Comments on: Abrams Contrasts Cloverfield and Trek

By: TrekNerd

TrekNerd — Tue, 29 Apr 2008 03:41:22 +0000

To Chris Doohan,

Where on the site can one contribute to the campaign?

It appears to say that the money has already been raised, but now they need letters to be written.

Also, it says that the Hollywood Chamber of Commerce won’t accept e-mails or signed petitions, but then an e-mail contact is provided.

Could you please clarify this?

By the way, thanks for supporting and shining the spotlight on your father’s former colleague.

TrekNerd

By: British Naval Dude

British Naval Dude — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 14:20:05 +0000

33.
Thanke, deary. Ahhh… tha’ age old question, who are I? Hmmmm… let me consult Plato and Sartre and get back to ye’….

By: Battletrek

Battletrek — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 08:22:20 +0000

funny to think that siskel and ebert liked first contact out of all the star trek movies.

By: Warlock

Warlock — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 03:03:18 +0000

mouse says cloverfield really sucked bad I felt like I was watching the blair witch project which was really bad too……

By: Garovorkin

Garovorkin — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 02:04:44 +0000

#36 Devon with all due respect ,the next Generation’s time as a movie franchise has come and gone. First Contact was the only good movie in the next generation series. They had as many chances as the highlander movie series and they still blew it. Its time to let someone else take a shot at revitalizing the series. I have to disagree with your statement about people not wanting to see a prequel/reboot of the series. The vast majority of us want the Abrams trek film to happen and to be a success and quite frankly, it will be a success.At this point I doubt many people are up for another next generation movie and besides the cast for next generation is getting a little long in the tooth themselves, wouldn’t you agree?

By: kmart

kmart — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 02:02:47 +0000

sorry, hyams 2010 (see above) bad typo

By: kmart

kmart — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 02:01:51 +0000

TNG never made a decent feature, probably because it was based on an inane too-safe television show. It is still hard for me to believe that so many people got into trek on the basis of TNG, that’d be like discovering Kubrick by seeing and liking Hyams’ 2001.

Any series that needs the better part of three seasons to get its act together has no business being vomited onto the airwaves in the first place.

By: Xai

Xai — Sun, 27 Apr 2008 23:50:46 +0000

Ok Warlock…. why?

By: Warlock

Warlock — Sun, 27 Apr 2008 21:26:13 +0000

Cloverfield SUCKED!!!!!

By: Mr. Bob Dobalina

Mr. Bob Dobalina — Sun, 27 Apr 2008 16:52:22 +0000

Cloverfield was an interesting experiment. I like monster movies but I never bought into the idea that this was real video with real people. Still fun to see the buildingget smahed. lol

And TNG has been over and done for years, stick a fork in it.