


<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: BSG Preview: “The Road Less Travelled”</title>
	<atom:link href="http://trekmovie.com/2008/05/02/bsg-preview-%e2%80%9cthe-road-less-travelled%e2%80%9d/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://trekmovie.com/2008/05/02/bsg-preview-%e2%80%9cthe-road-less-travelled%e2%80%9d/</link>
	<description>the source for Star Trek news and information</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 22:19:53 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Garovorkin</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2008/05/02/bsg-preview-%e2%80%9cthe-road-less-travelled%e2%80%9d/comment-page-3/#comment-632544</link>
		<dc:creator>Garovorkin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 02:43:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2008/05/02/bsg-preview-%e2%80%9cthe-road-less-travelled%e2%80%9d/#comment-632544</guid>
		<description>#108 Gerry we like talking about trek but we are also science fiction fans so we like talking about other science fiction shows as well. Just for a bit of a change and I think you will find that alot of trek fans are BSG fans as well. You can&#039;t isolate trek from the rest of the science fiction universe. If you go to some of the site devoted to specific shows some of them talk about other shows. so your statement doesn&#039;t make any sense.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#108 Gerry we like talking about trek but we are also science fiction fans so we like talking about other science fiction shows as well. Just for a bit of a change and I think you will find that alot of trek fans are BSG fans as well. You can&#8217;t isolate trek from the rest of the science fiction universe. If you go to some of the site devoted to specific shows some of them talk about other shows. so your statement doesn&#8217;t make any sense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gerry Alanguilan</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2008/05/02/bsg-preview-%e2%80%9cthe-road-less-travelled%e2%80%9d/comment-page-3/#comment-632512</link>
		<dc:creator>Gerry Alanguilan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 02:20:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2008/05/02/bsg-preview-%e2%80%9cthe-road-less-travelled%e2%80%9d/#comment-632512</guid>
		<description>This post isn&#039;t IDIC.

Why?

People outside the US can&#039;t see the videos! Sorry, our video library can only be streamed in the United States blah blah blah.

That said, I&#039;m a fan of BSG. I hope there&#039;s a BSG blog like this one. I&#039;d like the stuff here to stick to Star Trek. If you have a story about Ronald Moore or any other Star Trek vet, then run that. This isn&#039;t a BSG blog.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This post isn&#8217;t IDIC.</p>
<p>Why?</p>
<p>People outside the US can&#8217;t see the videos! Sorry, our video library can only be streamed in the United States blah blah blah.</p>
<p>That said, I&#8217;m a fan of BSG. I hope there&#8217;s a BSG blog like this one. I&#8217;d like the stuff here to stick to Star Trek. If you have a story about Ronald Moore or any other Star Trek vet, then run that. This isn&#8217;t a BSG blog.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeyl</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2008/05/02/bsg-preview-%e2%80%9cthe-road-less-travelled%e2%80%9d/comment-page-3/#comment-631785</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeyl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 May 2008 20:43:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2008/05/02/bsg-preview-%e2%80%9cthe-road-less-travelled%e2%80%9d/#comment-631785</guid>
		<description>#101 VOODOO &quot;Can you tell me with a straight face that Enterprise or Voyager are in the same league with BSG as far as quality goes? With all due respect please don’t try and argue that they are because they simply are not.&quot;

Oh don&#039;t worry. I wasn&#039;t even going to. I watched a couple of seasons of Voyager and didn&#039;t like where it was going. I watched the first episode of Enterprise and loathed every second of it. I even watched that stupid Borg episode that only confirmed what I had for the series all along. I was a prequel to TNG, not TOS. Over 30 HD screens on a bridge when the original series had no screens at all 100 years later? Not buying it.

But you know what&#039;s sad? I actually felt bad for all of the show&#039;s fans that had to endure the so called &quot;treat for Star Trek fans&quot; final episode of Enterprise. Awful. Absolutely awful. Where is the logic in taking a series that was so good for people and turning it&#039;s very episode into another episode of TNG? Nothing spells &quot;Let&#039;s just quit on Enterprise and do another TNG. Those were always good!&quot; like that last episode did.

