


<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Blalock: Why No Shatner in Star Trek? + Mini-Review of Starship Troopers Marauder</title>
	<atom:link href="http://trekmovie.com/2008/07/22/blalock-why-no-shatner-in-star-trek-mini-review-of-starship-troopers-marauder/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://trekmovie.com/2008/07/22/blalock-why-no-shatner-in-star-trek-mini-review-of-starship-troopers-marauder/</link>
	<description>the source for Star Trek news and information</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 21:12:32 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Commodore Lurker</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2008/07/22/blalock-why-no-shatner-in-star-trek-mini-review-of-starship-troopers-marauder/comment-page-2/#comment-885192</link>
		<dc:creator>Commodore Lurker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jul 2008 03:04:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2008/07/22/blalock-why-no-shatner-in-star-trek-mini-review-of-starship-troopers-marauder/#comment-885192</guid>
		<description>I love Jolene Blalock!  To those who mock her acting talent, I say . . . just look at that picture above:  I swear that woman wants me.  Now that&#039;s acting!

I still say she out Vulcaned Nimoy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love Jolene Blalock!  To those who mock her acting talent, I say . . . just look at that picture above:  I swear that woman wants me.  Now that&#8217;s acting!</p>
<p>I still say she out Vulcaned Nimoy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harry Ballz</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2008/07/22/blalock-why-no-shatner-in-star-trek-mini-review-of-starship-troopers-marauder/comment-page-2/#comment-882367</link>
		<dc:creator>Harry Ballz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jul 2008 07:10:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2008/07/22/blalock-why-no-shatner-in-star-trek-mini-review-of-starship-troopers-marauder/#comment-882367</guid>
		<description>An elder T&#039;Pol at the launch of the Enterprise?

Yeah, and at the end she dies and we have Porky Pig going, &quot;m&#039;neh, m&#039;neh, that&#039;s T&#039;Pol, folks!&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An elder T&#8217;Pol at the launch of the Enterprise?</p>
<p>Yeah, and at the end she dies and we have Porky Pig going, &#8220;m&#8217;neh, m&#8217;neh, that&#8217;s T&#8217;Pol, folks!&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Closettrekker</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2008/07/22/blalock-why-no-shatner-in-star-trek-mini-review-of-starship-troopers-marauder/comment-page-2/#comment-880293</link>
		<dc:creator>Closettrekker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 17:38:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2008/07/22/blalock-why-no-shatner-in-star-trek-mini-review-of-starship-troopers-marauder/#comment-880293</guid>
		<description>#89---I don&#039;t recall that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#89&#8212;I don&#8217;t recall that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Smitty</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2008/07/22/blalock-why-no-shatner-in-star-trek-mini-review-of-starship-troopers-marauder/comment-page-2/#comment-877040</link>
		<dc:creator>Smitty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 22:00:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2008/07/22/blalock-why-no-shatner-in-star-trek-mini-review-of-starship-troopers-marauder/#comment-877040</guid>
		<description>It would&#039;ve been cool if Jolene had a cameo in the movie.

Perhaps an elder T&#039;Pol present at the launch of the Enterprise. Wait was there a mention in and ENT that an older T&#039;Pol was present?

Or was that a dream I had?

-cs™</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It would&#8217;ve been cool if Jolene had a cameo in the movie.</p>
<p>Perhaps an elder T&#8217;Pol present at the launch of the Enterprise. Wait was there a mention in and ENT that an older T&#8217;Pol was present?</p>
<p>Or was that a dream I had?</p>
<p>-cs™</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: VERG</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2008/07/22/blalock-why-no-shatner-in-star-trek-mini-review-of-starship-troopers-marauder/comment-page-2/#comment-876435</link>
		<dc:creator>VERG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 18:02:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2008/07/22/blalock-why-no-shatner-in-star-trek-mini-review-of-starship-troopers-marauder/#comment-876435</guid>
		<description>VILF!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>VILF!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NotBob</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2008/07/22/blalock-why-no-shatner-in-star-trek-mini-review-of-starship-troopers-marauder/comment-page-2/#comment-874985</link>
		<dc:creator>NotBob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 07:02:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2008/07/22/blalock-why-no-shatner-in-star-trek-mini-review-of-starship-troopers-marauder/#comment-874985</guid>
		<description>She&#039;s &quot;perturbed that William Shatner’s not in it.&quot;

I&#039;m perturbed she not in it. In fact, I say that she should be in everything. All movies good and bad direct to DVD or not.

And while I am at it, Starship Troopers 3? Is that a joke? Where the hell was I for 2? Hollywood is all about remaking things, why not remake this franchise into a series or something (I liked the cartoon better than the movie. I think the acting is better in the cartoon as is the story).

