


<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Saturday Matinee &#8211; Trek Through Time Part II</title>
	<atom:link href="http://trekmovie.com/2009/04/11/saturday-matinee-trek-through-time-part-ii/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://trekmovie.com/2009/04/11/saturday-matinee-trek-through-time-part-ii/</link>
	<description>the source for Star Trek news and information</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 10:11:57 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Si</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2009/04/11/saturday-matinee-trek-through-time-part-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-1787309</link>
		<dc:creator>Si</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2009 22:21:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2009/04/11/saturday-matinee-trek-through-time-part-ii/#comment-1787309</guid>
		<description>I am SPEECHLESS!.....Slightly moist but definately SPEECHLESS!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am SPEECHLESS!&#8230;..Slightly moist but definately SPEECHLESS!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marian Ciobanu</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2009/04/11/saturday-matinee-trek-through-time-part-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-1726067</link>
		<dc:creator>Marian Ciobanu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 18:58:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2009/04/11/saturday-matinee-trek-through-time-part-ii/#comment-1726067</guid>
		<description>- I want to vote this video as the best Star Trek movie EVER..!!!.........</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>- I want to vote this video as the best Star Trek movie EVER..!!!&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kelvington</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2009/04/11/saturday-matinee-trek-through-time-part-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-1722542</link>
		<dc:creator>Kelvington</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 23:08:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2009/04/11/saturday-matinee-trek-through-time-part-ii/#comment-1722542</guid>
		<description>#42: &quot;a video Rubik&#039;s Cube&quot; best imagery ever!  That made both Paul and I laugh.  I&#039;ll have that by the way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#42: &#8220;a video Rubik&#8217;s Cube&#8221; best imagery ever!  That made both Paul and I laugh.  I&#8217;ll have that by the way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Matthews</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2009/04/11/saturday-matinee-trek-through-time-part-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-1722162</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Matthews</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 20:25:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2009/04/11/saturday-matinee-trek-through-time-part-ii/#comment-1722162</guid>
		<description>#38: &quot;I have waited over 30 years to see if these two popular cultural series would crossover each other.&quot;

While I&#039;m not a Doctor Who fan, I am a fan of throwing together disparate cultural icons and see what happens (check out my webtoon series &#039;Stone Trek&#039;). I enjoyed the first installment, but not so much this second one. While I admire the fanboyism, I have to admit to appreciating more the idea of a coherent mashing of the two, as opposed to a video Rubik&#039;s Cube (again, probably because that&#039;s pretty much how I did it with &#039;Stone Trek&#039;).

But, hey... keep it comin&#039;. We need stuff to watch. This damned mavie is taking forever to get here!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#38: &#8220;I have waited over 30 years to see if these two popular cultural series would crossover each other.&#8221;</p>
<p>While I&#8217;m not a Doctor Who fan, I am a fan of throwing together disparate cultural icons and see what happens (check out my webtoon series &#8216;Stone Trek&#8217;). I enjoyed the first installment, but not so much this second one. While I admire the fanboyism, I have to admit to appreciating more the idea of a coherent mashing of the two, as opposed to a video Rubik&#8217;s Cube (again, probably because that&#8217;s pretty much how I did it with &#8216;Stone Trek&#8217;).</p>
<p>But, hey&#8230; keep it comin&#8217;. We need stuff to watch. This damned mavie is taking forever to get here!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Smitty™</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2009/04/11/saturday-matinee-trek-through-time-part-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-1720047</link>
		<dc:creator>Smitty™</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 03:14:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2009/04/11/saturday-matinee-trek-through-time-part-ii/#comment-1720047</guid>
		<description>@Kelvington Lemme guess Kirk&#039;s middle initial? Heh!

Spock&#039;s funky eyebrows in WNMHGB?

-cs™</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Kelvington Lemme guess Kirk&#8217;s middle initial? Heh!</p>
<p>Spock&#8217;s funky eyebrows in WNMHGB?</p>
<p>-cs™</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hat Rick</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2009/04/11/saturday-matinee-trek-through-time-part-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-1719130</link>
		<dc:creator>Hat Rick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2009 22:50:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2009/04/11/saturday-matinee-trek-through-time-part-ii/#comment-1719130</guid>
		<description>Many thanks, Kelvington and Paul.  Keep on Trekkin&#039;!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Many thanks, Kelvington and Paul.  Keep on Trekkin&#8217;!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kelvington</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2009/04/11/saturday-matinee-trek-through-time-part-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-1718972</link>
		<dc:creator>Kelvington</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2009 21:57:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2009/04/11/saturday-matinee-trek-through-time-part-ii/#comment-1718972</guid>
		<description>Hey folks,

Thanks so much for all the kind words, it&#039;s really appreciated, for those of you that enjoyed... cool  For those that didn&#039;t... cool.  I mostly make these for myself, and Paul fixes the hell out of them. Then we put them out for everyone to have a little look at.   You should see the stuff we don&#039;t let out! LOL

I go back to years in the theater when it comes to reviews.  Love the good ones, hate the bad ones, but don&#039;t pay attention to any of them.  Which is the same thing I feel about the new movie.  It might be rubbish, it might be great, either way, I&#039;m going to give it a chance, and hope for the best.

