


<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CelebWatch: Stardate 06.05.08</title>
	<atom:link href="http://trekmovie.com/2008/06/05/celebwatch-stardate-060508/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://trekmovie.com/2008/06/05/celebwatch-stardate-060508/</link>
	<description>the source for Star Trek news and information</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 23:27:10 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: beerwriter</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2008/06/05/celebwatch-stardate-060508/comment-page-1/#comment-744866</link>
		<dc:creator>beerwriter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 14:54:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2008/06/05/celebwatch-stardate-060508/#comment-744866</guid>
		<description>#8; The British &quot;Life on Mars&quot; aired in the U.S. on the BBC America cable channel.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#8; The British &#8220;Life on Mars&#8221; aired in the U.S. on the BBC America cable channel.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dom</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2008/06/05/celebwatch-stardate-060508/comment-page-1/#comment-744516</link>
		<dc:creator>Dom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 12:03:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2008/06/05/celebwatch-stardate-060508/#comment-744516</guid>
		<description>Yeah, Shatner was simply making a logical business decision.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, Shatner was simply making a logical business decision.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TrekNerd</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2008/06/05/celebwatch-stardate-060508/comment-page-1/#comment-740057</link>
		<dc:creator>TrekNerd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jun 2008 01:50:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2008/06/05/celebwatch-stardate-060508/#comment-740057</guid>
		<description>&quot;Autograph seeker Stephen Duncan reported that Shatner’s reasoning for cancelling all the phone orders was because fans could turn around and sell the signed book on eBay for $100. A visit to his website shows Shatner himself is selling signed copies of his autobiography for $94.95&quot;

William Shatner is completely in the right. Why should he sign something for somebody whose only purpose is to sell it?

That&#039;s why Shatner&#039;s policy at appearances is to personalize autographs. If you think about it, why would any true-blue Trek/Shatner fan want a non-personalized autograph, anyway? The whole point is the idol-fan connection.

And truth be told, Shatner has every right to sell his non-personalized autograph at whatever price he sets. It&#039;s his name, after all. If anyone profits off his name, it should be him.

However, I don&#039;t see why Shatner couldn&#039;t have personalized those phone-order autographs. Just like he does at his personal appearances, he could have taken the time by himself to personalize the autographs based on the phone orders. It would be even quicker for him because he wouldn&#039;t be personally greeting each autograph seeker.

I suspect that Book Soup was too lazy to take and keep track of personalization orders for those phone orders. They just wanted to make as much money as possible as quickly as possible by selling non-personalized autographs.

I don&#039;t blame Shatner for cancelling those orders.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Autograph seeker Stephen Duncan reported that Shatner’s reasoning for cancelling all the phone orders was because fans could turn around and sell the signed book on eBay for $100. A visit to his website shows Shatner himself is selling signed copies of his autobiography for $94.95&#8243;</p>
<p>William Shatner is completely in the right. Why should he sign something for somebody whose only purpose is to sell it?</p>
<p>That&#8217;s why Shatner&#8217;s policy at appearances is to personalize autographs. If you think about it, why would any true-blue Trek/Shatner fan want a non-personalized autograph, anyway? The whole point is the idol-fan connection.</p>
<p>And truth be told, Shatner has every right to sell his non-personalized autograph at whatever price he sets. It&#8217;s his name, after all. If anyone profits off his name, it should be him.</p>
<p>However, I don&#8217;t see why Shatner couldn&#8217;t have personalized those phone-order autographs. Just like he does at his personal appearances, he could have taken the time by himself to personalize the autographs based on the phone orders. It would be even quicker for him because he wouldn&#8217;t be personally greeting each autograph seeker.</p>
<p>I suspect that Book Soup was too lazy to take and keep track of personalization orders for those phone orders. They just wanted to make as much money as possible as quickly as possible by selling non-personalized autographs.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t blame Shatner for cancelling those orders.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Xai</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2008/06/05/celebwatch-stardate-060508/comment-page-1/#comment-739200</link>
		<dc:creator>Xai</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jun 2008 19:51:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2008/06/05/celebwatch-stardate-060508/#comment-739200</guid>
		<description>Weddings are not an event that you also invite people to &quot;bury the hatchet&quot;. The couple, regardless of who they are, are busy enjoying their family and guests and, you know... getting MARRIED!

