


<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Star Trek Movie Likely Headed For IMAX</title>
	<atom:link href="http://trekmovie.com/2008/11/24/new-star-trek-movie-likely-headed-for-imax/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://trekmovie.com/2008/11/24/new-star-trek-movie-likely-headed-for-imax/</link>
	<description>the source for Star Trek news and information</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 20:32:21 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Robert H.</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2008/11/24/new-star-trek-movie-likely-headed-for-imax/comment-page-2/#comment-1284531</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert H.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Nov 2008 22:18:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2008/11/24/new-star-trek-movie-likely-headed-for-imax/#comment-1284531</guid>
		<description>I agree with NCC-73515, AKA USS Nova.  Make it in 3D.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with NCC-73515, AKA USS Nova.  Make it in 3D.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: braxus</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2008/11/24/new-star-trek-movie-likely-headed-for-imax/comment-page-2/#comment-1273123</link>
		<dc:creator>braxus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 01:01:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2008/11/24/new-star-trek-movie-likely-headed-for-imax/#comment-1273123</guid>
		<description>http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0796366/technical

I had to check into this and it appears the Super 35mm comment is incorrect. It is using Panavision as almost every other Trek movie has. So this is anamorphic 35mm, not Super 35mm. Super 35mm was used in movies like Titanic and Apollo 13. Grain is apparent when using that process and converting it to 35mm scope prints.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0796366/technical" rel="nofollow">http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0796366/technical</a></p>
<p>I had to check into this and it appears the Super 35mm comment is incorrect. It is using Panavision as almost every other Trek movie has. So this is anamorphic 35mm, not Super 35mm. Super 35mm was used in movies like Titanic and Apollo 13. Grain is apparent when using that process and converting it to 35mm scope prints.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: braxus</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2008/11/24/new-star-trek-movie-likely-headed-for-imax/comment-page-2/#comment-1273077</link>
		<dc:creator>braxus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 00:48:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2008/11/24/new-star-trek-movie-likely-headed-for-imax/#comment-1273077</guid>
		<description>Ok- Who said this was being shot on Super 35mm? Every Trek movie except ST 6 used anamorphic 35mm which most movies today use. Why on God&#039;s Earth would they go back to Super 35mm which is inferior to 35mm scope?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok- Who said this was being shot on Super 35mm? Every Trek movie except ST 6 used anamorphic 35mm which most movies today use. Why on God&#8217;s Earth would they go back to Super 35mm which is inferior to 35mm scope?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IMAX Blow Up is NOT True 70mm Pt 2</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2008/11/24/new-star-trek-movie-likely-headed-for-imax/comment-page-2/#comment-1272871</link>
		<dc:creator>IMAX Blow Up is NOT True 70mm Pt 2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 23:45:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2008/11/24/new-star-trek-movie-likely-headed-for-imax/#comment-1272871</guid>
		<description>Re 65

I saw Eagle Eye in IMAX at the AMC Columbia and the up converting does yield some undesirable artifacts.  You can see a difference even in the end credits as there was a slight blur during the roll.  

Also, the wide screen projection (2:35) causes masking that leaves the top and bottom of the huge IMAX screen blank..a waste of space that makes the experience less desirable.   If Trek is projected that way in IMAX, forget it. Its not worth paying the $15 to see it cropped.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re 65</p>
<p>I saw Eagle Eye in IMAX at the AMC Columbia and the up converting does yield some undesirable artifacts.  You can see a difference even in the end credits as there was a slight blur during the roll.  </p>
<p>Also, the wide screen projection (2:35) causes masking that leaves the top and bottom of the huge IMAX screen blank..a waste of space that makes the experience less desirable.   If Trek is projected that way in IMAX, forget it. Its not worth paying the $15 to see it cropped.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AdamTrek</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2008/11/24/new-star-trek-movie-likely-headed-for-imax/comment-page-2/#comment-1272061</link>
		<dc:creator>AdamTrek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 19:35:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2008/11/24/new-star-trek-movie-likely-headed-for-imax/#comment-1272061</guid>
		<description>IMAX, meh.

I&#039;m waiting for Holodeck 4D.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>IMAX, meh.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m waiting for Holodeck 4D.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DesiluTrek</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2008/11/24/new-star-trek-movie-likely-headed-for-imax/comment-page-2/#comment-1271877</link>
		<dc:creator>DesiluTrek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 18:05:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2008/11/24/new-star-trek-movie-likely-headed-for-imax/#comment-1271877</guid>
		<description>I fully expected the movie to be issued in IMAX ... psyched by the confirmation!  It will make for an awesome day at the theater at the Udvar-Hazy Air &amp; Space annex at Dulles Airport, about 15 minutes south of my house. The Enterprise (shuttle) and the Enterprise will come full circle!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I fully expected the movie to be issued in IMAX &#8230; psyched by the confirmation!  It will make for an awesome day at the theater at the Udvar-Hazy Air &amp; Space annex at Dulles Airport, about 15 minutes south of my house. The Enterprise (shuttle) and the Enterprise will come full circle!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FREAKAZOID</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2008/11/24/new-star-trek-movie-likely-headed-for-imax/comment-page-2/#comment-1271612</link>
		<dc:creator>FREAKAZOID</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 15:45:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2008/11/24/new-star-trek-movie-likely-headed-for-imax/#comment-1271612</guid>
		<description>I can&#039;t see them NOT doing this film in IMAX!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t see them NOT doing this film in IMAX!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: star trackie</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2008/11/24/new-star-trek-movie-likely-headed-for-imax/comment-page-2/#comment-1271331</link>
		<dc:creator>star trackie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 13:06:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2008/11/24/new-star-trek-movie-likely-headed-for-imax/#comment-1271331</guid>
		<description>#54 &quot;I am also tired of the Berman Bashing….He kept Trek Alive After Gene Left us..&quot;