And I LOVE shows with continuity where characters go through change, past events are either mentioned or play a big part in what&#039;s to come and how nothing is the same from when it started. There were a lot of Sci-Fi shows that did that which I really like. DS9, Firefly, Doctor Who and Stargate.

I&#039;m glad BSG is following suit and that&#039;s why you and a lot of other people like it so much. There was just nothing about it that clicked to me. I didn&#039;t like the idea of Cylons taking human forms or how TERMINATOR like the opening story was handled with humanity being nuked by machines that they created and must now fight them in order to survive. And that &quot;in brain Six&quot; stint is a complete &quot;Harvey&quot; scenario from Farscape. But hey, who ever said there was a perfect series out there?

Maybe if the show introduced the character of Lucifer I&#039;d watch it again, but since this is the final season and only the human like Cylons are dominant here, it doesn&#039;t look like it will happen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#101 VOODOO &#8220;Can you tell me with a straight face that Enterprise or Voyager are in the same league with BSG as far as quality goes? With all due respect please don’t try and argue that they are because they simply are not.&#8221;</p>
<p>Oh don&#8217;t worry. I wasn&#8217;t even going to. I watched a couple of seasons of Voyager and didn&#8217;t like where it was going. I watched the first episode of Enterprise and loathed every second of it. I even watched that stupid Borg episode that only confirmed what I had for the series all along. I was a prequel to TNG, not TOS. Over 30 HD screens on a bridge when the original series had no screens at all 100 years later? Not buying it.</p>
<p>But you know what&#8217;s sad? I actually felt bad for all of the show&#8217;s fans that had to endure the so called &#8220;treat for Star Trek fans&#8221; final episode of Enterprise. Awful. Absolutely awful. Where is the logic in taking a series that was so good for people and turning it&#8217;s very episode into another episode of TNG? Nothing spells &#8220;Let&#8217;s just quit on Enterprise and do another TNG. Those were always good!&#8221; like that last episode did.</p>
<p>And I LOVE shows with continuity where characters go through change, past events are either mentioned or play a big part in what&#8217;s to come and how nothing is the same from when it started. There were a lot of Sci-Fi shows that did that which I really like. DS9, Firefly, Doctor Who and Stargate.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m glad BSG is following suit and that&#8217;s why you and a lot of other people like it so much. There was just nothing about it that clicked to me. I didn&#8217;t like the idea of Cylons taking human forms or how TERMINATOR like the opening story was handled with humanity being nuked by machines that they created and must now fight them in order to survive. And that &#8220;in brain Six&#8221; stint is a complete &#8220;Harvey&#8221; scenario from Farscape. But hey, who ever said there was a perfect series out there?</p>
<p>Maybe if the show introduced the character of Lucifer I&#8217;d watch it again, but since this is the final season and only the human like Cylons are dominant here, it doesn&#8217;t look like it will happen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thebiggfrogg</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2008/05/02/bsg-preview-%e2%80%9cthe-road-less-travelled%e2%80%9d/comment-page-3/#comment-630863</link>
		<dc:creator>thebiggfrogg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 May 2008 13:20:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2008/05/02/bsg-preview-%e2%80%9cthe-road-less-travelled%e2%80%9d/#comment-630863</guid>
		<description>#21: In 10 years I will still be holding on to my BSG DVDs and iTunes downloads. It is a fascinating, morally complex show. I am a Trek fan too, but  the drama of Trek too often drifted into formula--too many reiterations. Before this film I felt Trek needed a decade or two rest until fresh blood came along and if this falls flat I&#039;ll return to that line of thought. People may still be watching Trek, but if it series 10 in the lame style of Enterprise I&#039;ll take BSG over it any day.

