


<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Star Trek Online Update: Cryptic Begins To Chart Its Own Star Trek History</title>
	<atom:link href="http://trekmovie.com/2008/12/07/star-trek-online-update-cryptic-begins-to-chart-its-own-star-trek-history/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://trekmovie.com/2008/12/07/star-trek-online-update-cryptic-begins-to-chart-its-own-star-trek-history/</link>
	<description>the source for Star Trek news and information</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 14:21:44 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: S. John Ross</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2008/12/07/star-trek-online-update-cryptic-begins-to-chart-its-own-star-trek-history/comment-page-2/#comment-1320199</link>
		<dc:creator>S. John Ross</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 16:32:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2008/12/07/star-trek-online-update-cryptic-begins-to-chart-its-own-star-trek-history/#comment-1320199</guid>
		<description>#91: All I can say is &quot;wow,&quot; dude. Just ... wow. Hugs, man. What you need are hugs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#91: All I can say is &#8220;wow,&#8221; dude. Just &#8230; wow. Hugs, man. What you need are hugs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TOS Enterprise</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2008/12/07/star-trek-online-update-cryptic-begins-to-chart-its-own-star-trek-history/comment-page-2/#comment-1320024</link>
		<dc:creator>TOS Enterprise</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 15:12:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2008/12/07/star-trek-online-update-cryptic-begins-to-chart-its-own-star-trek-history/#comment-1320024</guid>
		<description>Re: 88. S. John Ross - December 10, 2008 

&quot;I think it’s an excellent sign of personal progress that you’ve acknowledged that it’s a matter of opinion.&quot;

There&#039;s that old reliable Star Trek Fan condescending attitude of late...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re: 88. S. John Ross &#8211; December 10, 2008 </p>
<p>&#8220;I think it’s an excellent sign of personal progress that you’ve acknowledged that it’s a matter of opinion.&#8221;</p>
<p>There&#8217;s that old reliable Star Trek Fan condescending attitude of late&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris M</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2008/12/07/star-trek-online-update-cryptic-begins-to-chart-its-own-star-trek-history/comment-page-2/#comment-1319793</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 13:46:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2008/12/07/star-trek-online-update-cryptic-begins-to-chart-its-own-star-trek-history/#comment-1319793</guid>
		<description>The Live Actions Television Series and Movies are Canon! :)

Anything else can only be considered Canon once it has appears in a Star Trek TV Series or Movie. Simple as that!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Live Actions Television Series and Movies are Canon! :)</p>
<p>Anything else can only be considered Canon once it has appears in a Star Trek TV Series or Movie. Simple as that!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: YARN</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2008/12/07/star-trek-online-update-cryptic-begins-to-chart-its-own-star-trek-history/comment-page-2/#comment-1316541</link>
		<dc:creator>YARN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 16:07:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2008/12/07/star-trek-online-update-cryptic-begins-to-chart-its-own-star-trek-history/#comment-1316541</guid>
		<description>#84 TOS ENT 

Thank you for the correction

#87 BK613 

Thank you for pointing out that my analysis still attaches. 

Corrections and refinements aside, I stand by what I wrote in the original post (i.e., the actual point of the thing). ; )</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#84 TOS ENT </p>
<p>Thank you for the correction</p>
<p>#87 BK613 </p>
<p>Thank you for pointing out that my analysis still attaches. </p>
<p>Corrections and refinements aside, I stand by what I wrote in the original post (i.e., the actual point of the thing). ; )</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: S. John Ross</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2008/12/07/star-trek-online-update-cryptic-begins-to-chart-its-own-star-trek-history/comment-page-2/#comment-1316401</link>
		<dc:creator>S. John Ross</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 15:07:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2008/12/07/star-trek-online-update-cryptic-begins-to-chart-its-own-star-trek-history/#comment-1316401</guid>
		<description>#87: &quot;And pointing out that in my opinion Battlestar hasn’t gone down hill.&quot;

