


<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Collins Confirms Star Trek Villain Details</title>
	<atom:link href="http://trekmovie.com/2008/08/14/collins-confirms-star-trek-villain-details/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://trekmovie.com/2008/08/14/collins-confirms-star-trek-villain-details/</link>
	<description>the source for Star Trek news and information</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 13:20:54 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: joe nahhas</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2008/08/14/collins-confirms-star-trek-villain-details/comment-page-4/#comment-1467840</link>
		<dc:creator>joe nahhas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 12:57:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2008/08/14/collins-confirms-star-trek-villain-details/#comment-1467840</guid>
		<description>Einstein&#039;s Nemesis: DI Her Eclipsing Binary Stars Solution
The problem that the 100,000 PHD Einsteinists could not solve  

This is the solution to the &quot;Quarter of a century&quot; Smithsonian-NASA Posted motion puzzle that Einstein and the 100,000 space-time physicists including 109 years of Nobel prize winner physics and physicists and 400 years of astronomy and Astrophysicists could not solve and solved here and dedicated to Drs Edward Guinan and Frank Maloney      
Of Villanova University Pennsylvania who posted this motion puzzle and started the search collections of stars with motion that can not be explained by any published physics   
For 350 years Physicists Astrophysicists and Mathematicians and all others including Newton and Kepler themselves missed the time-dependent Newton&#039;s equation and time dependent Kepler&#039;s equation that accounts for Quantum - relativistic effects and it explains these effects as visual effects. Here it is  

Universal- Mechanics

All there is in the Universe is objects of mass m moving in space (x, y, z) at a location 
r = r (x, y, z). The state of any object in the Universe can be expressed as the product 

S = m r; State = mass x location

P = d S/d t = m (d r/dt) + (dm/dt) r = Total moment 

  = change of location + change of mass

  = m v + m&#039; r; v = velocity = d r/d t; m&#039; = mass change rate

F = d P/d t = d²S/dt² = Force = m (d²r/dt²) +2(dm/d t) (d r/d t) + (d²m/dt²) r

   = m γ + 2m&#039;v +m&quot;r; γ = acceleration; m&#039;&#039; = mass acceleration rate

In polar coordinates system

r = r r(1) ;v = r&#039; r(1)  + r θ&#039; θ(1) ; γ = (r&quot; - rθ&#039;²)r(1) + (2r&#039;θ&#039; + rθ&quot;)θ(1)

F = m[(r&quot;-rθ&#039;²)r(1) + (2r&#039;θ&#039; + rθ&quot;)θ(1)] + 2m&#039;[r&#039;r(1) + rθ&#039;θ(1)] + (m&quot;r) r(1)
  
F = [d²(m r)/dt² - (m r)θ&#039;²]r(1) + (1/mr)[d(m²r²θ&#039;)/d t]θ(1) = [-GmM/r²]r(1)

d² (m r)/dt² - (m r) θ&#039;² = -GmM/r²; d (m²r²θ&#039;)/d t = 0

Let m =constant: M=constant

d²r/dt² -  r θ&#039;²=-GM/r²  ------ I

 d(r²θ&#039;)/d t = 0   -----------------II

r²θ&#039;=h = constant -------------- II     
                                                 r = 1/u; r&#039; = -u&#039;/u² = - r²u&#039; = - r²θ&#039;(d u/d θ) = -h (d u/d θ)                                 
d (r²θ&#039;)/d t = 2rr&#039;θ&#039; + r²θ&quot; = 0        r&quot; = - h d/d t (du/d θ) = - h θ&#039;(d²u/d θ²) = - (h²/r²)(d²u/dθ²)
                                                                  [- (h²/r²) (d²u/dθ²)] - r [(h/r²)²] = -GM/r²              
2(r&#039;/r) = - (θ&quot;/θ&#039;) = 2[λ + ỉ ω (t)]                              - h²u² (d²u/dθ²) - h²u³ = -GMu²
                                                                                                d²u/dθ² + u = GM/h²             
 r(θ, t) = r (θ, 0) Exp [λ + ỉ ω (t)]    u(θ,0) = GM/h² + Acosθ; r (θ, 0) = 1/(GM/h² + Acosθ)        
                                                         r ( θ, 0) = h²/GM/[1 + (Ah²/Gm)cosθ]      
r(θ,0) = a(1-ε²)/(1+εcosθ)               ; h²/GM = a(1-ε²); ε = Ah²/GM                

