Comments on: Super High Resolution Images For ‘Star Trek’ 2009

By: The Evolution of Science Fiction in the 20th and 21st Centuries | Cinemaroll

Thu, 28 May 2009 08:18:28 +0000

[...] Image Source [...]

By: iplaicawd

iplaicawd — Tue, 12 May 2009 20:16:56 +0000

i like turtles

By: Ervin Shlopnick

Ervin Shlopnick — Fri, 13 Mar 2009 19:32:34 +0000

I like beans

By: jiji

jiji — Thu, 22 Jan 2009 19:28:54 +0000

slt cava

By: Sodhexo

Sodhexo — Wed, 14 Jan 2009 16:54:19 +0000

@264
It most certainly is my bsiness, you type of people who claim to be fans just want to see anything with the words “Star Trek” in it even if has done away with everything that makes star trek what it is, such as continunity, canon, history. You people will be the death of str trek given the oportunity, this movie is the beginning of Star Treks death. It is NOT arrogant at all and right of me to say it. But at least i am not deluded as you to think this movie is Star Trek and that it will work. I speak for many others who feel the same as me, They are TRUE fans.

By: Devon

Devon — Wed, 14 Jan 2009 06:44:15 +0000

#263 – It is not your business or your place to declare who is a fan or who isn’t just because they don’t agree with you. That is highly arrogant and wrong of you. Speak for yourself please.

By: Sodhexo

Sodhexo — Wed, 07 Jan 2009 16:36:42 +0000

Mr Irksome @262

All your comments about the ship, well said. Its is sacralidge that thay have changed the ship, let alone all the other things that have been changed.

Thanks, it is good to know that not all the people who call themselves “fans” have lost their mind, If you people truly call yourselves fans then you should be as appauled and disgusted as i am at what Abrams has done to Star Trek.

And to @261. Capt. of the USS Anduril I am quite sure that kirk would be just as disgusted as myself at what has been done to his ship. I dont mind change as long as it fits in. This movie does NOT fit in hence why i am so annoid. As i stated before had a prequel been done in a time we know nothing about im sure the movie would have worked. And the writers could do as they please, within reason and if it fitted in with established trek style.

By: Mr Irksome

Mr Irksome — Wed, 07 Jan 2009 15:05:01 +0000

#253 Sodhexo, I agree with every word you said!
When I first heard that Star Trek XI would be a prequel, I was so excited! I couldn’t wait to see that old beautiful ship on the big screen. I would have been great to the magic that would be done to realy bring it to life. I was also excited to hear that JJ Abrams would be directing it. Now I’m not so sure.

I for one am mad as hell that he and whoever else took it upon themselves to “re-imagine” the Enterprise!!!!!!!!! I can’t even consider it the same ship. Why must the armor be changed to movie style armor? Why must the torpedoes be moved to the dorsal pylon just above the secondary hull? On the real (TOS) Enterprise they are on the main hull three decks below the bridge. I was excited to see that portrayed. The warp nacelles are bulbous and disgusting! Why must the deflector dish be all glowey blue? At least It’s sort of detached like it should be. Why must the nacelle support pylons be angled? They were fine straight. Why is the secondary hull almost angled to an point in the rear? Is there even a shuttle bay there? If this is supposed to be a pre-TOS design, why are there post TOS era parts on it? Such as the sensor suite on the bottom of the saucer.

Star Trek has been raped and distorted to where it is no longer recognizable. Every new thing that is added gives no regard to previously established (in episode) fact or time line. I am more and more disgusted with how I see this movie turning out and I hope that Mr. Abrams is never allowed near anything Trek again!

Oh, and Capt. of the USS Andruril, Some things Should not be changed.

By: Capt. of the USS Anduril

Capt. of the USS Anduril — Wed, 07 Jan 2009 00:05:08 +0000

“People can be very frightened of change.”-James T Kirk.

People, shut up now. Please.

By: Sodhexo

Sodhexo — Tue, 06 Jan 2009 16:20:29 +0000

@ 257 van archer…

Well said heh, heh.