


<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Enterprise Incident Review + Screenshots &amp; Video</title>
	<atom:link href="http://trekmovie.com/2008/04/07/the-enterprise-incident-review-screenshots-video/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://trekmovie.com/2008/04/07/the-enterprise-incident-review-screenshots-video/</link>
	<description>the source for Star Trek news and information</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 00:47:46 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Adam Bomb</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2008/04/07/the-enterprise-incident-review-screenshots-video/comment-page-5/#comment-752502</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam Bomb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 20:14:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2008/04/07/the-enterprise-incident-review-screenshots-video/#comment-752502</guid>
		<description>#154: This episode aired at noon on Sunday, April 6. WWOR usually runs &quot;Trek&quot; Sat. night/ early Sunday at midnight.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#154: This episode aired at noon on Sunday, April 6. WWOR usually runs &#8220;Trek&#8221; Sat. night/ early Sunday at midnight.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Bernardo</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2008/04/07/the-enterprise-incident-review-screenshots-video/comment-page-5/#comment-572777</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Bernardo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 20:43:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2008/04/07/the-enterprise-incident-review-screenshots-video/#comment-572777</guid>
		<description>diabolik a.k.a. Laura G. wrote:

&gt; please ask her, “Why did Sulu, in Episode #32, press the third from
&gt; the left button for Warp Drive, when in Episode #12, it was plainly
&gt; established that the button is for Impulse Drive?

Uh, no.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>diabolik a.k.a. Laura G. wrote:</p>
<p>&gt; please ask her, “Why did Sulu, in Episode #32, press the third from<br />
&gt; the left button for Warp Drive, when in Episode #12, it was plainly<br />
&gt; established that the button is for Impulse Drive?</p>
<p>Uh, no.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: diabolik</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2008/04/07/the-enterprise-incident-review-screenshots-video/comment-page-5/#comment-572714</link>
		<dc:creator>diabolik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 20:18:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2008/04/07/the-enterprise-incident-review-screenshots-video/#comment-572714</guid>
		<description>#204... while there, please ask her, &quot;Why did Sulu, in Episode #32, press the third from the left button for Warp Drive, when in Episode #12, it was plainly established that the button is for Impulse Drive?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#204&#8230; while there, please ask her, &#8220;Why did Sulu, in Episode #32, press the third from the left button for Warp Drive, when in Episode #12, it was plainly established that the button is for Impulse Drive?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Bernardo</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2008/04/07/the-enterprise-incident-review-screenshots-video/comment-page-5/#comment-572583</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Bernardo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 18:56:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2008/04/07/the-enterprise-incident-review-screenshots-video/#comment-572583</guid>
		<description>RD wrote:

&gt; Arguing the reason why … the script is dated June 1968 and the
&gt; writers would have been directed to make use of the new Klingon ship
&gt; models in any way they could.

When I see D.C. Fontana at another S. T. con, I will ask her.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RD wrote:</p>
<p>&gt; Arguing the reason why … the script is dated June 1968 and the<br />
&gt; writers would have been directed to make use of the new Klingon ship<br />
&gt; models in any way they could.</p>
<p>When I see D.C. Fontana at another S. T. con, I will ask her.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean4000</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2008/04/07/the-enterprise-incident-review-screenshots-video/comment-page-5/#comment-572556</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean4000</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 18:40:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2008/04/07/the-enterprise-incident-review-screenshots-video/#comment-572556</guid>
		<description>http://www.edenfx.com/

Take a look at the &quot;montage reel.&quot; Wait for the Enterprise-D to fly by.

I dare anyone to tell me Eden should not do TNG-R.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.edenfx.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.edenfx.com/</a></p>
<p>Take a look at the &#8220;montage reel.&#8221; Wait for the Enterprise-D to fly by.</p>
<p>I dare anyone to tell me Eden should not do TNG-R.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RD</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2008/04/07/the-enterprise-incident-review-screenshots-video/comment-page-5/#comment-572470</link>
		<dc:creator>RD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 17:47:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2008/04/07/the-enterprise-incident-review-screenshots-video/#comment-572470</guid>
		<description>196. Robert Bernardo - April 9, 2008 wrote:
&quot;Ahem… look at http://www.fastcopyinc.com/orionpress/articles/enterpriseincident.htm
Seems that the use of Klingon-designed ships for the Romulans was planned from the very first.&quot;

Not arguing that. Arguing the reason why ... the script is dated June 1968 and the writers would have been directed to make use of the new Klingon ship models in any way they could. Since NOTHING was ever made of this plot point in Start Trek cannon in any direct way. So lose it ... it was clearly a ploy to feature the expensive new models and unless someone at Paramount has a great idea how to exploit this as a future plot point, lose it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>196. Robert Bernardo &#8211; April 9, 2008 wrote:<br />
&#8220;Ahem… look at <a href="http://www.fastcopyinc.com/orionpress/articles/enterpriseincident.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.fastcopyinc.com/orionpress/articles/enterpriseincident.htm</a><br />
Seems that the use of Klingon-designed ships for the Romulans was planned from the very first.&#8221;</p>
<p>Not arguing that. Arguing the reason why &#8230; the script is dated June 1968 and the writers would have been directed to make use of the new Klingon ship models in any way they could. Since NOTHING was ever made of this plot point in Start Trek cannon in any direct way. So lose it &#8230; it was clearly a ploy to feature the expensive new models and unless someone at Paramount has a great idea how to exploit this as a future plot point, lose it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean4000</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2008/04/07/the-enterprise-incident-review-screenshots-video/comment-page-5/#comment-572380</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean4000</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 16:39:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2008/04/07/the-enterprise-incident-review-screenshots-video/#comment-572380</guid>
		<description>The second thing I thought after seeing EdenFX&#039;s &quot;In A Mirror Darkly, Part II&quot; was &quot;What if these guys could get their hands on TOS?&quot;

