


<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Star Trek Trailer #3: Shot-By-Shot Analysis</title>
	<atom:link href="http://trekmovie.com/2009/03/08/star-trek-trailer-3-shot-by-shot-analysis/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://trekmovie.com/2009/03/08/star-trek-trailer-3-shot-by-shot-analysis/</link>
	<description>the source for Star Trek news and information</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 10:11:57 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Masana82</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2009/03/08/star-trek-trailer-3-shot-by-shot-analysis/comment-page-10/#comment-1879053</link>
		<dc:creator>Masana82</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 21:04:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2009/03/08/star-trek-trailer-3-shot-by-shot-analysis/#comment-1879053</guid>
		<description>#450. JTrek wrote: &quot;But make no mistake…this will not be Star Trek…its will be an “entertaining science fiction film” for the masses.&quot;

I was born in 1982, so I&#039;m 27. I&#039;ve never watched the old Star Trek movies or original series, but watched the Next Generation and this new movie. I always thought that Star Trek was, and will always be, an entertaining science fiction film. The tolerance and understanding messages all the die hard fans talk about are still there in the new movie.
There&#039;s no sex scene, just a comic &quot;almost sex scene&quot; in the entire movie. The tight outfits as just as tight as in the original series:

STO outfit: http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_KWR_gvxCigs/SVfi0CO5k4I/AAAAAAAABgA/qVqCyCyNMRk/s320/Uhura1.jpg

Please, go watch it and let us know if you enjoyed, or not.

:D
Cheers!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#450. JTrek wrote: &#8220;But make no mistake…this will not be Star Trek…its will be an “entertaining science fiction film” for the masses.&#8221;</p>
<p>I was born in 1982, so I&#8217;m 27. I&#8217;ve never watched the old Star Trek movies or original series, but watched the Next Generation and this new movie. I always thought that Star Trek was, and will always be, an entertaining science fiction film. The tolerance and understanding messages all the die hard fans talk about are still there in the new movie.<br />
There&#8217;s no sex scene, just a comic &#8220;almost sex scene&#8221; in the entire movie. The tight outfits as just as tight as in the original series:</p>
<p>STO outfit: <a href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_KWR_gvxCigs/SVfi0CO5k4I/AAAAAAAABgA/qVqCyCyNMRk/s320/Uhura1.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_KWR_gvxCigs/SVfi0CO5k4I/AAAAAAAABgA/qVqCyCyNMRk/s320/Uhura1.jpg</a></p>
<p>Please, go watch it and let us know if you enjoyed, or not.</p>
<p>:D<br />
Cheers!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2009/03/08/star-trek-trailer-3-shot-by-shot-analysis/comment-page-10/#comment-1865027</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 01:56:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2009/03/08/star-trek-trailer-3-shot-by-shot-analysis/#comment-1865027</guid>
		<description>I loved the movie but was horrified at the destruction of both Romulus and Vulcan,the fact that the timeline was not restored left me feeling very nervous about the franchise’s future,what are we paying those guys who inforce the Temporal Prime Directive for?

Well they did drop the ball on the whole Xindi thing,but still the loss of these two core worlds in the Star Trek universe? bad medicine I say

Now with this timeline the Alpha quadrant will be doomed to loose the Dominion war 

Also I wasnt thrilled with the Romulans looking like extras from Road Warrior I could see if the crew did that out of mourning for their lost homeworld but the scene on Romulus w/ Spock showed they too were bald .

I can only hope Q shows up and snaps the two planets back into existence in the sequel or those temporal agents who pestered Archer rescue Spock and help him do the job right the first time

I’d prefer to see the Skorr or the Kzinti utilized in future sequels too ,if any both have lots of potential as adversaries