That said, Trek and BSG are completely different animals (add to that list some of my other favorites like Babylon 5, Farscape, and Firefly). When I want an optimistic view of the future that, at its best, spins a good speculative yarn I will watch Trek. When I want to watch a show that is closer to reality, closer to home with dark contours, shades of gray, and characters who feel the consequences of their actions I&#039;ll watch BSG. While I love both (and the others mentioned above) I have to admit BSG usually offers superior drama, acting, and suspense.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#21: In 10 years I will still be holding on to my BSG DVDs and iTunes downloads. It is a fascinating, morally complex show. I am a Trek fan too, but  the drama of Trek too often drifted into formula&#8211;too many reiterations. Before this film I felt Trek needed a decade or two rest until fresh blood came along and if this falls flat I&#8217;ll return to that line of thought. People may still be watching Trek, but if it series 10 in the lame style of Enterprise I&#8217;ll take BSG over it any day.</p>
<p>That said, Trek and BSG are completely different animals (add to that list some of my other favorites like Babylon 5, Farscape, and Firefly). When I want an optimistic view of the future that, at its best, spins a good speculative yarn I will watch Trek. When I want to watch a show that is closer to reality, closer to home with dark contours, shades of gray, and characters who feel the consequences of their actions I&#8217;ll watch BSG. While I love both (and the others mentioned above) I have to admit BSG usually offers superior drama, acting, and suspense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Garovorkin</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2008/05/02/bsg-preview-%e2%80%9cthe-road-less-travelled%e2%80%9d/comment-page-3/#comment-629428</link>
		<dc:creator>Garovorkin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 22:33:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2008/05/02/bsg-preview-%e2%80%9cthe-road-less-travelled%e2%80%9d/#comment-629428</guid>
		<description>The thing is I find the BSG to be a fascinating show. The storys are very Dark and characters with all their shades of grey moral ambiguities, hangups and complexities are fun to watch. They never seem to do what we expect them to do. For them doing the right thing is neither easy or in some cases convenient. There are quick formula fixes like so many past shows used to give us.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The thing is I find the BSG to be a fascinating show. The storys are very Dark and characters with all their shades of grey moral ambiguities, hangups and complexities are fun to watch. They never seem to do what we expect them to do. For them doing the right thing is neither easy or in some cases convenient. There are quick formula fixes like so many past shows used to give us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Garovorkin</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2008/05/02/bsg-preview-%e2%80%9cthe-road-less-travelled%e2%80%9d/comment-page-3/#comment-629391</link>
		<dc:creator>Garovorkin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 22:16:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2008/05/02/bsg-preview-%e2%80%9cthe-road-less-travelled%e2%80%9d/#comment-629391</guid>
		<description>#101  I to came to that conclusion along time ago that what we were dealing with Colonials and Cylons were two different groups of machines. It started on Kobol thousands of years ago. they had a machine rebellion, what left Kobol to colonize the 12 worlds only thought it was human but forgot either through accident or design that they were in fact machines, as to whta went to Earth could be the human survivors from Kobol.  Look at the fact that both Colonials and Cylons have the final five in common. To the colonials they are the gos to the Cylons they are the final models .it seems to tie pretty well.
As to the agenda of the final five? I think that they will know what their purpose is when the 5th cylon is revealed. Most likely the 5th Cylon is like a program key which will enable them to remember what their purpose is. I think that the Purpose of the 5 is to act as shepards to both colonials and Cylons, I think their job may be to bring them together.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#101  I to came to that conclusion along time ago that what we were dealing with Colonials and Cylons were two different groups of machines. It started on Kobol thousands of years ago. they had a machine rebellion, what left Kobol to colonize the 12 worlds only thought it was human but forgot either through accident or design that they were in fact machines, as to whta went to Earth could be the human survivors from Kobol.  Look at the fact that both Colonials and Cylons have the final five in common. To the colonials they are the gos to the Cylons they are the final models .it seems to tie pretty well.<br />
As to the agenda of the final five? I think that they will know what their purpose is when the 5th cylon is revealed. Most likely the 5th Cylon is like a program key which will enable them to remember what their purpose is. I think that the Purpose of the 5 is to act as shepards to both colonials and Cylons, I think their job may be to bring them together.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cyberghost</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2008/05/02/bsg-preview-%e2%80%9cthe-road-less-travelled%e2%80%9d/comment-page-3/#comment-629346</link>
		<dc:creator>Cyberghost</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 22:00:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2008/05/02/bsg-preview-%e2%80%9cthe-road-less-travelled%e2%80%9d/#comment-629346</guid>
		<description>BSG is intended for a mature audience, and that is where the problem is. People like shows spoon feed to them and the new BSG does not do that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BSG is intended for a mature audience, and that is where the problem is. People like shows spoon feed to them and the new BSG does not do that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: VOODOO</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2008/05/02/bsg-preview-%e2%80%9cthe-road-less-travelled%e2%80%9d/comment-page-3/#comment-629246</link>
		<dc:creator>VOODOO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 21:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2008/05/02/bsg-preview-%e2%80%9cthe-road-less-travelled%e2%80%9d/#comment-629246</guid>
		<description>Anthony:

