


<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Report From JJ Abrams&#8217; German Star Trek Presentation + more movie details</title>
	<atom:link href="http://trekmovie.com/2008/11/12/report-from-jj-abrams-german-star-trek-presentation-more-movie-details/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://trekmovie.com/2008/11/12/report-from-jj-abrams-german-star-trek-presentation-more-movie-details/</link>
	<description>the source for Star Trek news and information</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 15:21:15 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: DengarX</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2008/11/12/report-from-jj-abrams-german-star-trek-presentation-more-movie-details/comment-page-7/#comment-1272260</link>
		<dc:creator>DengarX</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 20:38:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2008/11/13/report-from-jj-abrams-german-star-trek-presentation-more-movie-details/#comment-1272260</guid>
		<description>One interesting point that I haven&#039;t heard anyone discuss yet.  The reason that the bridge of the Enterprise, and all other technology has changed is because Nero accidentally leaves something behind during the attack.  Something that is technologically centuries ahead of its time.  This allows the new Enterprise, and really everything in this &quot;altered reality&quot;, to be possible.  And it&#039;s all according to canon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One interesting point that I haven&#8217;t heard anyone discuss yet.  The reason that the bridge of the Enterprise, and all other technology has changed is because Nero accidentally leaves something behind during the attack.  Something that is technologically centuries ahead of its time.  This allows the new Enterprise, and really everything in this &#8220;altered reality&#8221;, to be possible.  And it&#8217;s all according to canon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy Patterson</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2008/11/12/report-from-jj-abrams-german-star-trek-presentation-more-movie-details/comment-page-7/#comment-1224478</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy Patterson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 17:32:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2008/11/13/report-from-jj-abrams-german-star-trek-presentation-more-movie-details/#comment-1224478</guid>
		<description>287

Now you know that other than you, and Uta that works in the grocery store down the street (and I doubt it&#039;s that important to ask her), who am I going to ask to translate this.   You remember that my German cultural knowledge is all learned from Hogan&#039;s Heroes.   Don&#039;t have time right now to figure it out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>287</p>
<p>Now you know that other than you, and Uta that works in the grocery store down the street (and I doubt it&#8217;s that important to ask her), who am I going to ask to translate this.   You remember that my German cultural knowledge is all learned from Hogan&#8217;s Heroes.   Don&#8217;t have time right now to figure it out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Emotionally Logical</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2008/11/12/report-from-jj-abrams-german-star-trek-presentation-more-movie-details/comment-page-7/#comment-1224229</link>
		<dc:creator>Emotionally Logical</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 16:43:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2008/11/13/report-from-jj-abrams-german-star-trek-presentation-more-movie-details/#comment-1224229</guid>
		<description>Hi everyone. Here is my attempt at a canon explanation for what we have seen so far. Sorry if someone has already posted this before. By the way, my spellng sucks. 

A lot of people seem to be upset because kirk et all were assigned to the Enterprise as cadets. How could kirk and checkov be assigned at the same time? And on the surface, I would totally agree. 

I am thinking that the reason kirk and checkov were at the acadamy at the same time and then posted to the Enterprise at the same time was because kirk was there for command training. He could have already been a commissioned officer previously serving aboard the faragaut but, just like Savik in Trek II, he was there for training like the Kobiashi Maru, and was wearing an acadamy uniform for his time spent there. 

Checkov on the other hand was there for his regular training and graduated as an ensign. Checkov could have been a wiz kid like Wesley and went there early and graduated early, explaining the age discrepency. Didn&#039;t someone say Pike referred to him as a &quot;wiz kid&quot;? We don&#039;t know how much time has passed between the bar scene and the enterprise scene. And I&#039;m not totally convinced what we saw was the initial launch of the enterprise. 

McCoy would have been there for graduate training as a doctor just like kirk was there for command. Its sort of like when you have an MD in another country. You may have the training and the MD, but when you come to the US to practice, you need to go through the MCATS all over again (i think). 

uhura and Sulu might have gone to the academy at the same time, but I think thats ok, because kirk was the youngest captain in starfleet history so it might make sense that where they are leutenants, he is a captain. 

Also, the time that kirk would have been aboard the faragaut give time for Pike, Number one, Spock et all to have gone through the events of the cage.