 r(0,t)= Exp[λ(r) + ỉ ω (r)]t; Exp = Exponential

r = r(θ , t)=r(θ,0)r(0,t)=[a(1-ε²)/(1+εcosθ)]{Exp[λ(r) + ì ω(r)]t} Nahhas&#039; Solution

If λ(r) ≈ 0; then:    

r (θ, t) = [(1-ε²)/(1+εcosθ)]{Exp[ỉ ω(r)t]

θ&#039;(r,  t) = θ&#039;[r(θ,0), 0]  Exp{-2ỉ[ω(r)t]} 

h = 2π a b/T; b=a√ (1-ε²); a = mean distance value; ε = eccentricity
h = 2πa²√ (1-ε²); r (0, 0) = a (1-ε)

θ&#039; (0,0) = h/r²(0,0) =  2π[√(1-ε²)]/T(1-ε)²   
θ&#039; (0,t) = θ&#039;(0,0)Exp(-2ỉwt)={2π[√(1-ε²)]/T(1-ε)²} Exp (-2iwt)
 
θ&#039;(0,t) = θ&#039;(0,0) [cosine 2(wt) - ỉ sine 2(wt)] = θ&#039;(0,0) [1- 2sine² (wt) - ỉ sin 2(wt)] 
θ&#039;(0,t) = θ&#039;(0,t)(x) + θ&#039;(0,t)(y); θ&#039;(0,t)(x) = θ&#039;(0,0)[ 1- 2sine² (wt)]  
θ&#039;(0,t)(x) – θ&#039;(0,0) = - 2θ&#039;(0,0)sine²(wt) = - 2θ&#039;(0,0)(v/c)²  v/c=sine wt; c=light speed

Δ θ&#039; = [θ&#039;(0, t) - θ&#039;(0, 0)] = -4π {[√ (1-ε) ²]/T (1-ε) ²} (v/c) ²} radians/second
{(180/π=degrees) x (36526=century) 

Δ θ&#039; = [-720x36526/ T (days)] {[√ (1-ε) ²]/ (1-ε) ²}(v/c) = 1.04°/century

This is the T-Rex equation that is going to demolished Einstein&#039;s space-jail of time
  
The circumference of an ellipse: 2πa (1 - ε²/4 + 3/16(ε²)²---) ≈ 2πa (1-ε²/4); R =a (1-ε²/4)
 v (m) = √ [GM²/ (m + M) a (1-ε²/4)] ≈ √ [GM/a (1-ε²/4)]; m&lt;&lt;M; Solar system    

 v = v (center of mass); v is the sum of orbital/rotational velocities = v(cm) for DI Her
Let m = mass of primary; M = mass of secondary