Still these complaints aside I really did love the movie

one more thing what about Romulus&#039; twin world Remus? no mention of it&#039;s fate

but if they dont repair the traditional timeline they run the risk of ruining the franchise</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I loved the movie but was horrified at the destruction of both Romulus and Vulcan,the fact that the timeline was not restored left me feeling very nervous about the franchise’s future,what are we paying those guys who inforce the Temporal Prime Directive for?</p>
<p>Well they did drop the ball on the whole Xindi thing,but still the loss of these two core worlds in the Star Trek universe? bad medicine I say</p>
<p>Now with this timeline the Alpha quadrant will be doomed to loose the Dominion war </p>
<p>Also I wasnt thrilled with the Romulans looking like extras from Road Warrior I could see if the crew did that out of mourning for their lost homeworld but the scene on Romulus w/ Spock showed they too were bald .</p>
<p>I can only hope Q shows up and snaps the two planets back into existence in the sequel or those temporal agents who pestered Archer rescue Spock and help him do the job right the first time</p>
<p>I’d prefer to see the Skorr or the Kzinti utilized in future sequels too ,if any both have lots of potential as adversaries</p>
<p>Still these complaints aside I really did love the movie</p>
<p>one more thing what about Romulus&#8217; twin world Remus? no mention of it&#8217;s fate</p>
<p>but if they dont repair the traditional timeline they run the risk of ruining the franchise</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2009/03/08/star-trek-trailer-3-shot-by-shot-analysis/comment-page-10/#comment-1815540</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 19:09:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2009/03/08/star-trek-trailer-3-shot-by-shot-analysis/#comment-1815540</guid>
		<description>Has no one else noticed Kirks immediate jump from Cadet to Captain.  I&#039;m throwing the BS flag on this one.  As far as this movie goes, Spock would have been the more believable one to relieve Pike as Captain of the Enterprise in the end.  You just dont go from being a Cadet to a Captain of anything.  Very unbelievable.  The movie was entertaining but the BS flag must be thrown.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Has no one else noticed Kirks immediate jump from Cadet to Captain.  I&#8217;m throwing the BS flag on this one.  As far as this movie goes, Spock would have been the more believable one to relieve Pike as Captain of the Enterprise in the end.  You just dont go from being a Cadet to a Captain of anything.  Very unbelievable.  The movie was entertaining but the BS flag must be thrown.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shireinthecity</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2009/03/08/star-trek-trailer-3-shot-by-shot-analysis/comment-page-10/#comment-1812614</link>
		<dc:creator>shireinthecity</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 08:49:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2009/03/08/star-trek-trailer-3-shot-by-shot-analysis/#comment-1812614</guid>
		<description>I would really love a close look at Pike&#039;s Star Fleet Academy ring if at all possible. Also a clear shot of both Future Spock and Kirk&#039;s Delta Vega Parkas.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would really love a close look at Pike&#8217;s Star Fleet Academy ring if at all possible. Also a clear shot of both Future Spock and Kirk&#8217;s Delta Vega Parkas.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jace</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2009/03/08/star-trek-trailer-3-shot-by-shot-analysis/comment-page-10/#comment-1778007</link>
		<dc:creator>Jace</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 20:50:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2009/03/08/star-trek-trailer-3-shot-by-shot-analysis/#comment-1778007</guid>
		<description>so is that a member of the Jedi Council just to the left of Kirk&#039;s head in the shot with a close-up of him at the Academy assembly?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>so is that a member of the Jedi Council just to the left of Kirk&#8217;s head in the shot with a close-up of him at the Academy assembly?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Morgan</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2009/03/08/star-trek-trailer-3-shot-by-shot-analysis/comment-page-10/#comment-1639242</link>
		<dc:creator>James Morgan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 19:42:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2009/03/08/star-trek-trailer-3-shot-by-shot-analysis/#comment-1639242</guid>
		<description>Ah well, Im sure everyones questions will be answered on May 8th... really looking forward to this one.  Do you think this is the last trailer to emerge or will there be a theatrical one?..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah well, Im sure everyones questions will be answered on May 8th&#8230; really looking forward to this one.  Do you think this is the last trailer to emerge or will there be a theatrical one?..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anthony Pascale</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2009/03/08/star-trek-trailer-3-shot-by-shot-analysis/comment-page-10/#comment-1639039</link>