As for part III, I&#039;m really torn on these, as I really can only do about six minutes of story, since I have a re-cap for the pre-title sequence, then titles, then six minutes to tell a story, then credits and a teaser.  I think sometime, when YouTube or whomever makes it possible there will be a full version of this episode up there someday, when I can add all the exposition and story that I&#039;m forced to cut out.

But I will tell you this much, in part III thanks to Doctor Who universe, I figured out a way to fix something that so far in Trek universe they haven&#039;t been able to, or wanted to fix... how&#039;s that for a tease! LOL

Happy Easter!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey folks,</p>
<p>Thanks so much for all the kind words, it&#8217;s really appreciated, for those of you that enjoyed&#8230; cool  For those that didn&#8217;t&#8230; cool.  I mostly make these for myself, and Paul fixes the hell out of them. Then we put them out for everyone to have a little look at.   You should see the stuff we don&#8217;t let out! LOL</p>
<p>I go back to years in the theater when it comes to reviews.  Love the good ones, hate the bad ones, but don&#8217;t pay attention to any of them.  Which is the same thing I feel about the new movie.  It might be rubbish, it might be great, either way, I&#8217;m going to give it a chance, and hope for the best.</p>
<p>As for part III, I&#8217;m really torn on these, as I really can only do about six minutes of story, since I have a re-cap for the pre-title sequence, then titles, then six minutes to tell a story, then credits and a teaser.  I think sometime, when YouTube or whomever makes it possible there will be a full version of this episode up there someday, when I can add all the exposition and story that I&#8217;m forced to cut out.</p>
<p>But I will tell you this much, in part III thanks to Doctor Who universe, I figured out a way to fix something that so far in Trek universe they haven&#8217;t been able to, or wanted to fix&#8230; how&#8217;s that for a tease! LOL</p>
<p>Happy Easter!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sotirios Moshonas</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2009/04/11/saturday-matinee-trek-through-time-part-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-1718764</link>
		<dc:creator>Sotirios Moshonas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2009 20:51:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2009/04/11/saturday-matinee-trek-through-time-part-ii/#comment-1718764</guid>
		<description>For #23 - DFinn:

Thank you for responding me with your comments.  Its an honour.

But let me tell you something, young man.  I do not throw &quot;A Bucket Of Cold Water&quot; towards Kelvington and Spockboy.

That would be &quot;illogical&quot; and &quot;unethnical&quot; to do that.  These two young men put a lot of effort to create the Dr. Who/Star Trek series.  I have waited over 30 years to see if these two popular cultural series would crossover each other.

After a year and a half of Paramount Pictures United States teased the world that Star Trek coming on Christmas Day 2008, they have the gull to changed their minds saying Star Trek is coming on May 2009.  That dash my hopes.  I know, I know,  live with that.

Do you know how many fans made their own Star Trek 11 trailers?  Using the TOS format or the TNG format or any other Star Trek series format?  Have you created a pre-Star Trek 11 trailer, young man?

I appreciate Kelvington&#039;s version.  I appreciate Spockboy&#039;s version and I even appreciate Anthony&#039;s Pascale&#039;s version as well.  Every Star Trek fan around the world have or has created their own trailer for Star Trek 11 should get recognition for their own efforts and accomplish this big feat.

The reason I don&#039;t like JJ Abrams version of Star Trek is becasue it looks too much like &quot;90210&quot;.  If Matt Damon became Kirk, Gary Senise became McCoy and Koerner&#039;s Enterprise was there, I would have give a chance to see it.  

As long it sticks to Mr. Gene Roddenbury&#039;s original format version. not JJ&#039;s version.  But that is my point of view.  I will accept your point of view as well.  Without arguing or fighting in this respectable chat room

I am not interested in seeing the &quot;USS Edselprise&quot; and the technology/ time wise does not much match after the four seasons of Star Trek: Enterprise.

I agree with #27&#039;s (ENC) comments.  This series is much better than Mr. Abrams movie

If I hurt your easter weekend or feelings about the movie coming up, my apologies.  At least, I am honest with you.

Mr. Kelvington, Mr. Spockboy, I apologise to both of you if this matter got out of hand.  I am too blame.