But I will look for the third one and see it because of her.  Well, that and the gratuitous nudity. I&#039;ll watch pretty much anything that has gratuitous nudity. That was the one thing the first movie has on the cartoon. It has gratuitous nudity. But let&#039;s face it naked cartoons are just well....sad. Unless if they are disney. Then it&#039;s fun for the whole family. What? I meant Donald Duck. He never wore pants and there wasn&#039;t anything dirty or wrong about that? He&#039;s a Duck.  Did you really think I meant....oh, your sick if you did.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>She&#8217;s &#8220;perturbed that William Shatner’s not in it.&#8221;</p>
<p>I&#8217;m perturbed she not in it. In fact, I say that she should be in everything. All movies good and bad direct to DVD or not.</p>
<p>And while I am at it, Starship Troopers 3? Is that a joke? Where the hell was I for 2? Hollywood is all about remaking things, why not remake this franchise into a series or something (I liked the cartoon better than the movie. I think the acting is better in the cartoon as is the story).</p>
<p>But I will look for the third one and see it because of her.  Well, that and the gratuitous nudity. I&#8217;ll watch pretty much anything that has gratuitous nudity. That was the one thing the first movie has on the cartoon. It has gratuitous nudity. But let&#8217;s face it naked cartoons are just well&#8230;.sad. Unless if they are disney. Then it&#8217;s fun for the whole family. What? I meant Donald Duck. He never wore pants and there wasn&#8217;t anything dirty or wrong about that? He&#8217;s a Duck.  Did you really think I meant&#8230;.oh, your sick if you did.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dennis Bailey</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2008/07/22/blalock-why-no-shatner-in-star-trek-mini-review-of-starship-troopers-marauder/comment-page-2/#comment-873926</link>
		<dc:creator>Dennis Bailey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 23:23:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2008/07/22/blalock-why-no-shatner-in-star-trek-mini-review-of-starship-troopers-marauder/#comment-873926</guid>
		<description>Gotta agree with #85.  Loved the movie.  LOL</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gotta agree with #85.  Loved the movie.  LOL</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dom</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2008/07/22/blalock-why-no-shatner-in-star-trek-mini-review-of-starship-troopers-marauder/comment-page-2/#comment-873704</link>
		<dc:creator>Dom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 21:55:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2008/07/22/blalock-why-no-shatner-in-star-trek-mini-review-of-starship-troopers-marauder/#comment-873704</guid>
		<description>82. Rick

Yeah SST, the film, was a satire of US foreign policy that America, in particular, failed to get! So many reviews of the film are hilarious: critics actually took the film seriously and not as a $100 million mickeytake. It&#039;s like seeing Robocop as a standard police procedural. From the looks of things, a lot of the actors even didn&#039;t realise Neumeier and Verhoeven were sending them up!!

Sure I&#039;d like to see SST, the novel, get a proper adaptation one day, but the send-up is too wickedly subversive and hilarious to overlook!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>82. Rick</p>
<p>Yeah SST, the film, was a satire of US foreign policy that America, in particular, failed to get! So many reviews of the film are hilarious: critics actually took the film seriously and not as a $100 million mickeytake. It&#8217;s like seeing Robocop as a standard police procedural. From the looks of things, a lot of the actors even didn&#8217;t realise Neumeier and Verhoeven were sending them up!!</p>
<p>Sure I&#8217;d like to see SST, the novel, get a proper adaptation one day, but the send-up is too wickedly subversive and hilarious to overlook!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Closettrekker</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2008/07/22/blalock-why-no-shatner-in-star-trek-mini-review-of-starship-troopers-marauder/comment-page-2/#comment-873350</link>
		<dc:creator>Closettrekker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 20:02:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2008/07/22/blalock-why-no-shatner-in-star-trek-mini-review-of-starship-troopers-marauder/#comment-873350</guid>
		<description>#83---I understood the point.

 (Sigh) But is inviting Shatner to the party more important to you than the integrity of the story?
 Bob Orci said that they would love to have worked him into the film, but that Shatner required a bigger role than the movie could sustain (&quot;I don&#039;t do cameos&quot;). That implies that they might have been willing to accomodate something which amounted to a cameo, and that it became a moot point after seeing Shatner&#039;s public comments about that possibility. That is not altogether different from what Nimoy was offered in Generations.

So, while I understood what you were trying to say, I fail to see the significance...Nimoy turned down a cameo in GEN, and Shatner was never offered one in STXI after he indicated that he would not be open to that possibility.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#83&#8212;I understood the point.</p>
<p> (Sigh) But is inviting Shatner to the party more important to you than the integrity of the story?<br />
 Bob Orci said that they would love to have worked him into the film, but that Shatner required a bigger role than the movie could sustain (&#8221;I don&#8217;t do cameos&#8221;). That implies that they might have been willing to accomodate something which amounted to a cameo, and that it became a moot point after seeing Shatner&#8217;s public comments about that possibility. That is not altogether different from what Nimoy was offered in Generations.</p>
<p>So, while I understood what you were trying to say, I fail to see the significance&#8230;Nimoy turned down a cameo in GEN, and Shatner was never offered one in STXI after he indicated that he would not be open to that possibility.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Please</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2008/07/22/blalock-why-no-shatner-in-star-trek-mini-review-of-starship-troopers-marauder/comment-page-2/#comment-873329</link>
		<dc:creator>Please</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 19:49:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2008/07/22/blalock-why-no-shatner-in-star-trek-mini-review-of-starship-troopers-marauder/#comment-873329</guid>
		<description>81--you&#039;re right.  But the point is that it wasn&#039;t like Nimoy wasn&#039;t invited to the party, which is the case with Shatner this go around.

80--while it&#039;s understandable you are tired of the Shatner in Trek XI talk, maybe going through a thread where Blalock is talking about the ridiculous idea that Shatner wasn&#039;t in the movie is not one you should click on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>81&#8211;you&#8217;re right.  But the point is that it wasn&#8217;t like Nimoy wasn&#8217;t invited to the party, which is the case with Shatner this go around.</p>
<p>80&#8211;while it&#8217;s understandable you are tired of the Shatner in Trek XI talk, maybe going through a thread where Blalock is talking about the ridiculous idea that Shatner wasn&#8217;t in the movie is not one you should click on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