Really tired of this supposed feud making news.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Weddings are not an event that you also invite people to &#8220;bury the hatchet&#8221;. The couple, regardless of who they are, are busy enjoying their family and guests and, you know&#8230; getting MARRIED!</p>
<p>Really tired of this supposed feud making news.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: THX-1138 The Fandom Menace</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2008/06/05/celebwatch-stardate-060508/comment-page-1/#comment-739063</link>
		<dc:creator>THX-1138 The Fandom Menace</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jun 2008 18:50:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2008/06/05/celebwatch-stardate-060508/#comment-739063</guid>
		<description>Charles, my point was that I didn&#039;t realize (my bad) that the Nichols link was to pictures and not a discussion, as was sort of the indication of your text.  Make no mistake, I thought the pics were great.  But I own the business and my office is readily available to all who work for me when I&#039;m in it.  Just a little hard to get them to believe it was my normal geek stuff.  I think they they still think I&#039;m some sort of perv.  And they are not too far off.  But I am a discrete perv.

No complaint, really, just a suggestion.  I loved the article this week.  I think I lingered too long at JoBlo&#039;s site, though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Charles, my point was that I didn&#8217;t realize (my bad) that the Nichols link was to pictures and not a discussion, as was sort of the indication of your text.  Make no mistake, I thought the pics were great.  But I own the business and my office is readily available to all who work for me when I&#8217;m in it.  Just a little hard to get them to believe it was my normal geek stuff.  I think they they still think I&#8217;m some sort of perv.  And they are not too far off.  But I am a discrete perv.</p>
<p>No complaint, really, just a suggestion.  I loved the article this week.  I think I lingered too long at JoBlo&#8217;s site, though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wildthanglover</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2008/06/05/celebwatch-stardate-060508/comment-page-1/#comment-738762</link>
		<dc:creator>wildthanglover</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jun 2008 15:51:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2008/06/05/celebwatch-stardate-060508/#comment-738762</guid>
		<description>Patrick Stewart and Ian McKellan are my two favorite actors in the world! I got to see Ian in King Lear and Patrick in Macbeth. They both were amazing!

Patrick Stewart rocks! He should get the &quot; Overall Great Person&quot; award.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Patrick Stewart and Ian McKellan are my two favorite actors in the world! I got to see Ian in King Lear and Patrick in Macbeth. They both were amazing!</p>
<p>Patrick Stewart rocks! He should get the &#8221; Overall Great Person&#8221; award.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2008/06/05/celebwatch-stardate-060508/comment-page-1/#comment-737364</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jun 2008 05:09:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2008/06/05/celebwatch-stardate-060508/#comment-737364</guid>
		<description>Man that chick is smokin&#039; hot.

No surprise about what an ass Shatner can be to autograph seekers.  Kirk will always be my favorite character and I have a soft spot for Bill but I&#039;m well aware that he&#039;s as self-absorbed as ever.  You would think he&#039;d mellow with age.

Glad to see Stephen Collins on Broadway(maybe I&#039;ll finally make time to see the play).  I&#039;m amazed there hasn&#039;t been a TMP sequel in novel form where we would see what kind of lifeform came of the merging of Decker-Ilia-V&#039;ger.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Man that chick is smokin&#8217; hot.</p>
<p>No surprise about what an ass Shatner can be to autograph seekers.  Kirk will always be my favorite character and I have a soft spot for Bill but I&#8217;m well aware that he&#8217;s as self-absorbed as ever.  You would think he&#8217;d mellow with age.</p>
<p>Glad to see Stephen Collins on Broadway(maybe I&#8217;ll finally make time to see the play).  I&#8217;m amazed there hasn&#8217;t been a TMP sequel in novel form where we would see what kind of lifeform came of the merging of Decker-Ilia-V&#8217;ger.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charles Trotter</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2008/06/05/celebwatch-stardate-060508/comment-page-1/#comment-737181</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles Trotter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jun 2008 03:45:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2008/06/05/celebwatch-stardate-060508/#comment-737181</guid>
		<description>#27. CmdrR -- I never said you didn&#039;t like it. And I&#039;m not Anthony. ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#27. CmdrR &#8212; I never said you didn&#8217;t like it. And I&#8217;m not Anthony. ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dom</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2008/06/05/celebwatch-stardate-060508/comment-page-1/#comment-736677</link>
		<dc:creator>Dom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jun 2008 00:16:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2008/06/05/celebwatch-stardate-060508/#comment-736677</guid>
		<description>Hi THX-1138. In the world of six degrees of separation, Rachel Nichols is a friend of a friend of a friend of mine who also happens to come from Maine - old school connection, I believe. I obviously don&#039;t know Rachel Nichols and am even more obviously never likely to meet her at that number of degrees of separation!! But, I mentioned her as the &#039;new girl on Alias&#039; to my friend a couple of years back and my friend immediately knew who I was talking about and said she&#039;s heard down the line that Rachel Nichols is as a really nice person.