Also, thank you for bringing back Rose Tyler.  I really miss her.  She has been the best companion since Sara Jane Smith.  I would give a big credit to Kyle Minogue for being a temporary Doctor&#039;s Companion.  Kylie would have been a great one in the ratings.

Good to see the 9th Doctor again.  It would be nice if K-9 shows up.

Still, gentlemen, you did a beautiful job.  I look forward for part 3.  Enjoy your easter weekend.

By the way, have a great summer, Mr. Kelvington.  You as well, Mr. Spockboy.  You have a great summer, too.

Take Care,

Respectfully Yours,

Sam</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For #23 &#8211; DFinn:</p>
<p>Thank you for responding me with your comments.  Its an honour.</p>
<p>But let me tell you something, young man.  I do not throw &#8220;A Bucket Of Cold Water&#8221; towards Kelvington and Spockboy.</p>
<p>That would be &#8220;illogical&#8221; and &#8220;unethnical&#8221; to do that.  These two young men put a lot of effort to create the Dr. Who/Star Trek series.  I have waited over 30 years to see if these two popular cultural series would crossover each other.</p>
<p>After a year and a half of Paramount Pictures United States teased the world that Star Trek coming on Christmas Day 2008, they have the gull to changed their minds saying Star Trek is coming on May 2009.  That dash my hopes.  I know, I know,  live with that.</p>
<p>Do you know how many fans made their own Star Trek 11 trailers?  Using the TOS format or the TNG format or any other Star Trek series format?  Have you created a pre-Star Trek 11 trailer, young man?</p>
<p>I appreciate Kelvington&#8217;s version.  I appreciate Spockboy&#8217;s version and I even appreciate Anthony&#8217;s Pascale&#8217;s version as well.  Every Star Trek fan around the world have or has created their own trailer for Star Trek 11 should get recognition for their own efforts and accomplish this big feat.</p>
<p>The reason I don&#8217;t like JJ Abrams version of Star Trek is becasue it looks too much like &#8220;90210&#8243;.  If Matt Damon became Kirk, Gary Senise became McCoy and Koerner&#8217;s Enterprise was there, I would have give a chance to see it.  </p>
<p>As long it sticks to Mr. Gene Roddenbury&#8217;s original format version. not JJ&#8217;s version.  But that is my point of view.  I will accept your point of view as well.  Without arguing or fighting in this respectable chat room</p>
<p>I am not interested in seeing the &#8220;USS Edselprise&#8221; and the technology/ time wise does not much match after the four seasons of Star Trek: Enterprise.</p>
<p>I agree with #27&#8217;s (ENC) comments.  This series is much better than Mr. Abrams movie</p>
<p>If I hurt your easter weekend or feelings about the movie coming up, my apologies.  At least, I am honest with you.</p>
<p>Mr. Kelvington, Mr. Spockboy, I apologise to both of you if this matter got out of hand.  I am too blame.</p>
<p>Also, thank you for bringing back Rose Tyler.  I really miss her.  She has been the best companion since Sara Jane Smith.  I would give a big credit to Kyle Minogue for being a temporary Doctor&#8217;s Companion.  Kylie would have been a great one in the ratings.</p>
<p>Good to see the 9th Doctor again.  It would be nice if K-9 shows up.</p>
<p>Still, gentlemen, you did a beautiful job.  I look forward for part 3.  Enjoy your easter weekend.</p>
<p>By the way, have a great summer, Mr. Kelvington.  You as well, Mr. Spockboy.  You have a great summer, too.</p>
<p>Take Care,</p>
<p>Respectfully Yours,</p>
<p>Sam</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hat Rick</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2009/04/11/saturday-matinee-trek-through-time-part-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-1718542</link>
		<dc:creator>Hat Rick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2009 18:40:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2009/04/11/saturday-matinee-trek-through-time-part-ii/#comment-1718542</guid>
		<description>Good to know I&#039;ve got the basics, 36.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good to know I&#8217;ve got the basics, 36.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Smitty™</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2009/04/11/saturday-matinee-trek-through-time-part-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-1718445</link>
		<dc:creator>Smitty™</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2009 17:43:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2009/04/11/saturday-matinee-trek-through-time-part-ii/#comment-1718445</guid>
		<description>@34 You got it down pat!

Love it but Part 3 isn&#039;t until Christmas?!

It appears Mr Kelvington is running these parallel to the DW specials...smart move!

On cool Section 31 is a division of Torchwood! Or is Torchwood a division of Section 31?

-cs™</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@34 You got it down pat!</p>
<p>Love it but Part 3 isn&#8217;t until Christmas?!</p>
<p>It appears Mr Kelvington is running these parallel to the DW specials&#8230;smart move!</p>
<p>On cool Section 31 is a division of Torchwood! Or is Torchwood a division of Section 31?</p>
<p>-cs™</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

