


<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Another TV Spot For Star Trek w/ new shots!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://trekmovie.com/2009/05/08/another-tv-spot-for-star-trek-w-new-shots/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://trekmovie.com/2009/05/08/another-tv-spot-for-star-trek-w-new-shots/</link>
	<description>the source for Star Trek news and information</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 21:23:14 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Can Special Effects Lenses Be Used Multiple Times Or Are They Only Able to Be Used One Time?</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2009/05/08/another-tv-spot-for-star-trek-w-new-shots/comment-page-3/#comment-1817933</link>
		<dc:creator>Can Special Effects Lenses Be Used Multiple Times Or Are They Only Able to Be Used One Time?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 11:38:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2009/05/08/another-tv-spot-for-star-trek-w-new-shots/#comment-1817933</guid>
		<description>[...] Another TV Spot For Star Trek w/ new shots! &#124; TrekMovie.com [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Another TV Spot For Star Trek w/ new shots! | TrekMovie.com [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Nightshade</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2009/05/08/another-tv-spot-for-star-trek-w-new-shots/comment-page-3/#comment-1815281</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Nightshade</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 16:23:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2009/05/08/another-tv-spot-for-star-trek-w-new-shots/#comment-1815281</guid>
		<description>And if you are a Pike fan, bruce greenwood is Great as Capn Pike!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And if you are a Pike fan, bruce greenwood is Great as Capn Pike!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Nightshade</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2009/05/08/another-tv-spot-for-star-trek-w-new-shots/comment-page-3/#comment-1815268</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Nightshade</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 16:18:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2009/05/08/another-tv-spot-for-star-trek-w-new-shots/#comment-1815268</guid>
		<description>I hear you Pike Fan but it just is not going to happen that way due to audiences sophistication with modern looking visual efx etc. This new Trek set in the old times is the closest you&#039;re going to get. Whoopi Goldberg said just go and see this movie without expectations-go with it and let go and have fun...It is worth seeing unless ALL you care about is old school ships and efx-if so then don&#039;t go and your only choices are reruns or the various fan based new shows like Cawleys New Voygages-yet even those shows borrow newer elements at times-This new movie is a new old trek and closer to that than many of us thought it would be.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hear you Pike Fan but it just is not going to happen that way due to audiences sophistication with modern looking visual efx etc. This new Trek set in the old times is the closest you&#8217;re going to get. Whoopi Goldberg said just go and see this movie without expectations-go with it and let go and have fun&#8230;It is worth seeing unless ALL you care about is old school ships and efx-if so then don&#8217;t go and your only choices are reruns or the various fan based new shows like Cawleys New Voygages-yet even those shows borrow newer elements at times-This new movie is a new old trek and closer to that than many of us thought it would be.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pike Fan</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2009/05/08/another-tv-spot-for-star-trek-w-new-shots/comment-page-3/#comment-1814290</link>
		<dc:creator>Pike Fan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 02:56:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2009/05/08/another-tv-spot-for-star-trek-w-new-shots/#comment-1814290</guid>
		<description>Good people,

Strictly out of curiosity, and warm feelings for the original series, I want to see this movie. ...but the &quot;alternate timeline&quot; gimmick ran sour years ago. I find that alternate timelines have become a crutch for writers who cannot figure out how to continue an established narrative. Jumping through &quot;multiverses&quot; is all the rage, and rewriting an established vision of how the future is to look is hack. For example, the best thing that happened to &quot;Star Trek Enterprise&quot; was the appearance of the Defiant from the original Star Trek series. The &quot;NX&quot; Enterprise looked too much like the ships in the modern Trek movies &amp; series, even though it was &quot;the original&quot; Enterprise. The original Defiant was supposed to be the decendant of ships that looked simpler, and &quot;old-school futuristic&quot;, not ships that were &quot;modern futuristic&quot;. The NX-001 Enterprise should have folowed the old patern of design, instead of a re-imagined plan.

I long for a new Star Trek. I would love a &quot;beginnings&quot; prequel  with the look, feel, ideology and good storytelling of  the original series&#039; first dozen episodes, but with the appropriate older-looking, period-correct costumes &amp; ships.

