Comments on: Diora Baird Talks About Her Role as An Orion in Star Trek

By: grendel2225

grendel2225 — Sun, 24 May 2009 05:18:57 +0000

If you look closely in the cast listing, Diora Baird is not the Orion Girl, Rachel Nichols is. Not sure why this hasn’t been corrected.

By: bgiles73

bgiles73 — Thu, 06 Nov 2008 02:01:29 +0000

Wow! Now there’s a Baird with something to bring to the whole Final Frontier experience! I only hope she will do an Orion Slave Girl layout in some future Playboy issue! Man, I’m a pig!

By: 10 Things The Star Trek Movie Doesn’t Need « Weather Station 1

10 Things The Star Trek Movie Doesn’t Need « Weather Station 1 — Mon, 29 Sep 2008 14:13:49 +0000

[...] Captain Pike is in it. Man, there isn’t much more. Oh, a Maxim model plays an Orion, or, as she put it, ‘One of those green [...]

By: The REAL Redjac

The REAL Redjac — Fri, 26 Sep 2008 00:28:19 +0000

I wonder if she’s related to Stuart Baird…the infamous director of Star Trek Nemesis? LOL!!!

Probably not…lol.

By: Harry Ballz

Harry Ballz — Thu, 25 Sep 2008 20:26:20 +0000

Who cares about her face??!!

Let’s put it this way…..if she were a singer, I could look at her “voice” for hours!

By: Mark Lynch

Mark Lynch — Thu, 25 Sep 2008 15:57:51 +0000

Yes she’s real cute. But I really hope the whole film is not going to have to depend on carrying itself off using pretty faces…..

By: The REAL Redjac

The REAL Redjac — Thu, 25 Sep 2008 02:25:52 +0000

#112 — HOLY SCHNIKEES!!!

Thank you, thank you, thank you for that link!!!

:-)

Ahhh, she’s a thing o’ beauty, huh?

I haven’t even seen her in the new Trek (obviously), but I have to say it wouldnae hurt my feelin’s if the lass was in EVERY Trek film!

::drool::

By: Closettrekker

Closettrekker — Wed, 24 Sep 2008 02:13:41 +0000

#123—lol.

If my wife saw that you put it that way, she might start monitoring my internet activity….ugh!

By: Dom

Dom — Wed, 24 Sep 2008 00:40:48 +0000

Ah! Things never change! Grown men fighting over a pretty girl!

Just kidding, guys!! ;)

Diora proves beyond shadow of a doubt that Rodders was wrong: there is a God and He loves us!!!

By: Closettrekker

Closettrekker — Wed, 24 Sep 2008 00:27:50 +0000

#119—”…all opinion is part of a greater dialogue leading to understanding, not an invitation to contention.”

Here is a sample of your recent postings, supposedly meant to lead to “understanding”, rather than to be “an invitation to contention”…

“Baird’s green all right; but it’s got nothing to do with being cast as an Orion. Still nice to know they still know how to pick em…This is even better than Chris “Indiana Jones/Heath Ledger” Pine in the lead role.”–September 22, 2008.

“Prediction: $150-170 million Box Office for Trek, tops.

Case closed.”—September 20, 2008.

” Mr. Abram’s making a big mistake sitting on a film that long and playing this cat and mouse game with people…”—September 22, 2008.

“If that film’s rumored storyline is true, the plot for it came right out of one of them, so it’s only proper to pay lip service to them, I suppose, if for no other reason to avoid a lawsuit for copyright infringement.” – September 22, 2008.

Such remarks do not reflect the expected maturity level of someone who is old enough to have “been trekkin’ since 1966″.

And you are being very naive if you expect or feel entitled to make such sarcastic and even flaming remarks aimed at the creative team behind this film without “contention”.

You can expect a debate and “further comment” every time.