		<dc:creator>Anthony Pascale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 17:06:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2009/03/08/star-trek-trailer-3-shot-by-shot-analysis/#comment-1639039</guid>
		<description>the &#039;spoilers&#039; above are not assumptions, but based on seeing footage that is not yet public and talking to people associated with the film on and off the record.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the &#8217;spoilers&#8217; above are not assumptions, but based on seeing footage that is not yet public and talking to people associated with the film on and off the record.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Morgan</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2009/03/08/star-trek-trailer-3-shot-by-shot-analysis/comment-page-10/#comment-1639031</link>
		<dc:creator>James Morgan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 16:56:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2009/03/08/star-trek-trailer-3-shot-by-shot-analysis/#comment-1639031</guid>
		<description>There are a lot of assumptions at the begining of the shot by shot analysis. just because Kirk&#039;s bike has Iowa plates dosent necessarily mean that he is or the ship is being contructed in Iowa.  Cant really say they are spoilers really...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are a lot of assumptions at the begining of the shot by shot analysis. just because Kirk&#8217;s bike has Iowa plates dosent necessarily mean that he is or the ship is being contructed in Iowa.  Cant really say they are spoilers really&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JTrek</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2009/03/08/star-trek-trailer-3-shot-by-shot-analysis/comment-page-9/#comment-1631532</link>
		<dc:creator>JTrek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 01:55:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2009/03/08/star-trek-trailer-3-shot-by-shot-analysis/#comment-1631532</guid>
		<description>I dont think I&#039;ll see it. I was hoping the newer trailor would light some interest...but nope...nuthin. I grew up in the TNG era of Trek, then had to retroactively find out about Kirk and friends. This movie will garner its fans...legions of IPhone carrying, Gossip Girl watching, bottled water guzzling minions will flock to this Star Wars adjacent sci-fi flick and love it for its very...VERY simple story of action, sex, and tight outfits.
And I leave the fandom to them. I have my DVDs and memories. Just like th crusty old TOS fans to this day bitch and moan about THEIR Trek being the only true Trek, I will do the same...at the ripe old age of 27. Loved the TOS movies, though the series is unwatchable for me...
If this revamps the frachise...great...millions more dollars to be squeezed out of Roddenberrys corpse. But make no mistake...this will not be Star Trek...its will be an &quot;entertaining science fiction film&quot; for the masses.
Thats all. If people can just accept that (and the latest effort to drag us back, kicking and screaming into the TOS tomb)...then all will be well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I dont think I&#8217;ll see it. I was hoping the newer trailor would light some interest&#8230;but nope&#8230;nuthin. I grew up in the TNG era of Trek, then had to retroactively find out about Kirk and friends. This movie will garner its fans&#8230;legions of IPhone carrying, Gossip Girl watching, bottled water guzzling minions will flock to this Star Wars adjacent sci-fi flick and love it for its very&#8230;VERY simple story of action, sex, and tight outfits.<br />
And I leave the fandom to them. I have my DVDs and memories. Just like th crusty old TOS fans to this day bitch and moan about THEIR Trek being the only true Trek, I will do the same&#8230;at the ripe old age of 27. Loved the TOS movies, though the series is unwatchable for me&#8230;<br />
If this revamps the frachise&#8230;great&#8230;millions more dollars to be squeezed out of Roddenberrys corpse. But make no mistake&#8230;this will not be Star Trek&#8230;its will be an &#8220;entertaining science fiction film&#8221; for the masses.<br />
Thats all. If people can just accept that (and the latest effort to drag us back, kicking and screaming into the TOS tomb)&#8230;then all will be well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: t</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2009/03/08/star-trek-trailer-3-shot-by-shot-analysis/comment-page-9/#comment-1630890</link>
		<dc:creator>t</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Mar 2009 21:33:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2009/03/08/star-trek-trailer-3-shot-by-shot-analysis/#comment-1630890</guid>
		<description>@48

Romulus is destroyed in a supernova according to the comics (canon). I believe the planet imploding is Vulcan.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@48</p>
<p>Romulus is destroyed in a supernova according to the comics (canon). I believe the planet imploding is Vulcan.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

