Hey Pal!! You didn’t get my little joke there, did ‘ya? Anyhoos, I think you were looking for the spoilers thread. This here is the Faran Tahir thread. We were all sorta going with a running gag that you, of course, didn’t have to participate in. But have yourself a swell day.

Not according to the ratings of ENT (which I actually enjoy more than any of the other spinoffs), and the low turnout at the box-office for NEM.

To me, Star Trek has been off the air for many years. TNG (which built its own respectable fanbase and had a great run), DS9 (although I found it to be a good show in its own right), VOY, and ENT (also good in its own right) were light years from attaining the status of their ancestor, commonly known now as TOS. Its 79 episodes and 6 feature films are “Star Trek” to me.

The aforementioned spinoff series were all “based upon ‘Star Trek’, created by Gene Roddenberry”, so I suppose it all depends on how you look at it.

I have waiting since the late-1980’s for the iconic original characters to be recast and for Paramount to revisit the 23rd Century. While I felt then that the original cast was tired, I never cared for what came next with 24th Century Trek. It never felt right to me, and it certainly was never, IMO, worthy of a feature film series. The only TNG-era film which is even watchable to me is First Contact, and its by-the-numbers style resulted only in a marginal film (again, IMO). But I digress…

Maybe some have not watched TOS but it has not been off for ages

A circus clown, get over it.

It doesn’t matter what kind of spoilers, rumors, or other nonsense comes sifting through. Most of it will be of little or no matter to those who wish to see a Star Trek based movie. After all, “Enterprise” has already flushed canon down the toilet, that is, if you choose to accept “Enterprise” as canon itself. Personally, I’m looking forward to the movie, regardless.

So if I wear a size 24 men’s shoe, that means that I’m……………….