Just a thought :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi everyone. Here is my attempt at a canon explanation for what we have seen so far. Sorry if someone has already posted this before. By the way, my spellng sucks. </p>
<p>A lot of people seem to be upset because kirk et all were assigned to the Enterprise as cadets. How could kirk and checkov be assigned at the same time? And on the surface, I would totally agree. </p>
<p>I am thinking that the reason kirk and checkov were at the acadamy at the same time and then posted to the Enterprise at the same time was because kirk was there for command training. He could have already been a commissioned officer previously serving aboard the faragaut but, just like Savik in Trek II, he was there for training like the Kobiashi Maru, and was wearing an acadamy uniform for his time spent there. </p>
<p>Checkov on the other hand was there for his regular training and graduated as an ensign. Checkov could have been a wiz kid like Wesley and went there early and graduated early, explaining the age discrepency. Didn&#8217;t someone say Pike referred to him as a &#8220;wiz kid&#8221;? We don&#8217;t know how much time has passed between the bar scene and the enterprise scene. And I&#8217;m not totally convinced what we saw was the initial launch of the enterprise. </p>
<p>McCoy would have been there for graduate training as a doctor just like kirk was there for command. Its sort of like when you have an MD in another country. You may have the training and the MD, but when you come to the US to practice, you need to go through the MCATS all over again (i think). </p>
<p>uhura and Sulu might have gone to the academy at the same time, but I think thats ok, because kirk was the youngest captain in starfleet history so it might make sense that where they are leutenants, he is a captain. </p>
<p>Also, the time that kirk would have been aboard the faragaut give time for Pike, Number one, Spock et all to have gone through the events of the cage.</p>
<p>Just a thought :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thebiggfrogg</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2008/11/12/report-from-jj-abrams-german-star-trek-presentation-more-movie-details/comment-page-7/#comment-1224143</link>
		<dc:creator>thebiggfrogg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 16:29:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2008/11/13/report-from-jj-abrams-german-star-trek-presentation-more-movie-details/#comment-1224143</guid>
		<description>Re: Devon 239

&quot;The past iterations where Product Placement also existed? Apple? Michelob? Commodore Computers? Kraft “Marshmellon” Dispenser? Steppenwolf and Roy Orbison songs? Yeah…… so what now?&quot;

None of these were overly obtrusive or out of place. Apple, Michelob, and the songs were in the Earth past. It didn&#039;t jar you out of the story and it wasn&#039;t obnoxiously in your fast.

To my knowledge the &quot;marshmellon&quot; dispenser did not bear a huge Kraft logo. It was a movie tie-in product. The Commodore Computer was deep in the background of Kirk&#039;s apartment in Trek II. Given Kirk&#039;s fondness for antiques you could even justify it as a story item.

In a contemporary movie where it makes sense and it isn&#039;t ridiculously in your face I can understand and even excuse it. No sense going to all the effort to create fake brands or blot out brands if our characters are having pizza in a 21st century restaurant. But not in the 23rd century that is on its way to some sort of alternative economy. That is what I hated in the Wars prequels, the jarring references to 1950s diners and obnoxious sports announcers in the galaxy far, far away. Seemed like an attempt at some sort of sophomoric humor.

