


<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Abrams: Star Trek Is Hopeful</title>
	<atom:link href="http://trekmovie.com/2008/07/21/abrams-star-trek-is-hopeful/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://trekmovie.com/2008/07/21/abrams-star-trek-is-hopeful/</link>
	<description>the source for Star Trek news and information</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 07:39:38 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: NotBob</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2008/07/21/abrams-star-trek-is-hopeful/comment-page-3/#comment-875024</link>
		<dc:creator>NotBob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 07:17:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2008/07/21/abrams-star-trek-is-hopeful/#comment-875024</guid>
		<description>So does this mean he didn&#039;t like No Country For Old Men or There Will Be Blood?

Both great movies. Both dark and different. Good didn&#039;t win in either.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So does this mean he didn&#8217;t like No Country For Old Men or There Will Be Blood?</p>
<p>Both great movies. Both dark and different. Good didn&#8217;t win in either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Underpants Monster</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2008/07/21/abrams-star-trek-is-hopeful/comment-page-3/#comment-873779</link>
		<dc:creator>The Underpants Monster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 22:25:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2008/07/21/abrams-star-trek-is-hopeful/#comment-873779</guid>
		<description>#100 - I don&#039;t think that Ron Moore is averse to a bit of hyperbole, himself. I was, and continue to be, a regular TNG viewer, and as such was witness to the conflict between characters that existed from Farpoint on. It may not have been the grit and pessimism for grit and pessimism&#039;s sake that Berman and Moore seemed to think was the only worthwhile way to tell a story, but I can&#039;t deny the evidence of my eyes and ears enough to say that the conflict wasn&#039;t there. But I assume we&#039;ve both been viewers long enough to have made up our minds on the issue. I guess it&#039;s like the famous optical illusion drawing where some people see a young girl and others an old crone.

#97 - it may not have been disigned as solely a kids&#039; show in the same way that, say, &quot;Lost in Space&quot; was, but I&#039;ve never met anyone who grew up watching it in the &#039;60&#039;s who would disgaree with the idea that young people were the core of the target audience, or whose parents didn;t thinkof it as a kids&#039; show. Also, grownups didn&#039;t usually buy toys, er, I mean &quot;collectibles&quot; for themselves back then, so I don&#039;t imagine that those early ones would have been produced if TPTB hadn&#039;t known that a lot of kids were watching.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#100 &#8211; I don&#8217;t think that Ron Moore is averse to a bit of hyperbole, himself. I was, and continue to be, a regular TNG viewer, and as such was witness to the conflict between characters that existed from Farpoint on. It may not have been the grit and pessimism for grit and pessimism&#8217;s sake that Berman and Moore seemed to think was the only worthwhile way to tell a story, but I can&#8217;t deny the evidence of my eyes and ears enough to say that the conflict wasn&#8217;t there. But I assume we&#8217;ve both been viewers long enough to have made up our minds on the issue. I guess it&#8217;s like the famous optical illusion drawing where some people see a young girl and others an old crone.</p>
<p>#97 &#8211; it may not have been disigned as solely a kids&#8217; show in the same way that, say, &#8220;Lost in Space&#8221; was, but I&#8217;ve never met anyone who grew up watching it in the &#8217;60&#8217;s who would disgaree with the idea that young people were the core of the target audience, or whose parents didn;t thinkof it as a kids&#8217; show. Also, grownups didn&#8217;t usually buy toys, er, I mean &#8220;collectibles&#8221; for themselves back then, so I don&#8217;t imagine that those early ones would have been produced if TPTB hadn&#8217;t known that a lot of kids were watching.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Xai</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2008/07/21/abrams-star-trek-is-hopeful/comment-page-3/#comment-870984</link>
		<dc:creator>Xai</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 01:56:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2008/07/21/abrams-star-trek-is-hopeful/#comment-870984</guid>
		<description>52. Buckaroohawk - July 21, 2008

&quot; Calling Xai “baby” = bad move. I’m surprised she hasn’t dropped the hammer on you big time for that.&quot;

Especially since she is a he, and HE is me. I&#039;ve checked, and yes I am a male, thankyouverymuch.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>52. Buckaroohawk &#8211; July 21, 2008</p>
<p>&#8221; Calling Xai “baby” = bad move. I’m surprised she hasn’t dropped the hammer on you big time for that.&#8221;</p>
<p>Especially since she is a he, and HE is me. I&#8217;ve checked, and yes I am a male, thankyouverymuch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dom</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2008/07/21/abrams-star-trek-is-hopeful/comment-page-3/#comment-870883</link>
		<dc:creator>Dom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 01:14:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2008/07/21/abrams-star-trek-is-hopeful/#comment-870883</guid>
		<description>102. sean

I found some rewarding content in Transformers. it was called Megan Fox! ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>102. sean</p>
<p>I found some rewarding content in Transformers. it was called Megan Fox! ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sean</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2008/07/21/abrams-star-trek-is-hopeful/comment-page-3/#comment-870876</link>
		<dc:creator>sean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 01:12:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2008/07/21/abrams-star-trek-is-hopeful/#comment-870876</guid>
		<description>#97