I think it&#039;s an excellent sign of personal progress that you&#039;ve acknowledged that it&#039;s a matter of opinion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#87: &#8220;And pointing out that in my opinion Battlestar hasn’t gone down hill.&#8221;</p>
<p>I think it&#8217;s an excellent sign of personal progress that you&#8217;ve acknowledged that it&#8217;s a matter of opinion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TOS Enterprise</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2008/12/07/star-trek-online-update-cryptic-begins-to-chart-its-own-star-trek-history/comment-page-2/#comment-1316182</link>
		<dc:creator>TOS Enterprise</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 13:39:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2008/12/07/star-trek-online-update-cryptic-begins-to-chart-its-own-star-trek-history/#comment-1316182</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not arguing with anyone. Just correcting mistakes. And pointing out that in my opinion Battlestar hasn&#039;t gone down hill. Some of the second half of season 3 was eh, but so was some of the second half of season 2... whenever they try to do stand alone episodes (because the SCI  FI channel was on their case to do stand alone stories) they faltered a little. But then again, Dirty Hands (a stand alone) was a great episode. So none of that is written in stone.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not arguing with anyone. Just correcting mistakes. And pointing out that in my opinion Battlestar hasn&#8217;t gone down hill. Some of the second half of season 3 was eh, but so was some of the second half of season 2&#8230; whenever they try to do stand alone episodes (because the SCI  FI channel was on their case to do stand alone stories) they faltered a little. But then again, Dirty Hands (a stand alone) was a great episode. So none of that is written in stone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BK613</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2008/12/07/star-trek-online-update-cryptic-begins-to-chart-its-own-star-trek-history/comment-page-2/#comment-1316018</link>
		<dc:creator>BK613</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 12:17:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2008/12/07/star-trek-online-update-cryptic-begins-to-chart-its-own-star-trek-history/#comment-1316018</guid>
		<description>84
As long as we are being technical, that Peabody was awarded in April 2006, for BSG &quot;originally broadcast, cablecast or released for non-broadcast distribution during the previous calendar year&quot; (2005.)  

By the end of 2005, only the 13 episodes of the first season and ten episodes of the second season had aired in the U. S..   That is all that Peabody applies to.  Not the last half of season 2 nor the 3rd and 4th seasons.

No one that you are &quot;arguing&quot; with has said that the show didn&#039;t start out well, only that it went down hill from there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>84<br />
As long as we are being technical, that Peabody was awarded in April 2006, for BSG &#8220;originally broadcast, cablecast or released for non-broadcast distribution during the previous calendar year&#8221; (2005.)  </p>
<p>By the end of 2005, only the 13 episodes of the first season and ten episodes of the second season had aired in the U. S..   That is all that Peabody applies to.  Not the last half of season 2 nor the 3rd and 4th seasons.</p>
<p>No one that you are &#8220;arguing&#8221; with has said that the show didn&#8217;t start out well, only that it went down hill from there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Heaney - Wowbagger</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2008/12/07/star-trek-online-update-cryptic-begins-to-chart-its-own-star-trek-history/comment-page-2/#comment-1315405</link>
		<dc:creator>James Heaney - Wowbagger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 07:31:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2008/12/07/star-trek-online-update-cryptic-begins-to-chart-its-own-star-trek-history/#comment-1315405</guid>
		<description>#73: That&#039;s precisely the problem.  The ST EU is becoming coherent and internally consistent.  That needs to stop, immediately.  If it were to succeed, popular voice would carry the EU into full canon status.  This would be catastrophic.

Aside from the terrible quality of recent Trek books (I cannot tolerate the TNG relaunch.  It is dreck), you&#039;d be instantly increasing the canon by a massive amount--something like double to quintuple its current size.  Everything ever made thereafter would be doomed to choke on this enormous body of work (often very bad), and the free, open, sparsely populated Trekverse would instantly be crowded out by all the many, many different speculations and possible histories already recorded in the novels.

This has happened to Star Wars, where we saw the prequel movies suffering mightily because of their obsession with the EU canon.  We&#039;ve seen Star Wars video games have to tie themselves in increasingly complicated knots to find new adventures that Rogue Squadron can take during the movie timeline.  And, of course, we&#039;ve seen the long decline of the Wars novel series from the glory days of the Thrawn trilogy to the depressing state of today, where one can&#039;t even enter into the present Legacy of the Force series without first absorbing twenty years of unwanted and often terrible book canon.  This very fact continues to work to the detriment of the quality of the current crop of books, and the vicious circle continues.