At least the way things were described the BMW logo, thankfully omitted, was going to hog a lot of screen real estate (buy an f&#039;ng ad, I say). The description of the Bud Classic sounds similar. Yuk!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re: Devon 239</p>
<p>&#8220;The past iterations where Product Placement also existed? Apple? Michelob? Commodore Computers? Kraft “Marshmellon” Dispenser? Steppenwolf and Roy Orbison songs? Yeah…… so what now?&#8221;</p>
<p>None of these were overly obtrusive or out of place. Apple, Michelob, and the songs were in the Earth past. It didn&#8217;t jar you out of the story and it wasn&#8217;t obnoxiously in your fast.</p>
<p>To my knowledge the &#8220;marshmellon&#8221; dispenser did not bear a huge Kraft logo. It was a movie tie-in product. The Commodore Computer was deep in the background of Kirk&#8217;s apartment in Trek II. Given Kirk&#8217;s fondness for antiques you could even justify it as a story item.</p>
<p>In a contemporary movie where it makes sense and it isn&#8217;t ridiculously in your face I can understand and even excuse it. No sense going to all the effort to create fake brands or blot out brands if our characters are having pizza in a 21st century restaurant. But not in the 23rd century that is on its way to some sort of alternative economy. That is what I hated in the Wars prequels, the jarring references to 1950s diners and obnoxious sports announcers in the galaxy far, far away. Seemed like an attempt at some sort of sophomoric humor.</p>
<p>At least the way things were described the BMW logo, thankfully omitted, was going to hog a lot of screen real estate (buy an f&#8217;ng ad, I say). The description of the Bud Classic sounds similar. Yuk!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Dickerson</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2008/11/12/report-from-jj-abrams-german-star-trek-presentation-more-movie-details/comment-page-6/#comment-1223238</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Dickerson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 13:53:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2008/11/13/report-from-jj-abrams-german-star-trek-presentation-more-movie-details/#comment-1223238</guid>
		<description>In regards to the &quot;what future will Spock go back too?&quot; question, I have a very low degree of confidence &quot;Spock prime&quot; WILL go back. The way I&#039;m reading between the lines on this movie is that Spock either A) dies to save the future/his friends (again) or he remains back in the late 22nd century in an &quot;obi-wan&quot; situation (before Luke finds him in the first movie). I don&#039;t think Nimoy will return as Spock again - this is the last time he&#039;ll play the role, the torch is passed....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In regards to the &#8220;what future will Spock go back too?&#8221; question, I have a very low degree of confidence &#8220;Spock prime&#8221; WILL go back. The way I&#8217;m reading between the lines on this movie is that Spock either A) dies to save the future/his friends (again) or he remains back in the late 22nd century in an &#8220;obi-wan&#8221; situation (before Luke finds him in the first movie). I don&#8217;t think Nimoy will return as Spock again &#8211; this is the last time he&#8217;ll play the role, the torch is passed&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Holger</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2008/11/12/report-from-jj-abrams-german-star-trek-presentation-more-movie-details/comment-page-6/#comment-1222934</link>
		<dc:creator>Holger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 12:53:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2008/11/13/report-from-jj-abrams-german-star-trek-presentation-more-movie-details/#comment-1222934</guid>
		<description>295: Hello Closettrekker. I have already posted a response to your time travel loophole theory in the thread &#039;Trekmovie review on new Star Trek movie trailer&#039;, it&#039;s #210. It&#039;s the last post there so far, so I suppose it didn&#039;t get read much. In any case, that post is my response to your favorite theory ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>295: Hello Closettrekker. I have already posted a response to your time travel loophole theory in the thread &#8216;Trekmovie review on new Star Trek movie trailer&#8217;, it&#8217;s #210. It&#8217;s the last post there so far, so I suppose it didn&#8217;t get read much. In any case, that post is my response to your favorite theory ;-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2008/11/12/report-from-jj-abrams-german-star-trek-presentation-more-movie-details/comment-page-6/#comment-1221875</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 08:00:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2008/11/13/report-from-jj-abrams-german-star-trek-presentation-more-movie-details/#comment-1221875</guid>
		<description>Wow, just got back from Quantum of Solace and the Star Trek trailer was absolutely amazing! You must see it!

I heard people in the theater getting excited and several people around me saying, &quot;no way!&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, just got back from Quantum of Solace and the Star Trek trailer was absolutely amazing! You must see it!</p>
<p>I heard people in the theater getting excited and several people around me saying, &#8220;no way!&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reign1701A</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2008/11/12/report-from-jj-abrams-german-star-trek-presentation-more-movie-details/comment-page-6/#comment-1221822</link>
		<dc:creator>Reign1701A</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 07:45:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2008/11/13/report-from-jj-abrams-german-star-trek-presentation-more-movie-details/#comment-1221822</guid>
		<description>Hey guys I just got back from seeing the trailer and Quantum of Solace! The trailer is amazing. As others have reported, this movie just feels so epic. The special fx look amazing. There are a few quick shots of the Enterprise: one with its back turned to the camera zipping to warp…the other with the Enterprise rushing towards the camera front-on. From those angles, it looks like TOS Enterprise except with much larger nacelles, though its still very much familiar. The shot of the Enterprise under construction is of a similar angle to the photo released. Still looks a bit awkward, but I like it better after seeing it from different angles. The cuts were very very quick and I can’t wait til it’s released on the internet so I can freeze-frame.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey guys I just got back from seeing the trailer and Quantum of Solace! The trailer is amazing. As others have reported, this movie just feels so epic. The special fx look amazing. There are a few quick shots of the Enterprise: one with its back turned to the camera zipping to warp…the other with the Enterprise rushing towards the camera front-on. From those angles, it looks like TOS Enterprise except with much larger nacelles, though its still very much familiar. The shot of the Enterprise under construction is of a similar angle to the photo released. Still looks a bit awkward, but I like it better after seeing it from different angles. The cuts were very very quick and I can’t wait til it’s released on the internet so I can freeze-frame.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TREKKIE369</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2008/11/12/report-from-jj-abrams-german-star-trek-presentation-more-movie-details/comment-page-6/#comment-1221471</link>
		<dc:creator>TREKKIE369</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 06:20:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2008/11/13/report-from-jj-abrams-german-star-trek-presentation-more-movie-details/#comment-1221471</guid>
		<description>#295  ABSOLUTELY AGREE!  One of the earliest rumors about the plot of this movie was that Romulans would go back in time and try to kill James T. Kirk, OR his FATHER, thus erasing James T. Kirk from the Face of the universe.  What If when they killed his father with the Kelvin incident, accidentally killed  him to late?  Thus changing Kirk&#039;s whole life.  