Thanks for the weekly BSG story.

Is there anyway you can get an edit function on the site? I think faster than I type and I make really stupid spelling and punctuation errors. I go crazy looking at all the mistakes I made here.

Maybe I&#039;m just a dope?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anthony:</p>
<p>Thanks for the weekly BSG story.</p>
<p>Is there anyway you can get an edit function on the site? I think faster than I type and I make really stupid spelling and punctuation errors. I go crazy looking at all the mistakes I made here.</p>
<p>Maybe I&#8217;m just a dope?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: VOODOO</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2008/05/02/bsg-preview-%e2%80%9cthe-road-less-travelled%e2%80%9d/comment-page-3/#comment-629220</link>
		<dc:creator>VOODOO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 21:15:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2008/05/02/bsg-preview-%e2%80%9cthe-road-less-travelled%e2%80%9d/#comment-629220</guid>
		<description>Jeyl #97

No, I mean (and I think you know what I mean) that I hope that Abrams can return Star Trek to the days where it was a cutting edge, thought provoking/ground breaking program. Much like BSG is today. 

I don&#039;t want more of the same stale old copy of  a copy that Star Trek has become over the last 15 years. 

Ron Moore&#039;s BSG is a mature redefining of the sci-fi genre. While on the other hand the latest bunch of Star Trek spin-offs where becoming less and less relevant. They were dumbed down lifeless product handed to the masses by Paramount in an attempt to continue milking their golden cow.  After a while the general public simply lost interest in these programs that were living off the Star Trek name.

Can you tell me with a straight face that Enterprise or Voyager are in the same league with BSG as far as quality goes? With all due respect please don&#039;t try and argue that they are because they simply are not.

Please stop with the inferiority complex towards BSG.  Star Trek will soon have it&#039;s day (about a year from now) to reemerge and prove to the world that it is once again worthy of the thrown that Kirk and co. earned so many years ago.  Until then get out of BSG&#039;s way because it is blowing sci-fi&#039;s doors off the wall.

