


<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Shatner Reflects On Kirk</title>
	<atom:link href="http://trekmovie.com/2008/06/05/shatner-reflects-on-kirk/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://trekmovie.com/2008/06/05/shatner-reflects-on-kirk/</link>
	<description>the source for Star Trek news and information</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 06:43:17 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Cygnus-X1</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2008/06/05/shatner-reflects-on-kirk/comment-page-2/#comment-747466</link>
		<dc:creator>Cygnus-X1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 06:57:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2008/06/05/shatner-reflects-on-kirk/#comment-747466</guid>
		<description>69. Closettrekker -- 

Cheers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>69. Closettrekker &#8212; </p>
<p>Cheers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Closettrekker</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2008/06/05/shatner-reflects-on-kirk/comment-page-2/#comment-745131</link>
		<dc:creator>Closettrekker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 16:43:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2008/06/05/shatner-reflects-on-kirk/#comment-745131</guid>
		<description>#68---You won&#039;t get any argument from me on Shatner&#039;s acting in TOS and its overall effect on the production. It was really the dedication of the actors portraying the &quot;Big Three&quot; who carried the day. 

It was not until much later that I began to feel as though Shatner was underperforming as James Kirk. His performances, IMO, were great right up until STV. From that point, I think he really &quot;phoned-in&quot; his last three performances as the hero, Jim Kirk. I have always described it as being more Kirk-as-Shatner, as opposed to Shatner-as-Kirk. To me, there is a considerable dropoff in quality.

No matter what, I will always admire Shatner&#039;s Kirk from 1965-1986, and that&#039;s a pretty damned good run.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#68&#8212;You won&#8217;t get any argument from me on Shatner&#8217;s acting in TOS and its overall effect on the production. It was really the dedication of the actors portraying the &#8220;Big Three&#8221; who carried the day. </p>
<p>It was not until much later that I began to feel as though Shatner was underperforming as James Kirk. His performances, IMO, were great right up until STV. From that point, I think he really &#8220;phoned-in&#8221; his last three performances as the hero, Jim Kirk. I have always described it as being more Kirk-as-Shatner, as opposed to Shatner-as-Kirk. To me, there is a considerable dropoff in quality.</p>
<p>No matter what, I will always admire Shatner&#8217;s Kirk from 1965-1986, and that&#8217;s a pretty damned good run.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cygnus-X1</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2008/06/05/shatner-reflects-on-kirk/comment-page-2/#comment-745090</link>
		<dc:creator>Cygnus-X1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 16:28:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2008/06/05/shatner-reflects-on-kirk/#comment-745090</guid>
		<description>Of course, Shatner was &quot;rather good&quot; as Kirk.

He was a bit &quot;over the top&quot; at times, in terms of melodrama, but he always sold the scene to us, the audience. Shatner&#039;s acting is honestly one of the most enjoyable aspects of TOS, for me. When Shatner&#039;s on screen,  I&#039;m never taken out of the scene by weak or ambivalent acting. Though, at times, I may have thought to myself, &quot;Gosh, that Captain sure is melodramatic,&quot; I always thought of that man as &quot;Captain Kirk,&quot; and never as &quot;William Shatner playing Captain Kirk.&quot;

So, Captain Kirk was a melodramatic Starship Captain. Which was great! It made him that much more enjoyable to be around. What a character!!

At any rate, the bottom line is that Shatner always SOLD the part. He kept all of the actors in the moment and made the whole, damned thing seem REAL. 

That&#039;s a good performance, no matter what anyone says.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course, Shatner was &#8220;rather good&#8221; as Kirk.</p>
<p>He was a bit &#8220;over the top&#8221; at times, in terms of melodrama, but he always sold the scene to us, the audience. Shatner&#8217;s acting is honestly one of the most enjoyable aspects of TOS, for me. When Shatner&#8217;s on screen,  I&#8217;m never taken out of the scene by weak or ambivalent acting. Though, at times, I may have thought to myself, &#8220;Gosh, that Captain sure is melodramatic,&#8221; I always thought of that man as &#8220;Captain Kirk,&#8221; and never as &#8220;William Shatner playing Captain Kirk.&#8221;</p>
<p>So, Captain Kirk was a melodramatic Starship Captain. Which was great! It made him that much more enjoyable to be around. What a character!!</p>
<p>At any rate, the bottom line is that Shatner always SOLD the part. He kept all of the actors in the moment and made the whole, damned thing seem REAL. </p>
<p>That&#8217;s a good performance, no matter what anyone says.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: diabolk</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2008/06/05/shatner-reflects-on-kirk/comment-page-2/#comment-736983</link>
		<dc:creator>diabolk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jun 2008 02:19:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2008/06/05/shatner-reflects-on-kirk/#comment-736983</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t remember Kirk ever prancing about swinging his arms. I can&#039;t even picture that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t remember Kirk ever prancing about swinging his arms. I can&#8217;t even picture that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oprah</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2008/06/05/shatner-reflects-on-kirk/comment-page-2/#comment-736435</link>
		<dc:creator>Oprah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 22:27:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2008/06/05/shatner-reflects-on-kirk/#comment-736435</guid>
		<description>I really love Shatner when he&#039;s not &quot;in character.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really love Shatner when he&#8217;s not &#8220;in character.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gene L. Coon (was the better Gene because he) was a U. S. Marine</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2008/06/05/shatner-reflects-on-kirk/comment-page-2/#comment-735238</link>
		<dc:creator>Gene L. Coon (was the better Gene because he) was a U. S. Marine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 13:36:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2008/06/05/shatner-reflects-on-kirk/#comment-735238</guid>
		<description>#64  Jon...

