708927440&amp;q=%22%22Deforest+Kelley%22%22&amp;lr=lang_en&amp;total=122&amp;start=0&amp;num=10&amp;so=0&amp;type=search&amp;plindex=4</a></p>
<p>It appears to be in 4 parts.  The above link is Part 1.</p>
<p>For the record TMP is my favorite Star Trek film, I never cared for the sequels.  However, I am looking forward to seeing JJ Abrams&#8217; Star Trek 11 film.</p>
<p>Enjoy,</p>
<p>Navigator NCC 2120 USS Entente<br />
/\</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Navigator NCC 2120 USS Entente</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2008/02/27/roddenberry-considered-tos-prequel-for-tmp/comment-page-5/#comment-491191</link>
		<dc:creator>Navigator NCC 2120 USS Entente</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Mar 2008 23:33:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2008/02/27/roddenberry-considered-tos-prequel-for-tmp/#comment-491191</guid>
		<description>Here is a link to an 8 minute, 1982 interview with Gene Roddenberry:

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-1030912243585389797&amp;q=%22%22Gene+Roddenberry%22%22&amp;lr=lang_en&amp;total=215&amp;start=0&amp;num=10&amp;so=0&amp;type=search&amp;plindex=6

I found it by doing a gogle video search.

At the 02:25 (2 minutes and 25 seconds) point in the interview Gene Roddenberry gives credit to the actors, specifically Leonard Nimoy for developing the Spock character.  Gene states he only created the outline for the Spock character and that Leonard fleshed out the character.

At the 05:44 point in the interview Gene states that they (Paramount) are going to do a new one (Star Trek movie) probably shot as a high budget TV movie and that he has NO OBJECTION to some else doing it (Star Trek) and he would give technical advise if they will listen to him.

I recall issues of the Starlog magazine during that time having interviews with the cast and crew of TWOK, saying that they were introducing younger characters in the new Star Trek film (Lt. Saavik and Dr. David Marcus) to eventually replace TOS characters.  I thought that was strange and it would be a mistake.

Based on this 1982 interview I believe Gene would have approved of JJ Abram&#039;s Star Trek 11 film.


Enjoy the interview,

Navigator NCC 2120 USS Entente
/\</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here is a link to an 8 minute, 1982 interview with Gene Roddenberry:</p>
<p><a href="http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-1030912243585389797&amp;q=%22%22Gene+Roddenberry%22%22&amp;lr=lang_en&amp;total=215&amp;start=0&amp;num=10&amp;so=0&amp;type=search&amp;plindex=6" rel="nofollow">http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-1030912243585389797&amp;q=%22%22Gene+Roddenberry%22%22&amp;lr=lang_en&amp;total=215&amp;start=0&amp;num=10&amp;so=0&amp;type=search&amp;plindex=6</a></p>
<p>I found it by doing a gogle video search.</p>
<p>At the 02:25 (2 minutes and 25 seconds) point in the interview Gene Roddenberry gives credit to the actors, specifically Leonard Nimoy for developing the Spock character.  Gene states he only created the outline for the Spock character and that Leonard fleshed out the character.</p>
<p>At the 05:44 point in the interview Gene states that they (Paramount) are going to do a new one (Star Trek movie) probably shot as a high budget TV movie and that he has NO OBJECTION to some else doing it (Star Trek) and he would give technical advise if they will listen to him.</p>
<p>I recall issues of the Starlog magazine during that time having interviews with the cast and crew of TWOK, saying that they were introducing younger characters in the new Star Trek film (Lt. Saavik and Dr. David Marcus) to eventually replace TOS characters.  I thought that was strange and it would be a mistake.</p>
<p>Based on this 1982 interview I believe Gene would have approved of JJ Abram&#8217;s Star Trek 11 film.</p>
<p>Enjoy the interview,</p>
<p>Navigator NCC 2120 USS Entente<br />
/\</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: acb</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2008/02/27/roddenberry-considered-tos-prequel-for-tmp/comment-page-5/#comment-491085</link>
		<dc:creator>acb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Mar 2008 22:33:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2008/02/27/roddenberry-considered-tos-prequel-for-tmp/#comment-491085</guid>
		<description>#225

I think the ST VI point is not necessarily true since he only saw the film completely 2 days before he died, even commenting on how he actually enjoyed it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#225</p>
<p>I think the ST VI point is not necessarily true since he only saw the film completely 2 days before he died, even commenting on how he actually enjoyed it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Garovorkin</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2008/02/27/roddenberry-considered-tos-prequel-for-tmp/comment-page-5/#comment-489561</link>
		<dc:creator>Garovorkin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Mar 2008 03:51:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2008/02/27/roddenberry-considered-tos-prequel-for-tmp/#comment-489561</guid>
		<description>#233 Okay this is an area where we are not going to find agreement . Your right ,to expect  a show of that Era to have any kind of character development is little to much to ask, how silly of me. I guess Roddenberry just didn&#039;t believe in the concept of character growth and development, which is something  that all good drama has.  C&#039;mon  MIcheal even you have to Agree Kirk, Spock and McCoy didn&#039;t change or very much throughout the series. every week same character no change. Didn&#039;t you find that the least bit boring and predictable? Ellison was trying introduce a depth and believable humanity that the characters didn&#039;t even have. which  might have been to benefit of the show.  As to us suing Psuedonyms that purely our choice, and being a critic of something does not by definition make one a Hater as you put it.

Michel don&#039;t treat the rest of us like dummies, were not. We</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#233 Okay this is an area where we are not going to find agreement . Your right ,to expect  a show of that Era to have any kind of character development is little to much to ask, how silly of me. I guess Roddenberry just didn&#8217;t believe in the concept of character growth and development, which is something  that all good drama has.  C&#8217;mon  MIcheal even you have to Agree Kirk, Spock and McCoy didn&#8217;t change or very much throughout the series. every week same character no change. Didn&#8217;t you find that the least bit boring and predictable? Ellison was trying introduce a depth and believable humanity that the characters didn&#8217;t even have. which  might have been to benefit of the show.  As to us suing Psuedonyms that purely our choice, and being a critic of something does not by definition make one a Hater as you put it.</p>
<p>Michel don&#8217;t treat the rest of us like dummies, were not. We</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