If you want to make the books a part of your own personal canon, that&#039;s fine.  There are many books in my personal canon.  But official canon *must* stick to the filmed works and very, very little more (say, the &quot;Mosiac&quot; Voyager novel or the upcoming &quot;Countdown&quot; comics)--and flirting with them by more than the occasional hat-tip is just plain dangerous.  For the good of the franchise, the various sub-properties ought to remain as fragmented and uncoordinated as possible.  If they can occasionally deliberately kick sand in each others&#039; faces, so much the better.

Yeah, it is a little wild-eyed crazy, isn&#039;t it?  :P</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#73: That&#8217;s precisely the problem.  The ST EU is becoming coherent and internally consistent.  That needs to stop, immediately.  If it were to succeed, popular voice would carry the EU into full canon status.  This would be catastrophic.</p>
<p>Aside from the terrible quality of recent Trek books (I cannot tolerate the TNG relaunch.  It is dreck), you&#8217;d be instantly increasing the canon by a massive amount&#8211;something like double to quintuple its current size.  Everything ever made thereafter would be doomed to choke on this enormous body of work (often very bad), and the free, open, sparsely populated Trekverse would instantly be crowded out by all the many, many different speculations and possible histories already recorded in the novels.</p>
<p>This has happened to Star Wars, where we saw the prequel movies suffering mightily because of their obsession with the EU canon.  We&#8217;ve seen Star Wars video games have to tie themselves in increasingly complicated knots to find new adventures that Rogue Squadron can take during the movie timeline.  And, of course, we&#8217;ve seen the long decline of the Wars novel series from the glory days of the Thrawn trilogy to the depressing state of today, where one can&#8217;t even enter into the present Legacy of the Force series without first absorbing twenty years of unwanted and often terrible book canon.  This very fact continues to work to the detriment of the quality of the current crop of books, and the vicious circle continues.</p>
<p>If you want to make the books a part of your own personal canon, that&#8217;s fine.  There are many books in my personal canon.  But official canon *must* stick to the filmed works and very, very little more (say, the &#8220;Mosiac&#8221; Voyager novel or the upcoming &#8220;Countdown&#8221; comics)&#8211;and flirting with them by more than the occasional hat-tip is just plain dangerous.  For the good of the franchise, the various sub-properties ought to remain as fragmented and uncoordinated as possible.  If they can occasionally deliberately kick sand in each others&#8217; faces, so much the better.</p>
<p>Yeah, it is a little wild-eyed crazy, isn&#8217;t it?  :P</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TOS Enterprise</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2008/12/07/star-trek-online-update-cryptic-begins-to-chart-its-own-star-trek-history/comment-page-2/#comment-1314926</link>
		<dc:creator>TOS Enterprise</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 04:44:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2008/12/07/star-trek-online-update-cryptic-begins-to-chart-its-own-star-trek-history/#comment-1314926</guid>
		<description>Re: 83 YARN - December 9, 2008 

Wrong. The episode &quot;33&quot; won the Hugo Award for Best Dramatic Presentation.

Peabody Awards are for an entire series, not given out for single episodes.

From the Peabody website:

Battlestar Galactica (SCI FI)
,  
Battlestar Galactica is not just another apocalyptic vision of the future but an intense drama that poses provocative questions regarding religion, politics, sex and what it truly means to be &quot;human.&quot; The saga is set in motion when Cylon robots revolt against their creators with a devastating series of nuclear attacks. What&#039;s left of the human race, fewer than 50,000 refugees, roam the universe in a fleet led by the spacecraft Galactica. They must re-imagine their society even as they search for a new home. This dramatic premise, coupled with the threat from a new form of humanoid Cylons, affords diverse narrative and philosophical possibilities. Writers Ronald D. Moore, Toni Graphia, David Weddle, Bradley Thompson, Carla Robinson, Jeff Vlaming, Michael Angeli, and David Eick take full advantage to give us plotlines that are deeply personal and relatable, while never compromising their affinity and passion for science fiction. Moore, Graphia, and Eick are the executive producers. Harvey Frand is the producer. Directors Michael Rymer, Marita Grabiak, Allan Kroeker, Rod Hardy, Sergio Mimica-Gezzan, Robert Young, Brad Turner, Edward James Olmos, Jeff Woolnough, and Jonas Pate dazzle us, giving us a show that captivates on multiple levels. The cast includes Olmos, Mary McDonnell, Katee Sackhoff, Jamie Bamber, James Callis, Tricia Helfer, and Grace Park. For pushing the limits of science fiction and making it accessible to all, Battlestar Galactica receives a Peabody Award.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re: 83 YARN &#8211; December 9, 2008 </p>
<p>Wrong. The episode &#8220;33&#8243; won the Hugo Award for Best Dramatic Presentation.</p>
<p>Peabody Awards are for an entire series, not given out for single episodes.</p>
<p>From the Peabody website:</p>
<p>Battlestar Galactica (SCI FI)<br />
,<br />
Battlestar Galactica is not just another apocalyptic vision of the future but an intense drama that poses provocative questions regarding religion, politics, sex and what it truly means to be &#8220;human.&#8221; The saga is set in motion when Cylon robots revolt against their creators with a devastating series of nuclear attacks. What&#8217;s left of the human race, fewer than 50,000 refugees, roam the universe in a fleet led by the spacecraft Galactica. They must re-imagine their society even as they search for a new home. This dramatic premise, coupled with the threat from a new form of humanoid Cylons, affords diverse narrative and philosophical possibilities. Writers Ronald D. Moore, Toni Graphia, David Weddle, Bradley Thompson, Carla Robinson, Jeff Vlaming, Michael Angeli, and David Eick take full advantage to give us plotlines that are deeply personal and relatable, while never compromising their affinity and passion for science fiction. Moore, Graphia, and Eick are the executive producers. Harvey Frand is the producer. Directors Michael Rymer, Marita Grabiak, Allan Kroeker, Rod Hardy, Sergio Mimica-Gezzan, Robert Young, Brad Turner, Edward James Olmos, Jeff Woolnough, and Jonas Pate dazzle us, giving us a show that captivates on multiple levels. The cast includes Olmos, Mary McDonnell, Katee Sackhoff, Jamie Bamber, James Callis, Tricia Helfer, and Grace Park. For pushing the limits of science fiction and making it accessible to all, Battlestar Galactica receives a Peabody Award.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: YARN</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2008/12/07/star-trek-online-update-cryptic-begins-to-chart-its-own-star-trek-history/comment-page-2/#comment-1313818</link>
		<dc:creator>YARN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2008 22:10:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2008/12/07/star-trek-online-update-cryptic-begins-to-chart-its-own-star-trek-history/#comment-1313818</guid>
		<description>#82

BSG won the Peabody for 33, an early episode in the first season, before the series went massivly down hill. Started out great, no doubt. 

BSG defined itself by being anti-Trek in a lot of ways. The show was anti techno, anti-(over)optimism, anti-canon, anti-alien-of-the-week, and so on.  And it was cool. But the counter-virtues of BSG digressed into vices. The pessimism became overwhelming - the show became anti-humanist (not in the postmodernist sense, but in the &quot;people suck&quot; sense). The bold lack of concern with continuity resulted in dropped plot lines, retconning, and contradictions.  The singular enemy resulted in the perpetual deferral of the alleged &quot;plan&quot;. The show is ending as a caricature of itself. 

Trek digressed into well-known cul-de-sacs. BSG set out to boldly avoid these traps and fell into traps of its own. I think the lesson is that virtue (as Aristotle taught) is found midway between extremes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#82</p>
<p>BSG won the Peabody for 33, an early episode in the first season, before the series went massivly down hill. Started out great, no doubt. </p>
<p>BSG defined itself by being anti-Trek in a lot of ways. The show was anti techno, anti-(over)optimism, anti-canon, anti-alien-of-the-week, and so on.  And it was cool. But the counter-virtues of BSG digressed into vices. The pessimism became overwhelming &#8211; the show became anti-humanist (not in the postmodernist sense, but in the &#8220;people suck&#8221; sense). The bold lack of concern with continuity resulted in dropped plot lines, retconning, and contradictions.  The singular enemy resulted in the perpetual deferral of the alleged &#8220;plan&#8221;. The show is ending as a caricature of itself. </p>
<p>Trek digressed into well-known cul-de-sacs. BSG set out to boldly avoid these traps and fell into traps of its own. I think the lesson is that virtue (as Aristotle taught) is found midway between extremes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

