


<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Star Trek Trailer A Big Hit With The Media</title>
	<atom:link href="http://trekmovie.com/2009/03/07/new-star-trek-trailer-a-big-hit-with-the-media/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://trekmovie.com/2009/03/07/new-star-trek-trailer-a-big-hit-with-the-media/</link>
	<description>the source for Star Trek news and information</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 12:30:29 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Pimple</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2009/03/07/new-star-trek-trailer-a-big-hit-with-the-media/comment-page-7/#comment-1635988</link>
		<dc:creator>Pimple</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 16:00:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2009/03/07/new-star-trek-trailer-a-big-hit-with-the-media/#comment-1635988</guid>
		<description>a useful blog :)
thanks for info</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>a useful blog :)<br />
thanks for info</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Believer2</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2009/03/07/new-star-trek-trailer-a-big-hit-with-the-media/comment-page-7/#comment-1616810</link>
		<dc:creator>Believer2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 00:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2009/03/07/new-star-trek-trailer-a-big-hit-with-the-media/#comment-1616810</guid>
		<description>333, I hear you.  My nine year old son is dying to see this movie...I hope I can show it to him.

I guess I&#039;m kind of excited too...my wife is sitting behind me as a I write this - I&#039;ve watched the trailer like 10 times already tonight.  &quot;Are you watching that AGAIN?&quot; she says.  Snicker...gues I&#039;m a fan.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>333, I hear you.  My nine year old son is dying to see this movie&#8230;I hope I can show it to him.</p>
<p>I guess I&#8217;m kind of excited too&#8230;my wife is sitting behind me as a I write this &#8211; I&#8217;ve watched the trailer like 10 times already tonight.  &#8220;Are you watching that AGAIN?&#8221; she says.  Snicker&#8230;gues I&#8217;m a fan.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kirk's Girdle</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2009/03/07/new-star-trek-trailer-a-big-hit-with-the-media/comment-page-7/#comment-1612314</link>
		<dc:creator>Kirk's Girdle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 18:30:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2009/03/07/new-star-trek-trailer-a-big-hit-with-the-media/#comment-1612314</guid>
		<description>Re: 333

Don&#039;t worry. They&#039;re not going to show any boobies or anything. The scene will be cleaner than your average prime time television show.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re: 333</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t worry. They&#8217;re not going to show any boobies or anything. The scene will be cleaner than your average prime time television show.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: I'm a Beliver</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2009/03/07/new-star-trek-trailer-a-big-hit-with-the-media/comment-page-7/#comment-1612100</link>
		<dc:creator>I'm a Beliver</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 16:51:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2009/03/07/new-star-trek-trailer-a-big-hit-with-the-media/#comment-1612100</guid>
		<description>I only have one problem with this move. The sex scene. Star Trek: TOS does have sex apeal in some episodes, but it has never crossed the line into full blown sex. Everything else is great.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I only have one problem with this move. The sex scene. Star Trek: TOS does have sex apeal in some episodes, but it has never crossed the line into full blown sex. Everything else is great.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sean</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2009/03/07/new-star-trek-trailer-a-big-hit-with-the-media/comment-page-7/#comment-1612039</link>
		<dc:creator>sean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 16:28:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2009/03/07/new-star-trek-trailer-a-big-hit-with-the-media/#comment-1612039</guid>
		<description>This trailer just wipes the floor with the other two. I loved those, but this one really inspired. Nice job Team Abrams!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This trailer just wipes the floor with the other two. I loved those, but this one really inspired. Nice job Team Abrams!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dom</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2009/03/07/new-star-trek-trailer-a-big-hit-with-the-media/comment-page-7/#comment-1611383</link>
		<dc:creator>Dom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 12:42:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2009/03/07/new-star-trek-trailer-a-big-hit-with-the-media/#comment-1611383</guid>
		<description>328. Kirk&#039;s Girdle: &#039;I just don’t like to be cast as a “brainless” movie watcher because I didn’t love Superman Returns. I didn’t hate it, but it fell far short of my expectations.&#039;

You&#039;re not. Superman Returns fell flat because it was everything a major franchise relaunch shouldn&#039;t be: slavishly riffing on past themes having almost exactly the same designs as the original movies and actors cast who are made up and/or dressed to be almost exact lookalikes of the original actors, and whose performances are mostly pastiches of the originals.

I like it in a kind of nostalgic way and it&#039;s an interesting alternative Superman III, but it has no real identity of its own!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>328. Kirk&#8217;s Girdle: &#8216;I just don’t like to be cast as a “brainless” movie watcher because I didn’t love Superman Returns. I didn’t hate it, but it fell far short of my expectations.&#8217;</p>
<p>You&#8217;re not. Superman Returns fell flat because it was everything a major franchise relaunch shouldn&#8217;t be: slavishly riffing on past themes having almost exactly the same designs as the original movies and actors cast who are made up and/or dressed to be almost exact lookalikes of the original actors, and whose performances are mostly pastiches of the originals.</p>
<p>I like it in a kind of nostalgic way and it&#8217;s an interesting alternative Superman III, but it has no real identity of its own!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex Rosenzweig</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2009/03/07/new-star-trek-trailer-a-big-hit-with-the-media/comment-page-7/#comment-1610183</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex Rosenzweig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 03:09:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2009/03/07/new-star-trek-trailer-a-big-hit-with-the-media/#comment-1610183</guid>
		<description>#325 - &quot;The altered timeline premise and restart that occurs here actually frees all future incarnations of this crew and series from the events already in the current cannon.&quot;

I think what I just can&#039;t comprehend is the whole idea that we *need* to be &quot;freed&quot;. I don&#039;t see maintaining continuity to be a limiting thing at all, so I have never felt a need to run away from it. It&#039;s discontinuity that I dislike.