Oh, I agree 100%. I was just saying that the intent was not to make a children&#039;s TV show/movie, whereas Transformers - for example - clearly was made and marketed to children directly. Even though adults might find some rewarding content, it isn&#039;t made for them. Trek, on the other hand, was made for adults but could also be enjoyed by kids even if they didn&#039;t &#039;get&#039; all of it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#97</p>
<p>Oh, I agree 100%. I was just saying that the intent was not to make a children&#8217;s TV show/movie, whereas Transformers &#8211; for example &#8211; clearly was made and marketed to children directly. Even though adults might find some rewarding content, it isn&#8217;t made for them. Trek, on the other hand, was made for adults but could also be enjoyed by kids even if they didn&#8217;t &#8216;get&#8217; all of it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dom</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2008/07/21/abrams-star-trek-is-hopeful/comment-page-3/#comment-870758</link>
		<dc:creator>Dom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 00:24:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2008/07/21/abrams-star-trek-is-hopeful/#comment-870758</guid>
		<description>http://trekmovie.com/2008/06/12/exclusive-interview-ron-moore-on-breaking-out-of-the-box/

Read this, then come back to the debate!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://trekmovie.com/2008/06/12/exclusive-interview-ron-moore-on-breaking-out-of-the-box/" rel="nofollow">http://trekmovie.com/2008/06/12/exclusive-interview-ron-moore-on-breaking-out-of-the-box/</a></p>
<p>Read this, then come back to the debate!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dom</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2008/07/21/abrams-star-trek-is-hopeful/comment-page-2/#comment-870750</link>
		<dc:creator>Dom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 00:21:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2008/07/21/abrams-star-trek-is-hopeful/#comment-870750</guid>
		<description>There was no conflict permitted between the characters! Fact! I&#039;m not indulging in hyperbole! This is well documented and was something the writers had to struggle hard with!

Read every article from that era all the way through to the present day. Read Ron Moore&#039;s interviews.  Read interviews with writers, directors and producers of TNG! Maybe you never watched TNG, but there wasn&#039;t a single human argument in the show for years!

I&#039;m not making this up! Neither is anyone else on this forum. And if you imply that again, the rest of us are going to get cross, because you would clearly be taking the pee!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There was no conflict permitted between the characters! Fact! I&#8217;m not indulging in hyperbole! This is well documented and was something the writers had to struggle hard with!</p>
<p>Read every article from that era all the way through to the present day. Read Ron Moore&#8217;s interviews.  Read interviews with writers, directors and producers of TNG! Maybe you never watched TNG, but there wasn&#8217;t a single human argument in the show for years!</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not making this up! Neither is anyone else on this forum. And if you imply that again, the rest of us are going to get cross, because you would clearly be taking the pee!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Underpants Monster</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2008/07/21/abrams-star-trek-is-hopeful/comment-page-2/#comment-870717</link>
		<dc:creator>The Underpants Monster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 00:06:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2008/07/21/abrams-star-trek-is-hopeful/#comment-870717</guid>
		<description>#94 - I&#039;m aware that Roddenberry was against some extreme or gratuitous kinds of conflict within the Federation, because the changes which took place between our current society and one four hundred years in the future had reduced or eliminated the motivation for them.

While you have a right to your assertion that absolutely no confliict existed in TNG before the arrival of Ro, I have tough time believeing that anyone could really believe such a thing, so I&#039;m assuming you were indulging in a bit of hyperbole.

The type of conflict between characters may not have been to your taste, but to assert that it didn&#039;t exist strikes me as patently ridiculous.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#94 &#8211; I&#8217;m aware that Roddenberry was against some extreme or gratuitous kinds of conflict within the Federation, because the changes which took place between our current society and one four hundred years in the future had reduced or eliminated the motivation for them.</p>
<p>While you have a right to your assertion that absolutely no confliict existed in TNG before the arrival of Ro, I have tough time believeing that anyone could really believe such a thing, so I&#8217;m assuming you were indulging in a bit of hyperbole.</p>
<p>The type of conflict between characters may not have been to your taste, but to assert that it didn&#8217;t exist strikes me as patently ridiculous.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: That One Guy</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2008/07/21/abrams-star-trek-is-hopeful/comment-page-2/#comment-870353</link>
		<dc:creator>That One Guy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 21:45:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2008/07/21/abrams-star-trek-is-hopeful/#comment-870353</guid>
		<description>2, agreed. The trailer was actually very uplifting. Mixed with the music, it brings out the construction perferctly. I can&#039;t wait for the next one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>2, agreed. The trailer was actually very uplifting. Mixed with the music, it brings out the construction perferctly. I can&#8217;t wait for the next one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Closettrekker</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2008/07/21/abrams-star-trek-is-hopeful/comment-page-2/#comment-870255</link>
		<dc:creator>Closettrekker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 21:06:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2008/07/21/abrams-star-trek-is-hopeful/#comment-870255</guid>
		<description>#96----&quot;Sarek’s katra was floating around the ship making people cranky.&quot;

LMAO. That just cracks me up.

&quot;But Trek isn’t truly ‘for’ kids. They would fail to grasp many of the themes being explored&quot;

True enough in that it would not all be completely understood. But that does not mean that kids are not entertained by it. I fell in love with TOS at age 6 or 7. Of course, seeing it again as a teenager and later as an adult produced very different internal reactions (some better, some worse), but even as a very young child, I understood some of its more basic messages and themes. My point is, while I do not disagree that some of it is too complex for small children, that does not mean that it is without any value to them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#96&#8212;-&#8221;Sarek’s katra was floating around the ship making people cranky.&#8221;</p>
<p>LMAO. That just cracks me up.</p>
<p>&#8220;But Trek isn’t truly ‘for’ kids. They would fail to grasp many of the themes being explored&#8221;</p>
<p>True enough in that it would not all be completely understood. But that does not mean that kids are not entertained by it. I fell in love with TOS at age 6 or 7. Of course, seeing it again as a teenager and later as an adult produced very different internal reactions (some better, some worse), but even as a very young child, I understood some of its more basic messages and themes. My point is, while I do not disagree that some of it is too complex for small children, that does not mean that it is without any value to them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

