


<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: EW Star Trek Cover Story Online &#8211; Lots Of New Info &amp; Spoilers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://trekmovie.com/2008/10/16/ew-star-trek-cover-story-online-lots-of-new-info/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://trekmovie.com/2008/10/16/ew-star-trek-cover-story-online-lots-of-new-info/</link>
	<description>the source for Star Trek news and information</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 23:23:37 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: chris</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2008/10/16/ew-star-trek-cover-story-online-lots-of-new-info/comment-page-6/#comment-1807108</link>
		<dc:creator>chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 May 2009 02:05:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2008/10/16/ew-star-trek-cover-story-online-lots-of-new-info/#comment-1807108</guid>
		<description>wait I&#039;m confused.  I read something about Spock emerging from the nexus in the 24th century?  Ok plus hang on- if Kirk diedin generations then how the hel is this movie possible?   I&#039;m notstupidand I&#039;m not being asmart ass but wha I&#039;m saying is I would like for someone to maybe explain that to me is all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wait I&#8217;m confused.  I read something about Spock emerging from the nexus in the 24th century?  Ok plus hang on- if Kirk diedin generations then how the hel is this movie possible?   I&#8217;m notstupidand I&#8217;m not being asmart ass but wha I&#8217;m saying is I would like for someone to maybe explain that to me is all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darth Rane</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2008/10/16/ew-star-trek-cover-story-online-lots-of-new-info/comment-page-6/#comment-1260493</link>
		<dc:creator>Darth Rane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 23:32:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2008/10/16/ew-star-trek-cover-story-online-lots-of-new-info/#comment-1260493</guid>
		<description>I hope this isn&#039;t another disappointment...there have been so many of those movies. It&#039;s been FOREVER since Hollywood actually released something good. T_T</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hope this isn&#8217;t another disappointment&#8230;there have been so many of those movies. It&#8217;s been FOREVER since Hollywood actually released something good. T_T</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: emoboy</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2008/10/16/ew-star-trek-cover-story-online-lots-of-new-info/comment-page-6/#comment-1153603</link>
		<dc:creator>emoboy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Oct 2008 19:21:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2008/10/16/ew-star-trek-cover-story-online-lots-of-new-info/#comment-1153603</guid>
		<description>Hi, Check out the photos of my new emo hairstyle
in http://tinyurl.com/6y6u6s</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, Check out the photos of my new emo hairstyle<br />
in <a href="http://tinyurl.com/6y6u6s" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/6y6u6s</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TrekMadeMeWonder</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2008/10/16/ew-star-trek-cover-story-online-lots-of-new-info/comment-page-6/#comment-1147081</link>
		<dc:creator>TrekMadeMeWonder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 06:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2008/10/16/ew-star-trek-cover-story-online-lots-of-new-info/#comment-1147081</guid>
		<description>Deeply troubling for those trying to visualize the next Trek.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Deeply troubling for those trying to visualize the next Trek.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex Rosenzweig</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2008/10/16/ew-star-trek-cover-story-online-lots-of-new-info/comment-page-6/#comment-1146448</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex Rosenzweig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 01:34:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2008/10/16/ew-star-trek-cover-story-online-lots-of-new-info/#comment-1146448</guid>
		<description>252 - &quot;This reminds me of the ENTERPRISE episode that thought it was necessary to explain why Klingons from TOS era look different from Klingons from ST:TMP and beyond? That was just silly ’cause we all know the main reason was technology and economics. I just didn’t care, don’t care, nor did I think it was necessary to offer any explanation.&quot;

Well, to be fair, DS9 was the show that established that the difference was &quot;real&quot; in-universe. ;)

I actually liked the ENT ep, because it added some real depth to Klingon society, to see how they responded to the situation. I also liked that the episode was a good ol&#039;-fashioned allegory about today&#039;s issues, in the spirit of TOS, something that a lot of folks seem to miss in all the commentary about the &quot;Klingon forehead episode&quot;.