There is no higher compliment than to be told, on a Star Trek board no less, that one&#039;s logic is impeccable.   Thank you!

I really think that is how this will play out, and it will be fun!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#64  Jon&#8230;</p>
<p>There is no higher compliment than to be told, on a Star Trek board no less, that one&#8217;s logic is impeccable.   Thank you!</p>
<p>I really think that is how this will play out, and it will be fun!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2008/06/05/shatner-reflects-on-kirk/comment-page-2/#comment-735133</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 13:00:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2008/06/05/shatner-reflects-on-kirk/#comment-735133</guid>
		<description>#48...maybe, just maybe...it&#039;s a nice thought, if nothing else; your logic is impecable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#48&#8230;maybe, just maybe&#8230;it&#8217;s a nice thought, if nothing else; your logic is impecable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: star trackie</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2008/06/05/shatner-reflects-on-kirk/comment-page-2/#comment-734994</link>
		<dc:creator>star trackie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 12:21:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2008/06/05/shatner-reflects-on-kirk/#comment-734994</guid>
		<description>#62 &quot;Tah Dah! Remember, so far our dear Bill has been the only person to portray Kirk, leading to the assumption that his mannerisms and quirks eventually became Kirk’s. &quot;

Iowagirl is wise.  We hear her words.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#62 &#8220;Tah Dah! Remember, so far our dear Bill has been the only person to portray Kirk, leading to the assumption that his mannerisms and quirks eventually became Kirk’s. &#8221;</p>
<p>Iowagirl is wise.  We hear her words.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Iowagirl</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2008/06/05/shatner-reflects-on-kirk/comment-page-2/#comment-734246</link>
		<dc:creator>Iowagirl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 07:07:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2008/06/05/shatner-reflects-on-kirk/#comment-734246</guid>
		<description>#56
I like your speculation…;)

#58
- …it would truly be one of the best moments in the legacy’s history, and wouldn’t hurt the movie a bit, if done correctly. He’s a class act. -

Amen.

#59
- …so maybe the “Kirk Walk” is really the Shatner walk? -

Tah Dah! Remember, so far our dear Bill has been the only person to portray Kirk, leading to the assumption that his mannerisms and quirks eventually became Kirk&#039;s. Or show me Roddenberry&#039;s memo saying: Kirk should prance about while only swiveling his forearms about his hips, unless he&#039;s about to make a decision - in that case, he&#039;s supposed to stop dead and additionally square his shoulders. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#56<br />
I like your speculation…;)</p>
<p>#58<br />
- …it would truly be one of the best moments in the legacy’s history, and wouldn’t hurt the movie a bit, if done correctly. He’s a class act. -</p>
<p>Amen.</p>
<p>#59<br />
- …so maybe the “Kirk Walk” is really the Shatner walk? -</p>
<p>Tah Dah! Remember, so far our dear Bill has been the only person to portray Kirk, leading to the assumption that his mannerisms and quirks eventually became Kirk&#8217;s. Or show me Roddenberry&#8217;s memo saying: Kirk should prance about while only swiveling his forearms about his hips, unless he&#8217;s about to make a decision &#8211; in that case, he&#8217;s supposed to stop dead and additionally square his shoulders. :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thebiggfrogg</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2008/06/05/shatner-reflects-on-kirk/comment-page-2/#comment-734216</link>
		<dc:creator>thebiggfrogg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 06:49:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2008/06/05/shatner-reflects-on-kirk/#comment-734216</guid>
		<description>TOS bridge rocks!!! If they updated it with a few more mod looking monitor displays I think it would hold up. Hopefully the set designers are a bit creative, mixing the great old and updating it enough to make it believable. &quot;Ripped from the headlines tech plus&quot; looks dated a few years later. Picard&#039;s &quot;laptop&quot; anyone? Or the stupid designs of Enterprise--they could have made it look retro AND futuristic if they had really cooked their noodle a bit creatively. Instead, the NX-01 Enterprise looks like it could be a design for a U.S. Navy sub. Blech!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TOS bridge rocks!!! If they updated it with a few more mod looking monitor displays I think it would hold up. Hopefully the set designers are a bit creative, mixing the great old and updating it enough to make it believable. &#8220;Ripped from the headlines tech plus&#8221; looks dated a few years later. Picard&#8217;s &#8220;laptop&#8221; anyone? Or the stupid designs of Enterprise&#8211;they could have made it look retro AND futuristic if they had really cooked their noodle a bit creatively. Instead, the NX-01 Enterprise looks like it could be a design for a U.S. Navy sub. Blech!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