The trouble with Jo Blo&#039;s article is that they are looking for headlines and news stories - preferably scandal - in order to make a judgement on the likes of &#039;personality&#039; and &#039;career&#039;. It&#039;s sad that if you&#039;re a nice person who quietly gets on with the job at hand, that somehow makes you unremarkable!

Actually, she&#039;s appeared in shows like the massively-reworked The Inside, which was cancelled abruptly after seven episodes, although the ratings were growing week by week and her performance was considered good enough that she was the only castmember held over from the original pilot.

She had a good story arc in Alias and, given a direct follow-up to Alias is unlikely, I&#039;d love to see a spin-off following her Rachel Gibson character.

After a few other film appearances, she&#039;s now playing Scarlett in GI Joe, which is a pretty big role for someone Jo Blo rather bitchily  dismisses. Roll on her appearance in Star Trek!!!

Didn&#039;t think the pics were particularly NSFW: I&#039;ve seen worse around the office! But Jo Blo&#039;s title of the section, &#039;Body Shop&#039;, is pretty offensive in that context.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi THX-1138. In the world of six degrees of separation, Rachel Nichols is a friend of a friend of a friend of mine who also happens to come from Maine &#8211; old school connection, I believe. I obviously don&#8217;t know Rachel Nichols and am even more obviously never likely to meet her at that number of degrees of separation!! But, I mentioned her as the &#8216;new girl on Alias&#8217; to my friend a couple of years back and my friend immediately knew who I was talking about and said she&#8217;s heard down the line that Rachel Nichols is as a really nice person.</p>
<p>The trouble with Jo Blo&#8217;s article is that they are looking for headlines and news stories &#8211; preferably scandal &#8211; in order to make a judgement on the likes of &#8216;personality&#8217; and &#8216;career&#8217;. It&#8217;s sad that if you&#8217;re a nice person who quietly gets on with the job at hand, that somehow makes you unremarkable!</p>
<p>Actually, she&#8217;s appeared in shows like the massively-reworked The Inside, which was cancelled abruptly after seven episodes, although the ratings were growing week by week and her performance was considered good enough that she was the only castmember held over from the original pilot.</p>
<p>She had a good story arc in Alias and, given a direct follow-up to Alias is unlikely, I&#8217;d love to see a spin-off following her Rachel Gibson character.</p>
<p>After a few other film appearances, she&#8217;s now playing Scarlett in GI Joe, which is a pretty big role for someone Jo Blo rather bitchily  dismisses. Roll on her appearance in Star Trek!!!</p>
<p>Didn&#8217;t think the pics were particularly NSFW: I&#8217;ve seen worse around the office! But Jo Blo&#8217;s title of the section, &#8216;Body Shop&#8217;, is pretty offensive in that context.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CmdrR</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2008/06/05/celebwatch-stardate-060508/comment-page-1/#comment-736637</link>
		<dc:creator>CmdrR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 23:53:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2008/06/05/celebwatch-stardate-060508/#comment-736637</guid>
		<description>Anthony --
I&#039;m not saying I didn&#039;t like it.
I&#039;m just saying you can&#039;t f***in&#039; show it off at work.

heheehe</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anthony &#8211;<br />
I&#8217;m not saying I didn&#8217;t like it.<br />
I&#8217;m just saying you can&#8217;t f***in&#8217; show it off at work.</p>
<p>heheehe</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