The first thing running through my mind was &quot;HOLY HELL!!!!! Thsi looks awesome!!!&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The second thing I thought after seeing EdenFX&#8217;s &#8220;In A Mirror Darkly, Part II&#8221; was &#8220;What if these guys could get their hands on TOS?&#8221;</p>
<p>The first thing running through my mind was &#8220;HOLY HELL!!!!! Thsi looks awesome!!!&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: neo</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2008/04/07/the-enterprise-incident-review-screenshots-video/comment-page-4/#comment-572155</link>
		<dc:creator>neo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 15:19:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2008/04/07/the-enterprise-incident-review-screenshots-video/#comment-572155</guid>
		<description>yes, the original effects may look terrible, but at least they&#039;re terrible in a way consistent with the visuals of the rest of the show.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yes, the original effects may look terrible, but at least they&#8217;re terrible in a way consistent with the visuals of the rest of the show.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: neonknights</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2008/04/07/the-enterprise-incident-review-screenshots-video/comment-page-4/#comment-572084</link>
		<dc:creator>neonknights</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 14:45:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2008/04/07/the-enterprise-incident-review-screenshots-video/#comment-572084</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve just seen some remastered episodes in good quality version and they were really horrible. I&#039;ve thought: what the  [beep]?! Is this a PC game they pasted in between the live-action scenes???? This &quot;remastered&quot; travesty looks like an old PC game with second grade rendered images. The original effects looked like real life objects with integrity and dimension. I stick with the original (non remastered) series.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve just seen some remastered episodes in good quality version and they were really horrible. I&#8217;ve thought: what the  [beep]?! Is this a PC game they pasted in between the live-action scenes???? This &#8220;remastered&#8221; travesty looks like an old PC game with second grade rendered images. The original effects looked like real life objects with integrity and dimension. I stick with the original (non remastered) series.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: T in HI</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2008/04/07/the-enterprise-incident-review-screenshots-video/comment-page-4/#comment-571408</link>
		<dc:creator>T in HI</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 07:19:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2008/04/07/the-enterprise-incident-review-screenshots-video/#comment-571408</guid>
		<description>Mark Altman: &quot;The Enterprise looks particularly badly rendered and fake, when surrounded by the troika of three ships, and the D-7’s don’t come close to looking as good as the K’t’inga Klingon miniatures in Star Trek: The Motion Picture.&quot;

Mark Altman: &quot;With only a few episodes remaining, I continue to be frustrated by the many missed opportunities and often sloppy rendering being performed on these episodes...&quot;

Mark, you are SPOT ON TARGET.  Every week after a new ST Remastered ep airs, I come to this site and read (for the most part) how wonderful the new SFX shots were.   Frankly, I&#039;ve often had to scratch my head and wonder if perhaps the authors of the glowing comments had watched a different product than I had.

While I have the utmost respect for the Okudas, who have been great contributors to the ST universe since the 80&#039;s, the remastered renderings of the Enterprise and other space ships... and even the Doomsday Machine... have been a tremendous disappointment to me.  

Why?  Because THE DON&#039;T LOOK REALISTIC ENOUGH.  In many espisodes, the original footage of the Enterprise model looks more realistic than the remastered version.   That should NEVER HAPPEN!

Replacements for old mattes, yes, they are very well done as a whole.  (Interior) Visual and audio cleanup of the original masters?  Superb, with rich, vibrant colors and heretofore unheard sounds uncovered.  

But as for the new presentation of the ships and other space phenomena... what a terrible disapointment thay have been.   What a lost opportunity!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark Altman: &#8220;The Enterprise looks particularly badly rendered and fake, when surrounded by the troika of three ships, and the D-7’s don’t come close to looking as good as the K’t’inga Klingon miniatures in Star Trek: The Motion Picture.&#8221;</p>
<p>Mark Altman: &#8220;With only a few episodes remaining, I continue to be frustrated by the many missed opportunities and often sloppy rendering being performed on these episodes&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>Mark, you are SPOT ON TARGET.  Every week after a new ST Remastered ep airs, I come to this site and read (for the most part) how wonderful the new SFX shots were.   Frankly, I&#8217;ve often had to scratch my head and wonder if perhaps the authors of the glowing comments had watched a different product than I had.</p>
<p>While I have the utmost respect for the Okudas, who have been great contributors to the ST universe since the 80&#8217;s, the remastered renderings of the Enterprise and other space ships&#8230; and even the Doomsday Machine&#8230; have been a tremendous disappointment to me.  </p>
<p>Why?  Because THE DON&#8217;T LOOK REALISTIC ENOUGH.  In many espisodes, the original footage of the Enterprise model looks more realistic than the remastered version.   That should NEVER HAPPEN!</p>
<p>Replacements for old mattes, yes, they are very well done as a whole.  (Interior) Visual and audio cleanup of the original masters?  Superb, with rich, vibrant colors and heretofore unheard sounds uncovered.  </p>
<p>But as for the new presentation of the ships and other space phenomena&#8230; what a terrible disapointment thay have been.   What a lost opportunity!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