v (m) = primary speed; v(M) = secondary speed = √[Gm²/(m+M)a(1-ε²/4)]
v (cm) = [m v(m) + M v(M)]/(m + M)   All rights reserved. joenahhas1958@yahoo.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Einstein&#8217;s Nemesis: DI Her Eclipsing Binary Stars Solution<br />
The problem that the 100,000 PHD Einsteinists could not solve  </p>
<p>This is the solution to the &#8220;Quarter of a century&#8221; Smithsonian-NASA Posted motion puzzle that Einstein and the 100,000 space-time physicists including 109 years of Nobel prize winner physics and physicists and 400 years of astronomy and Astrophysicists could not solve and solved here and dedicated to Drs Edward Guinan and Frank Maloney<br />
Of Villanova University Pennsylvania who posted this motion puzzle and started the search collections of stars with motion that can not be explained by any published physics<br />
For 350 years Physicists Astrophysicists and Mathematicians and all others including Newton and Kepler themselves missed the time-dependent Newton&#8217;s equation and time dependent Kepler&#8217;s equation that accounts for Quantum &#8211; relativistic effects and it explains these effects as visual effects. Here it is  </p>
<p>Universal- Mechanics</p>
<p>All there is in the Universe is objects of mass m moving in space (x, y, z) at a location<br />
r = r (x, y, z). The state of any object in the Universe can be expressed as the product </p>
<p>S = m r; State = mass x location</p>
<p>P = d S/d t = m (d r/dt) + (dm/dt) r = Total moment </p>
<p>  = change of location + change of mass</p>
<p>  = m v + m&#8217; r; v = velocity = d r/d t; m&#8217; = mass change rate</p>
<p>F = d P/d t = d²S/dt² = Force = m (d²r/dt²) +2(dm/d t) (d r/d t) + (d²m/dt²) r</p>
<p>   = m γ + 2m&#8217;v +m&#8221;r; γ = acceleration; m&#8221; = mass acceleration rate</p>
<p>In polar coordinates system</p>
<p>r = r r(1) ;v = r&#8217; r(1)  + r θ&#8217; θ(1) ; γ = (r&#8221; &#8211; rθ&#8217;²)r(1) + (2r&#8217;θ&#8217; + rθ&#8221;)θ(1)</p>
<p>F = m[(r"-rθ'²)r(1) + (2r'θ' + rθ")θ(1)] + 2m&#8217;[r'r(1) + rθ'θ(1)] + (m&#8221;r) r(1)</p>
<p>F = [d²(m r)/dt² - (m r)θ'²]r(1) + (1/mr)[d(m²r²θ')/d t]θ(1) = [-GmM/r²]r(1)</p>
<p>d² (m r)/dt² &#8211; (m r) θ&#8217;² = -GmM/r²; d (m²r²θ&#8217;)/d t = 0</p>
<p>Let m =constant: M=constant</p>
<p>d²r/dt² &#8211;  r θ&#8217;²=-GM/r²  &#8212;&#8212; I</p>
<p> d(r²θ&#8217;)/d t = 0   &#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;II</p>
<p>r²θ&#8217;=h = constant &#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211; II<br />
                                                 r = 1/u; r&#8217; = -u&#8217;/u² = &#8211; r²u&#8217; = &#8211; r²θ&#8217;(d u/d θ) = -h (d u/d θ)<br />
d (r²θ&#8217;)/d t = 2rr&#8217;θ&#8217; + r²θ&#8221; = 0        r&#8221; = &#8211; h d/d t (du/d θ) = &#8211; h θ&#8217;(d²u/d θ²) = &#8211; (h²/r²)(d²u/dθ²)<br />
                                                                  [- (h²/r²) (d²u/dθ²)] &#8211; r [(h/r²)²] = -GM/r²<br />
2(r&#8217;/r) = &#8211; (θ&#8221;/θ&#8217;) = 2[λ + ỉ ω (t)]                              &#8211; h²u² (d²u/dθ²) &#8211; h²u³ = -GMu²<br />
                                                                                                d²u/dθ² + u = GM/h²<br />
 r(θ, t) = r (θ, 0) Exp [λ + ỉ ω (t)]    u(θ,0) = GM/h² + Acosθ; r (θ, 0) = 1/(GM/h² + Acosθ)<br />
                                                         r ( θ, 0) = h²/GM/[1 + (Ah²/Gm)cosθ]<br />
r(θ,0) = a(1-ε²)/(1+εcosθ)               ; h²/GM = a(1-ε²); ε = Ah²/GM                </p>
<p> r(0,t)= Exp[λ(r) + ỉ ω (r)]t; Exp = Exponential</p>
<p>r = r(θ , t)=r(θ,0)r(0,t)=[a(1-ε²)/(1+εcosθ)]{Exp[λ(r) + ì ω(r)]t} Nahhas&#8217; Solution</p>
<p>If λ(r) ≈ 0; then:    </p>
<p>r (θ, t) = [(1-ε²)/(1+εcosθ)]{Exp[ỉ ω(r)t]</p>
<p>θ&#8217;(r,  t) = θ&#8217;[r(θ,0), 0]  Exp{-2ỉ[ω(r)t]} </p>
<p>h = 2π a b/T; b=a√ (1-ε²); a = mean distance value; ε = eccentricity<br />
h = 2πa²√ (1-ε²); r (0, 0) = a (1-ε)</p>
<p>θ&#8217; (0,0) = h/r²(0,0) =  2π[√(1-ε²)]/T(1-ε)²<br />
θ&#8217; (0,t) = θ&#8217;(0,0)Exp(-2ỉwt)={2π[√(1-ε²)]/T(1-ε)²} Exp (-2iwt)</p>
<p>θ&#8217;(0,t) = θ&#8217;(0,0) [cosine 2(wt) - ỉ sine 2(wt)] = θ&#8217;(0,0) [1- 2sine² (wt) - ỉ sin 2(wt)]<br />
θ&#8217;(0,t) = θ&#8217;(0,t)(x) + θ&#8217;(0,t)(y); θ&#8217;(0,t)(x) = θ&#8217;(0,0)[ 1- 2sine² (wt)]<br />
θ&#8217;(0,t)(x) – θ&#8217;(0,0) = &#8211; 2θ&#8217;(0,0)sine²(wt) = &#8211; 2θ&#8217;(0,0)(v/c)²  v/c=sine wt; c=light speed</p>
<p>Δ θ&#8217; = [θ'(0, t) - θ'(0, 0)] = -4π {[√ (1-ε) ²]/T (1-ε) ²} (v/c) ²} radians/second<br />
{(180/π=degrees) x (36526=century) </p>
<p>Δ θ&#8217; = [-720x36526/ T (days)] {[√ (1-ε) ²]/ (1-ε) ²}(v/c) = 1.04°/century</p>