Either way, I agree that Abrams and Co. shouldn&#039;t be creating alternate timelines just to explain some production design differences. &#039;Course, it&#039;s really far from clear that they&#039;re actually doing that, when all is said and done. Even the &quot;heresy&quot; line in EW is referring to the end of the opening sequence, not the whole movie, which means there&#039;s a whole lot afterward that they haven&#039;t told us. ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>252 &#8211; &#8220;This reminds me of the ENTERPRISE episode that thought it was necessary to explain why Klingons from TOS era look different from Klingons from ST:TMP and beyond? That was just silly ’cause we all know the main reason was technology and economics. I just didn’t care, don’t care, nor did I think it was necessary to offer any explanation.&#8221;</p>
<p>Well, to be fair, DS9 was the show that established that the difference was &#8220;real&#8221; in-universe. ;)</p>
<p>I actually liked the ENT ep, because it added some real depth to Klingon society, to see how they responded to the situation. I also liked that the episode was a good ol&#8217;-fashioned allegory about today&#8217;s issues, in the spirit of TOS, something that a lot of folks seem to miss in all the commentary about the &#8220;Klingon forehead episode&#8221;.</p>
<p>Either way, I agree that Abrams and Co. shouldn&#8217;t be creating alternate timelines just to explain some production design differences. &#8216;Course, it&#8217;s really far from clear that they&#8217;re actually doing that, when all is said and done. Even the &#8220;heresy&#8221; line in EW is referring to the end of the opening sequence, not the whole movie, which means there&#8217;s a whole lot afterward that they haven&#8217;t told us. ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Quickening</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2008/10/16/ew-star-trek-cover-story-online-lots-of-new-info/comment-page-6/#comment-1145236</link>
		<dc:creator>The Quickening</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 14:19:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2008/10/16/ew-star-trek-cover-story-online-lots-of-new-info/#comment-1145236</guid>
		<description>I do remember reading the AICN article and have long since understood what Abrams and company might be trying to do--alter the TREK timeline in order for them to explain changes they will make in their new TREK film(s).  This will give their future stories more fresh and interesting possibilities and directions and it will also curb the accusation of canon violations.  My problem is, why is that necessary?  Just be creative and do your thing.  

This reminds me of the ENTERPRISE episode that thought it was necessary to explain why Klingons from TOS era look different from Klingons from ST:TMP and beyond?  That was just silly &#039;cause we all know the main reason was technology and economics.  I just didn&#039;t care, don&#039;t care, nor did I think it was necessary to offer any explanation.  

I say the same thing to Abrams.  If AICN is correct, they will--in part--be turning the future foundation of TREK into nothing more than a time travel franchise, so that any future changes seen in a future TREK story, will have that baggage.  Other franchises have survived changes, without this kind of pandering or contrived explanation.  In the film CASINO ROYALE, M is a female and Bond is blonde, and no damn explanation was given--or needed for that matter.

In a lot of ways this approach is condescending, &#039;cause it presupposes fans wouldn&#039;t accept change.  That is true to a slight degree, and it can be seen, just by reading some of the posts above, but, fans will get over it, and if they don&#039;t accept the changes, fine, let them move on--new blood is the primary mission of the film anyway.  Small changes will eventually be accepted and I doubt seriously if the film makers were ever going to make major changes anyway.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I do remember reading the AICN article and have long since understood what Abrams and company might be trying to do&#8211;alter the TREK timeline in order for them to explain changes they will make in their new TREK film(s).  This will give their future stories more fresh and interesting possibilities and directions and it will also curb the accusation of canon violations.  My problem is, why is that necessary?  Just be creative and do your thing.  </p>
<p>This reminds me of the ENTERPRISE episode that thought it was necessary to explain why Klingons from TOS era look different from Klingons from ST:TMP and beyond?  That was just silly &#8217;cause we all know the main reason was technology and economics.  I just didn&#8217;t care, don&#8217;t care, nor did I think it was necessary to offer any explanation.  </p>
<p>I say the same thing to Abrams.  If AICN is correct, they will&#8211;in part&#8211;be turning the future foundation of TREK into nothing more than a time travel franchise, so that any future changes seen in a future TREK story, will have that baggage.  Other franchises have survived changes, without this kind of pandering or contrived explanation.  In the film CASINO ROYALE, M is a female and Bond is blonde, and no damn explanation was given&#8211;or needed for that matter.</p>
<p>In a lot of ways this approach is condescending, &#8217;cause it presupposes fans wouldn&#8217;t accept change.  That is true to a slight degree, and it can be seen, just by reading some of the posts above, but, fans will get over it, and if they don&#8217;t accept the changes, fine, let them move on&#8211;new blood is the primary mission of the film anyway.  Small changes will eventually be accepted and I doubt seriously if the film makers were ever going to make major changes anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kimmycat</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2008/10/16/ew-star-trek-cover-story-online-lots-of-new-info/comment-page-6/#comment-1141118</link>
		<dc:creator>Kimmycat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2008 16:00:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2008/10/16/ew-star-trek-cover-story-online-lots-of-new-info/#comment-1141118</guid>
		<description>I received my copy of EW in the mail on Friday and have read the article several times. I am so looking forward to this movie. I think J.J. Abrams  outdid hmself. Even though he admits he&#039;s not a fan of Star Trek in the article, I think he was faithful to the characters and concept. The crew shot on the brdge is my favorite. These actors have nailed the TOS crew down. Simon Pegg really does look like Scotty (my favorite character) and Zoe Saldana looks stunning as Uhura.  I am looking forward to more pictures and plan to see  &quot;Quantum of Solace&quot; just so I can see the full trailer!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I received my copy of EW in the mail on Friday and have read the article several times. I am so looking forward to this movie. I think J.J. Abrams  outdid hmself. Even though he admits he&#8217;s not a fan of Star Trek in the article, I think he was faithful to the characters and concept. The crew shot on the brdge is my favorite. These actors have nailed the TOS crew down. Simon Pegg really does look like Scotty (my favorite character) and Zoe Saldana looks stunning as Uhura.  I am looking forward to more pictures and plan to see  &#8220;Quantum of Solace&#8221; just so I can see the full trailer!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: McCoy's Third Knee</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2008/10/16/ew-star-trek-cover-story-online-lots-of-new-info/comment-page-5/#comment-1141063</link>
		<dc:creator>McCoy's Third Knee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2008 15:16:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2008/10/16/ew-star-trek-cover-story-online-lots-of-new-info/#comment-1141063</guid>
		<description>Aesthics aside, it&#039;s the story for me.  From what I have learned about the story, I am not excited.  In the ST context, time travel is being used as a device to reboot.  

