


<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Paramount Already Thinking About Sequel To Abrams Star Trek</title>
	<atom:link href="http://trekmovie.com/2008/06/04/paramount-already-thinking-about-sequel-to-abrams-star-trek/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://trekmovie.com/2008/06/04/paramount-already-thinking-about-sequel-to-abrams-star-trek/</link>
	<description>the source for Star Trek news and information</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 17:14:27 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: &#187; Un sequel per Star Trek di J.J. Abrams? &#187; ScreenWEEK.it weblog</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2008/06/04/paramount-already-thinking-about-sequel-to-abrams-star-trek/comment-page-7/#comment-2225580</link>
		<dc:creator>&#187; Un sequel per Star Trek di J.J. Abrams? &#187; ScreenWEEK.it weblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 07:36:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2008/06/04/paramount-already-thinking-about-sequel-to-abrams-star-trek/#comment-2225580</guid>
		<description>[...] Trekmovie.com, Roberto Orci, che insieme ad Alex Kurtzman fa parte del team di sceneggiatori fidati di J.J. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Trekmovie.com, Roberto Orci, che insieme ad Alex Kurtzman fa parte del team di sceneggiatori fidati di J.J. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Viskous</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2008/06/04/paramount-already-thinking-about-sequel-to-abrams-star-trek/comment-page-7/#comment-2130536</link>
		<dc:creator>Viskous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 16:42:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2008/06/04/paramount-already-thinking-about-sequel-to-abrams-star-trek/#comment-2130536</guid>
		<description>Star Trek 2009 was mindblowingly good. Surprisingly good. I mean, it got 90+% on Rotten Tomatoes, and that&#039;s saying something!