<p>This is the T-Rex equation that is going to demolished Einstein&#8217;s space-jail of time</p>
<p>The circumference of an ellipse: 2πa (1 &#8211; ε²/4 + 3/16(ε²)²&#8212;) ≈ 2πa (1-ε²/4); R =a (1-ε²/4)<br />
 v (m) = √ [GM²/ (m + M) a (1-ε²/4)] ≈ √ [GM/a (1-ε²/4)]; m&lt;&lt;M; Solar system    </p>
<p> v = v (center of mass); v is the sum of orbital/rotational velocities = v(cm) for DI Her<br />
Let m = mass of primary; M = mass of secondary</p>
<p>v (m) = primary speed; v(M) = secondary speed = √[Gm²/(m+M)a(1-ε²/4)]<br />
v (cm) = [m v(m) + M v(M)]/(m + M)   All rights reserved. <a href="mailto:joenahhas1958@yahoo.com">joenahhas1958@yahoo.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Collins confirma papel de romulano e dá detalhes &#171; Startrekbr&#8217;s Weblog</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2008/08/14/collins-confirms-star-trek-villain-details/comment-page-4/#comment-957182</link>
		<dc:creator>Collins confirma papel de romulano e dá detalhes &#171; Startrekbr&#8217;s Weblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 12:33:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2008/08/14/collins-confirms-star-trek-villain-details/#comment-957182</guid>
		<description>[...] Fonte: Trek Movie [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Fonte: Trek Movie [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Closettrekker</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2008/08/14/collins-confirms-star-trek-villain-details/comment-page-4/#comment-955445</link>
		<dc:creator>Closettrekker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 21:39:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2008/08/14/collins-confirms-star-trek-villain-details/#comment-955445</guid>
		<description>#177----Don&#039;t make me bring Mr. Poopey Face back, Garth!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#177&#8212;-Don&#8217;t make me bring Mr. Poopey Face back, Garth!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Closettrekker</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2008/08/14/collins-confirms-star-trek-villain-details/comment-page-4/#comment-949160</link>
		<dc:creator>Closettrekker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Aug 2008 15:30:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2008/08/14/collins-confirms-star-trek-villain-details/#comment-949160</guid>
		<description>#186---Oh...I guess I never saw the deleted post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#186&#8212;Oh&#8230;I guess I never saw the deleted post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Pemble</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2008/08/14/collins-confirms-star-trek-villain-details/comment-page-4/#comment-948289</link>
		<dc:creator>John Pemble</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Aug 2008 07:29:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2008/08/14/collins-confirms-star-trek-villain-details/#comment-948289</guid>
		<description>Yeah!  Finally the Romulans get the treatment the deserve.  A language and hopefully a makeup job that doesn&#039;t look like glue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah!  Finally the Romulans get the treatment the deserve.  A language and hopefully a makeup job that doesn&#8217;t look like glue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jovan</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2008/08/14/collins-confirms-star-trek-villain-details/comment-page-4/#comment-948080</link>
		<dc:creator>Jovan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Aug 2008 06:09:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2008/08/14/collins-confirms-star-trek-villain-details/#comment-948080</guid>
		<description>#176: Your post number was obviously originally the abusive comment I refer to, as I no longer see it. Mr. Pascale or one of his assistants here probably deleted it. There is nothing against you, sir. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#176: Your post number was obviously originally the abusive comment I refer to, as I no longer see it. Mr. Pascale or one of his assistants here probably deleted it. There is nothing against you, sir. :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: XAi</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2008/08/14/collins-confirms-star-trek-villain-details/comment-page-4/#comment-947810</link>
		<dc:creator>XAi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Aug 2008 04:15:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2008/08/14/collins-confirms-star-trek-villain-details/#comment-947810</guid>
		<description>#184 Montreal