Time travel is like the holo deck IMHO:  A cheap way to craft a story without the challenge of crafting.  It&#039;s space - the final frontier people!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aesthics aside, it&#8217;s the story for me.  From what I have learned about the story, I am not excited.  In the ST context, time travel is being used as a device to reboot.  </p>
<p>Time travel is like the holo deck IMHO:  A cheap way to craft a story without the challenge of crafting.  It&#8217;s space &#8211; the final frontier people!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David (Flaming Wings Forever)</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2008/10/16/ew-star-trek-cover-story-online-lots-of-new-info/comment-page-5/#comment-1131635</link>
		<dc:creator>David (Flaming Wings Forever)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Oct 2008 20:58:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2008/10/16/ew-star-trek-cover-story-online-lots-of-new-info/#comment-1131635</guid>
		<description>The Kelvin&#039;s deflector  is on the top, her single warp nacelle is on the bottom.  Odd, but at the same time refreshing.

The *SPOILERS* in the article didn&#039;t give away too much.  We already knew about time travel, etc.

The ears on the villain - finally - confirmation on what we already knew.

Kirk - damn that man is sexy.  There I said it.  Mock me.

The bridge..... at first I was repulsed.  Then it started to grow on me, but I need to see more.  ORCI, KURT, and ABRAMS - we demand more.  Feed our addiction....

Today&#039;s deluge has made my day.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Kelvin&#8217;s deflector  is on the top, her single warp nacelle is on the bottom.  Odd, but at the same time refreshing.</p>
<p>The *SPOILERS* in the article didn&#8217;t give away too much.  We already knew about time travel, etc.</p>
<p>The ears on the villain &#8211; finally &#8211; confirmation on what we already knew.</p>
<p>Kirk &#8211; damn that man is sexy.  There I said it.  Mock me.</p>
<p>The bridge&#8230;.. at first I was repulsed.  Then it started to grow on me, but I need to see more.  ORCI, KURT, and ABRAMS &#8211; we demand more.  Feed our addiction&#8230;.</p>
<p>Today&#8217;s deluge has made my day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg2600</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2008/10/16/ew-star-trek-cover-story-online-lots-of-new-info/comment-page-5/#comment-1139054</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg2600</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Oct 2008 16:33:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2008/10/16/ew-star-trek-cover-story-online-lots-of-new-info/#comment-1139054</guid>
		<description>The &quot;Kelvin&#039;s&quot; design is not canon with the period, IMO.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The &#8220;Kelvin&#8217;s&#8221; design is not canon with the period, IMO.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

