Comments on: MTV Shows Behind-The-Scenes Star Trek ‘Featurette’ [UPDATED: w/ Kelvin Bridge Shot?]

By: CHRIS ROD

CHRIS ROD — Thu, 05 Mar 2009 18:00:20 +0000

157.

i think certain people just need to be exposed to the information properly.
some havent been exposed to it right… theyve been told by sstar wars fans! aaaaaaaaaaaaaah!

By: Databrain

Databrain — Fri, 27 Feb 2009 08:50:38 +0000

155:

Right. And no one knew how to market trek prior to JJ Abrams. JJ is the genius of the millennium, etc etc etc ad infinitum. Or maybe, just maybe people who got it before were the ones who were meant to get it, while those who didn’t get it never will? Ah, just maybe.

By: CHRIS ROD

CHRIS ROD — Thu, 26 Feb 2009 22:57:39 +0000

155 (typo)*-to tell NON-trek fans, thats its not geared for TREKKIES.

im just going to take the movie in for myself.. look at all the evidence piling up.. this is a Trek movie for sure! ive never been more excited! !

By: CHRIS ROD

CHRIS ROD — Thu, 26 Feb 2009 22:48:22 +0000

153!!!……
this movie is BIG TIME FOR TREKKIES!

if you read it all again, he went to Korea -to tell no trek fans, thats its not geared for them… ITS MARKETING BUBBA! YOU DONT WANT TO TELL A BUNCH OF TREK-DOUBTERS/HATERS/.NONFANS, THAT “HEY! THIS IS THE TREK MOVIES THAT YOUVE ALL KNOWN TO NOT CAARE TO GO TO THE THEATERS FOR!!!\ THIS IS FOR TREKKERS ONLY! ! ! ” ..so im glad hes saying what hes saying , this is opening a HUUUUGE DOOR FOR THE WORLD TO SEE RODDENBERRY’S VISION (FURTHER EXPANSION! :)

By: Databrain

Databrain — Thu, 26 Feb 2009 11:56:45 +0000

60 said:

‘And that bit with Will Wheaton was embarassing – watching this 30-something guy pretend to be ‘down’ with the young kids, and also to know anything at all about the movie based on exactly the same info the rest of us have’

Does that mean JJ Abrams is a 40 something guy pretending to be ‘down’ with the young kids by making a film that he apparently thinks they will ‘get into’? In fact isn’t Abrams insulting their intelligence a bit by thinking the majority of them will only go if their is sex and violence in the preview? hmm just saying..

By: Databrain

Databrain — Thu, 26 Feb 2009 11:31:16 +0000

if this film is ‘not for tekkies’ why even make a film based on the star trek characters instead of some generic sc fi film containing whatever message you want it to, to pull in whatever fan base you wish it to? make some sense JJ!

By: Chris Rod

Chris Rod — Wed, 25 Feb 2009 15:24:46 +0000

I’m wondering if the so-called “kelvin” bridge, is actually an old-style Romulan brige.
oh i wonder, wonder, [who wrote the book of love!]
.. it might be, slightly??
What do you think?

yes! i Hope Bill Shat! is in this movie! .. or at least in a future film!
(crossing fingers)

By: spark-17.1

spark-17.1 — Wed, 25 Feb 2009 04:02:27 +0000

#149. P.S. .. WILLIAM SHATNER IS IN THE MOVIE :D
..source leaked :P

I hope your right, not lying, or haven’t been lied to.

That would simply rock!

By: spark-17.1

spark-17.1 — Wed, 25 Feb 2009 04:01:03 +0000

That bridge there having the interview seems simply magnificent looking (from the little that was shown anyway). Is that the Kelvin bridge? Anyway, still looks fantastic! As long as they get Kirk right, I’m happy

By: Damn it, jim!

Damn it, jim! — Tue, 24 Feb 2009 22:35:53 +0000

#147
C’mon,.. Karl Urban, is like McCoy on Steroids!
I am hoping (and , im certain :-x ) that Karl is going to play the party pretty well. ITS THE PREVIEWS that have thrown me off… he just doesnt seem real enough… we’ll see.
..
P.S. .. WILLIAM SHATNER IS IN THE MOVIE :D
..source leaked :P