ps:  By the way I have confidence that the current creative team is on the right track to reinvigorate the franchise much the same way that Moore did with BSG.   Although they should get Shatner a cameo... Sorry I had to get that last bit in.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeyl #97</p>
<p>No, I mean (and I think you know what I mean) that I hope that Abrams can return Star Trek to the days where it was a cutting edge, thought provoking/ground breaking program. Much like BSG is today. </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t want more of the same stale old copy of  a copy that Star Trek has become over the last 15 years. </p>
<p>Ron Moore&#8217;s BSG is a mature redefining of the sci-fi genre. While on the other hand the latest bunch of Star Trek spin-offs where becoming less and less relevant. They were dumbed down lifeless product handed to the masses by Paramount in an attempt to continue milking their golden cow.  After a while the general public simply lost interest in these programs that were living off the Star Trek name.</p>
<p>Can you tell me with a straight face that Enterprise or Voyager are in the same league with BSG as far as quality goes? With all due respect please don&#8217;t try and argue that they are because they simply are not.</p>
<p>Please stop with the inferiority complex towards BSG.  Star Trek will soon have it&#8217;s day (about a year from now) to reemerge and prove to the world that it is once again worthy of the thrown that Kirk and co. earned so many years ago.  Until then get out of BSG&#8217;s way because it is blowing sci-fi&#8217;s doors off the wall.</p>
<p>ps:  By the way I have confidence that the current creative team is on the right track to reinvigorate the franchise much the same way that Moore did with BSG.   Although they should get Shatner a cameo&#8230; Sorry I had to get that last bit in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Biodredd</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2008/05/02/bsg-preview-%e2%80%9cthe-road-less-travelled%e2%80%9d/comment-page-2/#comment-629199</link>
		<dc:creator>Biodredd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 21:08:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2008/05/02/bsg-preview-%e2%80%9cthe-road-less-travelled%e2%80%9d/#comment-629199</guid>
		<description>Well I for one feel that the ship of light from the original series plays no part what-so-ever in this series.

After taking the time to freze frame Starbuck&#039;s paintings, she has painted something that looks more like a funky re-designed basestar then anything resembling the ship of light.

I think Starbuck may have been to Earth, but I think the feelings she is having are meant to direct her course to the Cylons for both sides mutual benefit.

The Galactica has been following a pretty straight forward course based on the clues it has uncovered so far.  Adama and Roslyn have no reason to believe anything but the markers they have found and continue on that path.

After 58 days, Starbuck is no closer to finding her way back to earth then when the mission started.  I have a feeling there will initially be two paths back to earth that eventually merge into one.  May may be longer and more harrowing, the quick path will have its own perils and difficulties to overcome.

The quick path is easy, quicker and leads into darkness (forgive the Star Wars alligories), the longer path will lead to the light and the eventual discovery of Earth.

I was also talking to a friend about this... our current thery is that while there may be 12 models of Cylons that are known (well with the exception of the 12th model), by the time the fleet arrives at earth it will be discovered that we are all Cylons and always have been.

And what could they possibly have planned for the last four hours that caused the producers to tell the writers to conserve the SFX budget for the season as they were pulling out all the stops in the last 4 hours?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well I for one feel that the ship of light from the original series plays no part what-so-ever in this series.</p>
<p>After taking the time to freze frame Starbuck&#8217;s paintings, she has painted something that looks more like a funky re-designed basestar then anything resembling the ship of light.</p>
<p>I think Starbuck may have been to Earth, but I think the feelings she is having are meant to direct her course to the Cylons for both sides mutual benefit.</p>
<p>The Galactica has been following a pretty straight forward course based on the clues it has uncovered so far.  Adama and Roslyn have no reason to believe anything but the markers they have found and continue on that path.</p>
<p>After 58 days, Starbuck is no closer to finding her way back to earth then when the mission started.  I have a feeling there will initially be two paths back to earth that eventually merge into one.  May may be longer and more harrowing, the quick path will have its own perils and difficulties to overcome.</p>
<p>The quick path is easy, quicker and leads into darkness (forgive the Star Wars alligories), the longer path will lead to the light and the eventual discovery of Earth.</p>
<p>I was also talking to a friend about this&#8230; our current thery is that while there may be 12 models of Cylons that are known (well with the exception of the 12th model), by the time the fleet arrives at earth it will be discovered that we are all Cylons and always have been.</p>
<p>And what could they possibly have planned for the last four hours that caused the producers to tell the writers to conserve the SFX budget for the season as they were pulling out all the stops in the last 4 hours?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