&quot;Can we just imagine what a retelling of SPACE SEED would be like with Bad Robot? Or how about BALANCE OF TERROR, or even the TRIBLES? Or what about a revisit of the DOOMSDAY MACHINE?&quot;

Frankly, I&#039;d really hope that even in an alternate timeline, the writers would be more innovative than simply redoing stories that have already been done, just differently. That seems to be defeating the whole purpose of breaking away from a previous continuity, doesn&#039;t it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#325 &#8211; &#8220;The altered timeline premise and restart that occurs here actually frees all future incarnations of this crew and series from the events already in the current cannon.&#8221;</p>
<p>I think what I just can&#8217;t comprehend is the whole idea that we *need* to be &#8220;freed&#8221;. I don&#8217;t see maintaining continuity to be a limiting thing at all, so I have never felt a need to run away from it. It&#8217;s discontinuity that I dislike.</p>
<p>&#8220;Can we just imagine what a retelling of SPACE SEED would be like with Bad Robot? Or how about BALANCE OF TERROR, or even the TRIBLES? Or what about a revisit of the DOOMSDAY MACHINE?&#8221;</p>
<p>Frankly, I&#8217;d really hope that even in an alternate timeline, the writers would be more innovative than simply redoing stories that have already been done, just differently. That seems to be defeating the whole purpose of breaking away from a previous continuity, doesn&#8217;t it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ClassicTrek</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2009/03/07/new-star-trek-trailer-a-big-hit-with-the-media/comment-page-7/#comment-1609575</link>
		<dc:creator>ClassicTrek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 23:27:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2009/03/07/new-star-trek-trailer-a-big-hit-with-the-media/#comment-1609575</guid>
		<description>that new trailer featuring the original series cast (shatner, nimoy etc) is breathtaking. absolutlely brilliant. very well done. loved it.

I loved the real new trailer also. cant wait. 

Buckle up

cheers
Greg
UK</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>that new trailer featuring the original series cast (shatner, nimoy etc) is breathtaking. absolutlely brilliant. very well done. loved it.</p>
<p>I loved the real new trailer also. cant wait. </p>
<p>Buckle up</p>
<p>cheers<br />
Greg<br />
UK</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kirk's Girdle</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2009/03/07/new-star-trek-trailer-a-big-hit-with-the-media/comment-page-7/#comment-1609167</link>
		<dc:creator>Kirk's Girdle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 19:27:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2009/03/07/new-star-trek-trailer-a-big-hit-with-the-media/#comment-1609167</guid>
		<description>Re: New Horizon.

&quot;Why can’t you go to a Superman movie for some introspection? That’s just proving my point right there…people just wanted more of the same regurgitated. I’m tired of brainless movies. There was plenty going on under the skin of Superman Returns…&quot;

The introspection comment was more of a joke. I wasn&#039;t asking for more of the same, and I have no problem with a compelling storyline. I&#039;m glad you found the new film to be compelling and feel that there was something going on &quot;under the skin&quot;, I just didn&#039;t feel it myself. 
I also have no problem with a film that runs long, as long as the material merits it. I liked Singer&#039;s X Men films, which somehow struck a good balance of action and drama despite having some of the goofiest heroes and villains in the cast.  I also feel that there was more joy in 5 minutes of Christopher Reeve flying, and more raw emotion when he finds Lois dead in the original than there was in the entire 2 + hours of Superman Returns.  

&quot;and saying you can find it in the $5 bin is hardly a reflection of how good or bad a movie is. Any movie will end up in the $5 bin eventually.&quot;

Actually when Superman Returns came out I went to Target and bought Superman: The Movie for $7.50 on sale. Not bad for a 30 year old film.

Anyway, I&#039;m not here to flame, I just don&#039;t like to be cast as a &quot;brainless&quot; movie watcher because I didn&#039;t love Superman Returns. I didn&#039;t hate it, but it fell far short of my expectations.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re: New Horizon.</p>
<p>&#8220;Why can’t you go to a Superman movie for some introspection? That’s just proving my point right there…people just wanted more of the same regurgitated. I’m tired of brainless movies. There was plenty going on under the skin of Superman Returns…&#8221;</p>
<p>The introspection comment was more of a joke. I wasn&#8217;t asking for more of the same, and I have no problem with a compelling storyline. I&#8217;m glad you found the new film to be compelling and feel that there was something going on &#8220;under the skin&#8221;, I just didn&#8217;t feel it myself.<br />
I also have no problem with a film that runs long, as long as the material merits it. I liked Singer&#8217;s X Men films, which somehow struck a good balance of action and drama despite having some of the goofiest heroes and villains in the cast.  I also feel that there was more joy in 5 minutes of Christopher Reeve flying, and more raw emotion when he finds Lois dead in the original than there was in the entire 2 + hours of Superman Returns.  </p>
<p>&#8220;and saying you can find it in the $5 bin is hardly a reflection of how good or bad a movie is. Any movie will end up in the $5 bin eventually.&#8221;</p>
<p>Actually when Superman Returns came out I went to Target and bought Superman: The Movie for $7.50 on sale. Not bad for a 30 year old film.</p>
<p>Anyway, I&#8217;m not here to flame, I just don&#8217;t like to be cast as a &#8220;brainless&#8221; movie watcher because I didn&#8217;t love Superman Returns. I didn&#8217;t hate it, but it fell far short of my expectations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan Spooner</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2009/03/07/new-star-trek-trailer-a-big-hit-with-the-media/comment-page-7/#comment-1609089</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Spooner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 18:21:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2009/03/07/new-star-trek-trailer-a-big-hit-with-the-media/#comment-1609089</guid>
		<description>@ 307

How very dare you, I resemble that remark.... :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ 307</p>
<p>How very dare you, I resemble that remark&#8230;. :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