...still, I will go see what all of the fuss is about, with this new Trek...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good people,</p>
<p>Strictly out of curiosity, and warm feelings for the original series, I want to see this movie. &#8230;but the &#8220;alternate timeline&#8221; gimmick ran sour years ago. I find that alternate timelines have become a crutch for writers who cannot figure out how to continue an established narrative. Jumping through &#8220;multiverses&#8221; is all the rage, and rewriting an established vision of how the future is to look is hack. For example, the best thing that happened to &#8220;Star Trek Enterprise&#8221; was the appearance of the Defiant from the original Star Trek series. The &#8220;NX&#8221; Enterprise looked too much like the ships in the modern Trek movies &amp; series, even though it was &#8220;the original&#8221; Enterprise. The original Defiant was supposed to be the decendant of ships that looked simpler, and &#8220;old-school futuristic&#8221;, not ships that were &#8220;modern futuristic&#8221;. The NX-001 Enterprise should have folowed the old patern of design, instead of a re-imagined plan.</p>
<p>I long for a new Star Trek. I would love a &#8220;beginnings&#8221; prequel  with the look, feel, ideology and good storytelling of  the original series&#8217; first dozen episodes, but with the appropriate older-looking, period-correct costumes &amp; ships.</p>
<p>&#8230;still, I will go see what all of the fuss is about, with this new Trek&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kraten</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2009/05/08/another-tv-spot-for-star-trek-w-new-shots/comment-page-3/#comment-1814017</link>
		<dc:creator>Kraten</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 00:21:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2009/05/08/another-tv-spot-for-star-trek-w-new-shots/#comment-1814017</guid>
		<description>James Cawley, Jeff Quinn, Chris Doohan and Randy Pausch &lt; Seen it twice now can&#039;t find them - Need an article to ID the the Players .. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>James Cawley, Jeff Quinn, Chris Doohan and Randy Pausch &lt; Seen it twice now can&#8217;t find them &#8211; Need an article to ID the the Players .. :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kraten</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2009/05/08/another-tv-spot-for-star-trek-w-new-shots/comment-page-3/#comment-1814009</link>
		<dc:creator>Kraten</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 00:13:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2009/05/08/another-tv-spot-for-star-trek-w-new-shots/#comment-1814009</guid>
		<description>Since this is the praise Channel :) I must also say Thank you to JJ and  Court, Great job 100%No, But Nothing is to everybody! I laso want to make note of the score, I miss the Org Trek Score, But I can&#039;t get this one out of my head... :) It&#039;s stuck and I love the how large and full it is. 

Thank you Again for all of it, When to we start the the countdown to the next one. 

Also since I am talking .. Thank you Anthony and your Crew for all you have done for the last 2 yrs +</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since this is the praise Channel :) I must also say Thank you to JJ and  Court, Great job 100%No, But Nothing is to everybody! I laso want to make note of the score, I miss the Org Trek Score, But I can&#8217;t get this one out of my head&#8230; :) It&#8217;s stuck and I love the how large and full it is. </p>
<p>Thank you Again for all of it, When to we start the the countdown to the next one. </p>
<p>Also since I am talking .. Thank you Anthony and your Crew for all you have done for the last 2 yrs +</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bman</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2009/05/08/another-tv-spot-for-star-trek-w-new-shots/comment-page-3/#comment-1813060</link>
		<dc:creator>bman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 16:36:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2009/05/08/another-tv-spot-for-star-trek-w-new-shots/#comment-1813060</guid>
		<description>100... &quot;yes James Cawley, Jeff Quinn, Chris Doohan and Randy Pausch all had scenes in the regular edition I saw Sunday 10 May!&quot;

Any clues as to where to spot them? I figure that was Chris Doohan sitting next to Scotty when he beamed 3 from 2 onto 1. But I have no clue where the others were, and I have seen the film three times already.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>100&#8230; &#8220;yes James Cawley, Jeff Quinn, Chris Doohan and Randy Pausch all had scenes in the regular edition I saw Sunday 10 May!&#8221;</p>
<p>Any clues as to where to spot them? I figure that was Chris Doohan sitting next to Scotty when he beamed 3 from 2 onto 1. But I have no clue where the others were, and I have seen the film three times already.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary Evans</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2009/05/08/another-tv-spot-for-star-trek-w-new-shots/comment-page-2/#comment-1812811</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary Evans</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 11:26:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2009/05/08/another-tv-spot-for-star-trek-w-new-shots/#comment-1812811</guid>
		<description>@87, yes James Cawley, Jeff Quinn, Chris Doohan and Randy Pausch all had scenes in the regular edition I saw Sunday 10 May!