I agree. If someone is that sure this movie is in the crapper...please vote with your dollars (euros, etc) and don&#039;t see it. It&#039;s one less whiner that I and many other posters will have to deal with at the movie.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#184 Montreal</p>
<p>I agree. If someone is that sure this movie is in the crapper&#8230;please vote with your dollars (euros, etc) and don&#8217;t see it. It&#8217;s one less whiner that I and many other posters will have to deal with at the movie.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: montreal paul</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2008/08/14/collins-confirms-star-trek-villain-details/comment-page-4/#comment-947614</link>
		<dc:creator>montreal paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Aug 2008 02:50:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2008/08/14/collins-confirms-star-trek-villain-details/#comment-947614</guid>
		<description>182 - Trek Fan...
&quot;I have a pretty strong feeling that this movie has gone into the crapper already.&quot;

Fine.. then don&#039;t go see the movie.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>182 &#8211; Trek Fan&#8230;<br />
&#8220;I have a pretty strong feeling that this movie has gone into the crapper already.&#8221;</p>
<p>Fine.. then don&#8217;t go see the movie.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TL</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2008/08/14/collins-confirms-star-trek-villain-details/comment-page-4/#comment-946943</link>
		<dc:creator>TL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Aug 2008 20:40:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2008/08/14/collins-confirms-star-trek-villain-details/#comment-946943</guid>
		<description>great posts Closettrekker</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>great posts Closettrekker</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trek Fan</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2008/08/14/collins-confirms-star-trek-villain-details/comment-page-4/#comment-946810</link>
		<dc:creator>Trek Fan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Aug 2008 19:48:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2008/08/14/collins-confirms-star-trek-villain-details/#comment-946810</guid>
		<description>I have a pretty strong feeling that this movie has gone into the crapper already.

Let&#039;s get back to Trek of the 1960&#039;s...some good stories (I know a few weren&#039;t good) and chicks in miniskirts!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a pretty strong feeling that this movie has gone into the crapper already.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s get back to Trek of the 1960&#8217;s&#8230;some good stories (I know a few weren&#8217;t good) and chicks in miniskirts!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