JJ and crew say that their going completely by canon, and here are contradicting quotes from memory-alpha.org and JJ.
Memory-Alpha.org: &quot;Looking back from the perspective of years, Kirk described himself as &quot;positively grim&quot; during that [Starfleet Academy] era.&quot;
JJ: &quot;So Kirk joins Starfleet and immediately he’s there he gets in trouble.&quot;

Definitely sounds like alternate realities</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#295  ABSOLUTELY AGREE!  One of the earliest rumors about the plot of this movie was that Romulans would go back in time and try to kill James T. Kirk, OR his FATHER, thus erasing James T. Kirk from the Face of the universe.  What If when they killed his father with the Kelvin incident, accidentally killed  him to late?  Thus changing Kirk&#8217;s whole life.  </p>
<p>JJ and crew say that their going completely by canon, and here are contradicting quotes from memory-alpha.org and JJ.<br />
Memory-Alpha.org: &#8220;Looking back from the perspective of years, Kirk described himself as &#8220;positively grim&#8221; during that [Starfleet Academy] era.&#8221;<br />
JJ: &#8220;So Kirk joins Starfleet and immediately he’s there he gets in trouble.&#8221;</p>
<p>Definitely sounds like alternate realities</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Closettrekker</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2008/11/12/report-from-jj-abrams-german-star-trek-presentation-more-movie-details/comment-page-6/#comment-1221214</link>
		<dc:creator>Closettrekker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 04:48:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2008/11/13/report-from-jj-abrams-german-star-trek-presentation-more-movie-details/#comment-1221214</guid>
		<description>#291---They are not &quot;screwing with canon&quot;, as long as what is played out differently is a result of an alternate timeline (which is in itself canon and has been for 40+ years) created by interference with the past by the film&#039;s chief antagonist.

According to the synopsis of the 20 minutes of footage reviewed, the attack upon the USS Kelvin occurs 4 days before Kirk is born. That makes it some dozen or so years before the Enterprise is even launched. 

Anything seemingly contradictory to the bits of backstory described in episodes like &quot;Where No Man Has Gone Before&quot;, &quot;The Menagerie&quot;, &quot;Obsession&quot;, &quot;The Conscience Of The King&quot;, and &quot;Court-Martial&quot;, can easily be attributed to the ripple efffects of the timeline incursion.

The existence and possibility of alternate timelines due to timeline interference is legitimate and concrete &#039;canon&#039;, and has been since episodes like &quot;Tommorow Is Yesterday&quot;, &quot;City On The Edge Of Forever&quot;, and &quot;Assignment: Earth&quot;.

In order for you to claim that they are somehow &quot;violating canon&quot;, you would have to invalidate the very &#039;canon&#039; those episodes established more than four decades ago.

Is that what you are saying?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#291&#8212;They are not &#8220;screwing with canon&#8221;, as long as what is played out differently is a result of an alternate timeline (which is in itself canon and has been for 40+ years) created by interference with the past by the film&#8217;s chief antagonist.</p>
<p>According to the synopsis of the 20 minutes of footage reviewed, the attack upon the USS Kelvin occurs 4 days before Kirk is born. That makes it some dozen or so years before the Enterprise is even launched. </p>
<p>Anything seemingly contradictory to the bits of backstory described in episodes like &#8220;Where No Man Has Gone Before&#8221;, &#8220;The Menagerie&#8221;, &#8220;Obsession&#8221;, &#8220;The Conscience Of The King&#8221;, and &#8220;Court-Martial&#8221;, can easily be attributed to the ripple efffects of the timeline incursion.</p>
<p>The existence and possibility of alternate timelines due to timeline interference is legitimate and concrete &#8216;canon&#8217;, and has been since episodes like &#8220;Tommorow Is Yesterday&#8221;, &#8220;City On The Edge Of Forever&#8221;, and &#8220;Assignment: Earth&#8221;.</p>
<p>In order for you to claim that they are somehow &#8220;violating canon&#8221;, you would have to invalidate the very &#8216;canon&#8217; those episodes established more than four decades ago.</p>
<p>Is that what you are saying?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