I thoroughly enjoyed the movie!

Doesn&#039;t mean its is perfect nor does it change my personal preference for classic ST: TOS!

But, I can accept the story, even if it has faults.

The real key here, folks, is the fact this movie and its promotion, have breathed new interest into this 43-year-old phenomenon! For that alone Abrams and Paramount deserve our thanks!

$76.5 million in Domestic Box Office Thursday - Sunday and another $35 million outside the US during the same period seem to indicate Star Trek will be a $$$ winner for Paramount. Not even counting merchandising revenues!

Star Trek is in the news and often in a positive light! This, too, should be good news for Trekkies everywhere and all the new Trek fans this movie is likely to initiate!

While the story may be average, the presence of too much lens flare and some clunky scenes this movie is action-packed, generally gets and holds one&#039;s attention. 

It has scenes provoking laughter, jaw-gaping action, a couple spots to weep BUT overall I exited th theater having injoyed my two hours six minutes.

My kudos to JJ, his team and the fans around the world who are newby trekkies due to Star Trek Eleven!

Anthony, as always, thanks for keep us up-to-date!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@87, yes James Cawley, Jeff Quinn, Chris Doohan and Randy Pausch all had scenes in the regular edition I saw Sunday 10 May!</p>
<p>I thoroughly enjoyed the movie!</p>
<p>Doesn&#8217;t mean its is perfect nor does it change my personal preference for classic ST: TOS!</p>
<p>But, I can accept the story, even if it has faults.</p>
<p>The real key here, folks, is the fact this movie and its promotion, have breathed new interest into this 43-year-old phenomenon! For that alone Abrams and Paramount deserve our thanks!</p>
<p>$76.5 million in Domestic Box Office Thursday &#8211; Sunday and another $35 million outside the US during the same period seem to indicate Star Trek will be a $$$ winner for Paramount. Not even counting merchandising revenues!</p>
<p>Star Trek is in the news and often in a positive light! This, too, should be good news for Trekkies everywhere and all the new Trek fans this movie is likely to initiate!</p>
<p>While the story may be average, the presence of too much lens flare and some clunky scenes this movie is action-packed, generally gets and holds one&#8217;s attention. </p>
<p>It has scenes provoking laughter, jaw-gaping action, a couple spots to weep BUT overall I exited th theater having injoyed my two hours six minutes.</p>
<p>My kudos to JJ, his team and the fans around the world who are newby trekkies due to Star Trek Eleven!</p>
<p>Anthony, as always, thanks for keep us up-to-date!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DGill</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2009/05/08/another-tv-spot-for-star-trek-w-new-shots/comment-page-2/#comment-1811504</link>
		<dc:creator>DGill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 May 2009 23:17:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2009/05/08/another-tv-spot-for-star-trek-w-new-shots/#comment-1811504</guid>
		<description>#97

Are you talking about a &quot;Godfather Part II&quot;-esque film?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#97</p>
<p>Are you talking about a &#8220;Godfather Part II&#8221;-esque film?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darkwing</title>
		<link>http://trekmovie.com/2009/05/08/another-tv-spot-for-star-trek-w-new-shots/comment-page-2/#comment-1811096</link>
		<dc:creator>Darkwing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 May 2009 21:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trekmovie.com/2009/05/08/another-tv-spot-for-star-trek-w-new-shots/#comment-1811096</guid>
		<description>#94

Oh sorry, yes, I see that I did, my apologies.  and i agree, chekov was great, he was smart but it was so funny listening to this teenage kid, oh man good stuff.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#94</p>
<p>Oh sorry, yes, I see that I did, my apologies.  and i agree, chekov was great, he was smart but it was so funny listening to this teenage kid, oh man good stuff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