• Star Trek Beta

• Star Trek Neo

Can&#039;t think of anything else. When the three disc Blu-Ray thing gets released, I&#039;m getting the puppy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Star Trek 2009 was mindblowingly good. Surprisingly good. I mean, it got 90+% on Rotten Tomatoes, and that&#8217;s saying something!</p>
<p>• Star Trek Beta</p>
<p>• Star Trek Neo</p>
<p>Can&#8217;t think of anything else. When the three disc Blu-Ray thing gets released, I&#8217;m getting the puppy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maggot</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2008/06/04/paramount-already-thinking-about-sequel-to-abrams-star-trek/comment-page-7/#comment-1925005</link>
		<dc:creator>Maggot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 12:52:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2008/06/04/paramount-already-thinking-about-sequel-to-abrams-star-trek/#comment-1925005</guid>
		<description>PS - you could always bring Tuvok into the equation somewhere!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PS &#8211; you could always bring Tuvok into the equation somewhere!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maggot</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2008/06/04/paramount-already-thinking-about-sequel-to-abrams-star-trek/comment-page-7/#comment-1924986</link>
		<dc:creator>Maggot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 12:45:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2008/06/04/paramount-already-thinking-about-sequel-to-abrams-star-trek/#comment-1924986</guid>
		<description>The film is out - great work from the CGIs and effects guyes, and a good bit of casting. The sequel to the prequel - how about Uhura on maternity leave, Kirk actually settling down with one woman, a fair amount of Pon Farr, the problems of where to go and who with, Drs Flox  and McCoy would have their hands full there I think.  How to build up numbers of an endangered species, aliens with selective reproductive abilities spring to mind - Spock could produce 2 kiddies one pure Vulcan one pure Human - the franchise goes on.  Can they battle the killer flying pancakes again [Anihalation Project] please. You could have hours of fun with Chekov - after all at 17 he&#039;s got a lot to learn about life.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The film is out &#8211; great work from the CGIs and effects guyes, and a good bit of casting. The sequel to the prequel &#8211; how about Uhura on maternity leave, Kirk actually settling down with one woman, a fair amount of Pon Farr, the problems of where to go and who with, Drs Flox  and McCoy would have their hands full there I think.  How to build up numbers of an endangered species, aliens with selective reproductive abilities spring to mind &#8211; Spock could produce 2 kiddies one pure Vulcan one pure Human &#8211; the franchise goes on.  Can they battle the killer flying pancakes again [Anihalation Project] please. You could have hours of fun with Chekov &#8211; after all at 17 he&#8217;s got a lot to learn about life.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rachel Marta</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2008/06/04/paramount-already-thinking-about-sequel-to-abrams-star-trek/comment-page-7/#comment-1903969</link>
		<dc:creator>Rachel Marta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 18:51:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2008/06/04/paramount-already-thinking-about-sequel-to-abrams-star-trek/#comment-1903969</guid>
		<description>I have seen Star Trek XI (or 9) ten times now. It is a thorough adrenaline rush. I can&#039;t wait for the sequel. Two comments: Please make sure Kirk&#039;s hair is blonde (the scenes where it appears red were very distracting). And do not have any famous guest stars. They will detract from the new crew who rightly should be the focus. They are young, gorgeous, and energetic. All they need is an equally exciting script as the 2009 movie. And although I adore Shatner&#039;s portrayal of Kirk, he is such a scene stealer that it would be a disservice to the story, and Chris Pine who is a perfectly wonderful Kirk in his own right, if he were in it. Shatner created Kirk but its time to move on. Its a different century and a different time line. It&#039;s not ageism, I am 65 years young.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have seen Star Trek XI (or 9) ten times now. It is a thorough adrenaline rush. I can&#8217;t wait for the sequel. Two comments: Please make sure Kirk&#8217;s hair is blonde (the scenes where it appears red were very distracting). And do not have any famous guest stars. They will detract from the new crew who rightly should be the focus. They are young, gorgeous, and energetic. All they need is an equally exciting script as the 2009 movie. And although I adore Shatner&#8217;s portrayal of Kirk, he is such a scene stealer that it would be a disservice to the story, and Chris Pine who is a perfectly wonderful Kirk in his own right, if he were in it. Shatner created Kirk but its time to move on. Its a different century and a different time line. It&#8217;s not ageism, I am 65 years young.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Quite Quotable Quotes: Star Trek (2009 film) &#171; F241vc15&#8242; Weblog</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2008/06/04/paramount-already-thinking-about-sequel-to-abrams-star-trek/comment-page-7/#comment-1812965</link>
		<dc:creator>Quite Quotable Quotes: Star Trek (2009 film) &#171; F241vc15&#8242; Weblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 15:07:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2008/06/04/paramount-already-thinking-about-sequel-to-abrams-star-trek/#comment-1812965</guid>
		<description>[...] Can&#8217;t wait for the sequel (as confirmed by this site, the major cast are and crew are signed up for 2 more [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Can&#8217;t wait for the sequel (as confirmed by this site, the major cast are and crew are signed up for 2 more [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rich (Pittsburgh)</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2008/06/04/paramount-already-thinking-about-sequel-to-abrams-star-trek/comment-page-7/#comment-1807433</link>
		<dc:creator>Rich (Pittsburgh)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 May 2009 05:55:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2008/06/04/paramount-already-thinking-about-sequel-to-abrams-star-trek/#comment-1807433</guid>
		<description>BTW- the movie was beyond awesome!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BTW- the movie was beyond awesome!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rich (Pittsburgh)</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2008/06/04/paramount-already-thinking-about-sequel-to-abrams-star-trek/comment-page-7/#comment-1807431</link>
		<dc:creator>Rich (Pittsburgh)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 May 2009 05:54:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2008/06/04/paramount-already-thinking-about-sequel-to-abrams-star-trek/#comment-1807431</guid>
		<description>Keep the numbering system, but employ good old standard Arabic numbers. Star Trek 2, Star Trek 3, etc. That way, when we get to number 38 it&#039;s Star Trek 38, not Star Trek XXXVIII. It&#039;s Star Trek, not the Super Bowl or the Olympics!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Keep the numbering system, but employ good old standard Arabic numbers. Star Trek 2, Star Trek 3, etc. That way, when we get to number 38 it&#8217;s Star Trek 38, not Star Trek XXXVIII. It&#8217;s Star Trek, not the Super Bowl or the Olympics!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alfred Parks</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2008/06/04/paramount-already-thinking-about-sequel-to-abrams-star-trek/comment-page-7/#comment-1779401</link>
		<dc:creator>Alfred Parks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 08:44:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2008/06/04/paramount-already-thinking-about-sequel-to-abrams-star-trek/#comment-1779401</guid>
		<description>It is logical to assume that there may be a link between the space craft &quot;Voyager 6&quot; as enhanced and returned by the &quot;Machine Planet&quot;  (Star Trek the Motion Picture) and the creation of the Borg and its philosophy.  Vyger was looking for the creator and it eventually joined machine with man or a cyborg (Captain Dekker and the Leutinent Ilea changeling) this may be something to base a new motion picture on with the person &quot;Q&quot; still putting humanity on trial.  Perhaps Vyger could be thought of as the founder of Borg society itself and may be the key to settling the conflicts between &quot;free will&quot; and &#039;forced servitude&quot;. Time travel may serve to alter the damage done by the borg by changing the Borg philosopy of assimilation of multitudes of lifeforms as a step in getting closer to perfection.  Changing the timeline in this manner would be carefully considered by those who inforce the &quot;temporal Prime Directive&quot;
This is just a suggestion for a future movie.  Someone would have to study the structures of past movie scripts and dialogues to eliminate conflicts in the entire &quot;star trek saga itself&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is logical to assume that there may be a link between the space craft &#8220;Voyager 6&#8243; as enhanced and returned by the &#8220;Machine Planet&#8221;  (Star Trek the Motion Picture) and the creation of the Borg and its philosophy.  Vyger was looking for the creator and it eventually joined machine with man or a cyborg (Captain Dekker and the Leutinent Ilea changeling) this may be something to base a new motion picture on with the person &#8220;Q&#8221; still putting humanity on trial.  Perhaps Vyger could be thought of as the founder of Borg society itself and may be the key to settling the conflicts between &#8220;free will&#8221; and &#8216;forced servitude&#8221;. Time travel may serve to alter the damage done by the borg by changing the Borg philosopy of assimilation of multitudes of lifeforms as a step in getting closer to perfection.  Changing the timeline in this manner would be carefully considered by those who inforce the &#8220;temporal Prime Directive&#8221;<br />
This is just a suggestion for a future movie.  Someone would have to study the structures of past movie scripts and dialogues to eliminate conflicts in the entire &#8220;star trek saga itself&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: It&#8217;s Official: Paramount Moving Forward On Star Trek Sequel - Supreme Court On Board - kaylaiacovino2.0</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2008/06/04/paramount-already-thinking-about-sequel-to-abrams-star-trek/comment-page-7/#comment-1676786</link>
		<dc:creator>It&#8217;s Official: Paramount Moving Forward On Star Trek Sequel - Supreme Court On Board - kaylaiacovino2.0</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 20:09:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2008/06/04/paramount-already-thinking-about-sequel-to-abrams-star-trek/#comment-1676786</guid>
		<description>[...] hinted at TrekMovie.com last June, it appears that it is now official that Paramount is in the works to make a sequel to the upcoming [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] hinted at TrekMovie.com last June, it appears that it is now official that Paramount is in the works to make a sequel to the upcoming [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