He Kept &quot;a&quot; form of Trek alive for some.....and effectively killed Star Trek for others.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#54 &#8220;I am also tired of the Berman Bashing….He kept Trek Alive After Gene Left us..&#8221;</p>
<p>He Kept &#8220;a&#8221; form of Trek alive for some&#8230;..and effectively killed Star Trek for others.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Pike</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2008/11/24/new-star-trek-movie-likely-headed-for-imax/comment-page-2/#comment-1271125</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Pike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 11:28:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2008/11/24/new-star-trek-movie-likely-headed-for-imax/#comment-1271125</guid>
		<description>The film has been shot in 35mm (super) and would be converted or &quot;upsampled&quot; to the Imax 70mm horizontal format. They use their proprietary DMR process for this which takes a massive amount of raw processing power over a long time period to analyse the inter neg frame by frame and effectively &quot;redraw&quot; each frame to a much higher resolution. Two cameras are needed during shooting for 3d movies, there is a custom 3d 70mm Imax rig for this, and the projected result is jaw dropping. This does not appear to have been used for the Trek film, so it would seem highly unlikely that it will be a 3d presentation. From Imax:

PROPRIETARY SOFTWARE CREATES AN EXTRAORDINARY NEW FILM EXPERIENCE
IMAX digital re-mastering starts by converting a 35mm frame into digital form at very high resolution, capturing all the detail from the original. Our proprietary software mathematically analyses and extracts the important image elements in each frame from the original grainy structure to create a pristine form of the original photography. This is the most complex step in IMAX digital re-mastering.

HOW DO YOU MAKE 35MM MEET THE IMAX STANDARD?
The image on a 35mm film frame is comprised of a fine grain structure like that of all photographic images. This grain when projected on to the IMAX screen looks like a TV channel with bad reception. IMAX DMR removes this grain while preserving the quality of the underlying image making what you see on the screen crystal clear.

DIGITALLY RE-MASTERED, REFINED, AND RESIZED!
To create the brightness and clarity that audiences have come to expect from The IMAX Experience®, IMAX uses a proprietary computer program to make the images sharper than they were originally, while colors are adjusted for the unique technically superior characteristics of the IMAX screen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The film has been shot in 35mm (super) and would be converted or &#8220;upsampled&#8221; to the Imax 70mm horizontal format. They use their proprietary DMR process for this which takes a massive amount of raw processing power over a long time period to analyse the inter neg frame by frame and effectively &#8220;redraw&#8221; each frame to a much higher resolution. Two cameras are needed during shooting for 3d movies, there is a custom 3d 70mm Imax rig for this, and the projected result is jaw dropping. This does not appear to have been used for the Trek film, so it would seem highly unlikely that it will be a 3d presentation. From Imax:</p>
<p>PROPRIETARY SOFTWARE CREATES AN EXTRAORDINARY NEW FILM EXPERIENCE<br />
IMAX digital re-mastering starts by converting a 35mm frame into digital form at very high resolution, capturing all the detail from the original. Our proprietary software mathematically analyses and extracts the important image elements in each frame from the original grainy structure to create a pristine form of the original photography. This is the most complex step in IMAX digital re-mastering.</p>
<p>HOW DO YOU MAKE 35MM MEET THE IMAX STANDARD?<br />
The image on a 35mm film frame is comprised of a fine grain structure like that of all photographic images. This grain when projected on to the IMAX screen looks like a TV channel with bad reception. IMAX DMR removes this grain while preserving the quality of the underlying image making what you see on the screen crystal clear.</p>
<p>DIGITALLY RE-MASTERED, REFINED, AND RESIZED!<br />
To create the brightness and clarity that audiences have come to expect from The IMAX Experience®, IMAX uses a proprietary computer program to make the images sharper than they were originally, while colors are adjusted for the unique technically superior characteristics of the IMAX screen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Nightshade</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2008/11/24/new-star-trek-movie-likely-headed-for-imax/comment-page-2/#comment-1270713</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Nightshade</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 08:10:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2008/11/24/new-star-trek-movie-likely-headed-for-imax/#comment-1270713</guid>
		<description>Schedule wise sounds like a good point....it would be difficult for IMAX movies to show two movies coming out just a week apart....hmmm.....and yes if it is not filmed in 65mm then even with tweaking it will essentially be a blown up 35mm print so it would have to be less clear and grainy....Id like to see it though....we will see i guess</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Schedule wise sounds like a good point&#8230;.it would be difficult for IMAX movies to show two movies coming out just a week apart&#8230;.hmmm&#8230;..and yes if it is not filmed in 65mm then even with tweaking it will essentially be a blown up 35mm print so it would have to be less clear and grainy&#8230;.Id like to see it though&#8230;.we will see i guess</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
