Comments on: More Details Emerge For Playmates Star Trek Movie Toys

By: Star Trek XI: Fakten, Ger�chte, Infos - Seite 169 - SciFi-Forum

Star Trek XI: Fakten, Ger�chte, Infos - Seite 169 - SciFi-Forum — Mon, 17 Nov 2008 19:48:30 +0000

[...] aber Art Asylum keine Lizenz mehr zu Star Trek XI, sondern die ist wieder bei Playmates. Siehe z.B: More Details Emerge For Playmates Star Trek Movie Toys | TrekMovie.com __________________ �T�glich Dr.Bock und du f�hlst dich [...]

By: wtf

wtf — Mon, 03 Nov 2008 14:26:05 +0000

Who was the “artist” who made that Toys “R” Us ad? It looks like there’s a big metal boob on the Enterprise.

By: EdDR

EdDR — Wed, 29 Oct 2008 15:00:10 +0000

TO 16 AAP———-

How about soup and chicken salad sandwich eating Kirk, chess playing Kirk, wrestling Kirk (WWF! Are you listening!?)slightly based on “Charlie X”, Gangster Kirk roughing up Krakow, how about Kirk On A Rope (Kirk -molded Zest Bar), Amorous Kirk – just place a different interchangable woman that he has known into his arms. The possibilities are truly endless!!!

By: OR Coast Trekkie

OR Coast Trekkie — Wed, 29 Oct 2008 00:24:01 +0000

I wish I had a plaid stallion… lol

By: Andy Patterson

Andy Patterson — Tue, 28 Oct 2008 19:59:46 +0000

Back order January, I hear.

By: Anthony Thompson

Anthony Thompson — Tue, 28 Oct 2008 14:03:36 +0000

What happened to my tricorder???!!!

By: DATA KILLED SPOT!

DATA KILLED SPOT! — Tue, 28 Oct 2008 04:46:16 +0000

69-E

Okay, “fan drawing”, whateva :D

I still think its the best conjecture, based on the teaser, to date.

By: Enterprise

Enterprise — Tue, 28 Oct 2008 04:41:08 +0000

That’s a fan drawing not a conceptual drawing.

By: DATA KILLED SPOT!

DATA KILLED SPOT! — Tue, 28 Oct 2008 04:29:19 +0000

Vic,

Are you kidding me? I would give anything to see the MOVIE right now! To be honest, I’m not much of a toy fan:(

Judging by the lack of feedback reguarding the pics, I would say that most people have already seen it. Still, I think you did an amazing job with it and it revealed a bit more about the new E. I can now tell that the hull plating is not metallic, but more of a gray color, which is consistent with the original. You can also see a lot further into the nacelles (sadly, the christmas lights aren’t included;-) Also, you can clearly see that the “fins” on the nacelles aren’t fins at all, but more like handle bars, which is also consistent with the original design.

Now, compare the nacelles with this conceptual drawing of the reimagined E:

http://i248.photobucket.com/albums/gg178/judexavier/STXINCC-17013View.jpg

This Judexavier obviously used the darker trailer pic as a model, because
he/she thought they looked more like fins! Why would a STARSHIP need fins?

But besides everything else, there is just one thing that has been bugging me about the new E, and it’s because of this picture:

http://trekmovie.com/images/sttease/sttease_01.jpg

What exact part of the ship are we looking at? I’ve looked at the original and the conceptual drawings, and I cannot figure it out!!! My first guess was the top of one of the nacelles, but since the E clearly doesn’t have any fins (and it looks too big for a nacelle anyways), what the hell is it?

By: cpelc

cpelc — Tue, 28 Oct 2008 03:43:37 +0000

also

did anyone else notice anything weird about the underneath of the saucer on the big E in that Toys R Us ad? subliminal?